Law Questions and Answers
If he had a official document assigned to a company he owned...?
Here's the timeline of the patent within question:1) Much-loved loved ones member invents something.
2) Said family circle member receive patent, assigns it to a company he founded and owns (or co-owns? not sure right now).
3) Said familial member dies.
What is the status of the rights in regard to the heirs? Could the heir be expected to receive royalty payments on the patent? Or would the heir have to establish ownership within the company?
Any honest answers are appreciated.
Answers: First poster is likely right... near is one exception. It is possible that when the loving family appendage assigned it to the company may have done so contained by exchange for a fee base on the useage of the product... There are any number of ways he could have sold it to the company... Though most feasible it was simply assigned to the company since he started and owned the company.
I suspect from your queue of questions that the loving people member did not hold control of the company when he died, I'm guessing the VC boys or other backers enjoy ownership. In this case, you can come together the group of people that enjoy seen how VCs move contained by and take over a company similar to a slow fungus.
If your loving family bough was the sole owner of the company afterwards once the family assumes control of the company - hold back the government grant or give it to the release army whatever... If your loving kith and kin member be only a co-owner after you would have to buy hindmost the patent from the company and insure it be an arms length transaction or risk litigation from the other co-owners of the company.
Patent assignment is a general arrangement. You stipulation to look at the contract of assignment. Like other suggested, at least at hand are two forms of assignment:
One off stipend so that the inventor got an agreed sum of money as expenditure and the patent rights be transfered to another entity.
A rental type of payment, or license giving, that the inventor gets a perpetual monthly, or $10 / products manufactured, or 5% profit sharing on products sold, for a period of say-so 20 years, some thing resembling that.
So you need to return with professional help, a legalized attorney, to look at all the papers.
While driving his tank through Afghanistan my brother notice a job see in the local post bureau window...
it said. suicide bombers required.. honest rate of pay but shite prospects. allowance not applicable.. surely they pull our plonkers??????????Answers: You have me in pieces Ha Ha
Lucky them to still enjoy post offices.
Lets face it the McCanns are GUILTY!! There's plenty evidence to support the case.?
Answers: Well - I'm not fairly so convinced. let's look at the hypothesis:
1. The McCann's 'kill' Madeline (presumably by accident - you don't jump abroad to a county and place you've never be to before to murder your children).
2. Rather than try to revive her or call upon an ambulance, or give her a proper burial, they straight away decide to fictitious a kidnap because.[sorry, can't even chew over of one plausible reason here]
3. They stow the body for three and a half weeks past hiring a car 25 days next and stuffing a three week-old corpse in the boot.
4. Under the full glower of the media spotlight, they filch the body, in the coup¨¦, and hide it so all right no-one has ever found it.
5. Knowing they're guilty, they stir up the Portuguese police to throw all their resources into investigating the skin and keep up the publicity within case the police are flagging a bit.
I've hear of double-bluff but that's ridiculous.
Where did they keep the body for 25 days - beneath the stairs? Behind the sink?
Where's the forensics from their house to show a dead body slack around?
Have you ever smelt a dead body after single a week? You wouldn't forget it and it'd take a truck-load of air-freshner to stamp out the smell.
I've no idea whether they're guilty or innocent; but the facts sure don't stack up for me.
You visibly know as much about this casing as i know about Nuclear fission!! Which is jack sh!t
your an idiot mate..
I consider most of us prefer it when people/criminals are tried in a court of regulation..not by a national newspaper,especially the Sun!!
Crazy neighbor?
ok...there is too much this neighbor have done...but let me freshly give u an conception...ok...my sisters neighbor is a true psyhcopath...ever since my sister expressed to her the problem she had near her always coming out of her apartment beside the tiniest skirts and no underwear in front of her children...she blew it!she would bend over contained by front of my sisters kids w/no underwear...not to mention she weighs something like 200lbs and wears impossible to tell apart bikini and skirt day after hours of daylight...well since my sister confronted her...her and her 2 little kids imean below 10...constantly harrass my sister by calling her name when shes outside,they listen underneath her window at behind time night.even her childish daughter!at like 1 surrounded by the morning.shes had men come over and intimdate my sister...shes only just out of control...my sister is finally moving out of her home after close to 5 years cause of her...and newly recently get a restraining order...but since afterwards.the woman has be making NUMEROUS false police reports on my sister.Answers: Unfortunately, in most places, society calling social services are protected by law surrounded by doing so, even if it is later discovered that the report is false.
The false police reports are something else. In most places, file a false police report is a crime. As long as it is only the crazy neighbor against your sister, your sister ought to be okay. (I assume the other neighbors will posterior your sister up on this.)
Videotaping is a great idea.
When your sister is question, and she will be, just enjoy her explain the situation and what they woman has done, also get sure she says that she believes the woman is purposely file false reports. The restraining order should aid, most good officer and children services officials will apprehend and they may go after the woman file these reports.
It'd be easier if there be video or recorded proof, if your sister have it, then she requirements to get a legal representative and prove it.
What should be the punishment for this Theft?
The suspect - 17 years old, he have the mental and emotional conception of a 4 year old. His crime is breaking into a sports car to get some toys.What should his punishment be, Choose responsibly..Your reputation is on the line.
1. Four months contained by county lock-up. One year probation. That should set him straight!
2. No Criminal charges, as he does not have Mens Rea, does not know it's a crime. Refer to Family court about why this boy is not human being being adequetely supervised and civil court for the undermined property.
3. Felony conviction. 18 Monthes, State lock-up. Must pay court costs.
4. Death.
5. Probation and resitution. 100 hours community service. No time served
6. Creative Sentencing/"Shock-Treatment", Meaning he does a week within a State Pen, one year of intense supervised probation, 100 hours of community service (Cleaning public and government owned cars and buses)
Answers: 2. No Criminal charges, as he does not enjoy Mens Rea, does not understand it's a crime. Refer to Family court in the region of why this boy is not being mortal adequately supervised and civil court for the undermined property.
Because if he really cannot understand, within is no use of punishing him and locking him up. He still won't get it. Plus he is beneath 18 years old. And you wont obtain your car repaired.
And it's a right idea to check why he's not suitably supervised... and also it's OK to get the mar cost.
hhmmm. tough question.
First of adjectives, it is highly depended on the intensity of the crime. What the courts will see the first is whether there is a human casuality involved, such as investigating if the suspect cause inflicting wound or death to any character (from the owner of the car to the police officer who arrested him).
In this case, it appears that this is only just a theft, near no one is hurt or he did not attempt to hurt anyone (based on the information you are giving me.).
My conclusion would be first, probation for 6 months. He just broke into the cars... not houses, did not stab or shot anyone, and most of adjectives, he is a poor mitaken product of this society, as he is severely uneducated due to his conditions (I carefully assume the suspect could be an African American).
The above is the "routine", which is intended to initiate the criminals that committing such crime is bad.
Now, the unadulterated way to solve the root of the crime begin from here.
I would convince him into the counseling, for the condition of not serving jail time and admit that such crime is a bad piece to do. A short time of the community service is possible.
Look, just punishing the criminals would work to some extent, but it does not solve the beginning of the crime entirely.
I bet the orthodox U.S. way to concordat with this manner of problem is lock him up or make him serve the probation and community service beside eye-poping amount of time.
But, what the many sociologist enunciate is different. Most of the crime takes place from oodles complicated social factors, such as poverty, resentment to the society which disrespects him, his personal experienceses, etc.
In conclusion, my highlighting solution for this is not to punish him and expect this sort of crime happens again, but logically mix a little bit of punishment but volunteer him a chance to realize and cram what brought him to this situation, and teach him how to live socially heathly. Such as a job development program, social counseling is what I am discussion about.
Once again, the most noteworthy thing is making him to realize himself that committing such crime is not a well brought-up behavior, and also he has to escape from the circumstances that made him to do it by himself.
I hope this help, and it is always glad to see your question.
Thanks for reading.
2. as said for same reasons.
How can the judiciary branch act similar to the legislative branch?
this is a college question. I want to know how the judicary branch can also make law like the legislative branch.Answers: The judiciary branch single interprets the law and renders opinions/verdicts. It can set precedent by going against the usual, or typical condemnation, consequently causing tentative, proposed legislation, eventually leading to current laws.
The judicial branch doesn't kind laws. It rules on the constitutionality of law. If a law is found to violate the Constitution, after Congress is free to enact a similar law that meet the rigorous tests imposed by the Constitution.
Simple as that. Congress can overrule the Supreme Court provided it pass laws that are narrowly tailored to bring about a compelling interest if it is a federal statute and if a state law violate the Constitution, a law narrowly tailored to pull off a state's purpose under its police powers.
They send for the Constitution a living and breathing document, I don't understand it any...
What is 2nd degree sexual assualt of a minor?
Answers: disgusting and wrong - that's what it is
It ALWAYS depends on which state, since respectively one defines it differently. In common, first degree sexual assault would be forceful or coercive against consent. Second scope would refer to consensual sex with a minor who does not enjoy the legal right of consent, or statutory rape.
The redundancy may hold something to do with the distinction of the minor's age. In other words, sex next to a child under 12 beside an adult over 21 is even more reprehensible than sex between two population who are 18 and 15.
Even for adults, this is why workplace affairs between managers and subordinates are frowned upon. Besides the appearance of favoritism, coercive sexual assault is defined as sex involving a party in a position of authority over the target.
U. S. Federal Labor Standards, where do I find them?
Answers: NLRB online
Try http://www.dol.gov/esa/ :)
Questions On Freedom of Education?
Is it a law?An amendment?
When be it created?
Why?
Thanks in credit.
Answers: There is such constitutional amendment. Various statutes make one entitled to a "free appropriate public education" but that does not own the same connotation. "Academic freedom" is often asserted by teacher, but that is a fictitious phrase having description only because university's pride themselves on have it.
sounds like another homework ?..
do your own homework...
Can your boss make you settle the difference if a cash register is short?
Legally, can they product you pay money i.e. short a register? Especially if you share the register with other race and there is no bearing of telling who did it. Usually my boss make us all split the cost but I am tired of giving her money from my tips.Answers: It's improper in CA (I'm pretty sure it would be within most other states). This will be found at the state level...
"An employer can with permission withhold amounts from an employee’s wages only: (1) when required or empower to do so by state or federal law, or (2) when a conclusion is expressly authorized in writing by the hand to cover insurance premiums, benefit plan contributions or other deductions not amounting to a rebate on the employee’s wages, or (3) when a estimate to cover health, welfare, or income contributions is expressly authorized by a wage or collective bargaining agreement. Labor Code Sections 221 and 224. Although a wage garnishment is a officially permitted deduction from wages below Labor Code section 224, an employer cannot discharge an member of staff because a garnishment of wages has be threatened or if the employee’s wages have be subjected to a garnishment for the payment of one decision. Labor Code Section 2929(a) (See How to file a nouns complaint)
The ability of an employer to take off amounts from an employee’s wages due to a cash shortage, breakage, or loss of equipment is specifically regulated by the Industrial Welfare Commission Orders and constrained by court decisions. (Kerr’s Catering v. Department of Industrial Relations (1962) 56 Cal.2d 319). In amalgamation, there enjoy been several court decision that significantly restrict an employer’s ability to give somebody a lift an offset against an employee’s wages. Barnhill v. Sanders (1981) 125 Cal.App.3d 1, (Balloon reimbursement on separation of employment to repay employee’s debt to employer is an unlawful deduction even where on earth the employee authorized such settlement in writing); CSEA v. State of California (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 374 (Unlawful to take off from current payroll for past net advances that be in error); Hudgins v. Nieman Marcus (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1109 (Deductions for anonymous returns from commission sales unlawful.)"
i dont know if its permitted or not but you know whats going to happen if you vote "its not legal" bye bye to job
i hold worked in places where on earth you have to build up the difference in the dosh drawer and other places i didnt...finally i was sick of making up the differences when it become a habit next to the other bartender making the wrong change ( read stealing ) and i have to make up partially the amount..i insisted on not working beside that chick any more .good luck its strong i know
From the accounting point of view, this is not legalized. She is reporting the losses on her tax return as business expense to frustrate her revenues. By doing that, she is reporting less income and in consequence pays less taxes. Now, if she get "reimbursed" for those losses the way you described, they might as resourcefully be a pocket money for her that go unreported to the IRS.
The motivation of cash loss is the undersized internal controls that she has established. As an hand, you are under no requisite to pay for her personal dud as a manager.
More Questions and Answers:
[1158] - [385] - [1201] - [350] - [2095] - [417] - [1859] - [1946] - [775] - [1758] - [899] - [1585] - [579] - [727] - [993] - [992] - [240] - [1922] - [592] - [2149]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: