Law Questions and Answers

I have a geological restriction...?

How do I step about making modifications to my final regulation and do I need my ex husband to sign anything? How does that work?
Answers: GEOIGRAPHICAL restrictions are conventional in custody battle to insure that one parent does not interfer with the other's rights lower than law.

Most courts (and most state statutes) restrict movement of the custodial parent because of the possibility of parental kidnap and because such is often used as a tool to frustrate the visitation and custody rights of the non-custodial parent.

If you enjoy a GOOD and valid reason to move, such as a better available job or no family to give a hand in the on the spot area, and you can show that the move will benefit the child, after you can file a motion to amend the current establish to allow for the move.

If you can't prove all elements required by your state later you can still move, however, the child will be required to remain in the jurisdiction.

Also, it is most potential that even if given court permission to move, any extra costs over and above what is presently expended by the non-custodial parent to effect visitation will be charged to you since you are the one causing the extra expenses.
You cannot generate any changes. Those near Geological restrictions will not be allowed to get their rocks bad, under any circumstances.

Privacy policy and Terms of use. plagiarizing legal forms?????

If my website is like as another website and I want to copy their "terms of service" and "Privacy policy" is that informal? Like plagiarizing legal forms but instead varying certain words. Or do I own to hire someone to do it for me?
Answers: Those policies are copyrighted to whatever website originally wrote them underneath the current copyright laws (anything i.e. copyrightable is automatically copyrighted once it is created). You are supposed to write your own policies for your website.

However, you probably don't need to hire a advocate to do it for you because you shouldn't need to use the courts to matter with any violation relating to your website (thus far, the courts haven't required any websites to unban problem users).

The main privacy directive applicable to a website would be COPPA, which prohibits anybody under 13 from registering minus parental permission (however, you hold to knowingly violate it to be surrounded by violation of the ruling, so you're compliant if you don't ask for age and merely ban anybody who claims to be beneath 13). Of course, nobody is sued under COPPA unbelievably much anyway (only the largest of websites). Beyond that, there are severely few privacy laws and you merely are supposed to read out what information you collect and what you do with it surrounded by a privacy policy. If you have a forum or other demeanour in which content can be posted, you should specify who holds the copyright to user-submitted content.

A Terms of Service consists of the rules for your website. You should catalogue all the rules which you expect your users to follow, but craft sure to include a rule that permits you to do doesn`t matter what you deem in the best interests of your site (such as prohibition a problem user who hasn't violated any listed rule).

You probably don't really want to run somebody else's privacy policy and terms of service anyway because they probably aren't terribly well suited for your own circumstance.
It is unlawful. However there are websites that proposal templates for creating jargon of services and privacy policies. Search the internet for the templates and create your own to avoid potential conflicts.

12 billion dollars missing. Who is accountable for adjectives the money shipped to and lost in Iraq?

Isn't the money used surrounded by Iraq American tax payers money?

From 2003 to 2005 America shipped literally 12 billion dollars within cash and this money be distributed or lost without any auditing.

My put somebody through the mill is, is there anyone contained by government to hold in charge for such a waste of our monies? Isn't within some sort of checks and balances for monies beyond congress?
Answers: Even more troubling is the loss of 200,000 weaponry and several hundred thousand flak jackets. Now we find out that Bush approved the disbanding of the military to release a few bucks (they could have rewarded them to keep them contained by line and from becoming salaried insurgents). Is there no accountability for any feat there? Can these family do anything, put our soldiers at risk and if we criticize these policies people right to be heard we do not support our troops? How much of that 12 billion ended up surrounded by the hands of the warlords over in that?
Bush is having a globe kicking back and counting so much money.

Court summons?

i was given summons to court concluding week i have already file my answer and have but to receive a court date i have own nought and have no chore can they come after my husband even if we are not together anymore i have tried to settle next to the company at 20 dollars a month but they say explicitly to low and they can't accepty anyone else going through this can shed some light or offer me some advice serious answers please
Answers: They can come after your husband for some debts (such as for medical bills), but not for others.

Keep paying your $20 a month and until that time either of you know it, the debt will be salaried in full. Good luck.
On the summons, it will enumerate who is being sued. It will say aloud "ABC COMPANY v. YOUR NAME." If your husband's name is programmed along with yours, afterwards he is being sued as all right. Even if he is not named, they could move about after him at a later date, if he signed doesn`t matter what contract they are suing on, but if he is not named surrounded by this suit, it's unlikely that they will go after him. If the debt is from some contract or lease or other written agreement you've signed, you will probably be liable for attorney fees as very well. This could be much more than the original debt. Try looking up your State's Bar Association, and contacting them for relieve. Sometimes they can refer you to lawyers who will give a hand indigent clients, or they may be able to refer you to a attorney who will at least answer some primary questions. Good Luck!

Should Kate and Gerry McCann be allowed to set up a fund to pay for their guard lawyers?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/wo...

TOTAL MADNESS.
Answers: I guess this fund business is getting out of hand. The fund is for that poor little girl Madeline not the parents, how dare they suggest to use the fund for their trial costs when this fund has be put in place to find this little girl, near them being very soon suspects I think the in one piece idea is ridiculous.
How could anyone prevent them from setting up a fund to look after themselves?
What is madness is that society actually donate to these funds at adjectives.
yeah, as long as they do not lie as to the mission of the charity.
There is no motivation why they shouldn`t be allowed, however expecting the general public to bail them out nonetheless again is a contemptuous act. They should bring to the fore the money through their assets the same as other associates have to.
be the krays able to set up funding for guard they were guilty werent they
I guess if individuals are stupid enough to dispense them money for killing their kid, why not? Actually, if to be precise true, I don't think they should at adjectives...
No. How many other populace would be allowed to do that? And what if they were found guilty?
Yes, they should, but what happen to all that money they put up for the false reward. Now for the relations who donate, well...
what if they are innocent? xx
Does anyone really contemplation
they already hav raised 2million $ as fund
Who within their right mind would contribute to such a fund, with so frequent questions that have need of answering and so much uncertainty in a minute hanging over them?
If you be to read the article properly a "family source" claimed they "may" set up a separate fund. So you believe the tabloids? Who is this source and are they credible? It's adjectives hearsay. What is total madness is this abhorrence campaign. Innocent until proven guilty. Stop judge until the truth comes out!
AND WHAT ABOUT ALL THE NORMAL PEOPLE WHO CANNOT MOUNT A LEGAL ACTION AS THEY CANNOT AFFORD THE COST?

WHERE IS THEIR LEGAL FUND?

Sad thing is nearby are some idiots who will give to it.
Hell yeah. I will distinctly be giving them my money. This is an injustice for them. Absolutely.

I recently asked a examine about applying for SSN# for my newborn who is due in 8 wks..?

Yahoo delete my question. It be NOT offensive within any way, I a moment ago wanted to know the process surrounded by which I can get a SSN for my newborn. Is Yahoo adjectives idiots? Do they have some guy a moment ago sitting there delete random question? What gives?
Answers: Don't you love ethnic group who don't read the extra information? They don't know your question (this time) ISN'T roughly speaking applying for a social security number. Only those who read the extra info know that your examine is REALLY about Yahoo! Answers.

I've have seemingly innocent questions removed as all right. Unfortunately, they do not give you a pretext why your question be deleted.

You can appeal, if you'd approaching. While you probably think it's not worth it, if you do appeal and win, it diminishes the faculty of whoever reported you to have influence over deletion.
First off, you do not hold a date of birth, which is required.

You must wait.
Who know really.

Oh and the hospital gives you those forms when you deliver! They hold too.

Good Luck-Rachel
Firstly~ CONGRATULATIONS to you!

Step 1~ Fill out the application provided by your hosptial & follow the instructions for mailing it within. If baby be born at home or at a non-participating hospital contact the Social Security Administration at (800) 772-1213 or visit your local Social Security bureau to obtain a form.

Step 2~ Take the inventive birth certificate (or a certified copy) to the local Social Security organization. If you're applying by mail, you'll entail to mail the unproved or certified copy with the form. It will be returned to you.

Step 3~ Expect to receive your child's Social Security card contained by the mail in two months.

Step 4~ Keep the card in a undisruptive place, such as a safety deposit box or home undisruptive!
Sometimes Y/A deletes question by accident--I've had it evolve a couple of times.

What probably happened is some push who has his person in charge up his a-- abot "social ist programs" reported your question and the Y/A personality who checked it deleted it by mistake.

In standard they do a pretty good job--and they do correct errors if you ask them to (I've also have a couple of erroneous violations removed).

Cut them some slack--nobody's watertight! :)

BTW--go to ssa.gov for info on getting that Social Security number and card.
You will need a birth card. Click this link for the form you call for: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/online/ss-...

Follow the instructions that come with the form.
Usually the hospital will hold someone come to your room with weekly work to sign and they submit it all for you..You will win your little ones card in 6-8 weeks

Should the legal age restraint for alchohol be lowered?

i am currently residing in a U.S. state where on earth the legal age hold back is 21. I have be to a lot of party, and i have see so many kids that are on a complete mission to verbs brain cells, because they know that they can't get hold of this drug that often, and mostly on the weekends, and after they make some insanely uneducated decisions similar to to drive 20 miles home. Wasted. Do you think that if the age bound was lowered they wouldn't hold so much of a pressure to consume this much at once?
Answers: no, youth now days are mode to irresponsible
Some states at one time had official drinking at 18. The federal government forced them to rework it, though, by tying any federal highway funds they got to the provision that they angle their drinking age to 21. The feds did the same next to the speed limit.

That's how the feds control the states----tie it to federal dollars that they receive. For example, states do not hold to participate contained by "No Child Left Behind", however, if they want federal funding for education, lunches at school, etc, they have to.
Your argument is flawed. If it held true - afterwards there would be no drinking to excess (ie getting drunk) for anyone over the age of 21 - b/c alcohol is decriminalized for those over 21 and we have confident access to it.

Underage kids drink to excess for the same reason that 21 + year olds drink to excess - to get drunk.

Lowering the drinking age support to 18 does not lower the number of intoxicated 18 yo's. It just take away one of the tools that law enforcement have to control underage drinking.
The utilitarian arguments for a lower drinking age (or none at all) are absolutely correct. Lowering the drinking age would lessen the underage drinking problem (Prohibition never ends the prohibited activity, but purely makes it more perilous, which is why all drugs should be legalized as well). In copious circumstances, I believe underage drinkers are merely doing it because it is illegal. The existence of a drinking age, by itself, is a disaster.

Of course, the moral arguments are far more central than the purely utilitarian ones. Because people own their own body (to dispute this is to contradict yourself, since you cannot dispute it if you don't own your own body), they enjoy an absolute right to do anything they want to their own body, no situation how harmful. However, nobody have any right to harm another individual, because the other person also have a right to their body. Anybody has a right to drink alcohol if they choose to do so (or to do any other consensual activity). The solitary circumstance in which drinking is not inwardly somebody's rights is if it interferes with somebody else's property rights (in circumstances such as if the alcohol be stolen or if you chose to drink it on somebody else's property without permission).

Not single is the existence of a drinking age a stupid idea (because it make drinking into a worse problem under that drinking age), it is also evil because it is immoral to interfere beside the consensual activities of others. Because of the certainty that the drinking age should be eliminated, any attempt to elevate it should be opposed and any attempt to lower or eliminate it supported.

How can i became a multimillionaire expert,humble, woman?

Answers: Hard work,lots of energy.Save your money or invest it.Or..marry a multimillionaire!LOL
I resembling your question!
I approaching that you want to do it yourself and I like that you want to be so economically rounded of a multimillionaire!
We need more in good health rounded multimillionaires!

Here is your role model: Anousheh Ansari.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anousheh_An...

Do what she did.
Go to school...marry a classmate and start a nearest and dearest business with that classmate.

If you enjoy the family business, next you will be well grounded and can build on that foundation.

Then, next to lots of luck and being contained by the right place at the right time, you will have everything you ever imagined.

Enjoy it because you've earn it!

Best wishes - can't wait to see you on the cover of Time!
Wow! So much ambition indeed, why not purloin one step at a time than having adjectives of these at once. Even God didnot make the world contained by one day.

Once you become millionaire the movement, you are not humble. Or to be exact, once you are humble being poor but when the tide is turn, you humbleness would gone up contained by smoke. Money will eventually turn you to something you wouldn't like surrounded by the first place. This is the power of money. Genius on the other hand, you hold to work at it harder than you think. Being millionaire is satisfactory why MULTI millionaire? Are you asking too much? Like the Chinese say : DON'T BE GREEDY, you are not the single son or daughter of God. Let others have your fortune too. So within this simple analysis, you are NOT humble already. Genius I donot think so. Being rich is another story.

Why not try something you could realize easily than dreaming of something much more than you could touch.

I live in a right to work state. Can my employer forbid discussion almost what we're payed? ($ per hr.)?

I remember signing an agreement that says they can fire us for any source, though it didn't specifically mention discussion of pay. I be not given a copy of this agreement for my records. In a college class, a professor told us it be against federal law for an employer to forbid discussion of gross or pay. Is this true? I quality like easy to fool employees are one taken advantage of.
Answers: Choose your battle carefully. This one of late ain't worth it. In most matters, the employer have the majority of the leverage.

You are going to mess around and get fired over this or gain pisst and end up quitting.

There are a specific set of federal and state law your employer must follow. I can promise you they know just exactly where on earth the "line" is.

It is good practice to NEVER discuss your take-home pay with anyone at work. In certainty, you don't even want to know what others are making. It will be a source of frustration that you can't do anything about.

Please newly leave this one alone and forget it.
If you're making ample money to support yourself and/or your family consequently who cares in the region of the amount. though when one earns their master's one will open (and should) make more money than someone lately out of high university. sounds like if a soaring schooler is making your salary to find another situation that meets your diploma!!

We have be assigned to excerpts from genesis in arts school. Is this legal?

We hold been assigned to excerpts from genesis within school. Is this allowed?
Answers: Way to repeat yourself instead of adding further information.
Way to repeat yourself instead of tally further information.

If it bothers you, don't do it. Otherwise, shut up and buckle down. The Bible is no different from any other work of fiction that you might read. It's a pretty interesting story, the Old Testament is. There's tons of violence as the God guise destroys everything from people to civilizations surrounded by all kind of terrible ways.
Depends on if you are chitchat about the Phil Collins Genesis or the Bible.

Regardless, your post doesn't manufacture sense. Care to elaborate?
Religion have has a roomy impact on historical and present condition of the world.

It is only forbidden for a government funded college to teach religion. Not for them to use a Holy book as a hint.
Only in a City Public university are you in a private academy? Plus any school that have mythology classes that focus on bible, greek, norse myth then its adjectives good, as long as they don't try and train any of them as factual.
I believe school need to inculcate compassion/morals of some sort maybe its upright you are reading it.
Actually, a book is a book and the bible is just a book.
This would be a remarkably good lesson for you.
Trust me on that.

You will be resourcefully armed for any debate, on "either side" of the subject. Use it, and hint history books and other theological "religion" books and see that many things do "jive" and connect us to the historical truth of an issue.

Yet the personal "religious" belief is a totally disconnected point. If its a morality lesson or spiritual lesson, that is not okay for this forum. I agree.

I love literature. I don't resembling the idea of Biblical reference "explained" in a university, its should be YOU and other individuals to interpret it for themselves, discuss the options and one-sidedly determine YOU percieved outcome. Much like any other work of literature or historical-scientic event. That is a choice of "free will" and thought.

In a private one it can be member of the curriculum, taught as the institution sees fit and parents agree to that format and choose that leeway.

I would reference other cultures version of "genesis" and resource them. That will make YOUR point surrounded by a very knowledgeable way roughly a very "touchy" subject.
Sure, as long as it isn't a religious exercise. The Bible is still a book, and analysis and comprehension of the prose in the Bible is basically an exercise.

More Questions and Answers:
[1208] - [144] - [1178] - [234] - [1821] - [1364] - [1378] - [2038] - [1628] - [1579] - [1820] - [1919] - [2033] - [1260] - [2059] - [852] - [2469] - [2475] - [2018] - [1936]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: