Law Questions and Answers

Should law guardians within the Court be used?

Should lawyers for children be required to enjoy children prior to representing them?
Answers: Yes, law guardians should be used. There are circumstances below which a child or children needs independent representation.

While some might suggest that the decree guardians have their own children, it isn't obligatory for them to have children to construe the legal issues at play.

Can you get sued for motto, "I hope your grandma dies"?

A friend of mine was threatened to be sued because he told his ex girlfriend that he hoped that her grandma died and so on.
Answers: grandma can bear her out of the will
No. You can't.

But that doesn't mean your friend isn't a complete shudder.
You can not be sued for an opinion, very soon if he said I am going to kill your grandmother he could be sued for mental anguish but even that would be thorny to prove.

Your friend is a PRICK though, pretty rotten thing to say-so just to hurt his ex-girlfriend
The truth is... you can win sued for anything,
Can anyone win such a lawsuit against your friend? No
**********
Thumbs down?
either someone doesn't know the consequence of "sue"
or they think the covering could be won.
No ... you cannot be criminally sued for that. However, you can sue anyone civilly for anything you want ... whether or not the civil court with approve the claimant's petition is up for debate (civil courts hold discretion over which cases they will hear).

In a purely criminal context saying you 'hope' someone dies is not a criminal feat, because it not directly threatening any the person the statement is directed at or a related third-party. If the human being in cross-examine were to enunciate "I'm going to kill your grandmother" after that would be considered a criminal threat, and could be cause for prosecution by the local district attorney's organization. The problem filing a grip for this violation is; 1) ample proof of the threat, by course of audio/video recording, and/or multiple fair-minded witnesses would be required to prove a criminal threat was issued, and 2) provide plausible belief the threat in press would be carried out (and would result in the serious bodily injury to the personality being threatened). For instance, aphorism "I'm going to go shoot Putin" would not be considered a criminal threat even though the individual may be serious because they do not have the direct capability of probably carrying out said threat. The same person (in matching situation) saying to a bartender "I'm going to shoot you" would more probable to considered a crime capable of man fulfilled by the malfeasor.

____________________________________

Some people surrounded by here obviously don't know how the regulation works ... in the United States you can sue anyone civilly for anything you want (and I be set to anything). Par example, the person who lives across the street from me uses a grass mulch that I dream up smells bad ... if I really required to I could file a civil suit against him. I could sue someone for looking at me funny ... nearby really is no limit or guideline to what you can record a suit for (which should be evident from the amount of ridiculous cases that appear contained by the news every week). Apparently, you haven't hear about the State Senator surrounded by Nebraska who has file a civil suit against God ... he did it to prove a point -- that being -- you can sue anyone for anything regardless of how ridiculous it is.

There be even a case a year or two vertebrae where a character sued their neighbor because they had an 'excessively fantastic baby,' that cause them 'serious and permanent mental anguish,' and not here them unable to sleep at darkness (unduly incapacitating them from performing their necessary tasks at work). There's adjectives the proof you need ... you can sue for ANYTHING!

___________________________

Wow ... two thumbs down ... guess relatives don't like to hear the truth. Me, individually, I like to live surrounded by this little place I like to call for REALITY! If you don't want to hear the real answer consequently don't ask the question ...
No.

Need info re: medical marijuana cards and possession citations...?

My 19-year-old brother-in-law was cited for possession of a small amount of pot and claims the police officer told him he could go and get a medical marijuana card (for anxiety, depression, or somthing similar) fairly slickly and avoid future citations. The cop supposedly said this after my bro-in-law lied and said it wasn't his. This sounds resembling something he cooked up to smooth things over a bit when telling his parents, but I'm not an expert. I know citizens in this nouns (Marin County, near San Francisco) are pretty "open-minded", but this seem a little ridiculous. I hold trouble believing that, one, a cop would enable an underage (for liquor and "harder" things) kid resembling that and, two, that it's THAT easy to ranking a MM card. My understanding is those cards are given to nation who have a serious bad health when nothing else will assist -- NOT to restless young men next to girl problems who don't want run-ins with the regulation. Any thoughts? Thanks in credit!
Answers: He's lying. Police officers know that possession of marijuana is a Federal offense. There are no cards that allow individuals permission to break that regulation.
In California, it is fairly difficult to seize a medical marijuana card. The cop probably believed that he actually have a medical condition, and was trying to be sympathetic and kindness.

There is a Court Appointed Social Worker in Nassau County, Lisa,**?

do you estimate she should own a share in a supervised visitation center within Weschester County? Does anyone know her? Have you had nouns in custody proceedings?
Answers: #1 - She is appointed by the court. In hypothesis, the court has the power, not the social worker, except beside reference to the cases to which she is appointed.

#2 - They're 2 different counties. I guess that contained by practical terms, because she works inside the system in the roles she plays, she probably have knowledge of & relationships next to folks in the system. One could angle the concern that she has undue power or influence. But, that could be said going on for people who play adjectives sorts of different roles in the world. Everyone have an "agenda," and everyone with power, the potential for misuse. So, I see no reason to single out court appointed social workers to be not permitted from involvement in visitation centers contained by counties outside of the counties in which they work. In certainty, it seems that a trained social worker would be a meaningful person to own involved in a visitation center.

#3 - Some visitation centers are nonprofit organization with board member who work in similar roles. I'm not identifiable with privately owned centers, but I see in your mind`s eye it would be analogous.

Would a just society own the death cost?

for a class i need to discuss the nouns behind the disappearance penalty and whether or not a mythical just society would enjoy it and why... any ideas?
Answers: I don't know how you are defining the word "of late." But, whatever definition you choose, how can a in recent times society continue to implement a punishment of dubious value in preventing or reducing crime, while risking the execution of innocent citizens??

Risks of executing innocent people- even in a lately society human beings can make mistakes.
124 folks on death rows enjoy been released near evidence of their innocence. DNA is available in smaller number than 10% of all homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent relatives.

The death cost doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the death cost to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death cost is neither. Homicide rates are higher within states and regions that have it than contained by states that don’t.

We have a apposite alternative. Life without parole is in a minute on the books surrounded by 48 states. It means what it say. It is sure and swift and rarely appealed. Life lacking parole is less expensive than the extermination penalty.

Death cost costs. The death cost costs much more than life surrounded by prison, mostly because of the legal process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent culture.

The death cost doesn't apply to people beside money. Its not reserved for the “worst of the worst,” but for defendants near the worst lawyers. When is the ending time a wealthy character was on loss row, let alone executed?

The loss penalty doesn't necessarily relief families of murder victims. Murder sufferer family member across the country argue that the drawn-out death cost process is painful for them and that energy without parole is an appropriate alternative.

Problems next to speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent people released from disappearance row had already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent creature.
There are crimes so abhorrent to a of late society that it would not only hold a death cost but would publicly apply it.

Studies on the death cost as a deterrent have not be done, for obvious reason, with public executions.

Bear surrounded by mind though that unless you're attending a military school you're going to enjoy the majority on the other side of the argument.
Would a just society not hold the death cost for those who put little girls in scrap bags and bury them alive?
http://crime.about.com/b/a/163982.htm

Is This Sexual Abuse?

If a girl has a boyfriend and for her, its a purely platonic relationship, but if her boyfriend forces himself on her, and make her perform oral sex on her, is this sexual misuse?
And what if the victim have a limited acquaintance about sexual issues due to her innocence and not know how to differentiate right from wrong?
Also, would the casualty be ''blamed'' for what happened as she is within a relationship with the guy?
Furthermore, what if the girl be a virgin before adjectives this happened?
Answers: If the boyfriend forced the girlfriend to make oral sex on him against her will, that is rape, not a moment ago sexual abuse. The subject should not be "blamed" for her actions.
1. First issue: if a girl have a boyfriend...what do you mean "purely platonic." Either they are g/f and b/f or not.

2. Age is an earth-shattering factor, both hers and his.

3. How does the b/f "force himself on her and "make her" get something done oral sex? If the b/f is using force by saying "I'll break up next to you if you don't" than that is not force. If he say "do it or I will hurt you physically" and has the proficiency to do it...then that would be force.

4. The g/f's predetermined knowledge is not really a factor unless she is below the age of consent contained by most cases. Being naive itself is not roughly a factor otherwise.

5. Regardless - if the g/f realizes that the b/f and her do not own a healthy relationship and it is base on power/intimidation/pressure.then she wishes to distance herself as this is not a boyfriend/platonic friend or otherwise. She is being exploited and this being recognizes these weakness. It is unlkely that the relationship will ever get better because of the differences within power (a person near power rarely give up the power for equality).

A hypothetical ethical dilemma question on incest, abortion, and adoption?

briefly the story is this
a infantile teen girl 13, impregnated by her elder brother
shes 6 mos preg and doesnt want to keep the babe
either she can choose to do this or choose to pass the baby for adoption
what do YOU feel she should do keeping in mind the complexities of any choice
can u briefly justify your declaration also.

just so u know im not a 13yr elderly girl this story isnt about me or anyone I know b/c yahoo answerers enjoy a tendency to relate the story to the writer it is a dilemma for a seminar i am contained by as an RN student. I just wondered what race thought
Answers: I believe under those and consistent circumstances that is ok! Incest brings a much larger hit and miss of mental and physical disability! Plus she's 13 and probably didnt choose to have sexual contact next to him!
In the USA this is wrong but other cultures are different

Read books written by other cultures and you will be shocked how some are almost polar to what we consider taboo and accepted norm.
6 months is too late for an abortion. NOBODY would do it anyway.NOBODY.

so the sound out is moot. She has to distribute it up for adoption.

I can't imagine this really up. Seems like household or counseling or someone would have interceded long up to that time 6 months.

But presuming it could happen, she have no choice unless she tries to kill the tot herself.

I'd certainly keep hold of her on suicide watch, that's for sure.

And logically, her brother should be in prison by this time.
The babe should be born. However if the girl does not want it she should not have to hang on to it. She could give the child up for abortion, or she feel comfortable she could try and give the custody to the father, or, her brother. Also, after have the child, she may choose to keep it after becoming exciting attached to it.

On a further note, if the girl be forced into having intercourse beside her brother, and she didn't want to have sex beside her brother she could file for rape charges.

Ultimately, do not verbs the babies right to live. If the girl did indeed get raped, two wrongs don't produce a right.
There are more factors to consider than the ones you present. However, I'll bring a wild guess . . .

My sense is the thrilling trauma of an abortion at 6 months would have longer selection ramifications for the ardent health of the mother than giving the child up for adoption. Although the living child might be a hurting reminder to her, the fact that the child is alive lessen the negative touching impact later on surrounded by life.

Of course seriously depends on the emotional state of the mother at the present time.
The reality that her brother is the father of the baby money that, unlike most 13 year olds, she is having her tot in a stable environment. A strong relatives relationship already exists between her brother and her. So I think she should discuss beside her brother whether the two of them, with serve from their parents of course, can possibly bring the infant up.

Otherwise an abortion is probably going to be less distressing for the poor girl than have the baby and next giving him/her away for adoption.

I was wondering if you own to have an appointment to steal your drivers test within california. or walk contained by is ok?

Answers: To take your driving tryout, you will need to trade name a driving test appointment. (Driving test are not given without an appointment.) You may also hail as 1-8OO-777-0133 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday-Friday, to make a driving try-out appointment.

*/End of Line.
Appointment only I believe.

Question on the 4th Amendment?

I live at college, and my school conducts "vivacity safety inspections" once per possession. Apparently they have a rule (I couldn't find it looking through the student handbook) that allows two RA's to master push button into any room to perform the inspection. My RA made use of this rule while I be just down the entry in a friend's room. I have no warning that this be going to happen, except for a sign over by the elevator, which I did not thought. I feel as though my rights enjoy been violated. Do college's enjoy some rule that makes their room's exempt from the fourth amendment? Is this an "unreasonable investigate?" Does it have to be an unreasonable check out and SEIZURE?
Answers: there allowed to do it because it's arts school property.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Or the rules, any. There is a public notice, so I would contemplate that the school have satisfied their duty to notify you of this.

When I be in college, this sort of inspection be part of my chore. We found all sorts of things - fire hazard, overloaded circuitry, contraband. We found evidence in a couple of rooms of nation who had set up commercial pot farm - IN A DORM ROOM. One had adequate paraphernalia and supplies that it was manifest he was dealing.
They own the property and may conduct a survey of it at any time. Can't tell you how much beer go out the window and down the drain within the shower while the first room was getting search.

Now if you have something evil in the dorm, you should not hold it there. Remember that the 4th amendment merely applies to private property that you own and of which you are in exclusive possession.
This is not a fourth amendment issue. This is a "tenant's rights" issue. Thus, it is govern by your state and city's laws on the topic. I don't know your jurisdiction, so I can't relay you anything more.

However, for most of the USA, you're SOL. In addition to acting as landlords, tons states recognize that colleges accomplishment "in loco parentis"* to students living surrounded by dormitories--even if those students are above the ages of 18 or 21.

Move off campus soon as you can, and you won't own the problem.

*in loco parentis: In place of parents.
The 4th Amendment says the GOVERNMENT cannot immorally search/seize. It does not apply to private actors (such as landlords/RAs). Chances are you signed some agreement to live surrounded by the dorms that made you subject to these searches. If they find contraband...they could turn it over to the police and you would own little grounds to challenge on 4th amendment principles. You MIGHT if the cops used the statute enforcement agent to conduct a search they could not properly do themselves...then they are possibly acting as rule agents.

So...the search CAN be unreasonable and the occupation can be unreasonable and it won't matter because it is not the GOVERNMENT to be exact performing the search. Yes, this would probalby apply at even a state-funded university.

Needs to sound professional?

ok i have need of to make this nouns more professional. As it could be used in court latter." i bought 2 cars from XXXXX for 12,000$ i paid 2500$, i will pay envelope the remaining before December 15-07

thank you within advance.
Answers: Name of being (place) letter mortal sent
Street number and name
City, State(Province)
Zip Code (Postal Code)

Dear Sir or Madame (or a mark is better if you know who will be recieving it, in which covering it should be Dear Ms. Doe),

As per my agreement with xxxxxxx, I purchased two cars one (Car type and year) and a (Car type and year) on (Date). I compensated $2500 at the time of purchase and will pay the remaining set off of $9500 on or before Decemeber 15, 2007. The Payments will be made within instalments of $$$$ every month. (Or whatever other road you plan on paying).

If you have any question or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 999-999-9999.

Sincerely,

Signature

John Smith
I, (name) agree to purchase two vehicle, (make model, year vin#) and (make model, year vin#) for the total sum of $12,000 from (name). Upon signing this agreement, I will pay $2500 and agree to money the remaining balance of $950 on or up to that time 15 Dec 07.

Make sure to have it notarized.
It wants a few details. :-)

This is a purchase agreement between <your name> (buyer) and <seller's name> (seller). The buyer agrees to purchase two vehicles for $12,000:

1. (vehicle details, including VIN)
2. (vehicle details, including VIN)

The buyer compensated the seller $2500 on <date>. The set off of $9500 is due to the seller by December 15, 2007.
_______
Then obviously both of your signatures. You should also add when the buyer get possession of the vehicles.
Check your math. Two cars for 12k respectively equals 24k, not 25k.

A contract should have:

Your term as the purchaser, the dealer's name, cross and description of the cars (make, model, year, etc.), price, and any warranties included surrounded by the price. If you are paying in installments, you have need of to state how much money per month you will be paying, or when you will pay the remaining be a foil for. It should also have the signatures of both party involved, and notarized for additional collateral, especially if you are buying from a private seller.

You can pick up generic contracts at places approaching Staples and adapt them to your requests.
If you are making this a binding contract, try this:

I, [buyer's name], am purchasing the following automobiles from [seller's name]:
* Car 1 year make model and VIN; purchase price $xxxx.xx
* Car 2 year form model and VIN; purchase price $xxxx.xx
Total purchase price: $12,000.00
First payment: $2500.00
Date: Oct 01, 2007
Remaining go together will be made in payments as follows:
$xxxx.xx per month, beside the next pocket money due on Nov 01, 2007 and final payment due on or past Dec 15, 2007.

This is a 0% interest agreement. No interest will accrue or be payable.

Signed:
Buyer name, signature, date
Seller baptize, signature, date

Make sure you photocopy this and give a copy to you and the dealer.

It's best if you both go to a notary, but it is not mandatory to craft this a legal document.
Don't try to formulate it professional. In court, simple language is best. If you try to gross it sound adjectives fancy, you may end up inadvertently axiom something you didn't intend to. If you're not a lawyer, not a soul expects you to act similar to one.

More Questions and Answers:
[1123] - [730] - [2542] - [2003] - [1855] - [340] - [1390] - [830] - [1929] - [2434] - [2259] - [1417] - [1097] - [1847] - [643] - [1375] - [2054] - [1926] - [857] - [1282]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: