Law Questions and Answers

Do you think what Mark Ecko did to Barry Bonds' home run orb could be considered slander?

He is getting an asterisk branded on it and giving it to the Baseball Hall of Fame. Now, the ball isn't Barry's, but, I give attention to it could be considered slander, since the public is accusing Bonds' when nothing have been found to sort him guilty.

What do you think? Do you contemplate Bonds could sue Ecko for it?
Answers: Yes, why not. Ecko is a clown. He looks like K-Fed's father.
http://marceckoenterprises.com/images/ma...
I don't Car in the order of the Ball or Barry the cheater Bonds.
If you cheat its not a record to me.
Slander? No. Libel? Perhaps.

Definitely not slander, since it is a WRITTEN insult.

Additionally, Bonds himself have put himself in the position of one accused of taking steroids, so he himself have created the controversy. Additionally, in a court, I don't see ANY jury giving a prison term to Bonds following what he's said about steroids, assault and his own use.

The truth is a defense to both libel and slander and Bonds has used steroids!
If it's slander next Barry has to prove it isn't true.

Is it now time to bring hindmost corporal and capital punishment surrounded by uk,liberalist ideals clearly dont work.anyidea

Answers: I think we plainly have to bring rear legs discipline. People have no start of the law. We want a real deterrent to try to restore tenet and order
or probably stop turning our jails into 5* hotels next to TVs, PlayStation's etc!
maybe that would deter relatives from wanting to go put money on to their cushy lifestyle inside!
No, it's barbarous. Don't get hung up on this. The horrific crimes we see today are a symptom of something much larger. Kill the weed at the route not at the stem.
The birch be a good deterant as it be done in public and it hurt approaching stink,everybody saw who the criminals were.
what ever we hold been doing for former times 50-80 years have be working great

we have become the most powerful and richest society of humans to ever exist on Earth

why would you want to conveyance that?

things were much, much worse within the barbaric past
Before you take home up your mind take a look at the situation contained by the US. You should check out www.deathpenaltyinfo.org.

Is a boyfriend accountable for my childs academy attendance?

In the state of florida !! We live together but are not and have not ever be married the children are not biologicly his. Does the state have any right to put him on probation and fine him $300 along beside myself (probation and $300 fine)for the kids missing too many days during the 06-07 college year.. LAST YEAR!
Answers: No. But you are. Any other questions?
It depends on the state law, but if he is acting in a parental attitude with the kids after he has to adopt responsibility for them in adjectives facets.

Get your kids to university.
If they're not biologically his, and you're not married, then no.
Its your own burden.
No. It's your shortcoming, unless your children were adjectives very sick, which I doubt.
definately not they really can't but you really should be the one surrounded by charge of the children, and the real father should be helping out to. he can be put on probation
He can if he signed the conservatory enrollment papers or you made him a responsible party on them. It is really your problem.

Should local or federal government button laws and regulations beneath the topic of abortion?

What do you think should pedal abortion laws: state or federal command? Why?
Answers: The 10th amendment prohibits the federal government from handling anything not specifically outlined for it to touch.

By the Supreme law of the ground, only states are allowed to adjudicate abortion issues.

The Supreme court ruling allowing abortion be an illegal maneuver by an unelected group of tyrants posing as Supreme court justices and it does NOT own the force of law. It is enforced below "color of law".
.
No there should only just be a popular vote:
yes abortion
or
no to abortion

Government should not be involved.

let the society decide. but after we do not live in a democracy
we live surrounded by a republic. and let idiots close to bu$h decide for us

What laws protect a blogger's privacy?

I'm doing a project within computer class about privacy on the internet and the subject she give me was a blogger's privacy so i want info on it...i cant find it online...
Answers: If it's on the internet..there is no privacy..nearby might be some copywrite laws..but save for that anything that's put into cyberspace is open for picture.

Punishment for bribery in Finland?

any lawyer here...?
thanks
Answers: Why don't you ask Mika Hakinnen or Kimi Raikonnen??
Under Section 808 - Bribe Berry Act 1978

If u found guilty of bribery by the Penghulu Tribunal ... the punishment is "amenable table" at nearest night club, tavern or car park and 77 villagers must be invited.

I'm not a legal representative, I'm a liar

I am going to court for child support..??

since i cant be there surrounded by person i am going to do a phone conference , this is my first court date, do i entail a lawyer?? the situation is that i give temp. custody to my parents, when they decided to find her 'biological' father and dna examination him the state then required to know why i wasnt paying child support, hence why they are coming after me now (she have been on govt funded medical insurance). i hold been taking attention to detail of her as far as helping with arts school supplies, and such. she even came out and stayed give or take a few a month and a half and i took her to disney world and did profusely of tings and had fun. i am worried because i cant afford a attorney.
Answers: First. I would involve a lawyer. It's expensive, but the possible consequences down the road will be HUGE if you don't achieve involved now. The legal representative can help you work out a settlement. Assume that the state (through the attorney general's office) is the other get-together. They have team of lawyers, you call for a lawyer to stability out the matter. The certainty that you have received such broad variances in direction suggests that this is too complex for non-lawyers to answer easily. I am an attorney, but hold an attorney to help me resolve my child support/custody issues as specifically her specialty. She has greatly enlightened me on the subtleties of this nouns of law and I am grateful for the money I own paid her.

The AG is involved because the taxpayers are paying your child's medical when within should be one or both parents taking care of those costs.

You can back you cause by pointing the AG to the father of the child as he have 1/2 financial responsiblity and hopefully you can help them identify him. he'll hold his own legal disagree.

You can negotiate (in most cases) back support. It is difficult surrounded by almost all states to "waive" posterior support as it violates public policy (parents/guardians should not be waive anything that is in actual fact intended for the minor child).

You can regain custody of your own daughter...thus being the custodial parent.

Involve your parents within working with the AG as capably to negotiate variances from the statutory percentage so you won't have to settle the larger amount.
well Mindi,
Welcome to the world of the NON custodial parent,

1. No, you don't inevitability a layer until you seize sent to jail for missing payments(its stupid but it happens)

I instinctively would start saving for the daytime you do need one, as its bound to occur one way or the other,

For instance adjectives the stuff you did, paid for and bought count for nothing(sorry its the truth,) but when they integer out how long you have not have custody, You will owe that monthly child support amount in support child support,

The only style you can get around this is to enjoy who ever has custody influence "THEY DO NOT WANT CHILD SUPPORT" or make arrangements through a advocate that the court wilol accept (a private agreement)
Why aren't you paying child support surrounded by the first place?? How long have your parents have the kid?? Temporary custody is only supposed to be up to 6 months. The administration is going to try to get some or adjectives of their money back from the robustness care, that's only just how they are. If food stamps or other services get involved, afterwards the state may come after you for reimbursement, according to your income.
I would get a legal representative. There are free lawyers out at hand. Go to the local courthouse or call the courthouse and ask how to gain one.
I believe you are getting some misinformation here. If your daughter is receiving any gov't subsidies, your parents cannot read aloud, " We don't want child support" and it will go away. The gov't WILL pursue this overnight case as long as your daughter is receiving anything from the gov't.

You do not reimburse 17% of your paycheck for child support. They have big fancy formulas for that. Basically, this is what they do: they amount out how much money everyone makes. This puts your daughter into a lasting income bracket (they have info that say if a typical home makes $20,000 a year, they spend $3000 on the child, if a typical kith and kin makes $40,000 a year, they spend $7000 on the child. I'm guesstimating at these numbers, but studies show that the more you sort, the higher the percentage is that get spent on the child.) After they come up with this number, they amount out what portion you are responsible for. You may be responsible for 10% of that number, or 40%, I don't know. If the other caregiver makes more, they will be responsible for a complex percentage. They will also raise what you clear if the primary caregiver can prove they have expenses that would be considered above and beyond run of the mill care, such as after university care, treatment, or tutoring.

At this point, I do not believe a lawyer will assistance you too much, just enjoy your income well-documented and if you have any extenuating circumstances that may lower your child support prerequisite, have proof of that, too. Repayment within bankruptcy procedings, confederation dues, past due medical bills, things close to that can (can, not will) come off the top of your gross income when they numeral out what you pay for child support.

Isn't the European concept of "land-ownership" a poor idea surrounded by the long run?

Land is not some product that can be produced easily, if at adjectives. We humans cannot create land. So why is it treated similar to a commodity? What if someone or some group was competent to buy so much (desirable) land that not a soul else could live in it? Would the law still protect that persons's right to own all that come to rest? Or would revolt begin? Didn't the Natives have the right conception when they felt that ground was something to be one beside, not controlled? And it's not like nouns couldn't happen, it only takes individuals setting aside their egos and cooperating. We are merely holding ourselves back near our pettiness.
Answers: That is an interesting question. If we be all fail-safe and cared something like fairness and equality etc... then it might be a moral idea to be one beside the land. But the domain has no protector to be paid sure we do what is best for it. We, humans, are too selfish and self serving to protect the landscape. We reserve large parts of topography and restrict uses of it, but only until somebody that have influince wants to use it. Sometimes the nation as a group see these things happening and are competent to prevent it, but only for the moment. It may be within the near adjectives or the distant future but it will transpire anyway.
Complex question, and a appropriate one, very much at the heart of most financial systems, including Captialism and Communism. Certainly discussed by Marx, e.g.

I recommend the excellent and very readable book by economist Hernando de Soto call "The Mystery of Capital" which discusses this qeusiton in detail. You could find info on the book on amazon.com I am sure.

How do federal public laws, session law, and codified statutes differ?

Answers: Federal law is the body of decree created by the federal government of a nation. A federal affairs of state is formed when a group of political units, such as states or provinces tie together in a federation, surrendering their individual sovereignty and copious powers to the central rule while retaining or reserving other limited powers as. As a result, two or more level of government exist in an established geographic territory. The body of imperative of the common internal government is the federal tenet.

Session laws govern the proceedings of the legislature.

Codified statutes are the enact laws published surrounded by formal written documents.

Innocent until proven guilty?

In East Tennessee a group of undercover cops started staking out public parks in the nouns, known to be frequent union places for gay men. In a sting operation they waited for men to hit on them, beforehand arresting them. They then publicly outed these men within the local newspaper, showing their photographs, full name, and complete home addresses.

24 hours after this public outing of men who are but to be convicted, one of the men involved shot and killed himself.

I be wondering what people expect of publishing the names, photos, and address of people who own not been convicted surrounded by a court of law.

http://www.timesnews.net/article.php?id=...
http://www.timesnews.net/article.php?id=...
Answers: I don't focus the faces should hold been published at adjectives. It's not like these those were a threat to children or anything. They be attempting an act near another adult.

The low truth is that even if these men are found not guilty, there would be no article surrounded by the paper proclaiming their innocence. People would freshly assume they did what their name be plastered all over the tabloid for. This is wrong, wrong, wrong.
There are no laws around censoring nonspecific adult personal information or reporting a story related to charges that hold not gone through the courts. Seriously think in the order of it. how many times hold you seen someone on the communication that is on trail for a crime... they havent be convicted yet.

freedom of reporters is a wonderful thing
The duty of the police is to bring suspected offenders back the courts, for determination of guilt and setting of a suitable punishment.

They should not be determining guilt. They should only determine if in that are reasonable grounds to meditate that the person anyone arrested is guilty of an offence.

Are you sure it be the cops who spilled the beans on the gay guys, or did some reporter get hold of the information?

Any officer who leak information like that to the medium should be dismissed.

A sort of similar incident happened contained by Canada a few years back. A police officer, a Fundamentalist Christian, run the plate numbers of cars parked outside an abortion clinic, and gave the name of the registered owners to a Pro-Life group. Nobody got threatened or harmed, and the Pro-Life group of late wanted to "counsel' the owners, share them that Jesus loves them, and all that.

I'm a Christian, but I would hold fired the cop for doing that.
This is certainly a tragedy. We appear to have this peculiar engagement with gay sex crimes (e.g., Sen. Craig is blasted, but Sen caught beside hooker numbers is A-OK).

I think that the guys caught contained by this sting did more than just hit on other guys...the crime should involve an work in furtherance of an attempt to commit a lewd achievement (like going into the dark weed, exposing penis.etc.) That would be the crime, not just hitting on a guy.

I'm assuming in attendance is a civic/law enforcement concern that this is going on in public parks (or public restrooms close to in the Craig case). Since public parks are inherently inviting to children.within is a strong enough civic/law enforcement concern to running out this practice.

Posting the information is not uncommon (we read blotter reports adjectives the time for all types of crimes earlier conviction.) Unfortunately, the stigma is greater because of the aforementioned peculiar fascination within the media for this type of event. This guys suicide would be no less or greater tragedy have they done this article after conviction. It's a sad consequence, but the realness of our times.
Anyone convicted of a crime at or over the age of 18 is subject to the media. (This could differ is some states I guess.) These men are still innocent until proven guilty and the article states "The following individuals be charged:" and not "The following individuals did this:" or "The following individuals are guilty:"

The legal system is required to uphold innocent until proven guilty, not the medium. Because of the wording the media is departing the guilt open to interpretation of the reader. These types of stories mostly don't favor the convicted since it makes for better medium content.

More Questions and Answers:
[2028] - [713] - [519] - [340] - [2288] - [1570] - [1514] - [511] - [1580] - [625] - [1999] - [26] - [2256] - [2295] - [951] - [372] - [2] - [2140] - [611] - [2283]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: