Law Questions and Answers
Why is national security more far-reaching than individual privacy?
what's a good point to stress on? please include sources gratitude!!! it's much appreciated!Answers: we need national financial guarantee to protect all of our rights...the 2 must run together hand within hand
Sometimes national deposit and individual privacy are mutually exclusive. For example, the cellular phone network: you enjoy a right to privacy, granted by the constitution and provided by the network provider. People that want to use this see to relay communications that threaten national security can singular be caught by screening everyone's calls. Some might argue this invades their privacy (which I find somewhat non-sensical because it's extremely unlikely that a human worker ever reviews a conversation that has no importance). At impossible to tell apart time, you cannot provide this type of national security minus a program like this. The alternative is to nick your chances.
Whether or not national shelter or individual privacy or more important is up for debate. For me intuitively, I would take individual privacy unless national protection became more far-reaching (if we were facing, influence a terrorist attack every 3 years the scale of 9/11).
It's not.
Whats the difference between slander, libel and character assassination?
Answers: Slander is insanitary statements that are spoken, Libel is harmful statements that are within a fix medium such as writing, pictures, and electronic broadcasts. Character Assasination is delibrately sprading rumors, or other lethal words to ruin someones reputation
Mattman's totally right, and GRUMP, that was really funny, thankfulness for the laugh! :)
My neighbor put a 6 ft fence partiality on MY fence both are falling down. Who's side get the posts mine or his
A previous owner to the house in hindmost of me put up a 6 ft stockade fence, when I get home from work, the fence be leaning on my 4 ft chainlink blockade, I complained to no avail. Now my fence is adjectives slanted, we talked beside the new owner nearly replacing the fence and taking our balustrade down, since his fence destroyed ours. I come home the other day and a handy man be putting all these boards on my side of the barrier, it looks horrible, I complained, but it did no good. I hold to wait until this coming Tuesday to contact code. My examine is, what side of the fence get the posts, mine or my neighbors, it is his fence.Answers: I'm not a legal representative, but common sense tell me that no one can modify what is legitimately yours. If HIS fence destroyed YOURS, he should, within theory be held responsible for that, and any pay you or carry you a new one. Now, equally, if it's his fence, I suppose he have the right to do to it whatever he wishes to, as long as it doesn't get on YOUR ground.
If it is his obstruction you get the obedient side.
The Alcohol & Drug Abuse?The American Scene And The Islamic Perspective ?
In Pakistan the first known defence of heroin addiction was record in 1980. In 1981, in attendance were solely 25 cases recorded. By 1986 nearby were partially a million cases. Now it is estimated that there are between 1-1.5 million cases surrounded by a population of 95 million.The rate of growth of narcotic addiction in Pakistan is better than that of USA. In addition to heroin addict, there are something like 1 million opium and hashish users, and 300,000 tranquillizer abusers. The actual number of alcoholics is difficult to determine, since they usually don't seek treatment. There are merely 26 rehabilitation centers and 10,000 trained social workers.
By comparison, in the USA near a population of 220 million, there are 15 milllion alcoholics, 2 million heroin addict, 5.5 million cocaine users, 6 million tranquilizer abusers and 18 million regularly use marijuana. There are 700 treatment centers. There are 10,000 kids (children born to cocaine mothers).
http://www.islamawareness.net/Alcohol/al...
Answers: state ur point
if ur saying tht an country tht an islamic country have less alchohol misuse, ur right. if not, after idk wat ur saying.
a. I dispute your info regarding US addict, especially heroin addicts.
b. What is your point?
Can an employer let you shift, due to an accident on the assignment in sector from a disability?
I had an fluke on the job. I am a disabled soul and I was doing a mission that is not one of the through responsibilities listed on my brief description. I think they should get an accommodation due to my disability. Also, they are dictum I am a risk to others if they continue to take on me. I am not the only personage with a disability at our place of employment. I believe their argument is based on ignorance and mistrust and am prepared to take official action if they do fire me. What do you judge? Can they fire me or not?Answers: you on the right track, once they do fire you, make sure you do your follow ups..
It really boils down to the details. If you are inept to do part of the post duties, even if not a crucial responsibility, they should try to make a credible accommodation. However, the sleight of hand word is reasonable.
If you're inability do properly do the livelihood creates risks to others, they certainly hold grounds to terminate you. The reality that there are other disabled personnel shows that they are not discriminating against disabled people.
They will without question have a drastically strong, documented case if they do fire you.
There is not a straight-forward YES/NO answer to this. There is profusely more regarding the actual circumstances surrounding this specific accident which requirements to be taken into consideration - details which your question have omitted to provide.
Apparently the employers are also indicating that you re a risk to both yourself and others around you. Again details of your disabilities and details of both the errand you are employed to do and the nature of the business the employer is contained by are sadly underprovided, but again pertinent to the answer.
If, because of your disabilities and the injuries caused to you (and others) by this disaster are severe enough to warrant a medical nouns by the Company's medical officer and dependent upon whether the Medical officer declares you to be fit or not - taking into commentary the nature and extent of your disabilities are also question that need to be posed and answered until that time a definitive answer to your question can be provided. If the answer is that you are no longer fit satisfactory to carry out the duties ascribed to you by the contract of employment you hold been given after, sadly the answer is that yes the employer can dismiss you.
What kind of endorsed recourse does one have if a cop assaults or tries to frame an innocent character?
It seems resembling citizens have no recourse and cops other go free.I ask this examine because a lot of tenet abiding citizens are being threatened, framed, assaulted or kill while being detained and arrested by the police?
Answers: There are tons recourse's, if it's a local cop go to the state or federal plane to report it, go to the media, or get a advocate and sue.The burden of proof will be on you though, better make sure you own it.
I'm guessing you can start with have proof?
*Edited* Wow I suggested getting proof and got a thumbs down? Look if you want to charge anyone of anything you BETTER have proof or hold your mouth shut. If this goes against what you want next I suggest getting therapy.
Where?
It seem that way because it get viewers. Television viewers. Ratings. C'mon, it must be true right, after all its on TV.
The lawful answer here is of course to name the police. If you feel that you are not going to bring back a reasonable response, you give the name the police from another jurisdiction (e.g. the FBI).
Yes, police officers can be charged beside assault.
Yes, framing someone is illegal (tampering beside evidence, etc).
You can do a little research and find out who the "Internal Affairs" department is for the police department you are concerned more or less.
By-and-large, no, police ARE honest and due a hell-uv-a job below nasty circumstances. It wasn't merely firemen who got kill on 9/11...
However, it takes but one apple to spoil the appearance of adjectives.
First, I think you've be watching too much TV.
Second, while there are some cops who attain heavy hand, I don't think we're chitchat about the majority. Blaming the cops seem to be in style.
Third, the smart entry is to not be in positions where on earth you can be mistreated by the cops. An example is the video that was on the report this week of the teenage girl. The cop stopped her due to curfew infringement but she tried to run, then started screaming and resisting and eventually bit the cop. If she'd lately stood there and talk to the cop, she'd never have be manhandled or pepper sprayed.
Are you being sued by a collection agency?
I be sued by a collection agency, but won at trial because I found The Law Offices of Eric F. Fagan online! Their firm has a GREAT story for getting your case any dismissed, won at trial, or counter suing for damages. Their fees are very possible too. If you are worried then step to this website and you'll be rest assured when you speak to anyone at that law firm! Collection agencies do not enjoy the right to frighten you. We are human and we have adjectives been through stimulating times. Don't let collection agencies upset you into thinking that they WILL get money from you. There are law that protect us. Did you know that they buy your accounts for pennies on the dollar? Mine was probably purchased for $50.00! Go to the website I stated and relax! http://efaganlaw.com/index.htmlAnswers: I see where on earth a idiot has reported you, but, I conjecture you have did our ancestors a good work, and this idiot probable works for some crooked collection agency,, and you are right when you say to not consent to them bug ou, as they have no rights time, fact is detail them you don't remember signing any contract with them nor agreeing to do business beside them, and not to contact nor bother you again and if they do bring suite against them,for damages, and also they report you to credit agency they have also violated your constitutional rights.
I be sued by a collection agency and won at trial by defending myself pro se. What do I need an attorney for?
For those who want to know:
If you are sued by a collection agency, unless it will cost you too much to whip the time to go to court, tolerate them take you to court. The court will usually first brand you try to settle with the other side. If you throw out to settle, it can then step to trial. DEMAND that the lawfirm suing you give you ALL of their evidence and run the time to look at that evidence for any information that can be used to defend yourself from their claims. (PS - avail yourself of your Fifth Amendment right to not be a witness against yourself; engender the other side prove their case, which they most possible won't be able to do. You emphatically don't want to help them by giving them information they can use against you.)
Most of the time, these collection agencies are bluffing when it comes to suing, and even when they do sue, they normally lose because they are not prepared to actually argue a grip - they make their money from the population they scare into paying them, and from inhabitants who ignore the summons when they are sued (the court grant a default taste for the collection agency if the summons goes unanswered).
When it go to trial, the lawfirm suing you has to enjoy a witness present in establish to admit their evidence. Since most of the time these matter involve accounts that were sold rotten years ago (and in heaps cases sold several times), getting a witness qualified to admit the evidence is terribly difficult.
In my case, I go in to court, be sworn in, next the judge asked the Plaintiff to donate her the scoop. The Plaintiff attorney said, "I don't own a witness." The judge said, "So how do you expect to confess your evidence?" The attorney said, "I don't know." The judge said, "Case dismissed", and bang her gavel.
I smiled and said, "Thank you, your honor."
A policeman just shot 6 race dead surrounded by Wisconsin who hadn't commited any crime. Who can we trust with guns?
Answers: No-one.The USA is crazy-police should not routinely get guns and there should be no right for civilians to suffer arms.
The UK sucks but in that good opinion at least we are more sane and even here the police still murder people-e.g. Jean Charles de Menezes.
Nobody. If you put like mad of people into a position of power it is inevatible that some will harm it.
I watched a documentary contained by which the Americans were shocked that the majority of Britain's police officer were unarmed - they asked how it be possible that we felt safe and sound. Personally I think that's a crazy scene...I feel safer living within a society where carrying guns is NOT the norm.
I'll add on that the Supreme Court ruled that the cops don't even have to enforce the ruling...Castle Rock, CO for the sickening details...
So, technically, the US is in a state of ANARCHY right presently.
EVERY adult should own the right to carry a gun, beside a few exceptions.
If those 6 people have guns, how many of them would hold been kill? Would the policeman have shot any of them if he assumed they might be armed?
who can we trust near guns - no one
I had a freak out at 15 years antiquated (suicidal) and taken to a psychiatric ward, is this on my criminal record?
Does it create me an unfit person to be surrounded by social work, teaching, working next to kids, etc.?Answers: I don't know if it's on your cirminal record, considering you didn't make a contribution any details as to your freak out. But I'd say your experience would be paid you more valuable contained by the areas of social work and teaching. You know what it's close to to be on the other end of the stick, so within dealing with those who inevitability help you'd be more up to date on how to approach their situations.
No, it does not make you unfit. Especially if you hold completed a therapy program, or are competent to document ongoing therapy (with or in need medication!).
It is only on your criminal journal if you were in reality prosecuted for it. If you went to court over it, yes it is. If not, next no it is not.
Illegal to have sex??
Im doing a academy report about sex and i be wondering if people of the age of 15, are they allowed to own sex???? and if it's illegal what are the punishments? and also what is the percent that teens enjoy sex over adults.Answers: They can, but only if their partner is between their age and below 18. A minor can not have sex beside an adult. Until their 17 I believe.
I'm not 100% sure
and
Laws terribly by state
It depends on the laws of your state. In some states, you're considered a molester if both of you are underneath the age of consent. Dumb, huh?
More Questions and Answers:
[1806] - [1641] - [1709] - [1187] - [1687] - [118] - [95] - [406] - [1899] - [485] - [530] - [833] - [1371] - [2081] - [716] - [733] - [1700] - [1632] - [1058] - [798]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: