Law Questions and Answers

Can i sue Pet smart for this?

I got bitten by my own dog within Petsmart while the vet do the shot for my dog. They took my dog into some backroom do some checking at first. after it came out, it procure really aggressive. then the vet said it wants another shot. and ask me to put the muzzle on the dog which they provide. But it seems my dog hate the muzzle and bite my hand. Then the vet said let not put the muzzle on and hold the dog in arm while she put a shot at my dog. while i holding my dog. it bites my maw and my lips split into 2. i entail to goto hospital and have 8 stiches on my jaws. I cant goto work because i am salesman and i cant talk beside 8 stiches on my lip. so my question is can i sue petsmart and if i do how do i find a attorney
Answers: yes, this is a case of negligence. The vet did not give somebody a lift precautions that a reasonably prudent vet would hold taken in indistinguishable circumstances to prevent your dog or any dog from causing damage. It is forseeable that dogs who don't like shots or dogs placed surrounded by unfamiliar situations may perceive threatened and blindly retaliate. Todd Crawford, Esq.
You cannot sue Pet Smart because of your poorly trained dog's actions.

If you're going to sue anyone, sue yourself. It's adjectives YOUR fault.

Be a man and be responsible for your shortcomings contained by the dog-training field.
No.

As the owner of the dog, you are liable for the dogs arrangements.

Suck it up - sometimes crap happens and you don't find paid for it.
This surrounded by all depends, logically it depends of your state law, and surrounded by regards to the procedures Banfield Veterinary Clinic is supposed to filch under this situation. Also, you would not travel against Pets-Mart, you would of course step against Banfield Veterinary Clinic (If that is the Vetanary Clinic contained by the Pets-Mart you went to).

If I be you, I would take this covering to a Litigation Attorney, and give them the details of your overnight case, and see if it is worth litigating. I kind of do see Liability and Loss of Wages, but I am not a Lawyer to present legal proposal, but this is just my judgment.
your dog, your problem.

My husband works for a County controlled company, and one of the other employees is threatening physical mar?

Managements answer was" will it go away if I fire both of them?" My husband have worked there 30 years, the other guy 5--my husband is also a federation vice president and unfortunately, have a mood affective disorder from the Vietnam War and falls under the disabilities conduct yourself..I'm so afraid my husband is going to snap and break this guy's neck.do we hold legal rights against his place of employment??? Please Attorneys answer.
Answers: Call the police. Have something printed. have witnesses step forward confer their side. You don't want to wait until it get to a lawsuit. Somebody may get hurt.
must not be to well brought-up of a union local.
you should make conversation to a union attorney.
if some one on my job threatened someone at work they would be out.
I'm a Teamster.

I have a non expungable felony within CA - Is there ANY instrument of getting it removed?

I have never be in trouble beforehand or since the incident (9 years now since the conviction and 11 years since the actual crime) It is a serious crime that happen because I was fragment of a company, and the law really looked-for my boss. When he wouldn't come clean, 4 of us be prosecuted for it. I had to plea because it be all or nil and I could not afford proper representation. I know it cannot be removed... but I have hope that I don`t know by writing a letter to the right human being... and finding a lawyer, that here may actually be some channel of getting rid of it. I cannot work in the pasture I belong in because of it.

Should I simply give up hope?
Answers: I do not know why you enunciate it cannot be expunged. The only felony cases which are not subject to Penal Code passage 1203.4 are sex offenses and cases where the defendant go to prison. Expungement does not mean what you might mull over in California, it does not get the record disappear.

Once you carry PC 1203.4 relief you can apply for a pass of rehabilitation (or you can apply for one directly if you were sentenced to prison). A documents of rehabilitation is also automatically an application for a pardon (but pardon are seldom granted in California). Note that the Public Defender assists within this, even if you could afford counsel.

Here is a web site that should assistance.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/oth...
you could write the governor and ask for a pardon.
it don't come about very offten thay one would be aproved.
In your statment here you place the blame on someone else specifically BS, and would disquailify you right off.
your stuck near it.

Speeding in School Zone?

Well, I be walking on the sidewalk by an elementary school a someone in recent times happened to be going more or less 40 mph. I yelled at them and said "HEY, IT'S A SCHOOL ZONE" and immediately I feel bleak about it. Was it requisite and what should I do next time I see them? How do you be aware of about speeding, within school zone?
Answers: Why feel desperate? It's a school zone and they could enjoy easily hit a child. The subsequent time you see them, make sure they're going the speed mark out or take a picture next to your phone and send it to the police. That's what adjectives the mom/dad patrols do when they're on duty.

I dislike when people speed surrounded by school zone. Like I said, someone could easily hit a child! :)
No, u did the right entity. People shouldnt be speeding in university zones due to so oodles kids around and them getting killed. But, if I be you, I would be careful yell at someone now a days due to adjectives the drivebyes, and someone will pull out a gun lacking hesitation.

Is this just bullying?

I own a friend who is Muslim and right now he is fast so he can't eat or drink anything from 6am to 7pm . I'm so proud of him that he's making that concerned of sacrfice and trying to feel what it's approaching to give something up. Well nearby is this boy in my category who is new and he sit with him at lunch today and adjectives of our friends. When my friend told him why he wasn't eating the guy started laughing and making really rude cruel joke about him and religion contained by general. But after he took it too far. He kept trying to shove food into his mouth and wouldn't quit. My friend, even when he is not fasting, cannot devour pork and the new boy tried cramming a hot dog into his mouth and laughing and be being so cruel. He would even drop it contained by his hair and literally have his fingers in his mouth trying to put food contained by.He wouldn't quit no matter how complex we tried to get him to stop. Finally my friend started crying. And I own NEVER seen him cry formerly for as long as I've ever known him. We told a guru
Answers: Yes,that's really sad.He could gain into big trouble if your friend or his family pushes it.Most inhabitants take their religion totally serious and the bully violated your friends freedom of religion.I really feel for your friend,I can basically imagine how he must perceive.
Tell your friend to report this to the pricipal.


The other student was out of flash and needs to be punished
This be not just annoyance, this was a dislike crime, and also could be classed as aggravated assault.

Not only can your friend record lawsuit against this person, he can also report it to the police so that he will be arrested and charged.
It's too fruitless your friend couldn't get physical, and safeguard himself. Defending yourself is important. The principal will probably only give the unpromising guy detention. Your friend needs some support up. You and any of your girl friends, should scout out some guy, like Mongo, within Blazing Saddles, ON your campus, to mentor, and aid your friend. If I was surrounded by the vicinity, I'd of ripped stale the bullie's head, and pooped down his collar. I hate when stuff close to that happens to innocent victims.

In the state of georgia. can a grandmother seek child support from a father whose daugther give custody to her

Answers: Yes, child support is for the child and is paid to the guardian of the child for his or her benefit. That soul does not have to be the parent but merely the officially recognized custodian of the child. You should visit the Georgia Office of Child Support Enforcement pattern page. They will assist you in obtain child support.

http://ocse.dhr.georgia.gov/portal/site/...
Not only this, but the grandmother have a right to that child if she so choses. If there is a custody combat between the parents, the grandmother can actually step surrounded by on her own and get custody since the child is currently staying surrounded by her home.

This law is stupid, and I don't hold any idea how several states have this, but I know Georgia does. If a child spends a in no doubt amount of time in a home, that being can claim custody of that child without any parents permission. It is extremely unfair, especially to father who do want custody and if the relative or family contributor is a female, they own a better chance at getting the child than the father does. Then the father still would hold to pay child support to that soul.

Another thing is that if they receive the father pay child support, they hold to make the mother salary it too. So then this give relatives a big initiative to steal custody because they would get double child support. It is a stupid preposterous law. I call it stealing custody because it gives someone a right to a child who really does not deserve or have need of a right to a child that has a parent (either mother or father) who requests that child.
I would think so, but I would bet my bottom dollar that the father wouldn't be ready to pay lacking a fight. I'd bet he'd do everything within his power to get full custody so that he wouldn't hold to pay the child support. I also bet that he would hold a good unpredictability of getting full custody if the child is living with the grandparents.

Is it required for police officers to stop if they witness a serious collision?

i thank everyone who responded previously, but i guess i need to clarify my cross-examine. if a police officer is on duty or at least contained by a patrol vehicle and not transporting, and they witnessed a serious collision where someone may hold been hurt, are they required to stop and assist at least possible until efficent help arrives and if so where on earth can i find this policy or law within writing. i am looking to change our current policies on this situation due to juristiction conflict
Answers: Some state they require it, depending on the amount of damage explicitly involved or injuries.
It's more of a common courtesy for them to stop to back with injuries and traffic control. A officer can also support with paperwork.
Most states enjoy a law that states you must phone call a report an accident if the property interrupt exceed $1000 dollars or there are injuries.
Also, if a officer have witnessed an accident he is bound by tenet to stop and render aid to those that need it, he would also be a witness for the insurance companies.
YES. they are police individuals 24/7
how would you change it, if you can't find it?.
yup even when transporting to trademark sure someone isnt bleeding out. they dont have to stop long but plenty to save a natural life. freakin cops just do your job
I've seen tenet enforcement drive right past vehicular collisions. In Arizona, they're not required to stop. The fire department shows up. The police are not in attendance to protect and serve. The police are in place to enforce laws--thus the baptize Law Enforcement. You cannot depend on them as a citizen to protect you. You have to protect yourself and your family--especially very soon. Think about it.
It vary from place to place and time to time.

I don't know if it is still the law, but it used to be that here contained by Calif. any trained person (EMT, Doctor, first aid, police, fire etc.) be required to stop and give assistance.

It may not be that track now, nearby has be an awful lot of unpublicized legislation and proclamation in the State the later few years, much of it really strange and uninformed.

Law on properties?

we live in this compound beside a neighbor and suddenly she wants to build a barricade around her lot. since our house is in the vertebrae part, it vehicle we would be able to enter our house just through the back patio by going the other way.

do we own right to oppose her plans? similar to suggests to her to give us a designated bridleway leading to our house?

please relief
Answers: Haven't done property law within a lot of years, but in that may be some easement/right of way issues that can prevent this. Every state is different and ever situation is different. Try to resolve this beside the neighbor in a neighborly course and if that doesn't work, you may have to consult an attorney who can research what can and cannot be done contained by your specific sitaution.

I LIGHTLY bumped a car within the parking lot?

Okay, I was pulling within, it was the morning, and the parking be tight. There was a truck contained by front of me(I was surrounded by a light car) and I be literally inching along at .1MPH. Then, my car stopped. Didn't bounce or pull back, it stopped. Not even a crack or noise or anything. I know I was touching his so I back up a little, get out, and assessed the damage.

Apparently, in that was not even a dent. So I even departed my car where on earth it was for 50 min and come back, get in, checked out the cars 1 more time, and drove sour.

What is your assessment of the situation? Did I do the right thing? Should I enjoy put my info on his car anyway? There be no visible damage(dent, scrap paint, anything). Could I be held liable?

I'm a responsible person and I'm shaken up by this. I of late want honest opinions, thankfulness.

If there have been even a dent, I would enjoy left some info. But within was no make worse.
Answers: It's nice you're a responsible person, nearby is a shortage of those on this planet. You could not be held liable because the owner of the car you bumped have no idea what your license plate number is. And even if he did, what are his damages? None! There's no exact of action.
No wound is no harm. If at hand was nil damage to my coup¨¦, what would I want with your identify and details?

I would have not here and I would expect you to leave if you bumped mine. That's base on what you describe, NO damage at adjectives.
If it was a lawyer's coup¨¦, you'll be getting a heavy medical bill and lawsuit for whiplash.

Even if the advocate wasn't in the motor.
From a more legal standpoint-- it is a hit and run.

While in attendance may not have be any visible wreckage, it is possible that the paint could have be broken down and will start to chip a few days later.

If this occur, the owner of the vehicle could file a police report. If the police be to investigate and learn that you be the one that hit the car, you would be responsible for damages and would own commited a crime (hit and run).

So, yes, you could be held liable if the person studious that you were the one that hit the motor (ie, witnesses, evidence, etc).

It is always best to contribute your information to the person. Also note that there be no visible twist to the car when you vanished (having a camera around is useful for this).
the reality that you even bothered to wait be already good ample bwahahh 1 minle and hour XD hilarious =D

yea flawless enough nought needed to be done if nothing hsappened
Personally I would speak IF there be no damage, it be okay to leave. BUT you should enjoy had a witness or 3rd entertainment look at it to make sure in that was no pull and take his identify as testimony, basically in casing.

Here's a scenario;

Let's say someone saw you and took down your stub number after the incident, gave it to the owner of other motor and owner of other car shabby it himself, saying that's how he found it, afterwards called police, and they go after you. It would then be YOUR word against the owner of other vehicle PLUS his witness which took your sticky label. You would lose because you left the scene, regardless if you read aloud there be no damage.

Let it be in motion this time. But remember there are crooked inhabitants in this world. Next time fetch a camera with you and hold on to it in your glove box, even if it's a disposable. I do it. Just within case. I beckon it my CYA camera for those "just surrounded by case" moments.
If there REALLY IS no gash, bump, dent, discoloration - REALLY no nothing at adjectives -

then no, there's no "hit". To be a hit and run afterwards there have to have be a hit, or?

But: somebody once hit my car "a moment ago a tiny bit" as they saw it - "why should I call the cops, it be really tiny?" but the dent was huge and I get a judgment for $600 and collected on their lying a##. To the terminate they refused to come clean anything. I just utter that b/c I almost got really screwed once.
Wow. Just wow.

Haven't you ever parallel parked and have your bumper touch another car?

What do you have an idea that happens to your coup¨¦ when you leave it and someone else parks close by? You could probably hit bumpes at 5 MPH and not even chisel either motor while parking.

There is no hit and run - that answerere is just pulling your leg.

Is it legal for a doctor to drug interview you without your consent?

Not a minor, but an grown.
Answers: If the drug test is section of a medical diagnosis you went to see him for, it could be permitted.

Many drugs interact adversely with other drugs, and he would requirement to know this to treat your condition. Plus, your symptoms may be brought on by drugs, he would have to interview to confirm or eliminate the possibility.

The results will be confidential. Nothing leaves your medical documents without your consent.
No, it is not. Your doctor may solitary perform test that you have ordered and agreed to purloin. Furthermore, if you were admit to the ER, they may be able to, but they cannot release it to third party.

If you didn't authorize your doctor to perform the oral exam on you, it is illegal. If your doctor releases the information when not required to by canon, you may sure him for violating doctor-patient privilege.
Yes it is officially recognized. When you sign the consent for treatment you agree to any testing the physician deem necessary. People are frequently drug screen in hospital ER's to determine if drug usage is cause their symptoms. The results of the drug test are confidential and even if obtain under a court directive their validity for evidence is efficiently impeached as in attendance is no chain of custody for medical conducting tests in the hospital.

More Questions and Answers:
[2039] - [2227] - [761] - [383] - [261] - [985] - [2044] - [243] - [1333] - [1619] - [555] - [2569] - [2541] - [366] - [762] - [337] - [1023] - [730] - [236] - [569]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: