Law Questions and Answers

Verbal Abuse by teacher?!?

I am not sure if this qualify as verbal harm. He is always making fun of me surrounded by class. I dont even know what is going on in math because I am afraid that he will voice something about me. I thought he be just kid at first, but now I dream up that enjoys making fun of me. I usually merely smile or dont say anything, and that make him want to do it more. He makes fun of a couple more those, but they all seem to be to be enjoying discussion back to him. Whenever I hold a question, during class or on a oral exam, he is always annoyed and make me feel stupid. Should I inform someone about this?

Answers: first shift to your parents and have them travel with you to the supervisor or director of the institution

Yes, you should tell someone in the region of this, you are feeling humiliated about mortal in academy and the teacher is not abiding by reasonable behavior.

If you feel comfortable ample confront the teacher directly and right to be heard that what they are doing makes you perceive uncomfortable. If they don't stop they could predictable put there brief in jeopardy. Whether or not you quality comfortable telling the lecturer directly you should inform the principal that you are having this issue as economically as your parents. The principal will certainly address it next to the teacher and that should clear it up. If achievement isn't happening your parents should be capable of help convince the principal and other administrator that this is a serious issue.

I hope things get better for you, it is no problem not good conduct on the segment of the teacher, and I'm guessing it will stop when address by you or an administrator.

Traditional way of answering this is as they enjoy said before, have a word to your parents and guidance councilor.
Better way of doing it, is narrative what is going on, and put it on you tube(as someone here also said) while traditional methods work, if it is up on you tube, the teacher can't weasel out of it and brand you look bad since the unbroken world can see what is going on.

Handle it like a grown up.

Ask to group with the don one on one after class. In a non-confrontational way, explain to him what you own told us. I could be something as simple as a misunderstanding that can easily be cleared up between the two of you.

There will come lots of times within your life when you enjoy to let someone know you don't appreciate something they said or did. Nows as honest a chance as any to start erudition how to handle it.

If abortion is legal, why do nation want to make it risky, and erase their freedom?

I am nuetral on the question, I own no religion or hate aid this up, just want to know!

Answers: It isn't the right of the govt. (federal, state, or local) to receive this decision for someone else.

People may own moral issues with it, and it is their right to own those issues. But it doesn't automatically make it right to net it law, amend existing law or create new law.

There is nothing stopping relatives from protesting abortion and urging women not to get one (I don't agree beside it either), but the govt. should stay out of it.

If that means keeping Roe vs. Wade, later so be it. If the states could be trusted to MYOB, then I would support the repeal of R v W, because I cogitate it is a bad precedent.

Because freedom from responsibility isn't beneficial to society.

The point for responsible reproductive supervisory is not AFTER one conceives a child, but BEFORE one engages within intercourse.

Society has never benefitted when cynical consequences are removed from making bad decision.

Many people are not independent on this question. They enjoy very strong opinion, and wish to encroach their religious or other beliefs on those who feel differently next they.

Those who feel it should be off the record to have a not detrimental medical abortion have forgotten that in that were tons deaths cause by illegal abortions. They claim to be pro enthusiasm, but only the enthusiasm of the fetus, they don't give a thought to the duration of the mother.

Those who are pro choice, recognize that here have be abortions for centuries, and that whether they are legal or not, single effects the cost and the safety of the procedure, not whether or not one will be done.

Even if within are legal abortions, some women are still dying because they do not own access to them, either because of financial or other considerations.

It is an argument base on the question of when a fetus/embryo is considered a living human human being.

Now I think the current ruling is that if it could survive on it's own even if requests medical assistance then it is a human and cannot be abort because would be murder.

Some people want the definition changed to "As soon as sperm meet egg that is a fully living human" and argue that the forming human's rights to vivacity supercede a woman's rights to control of her own body.

So you have populace fighting over 1) definition of when living cell qualify as a living human being and 2) rights of control over one's own body vs that of a dependent natural life.

For myself I do not know what is right or wrong..I leave that to the inhabitants who are in that situation. I in recent times know that IF we go near the pro-life stance we open the door to a command having TRUE authority over a person's body.
You could be FORCED to donate organs to help the dependent, you would have no right to determine if you want to die or hope medical treatment. ALL medical decisions could be taken from you and you could be MANDATED by affairs of state decree what you could chomp through, drink, etc based on what is well brought-up for you as you would not have the RIGHT to control what happen to your body.
To anyone who says this would never come to pass.I point you to the case of Terri Schiavo. The majority of the pro-life crowd also supported keeping her on existence support despite no realistic prospect for any type of recovery as she be basically brain unresponsive. The husband wanted to disconnect her energy support so she could die and rest in peace instead of "living" until her body a short time ago decomposed..If the govt had chose to maintain her alive it would have justifiably established that government have the final say on adjectives medical issues including ones in which the lenient has no uncertainty for any type of recovery.

Anyway as a guy I dream up of it like this. If I have sex and then woke up attached to another personality by machines that made my body support their biological functions then I would own to choose to either 1) disconnect myself and consent to other die or 2) stay attached for the 9 months and then tolerate immense pain during the disconnection. Now I individually, at this time, would pick #2 but you BETTER believe that it would be my inalienable and Constitutionally mandated right of sovereignty to disconnect myself and let the other one die.might label me an A-hole but I will be damned b4 someone tells me I am a slave to someone else to hang on to them alive.

Rather than attack the laws culture should be addressing the actual roots of the problem.not the symptoms

malcolm b> If you can do it after it is legal. If it be illegal afterwards even doctors OK would not make it court. Anything NOT against law is permitted...that is underlying premise of law.

Does anyone know what can be done if a coworker tells an outright falsehood about threats to bring someone fired?

Answers: Proof and evidence are your two best buddies.

Find them and you should have a crust.

talk to supervisor hopefully this looser have bad reputation and is already disliked by boss unfortunately sometimes this person is the boss and within that case start looking for better commission

Another business Law code!?

Howard purchased a 10 unit apartment building. He is spanking new to the business of being a hotelier. He intends to rent some of the units as furnished and some unfurnished. He is not sure how much of a collateral deposit he can charge for the furnished and unfurnished apartments.
Site the specific code section dealing next to this question.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html

Answers: Civil Code Section 1950.5.(c)
A innkeeper may not demand or receive collateral, however
denominated, in an amount or efficacy in excess of an amount equal to TWO MONTHS' rent, contained by the case of NFURNISHED residential property, and an amount equal to THREE MONTHS' rent, within the case of FURNISHED residential property, within addition to any rent for the first month
remunerated on or before initial occupation.

This subdivision does not prohibit an advance expense of not less than six months' rent if the residence of the lease is six months or longer.

This subdivision does not preclude a landlord and a tenant from entering into a mutual agreement for the innkeeper, at the request of the tenant and for a specified fee or charge, to brand name structural, decorative, furnishing, or other similar alterations, if the alterations are save for cleaning or repairing for which the landlord may charge the previous tenant as provided by subdivision

Where in the us constitution does it read aloud that in a trial, the go-between can assign you a lawyer?

what amendment number?

Answers: The constitution doesn't speak anything about that. The 6th amendment say you have the right to counsel. The miranda rights are where on earth that comes from Arizona Vs. Miranda 1954.

You have the righ to remain silent, anything you speak can be used against you in a court of ruling.

You have the right to an attorney, if you can't afford one, one will be appointed for you.

It doesn't read aloud that, but it guarantees everyone the right to have an attorney.

It is the Sixth Amendment.

Yeah lots of the law we have today are not made by lawmaker Constitution etc. They are made in the courts on rulings.

Why Was My "Your Views On The Death Penalty Deleted?!?!?

I Posted A Question Asking For Peoples Views On The Death Penalty, Why Was It Deleted??

Answers: I am not sure, but what makes you muse this one, asking the same piece, won't go matching way?

I am adjectives for it, to actually answer the cross-question, but we have to cause sure, with dna, that we get hold of the right person. I also give attention to if we had more swift commotion, it may serve better as a deterant. Now it doesn't, becuase they know they can stay in prison, return with 3 squares & a warm place to sleep. If they are smart, they can live pretty ably in here for as long as we want to pay for them.

I construe that as long as at least (2) two, associates find your question crude, it will be automatically deleted. I have a question delete that simply read: what should I do for my date tonight?

? about our equality David H. Souter?

Okay, I am doing this project on David H. Souter, and I need to include the "date of Court service" that he served... i dont even know what that means and CANT find anything on it. also, i necessitate to include a timeline on his life and court stuff. but i own soooo much other homework to do n dont have time for that. is here anyone who is into this "kinda stuff" and would want to find this info. for me?? or just find a site near info. on a TIMELINE?!?! pllleeasse help me it would be muchly appreciated!!!

Answers: Dates of court service mechanism when did he serve. It should be readily available information. If you can use this site you should know how to find a biography him, at least on wikipedia.

Is it illegal to put "does not live here return to sender" on post if the person DOES lives near?

Basically all I have need of is an answer to the question, I moved within with 37 and 30 year elderly little kids, and they dont like me extraordinarily much cause Im not braindead similar to them and I dont play 3 year old games. They sent my post back to the social surety office motto I dont live here, and I think they did it a second time. I devise they even admitted it to cops when they be here for different reasons (yes i have to call inflict they were acting similar to 3 year olds again). I mean I would to some extent not even deal next to it, but mabey this last one have important info.

Answers: first of adjectives why are you still living there?.secondly yes it is banned to tamper with the post in any opening. this means stealing e-mail, opening the correspondence of others, misdirecting mail (which is what happen here) , just to describe a few. basically when the sender drops it contained by their mailbox it becomes property of the US postal service until it is within your hands, consequence noone who is not a post office member of staff has the right to do ANYTHING near that mail.

Move out, or find a post office box. It is against the ruling to tamper with somone elses messages. Report this to your postmaster not the police. Tell your postmaster what is happening, and they could both bring new address.

What they are doing is a Federal Crime, report it now.

Why hold you not moved out?

I don't know if it's legal or not. I would imagine not, it's tampering beside the US mails, and probably something that a regular cop wouldn't know. Try the USPS's toll free number 1-866-545-USPS and ask them.

Get a PO Box. We be worried about the safekeeping of the mail where on earth we lived, and most anyplace will agree to send your stuff to a box.

Business Law class?

5 years ago a court Judgment ordered Peter to pay Jane $500 per month for spousal support and a total of $1000 per month for the support of their two children for a total support direct of $1,500 per month. Peter has be hiding and has not remunerated a penny to Jane. As of this month Peter owes Jane the total sum of $90,000 plus interest.
Jane has hear that she has to enjoy the judgment renewed. Otherwise flop to act may result within her not being competent to collect the money.

Site the specific code section dealing beside this question.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html

Answers: Sorry RedSparkle, Jane have been misinformed. A sensitivity for child, family, or spousal support, is enforceable until remunerated in full or otherwise rewarded, and is exempt from any requirement that it be renewed. Jane's failure to renew her decision has no effect on her man able to colect the money from Peter.

Read CALIFORNIA CODES FAMILY.CODE SECTION 290-292

290. A decision or order made or enter pursuant to this code may be enforced by the court by execution, the appointment of a receiver, or contempt, or by any other command as the court in its discretion determines from time to time to be prerequisite.

291. (a) A money judgment or shrewdness for possession or sale of property to be exact made or entered below this code, including a judgment for child, kith and kin, or spousal support, is enforceable until paid contained by full or otherwise satisfied.
(b) A decision described in this portion is exempt from any
requirement that a judgment be renewed. Failure to renew a result described in this partition has no effect on the enforceability of the shrewdness.
(c) A judgment described within this section may be renewed pursuant to Article 2 (commencing near Section 683.110) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 9 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An application for renewal of a judgment described within this section, whether or not payable contained by installments, may be filed:
(1) If the ruling has not previously be renewed as to past due amounts, at any time.
(2) If the ruling has previously be renewed, the amount of the judgment as previously renewed and any bygone due amount that became due and payable after the previous renewal may be renewed at any time after a spell of at least five years have elapsed from the time the judgment be previously renewed.
(d) In an action to enforce a perspicacity for child, family, or
spousal support, the defendant may incline, and the court may consider, the defense of laches only near respect to any portion of the judgment to be precise owed to the state.
(e) Nothing in this division supersedes the law governing
enforcement of a acumen after the death of the sentence creditor or judgment debtor.
(f) On or since January 1, 2008, the Judicial Council shall
develop self-help materials that include: (1) a description of the remedies available for enforcement of a judgment underneath this code, and
(2) practical advice on how to avoid disputes relating to the
enforcement of a support condition. The self-help materials shall be made available to the public through the Judicial Council self-help Web site.
(g) As used in this division, "judgment" includes an order.

Effects of an extended period of smaller amount oil and/or otherlimited resources?

T he 1973 grease embargo affected not simply the United States but other oil-dependent nations. I lived surrounded by London at the time at an international youth hostel and worked for a British construction firm that built oil pipelines. At every petrol station, cars crinkly up for hours (as in the United States), but the English in half a shake cut their dependency through conservation in a process that Americans never did. The government stipulated that the ancestors should go minus heat for partly of each week and lacking lights for the other half. Individuals and businesses that did not comply be fined heavily and written up in the subsequent day’s news. These measures artificial every home and workplace. I had urged our organization supervisor to buy an electric typewriter “to increase productivity,” which she did, trading in the older manual. Suddenly we couldn’t use the bright productive typewriter for half the week.
It be strange to enter a stately building, Her Majesty’s this or that, at midday and see workers toiling by candlelight or kerosene lamp. The subway reduced its hours of operation too. When my boyfriend and I would come out of a frigid theater or concert passage after some performance and find no subway running, we would stride the four or five miles home.
Without heat Londoners dressed affably, but the winter nights surrounded by our student hostel were bitter. I slept fully clothed, including socks and a head covering. On evenings with lights but no grill, we English-speakers would crowd the television room to keep watch on the Watergate hearings. They be gripping and we were raucous, warm the room with our own hot nouns.
At the hostel, run by a Socialist Indian family, I shared beside five other females a high-ceilinged room with three bunk-beds. One evening it be empty, so I pulled a straight-backed stool in front of the room’s single coin-operated space oven, rolled up a towel upon which to rest my feet, packed the heater near Italian 5 lira pieces (instead of the required 5 pence), and turned on the BBC. Chopin piano preludes wafted my road. Quickly I covered my legs with journalists and wrapped a blanket around my shoulders. As long as that piano played and I had lira, I sit alone in the fogginess, toasty in my weekly tent, transported by the music—bliss amid scarcity.
Contrast that episode within 1973 with events two years ago contained by the United States, when the northeast regional power grid broke down.
Here in the city that never sleeps, New Yorkers reach for their candles, wind-up radios and flashlights. Several friends spent the night camp out on the floor where I live, merely four flights up, friends whose other choices were to sleep contained by their offices or, after walking down 45 flights of stairs contained by total darkness, to spend hours more trying to make their homes outside the city. Bus and train stations were overcrowded and bad schedule.
Residents and businesses reach out to commuters, but some cab drivers charged outrageous fare (a practice London forbade in 1973). In high-rise buildings where on earth a roof pump is required, the plumbing backed up, worsening by the daytime.
Unlike the long-term power outages caused by Hurricane Katrina (or the 1973 grease embargo), the power grid problem lasted individual a few days. Still, it was striking to revise firsthand how even a brief loss of power causes the elderly, ailing and poor to suffer disproportionately. When I and thousands of other workers gone the office for home by shank`s pony, we hastened by others who appeared hardly able to waddle along.
In a high-rise publicly subsidized housing complex near where on earth I live, some elderly persons slept outside on park benches; in need elevators they could not reach their apartments. They have no cell phones with which to variety quick arrangements and no friends to hold them in. Many go without prescription medicine, which brought discomfort to some, but posed serious health hazard for those with diabetes, respiratory infection and heart disease.
If all this upheaval take place when oil is cut support or electricity is unavailable for a few days, what would an extended term of less grease mean year by day for the inhabitants in the United States? Hospitals enjoy emergency generators and other critical backup procedures are surrounded by place, but are there truly any alternatives for the long-term, any short of conservation and investigational fuels?
Why are we still waiting for that new grease discovery in the Gulf (or Alaska or Venezuela) to spare us any inconvenience? Why aren’t we instead doing adjectives we can personally and demanding from our political affairs and businesses sweeping conservation measures, serious research into alternative sources of fuel and smaller, more efficient cars?
Thirty years separate these two sets of observations, but the United States is still oil dependent and within that respect still sitting in the muddy.

Answers: considering the oil crisis be man made, I would say the effects would be bearable if this happen again. the oil countries be flexing their muscle. The reason this probably wont come about again in the close future, The U.S. is protecting masses friendly oil producing countries. the grease producing countries are not a close nit family anymore so to speak. as for the research, it is already going on, but as near all things, the cost far outweighs the rewards at this point. to shelve fossil fuel right immediately cold turkey would throw the entire world into a depression of unimaginable magnatude.

More Questions and Answers:
[1744] - [1534] - [1413] - [1862] - [841] - [1089] - [1014] - [2415] - [1796] - [469] - [2179] - [744] - [2267] - [1694] - [193] - [2121] - [1026] - [498] - [140] - [427]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: