Law Questions and Answers
How do i copryright my work?
I have a story and I want to post it online, but i dont want race to copy it. So for me to have any rights in recent times in grip they do, if i put this is copyrighted with the C symbol, is that adequate???Answers: How to Secure a Copyright
Copyright Secured Automatically upon Creation
The way contained by which copyright protection is secured is frequently misunderstood. No publication or registration or other action within the Copyright Office is required to secure copyright. (See following memo.) There are, however, certain certain advantages to registration. See “Copyright Registration.”
Copyright is secured automatically when the work is created, and a work is “created” when it is fixed in a copy or phonorecord for the first time. “Copies” are things objects from which a work can be read or visually perceived either directly or beside the aid of a machine or device, such as books, manuscript, sheet music, film, videotape, or microfilm. “Phonorecords” are things objects embodying fixations of sounds (excluding, by statutory definition, motion picture soundtracks), such as cassette tape, CDs, or LPs. Thus, for example, a song (the “work”) can be fixed in sheet music (“copies”) or contained by phonograph disks (“phonorecords”), or both. If a work is prepared over a period of time, the module of the work that is fixed on a exceptional date constitutes the created work as of that date.
ALSO...
One good style to prove that you wrote something/made something, just within case someone else copies it and say they did it first:
Mail it to yourself...
Put your work down on paper and when you correspondence it to yourself, the postoffice should postmark it with a date. Now, you enjoy dated evidence/proof of when you did it.
Just mark it beside your copyright, the date, and 'all rights reserved'. Should be fine.
So, is the story that angelic?
you need to look at www.copyright.gov to receive all the CORRECT information.
dutiful luck
R.A.M. is correct.
Is it illegal to force someone to do something at work(as within a type of duty) that is against their religion?
Answers: no as long as it allowed. if it was bent to force someone to everyone would use it as a scape goat when they were ask to do something they didnt want to.
The individual as a choice of whether or not to work for you.
If the task is trial and part of ordinary job functions and he is unqualified to perform it he should quit.
I differ on belief. The anti-discrimination laws read aloud that no one can be discriminated against due to religious reason. There are many body that require people to work on Sundays, which is something impossible if you're a Christian, who believe that the Sabbath falls on Sunday and no work should be done. An employer can NOT refrain from hiring someone who can't work on a indubitable day for religious reason, if they are otherwise an acceptable hand. As for performing a job function, if the personage was aware of the requirement of this pursuit and agreed to it (verbally, doing it before, etc) afterwards they are stuck or need to find a alien job. However, if this is a NEW assignment then the employer wishes to make acceptable accomodations (you don't mention exactly what the job is, so I can't be specific), such as have you do something else to make up for that division you cannot do.
I commend you if you are dealing with this type of situation for standing up for yourself. Don't permit these commies tell you otherwise.
Turtle is making a Moral point but not a legalized one. There is no such thing as Religious accomodation contained by the workplace. Working for an employer is a choice and not requirement. You have to form a choice as to if you want to work for the employer or not.
Given everyone has a choice to stride off of a post, no one can force you to do anything. With that said, it's mostly illegal for a non-religion base employer (religion based employer being churches, some types of private conservatory, etc) to ask for your religious affiliation.
Making allowances for someone's religion discriminates against all other workers who fail to share that religion (ex. Requiring atheists to work adjectives Sundays so Christians can have Sundays off). Someone contained by the situation you describe must weigh their religious convictions against their desire to remain employed at their current location. Isn't that what most religions are about...denying one's worldly desires against the spiritual?
If it is against someone's religion to wear a uniform at work.?
and they get fired for not wearing it...isn't that a violaton of the first ammendment of the US constitutional rights?on the serious side, it's kinda strange right?
thank you
Answers: That depends. If you got fired from Hooters for not wanting to wear skimpy clothes, consequently I'd have to speak you are just dumb.
However, as others enjoy pointed out, reasonable accomodations must be made on a case-by-case principle, such as women who are forbidden to wear slacks being given a skirt. Again, I will right to be heard "reasonable accomodations."
Most society know when hired, if they have to wear a uniform or not.
If the Mcdonalds outfit, or any other company uniform is impolite, or against that persons religion, he or she should run elsewhere for employment.
Next thing you know, culture who claim to be in a religion that ban all clothing altogether will be serving your 1/4 pounder, if we allow the individual to set the requirements.
Nope. Employment is an agreement between the hand and the employer where the hand agrees to follow certain rules and do confident things in return for compensate.
The you don't want to wear a uniform - find another job.
As an HR Director, I would inevitability a little information previously deciding that not wearing your uniform be cause for termination. What piece of the uniform was against their religion? Did they inform us of this when they be hired and told they would be required to wear a uniform? I have have to accomodate women who could not wear slacks due to their beleifs but have never hear that a uniform in common was against their religion.
On the serious side, working on days that shutting down in Y are against my religion.
I've never hear of any religion that prohibits a uniform. For the most part, you can control where on earth you apply for work, like a Muslim woman who weatrs the burqa plainly doesn't want to apply for a job at Hooters and next refuse to wear the uniform.
Criminal injuries information?
On saturday my brother came out from a nightclub at 2am and be heading for a taxi when a lad punched him who he did not know within an unprovoked attack. As a result of the attack it left him beside a broken jaw contained by 2 places and has since have a big operation into fixing his snapped jaw surrounded by which 2 teeth had to be removed.I hear he will be eligable for criminal injuries so does anyone have any info on where on earth to start and who to contact and sum amounts.He will lose a small furtune not being competent to work.
The incident has be repored to police already who were not much oblige.
thanks
Answers: This website will give support to: https://www.cica.gov.uk
There is a calculator on there - a fractured mouth with hospital treatment and average recovery comes contained by at 3,800 quid and the loss of a couple of teeth a further 500 - 700 depending on which teeth
Yes he can (it may be reduced if bro has previous criminal records)
Apply for application form to
Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA)
Tay House
300 Bath Street
Glasgow
G2 4LN
Tel: 0141 331 2726
The number for CICA is 0800 032 3092 the organization is in Glasgow.
The valise has to enjoy been taken through the courts as CICA stipulation finalisation and the full file from the Police division dealing near the case.
Your brother should receive notification from the Witness Care Unit, dealing next to the case, and they will know how to advise on doing a subject personal statement. This will be attached to the Prosecution file.
Were near any witnesses to the assault, or CCTV (there usually is near darkness clubs), have the police done a check on available witnesses and taken a full statement from your brother?
Its exceedingly difficult to take a Prosecution forward minus a defendant regardless of the injuries caused but it might be worthwhile, checking out the CCTV angle.
Good Luck
My client has a site self slandered by another site with false info. What kind of action can i filch?
my client is an auto dealer and a discruntled customer have devoted his life to slandering my clients site. the info he puts on his site is false but keep coming up number 2 in the inbred listings everytime you do a search for my client. What type of official action can I clutch, what organization can i contact? also, is in attendance a way to find this guys site shutdown?Answers: Watch the movie Liar Liar for motivation!
you can do nothing. His attorney may be capable of do something but without full disclosure of the facts, that's adjectives anyone can tell you.
Jena 6.Can we as american people allow this to crop up?
If you have hear about this story, I am curious to know what race think. I am not refering to one ethnic or financial group I am speaking to everyone. If you haven't heard of the story I hold posted it here.http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/09/04/bel...
Answers: Kids get into fight all the time! But to attain 20 years and lose the opportunity to go to college? What they don't explain to you is that some of the same Black students be beat up days prior at a shindig by some Whites. What they don't tell you is that the White boy who get the concussion kept racially taunting those same Black kids about human being beat up at the carnival. And after he got the concussion he be shortly released from the hospital and went on to academy that evening. What they don't tell you is that some Black kids within Jena had guns pulled on them by White ADULTS numerous times for nil, and they got arrested. This is what happen ALL THE TIME in Jena. I don't condone the children's engagements, but at what point are Black kids expected to get use to this type of treatment?
A Black student asked the principal for approval to sit under the campus tree! I'm sorry, but that say a lot.
It a moment ago amazes me that this is the same America that Blacks and Whites are going to period of war for. And if you think that there's no injustice contained by this incident, than imagine that it be your child spending 20 years in detain for a school box.
Yeah, we can.
A 'shod foot' is considered a dangerous weapon.
Hurling national epithets doesn't give someone consent to batter you - especially 6 on one.
This kid already has two priors for battery-operated? Sounds like a fine upstanding young at heart man. Here's a question: why wasn't he tried and convicted of a dislike crime as well. Oh, right. When blacks attack whites it's not a despise crime.
Fry Mumia.
Allow what? Justice for a white person?? OH NO Say it ain't so!!
Shutup.
if you bring up to date the truth, people would construe this story better.
6 blacks attacked one white kid.
we will not allow this to happen.
even-handedness will prevail!
Why do I owe Texas so much.?
I just moved to Texas better job than in Seattle. I own to pay 8 tolls a light of day just for work and more for personal trips, I buy a house but taxes are crazy dignified 3 times what they are in other places glibly and usually you get excise assessed at least 100K more than the actual worth by far which means 200 or 300 more a month within taxes. Fees for police tickets just raise $100 across the board and the police have a reputation for discourteous behavior I hear. Other states charge less and hold out the same services and roadways etc...So in that is some background, here is my give somebody the third degree again.
What am I paying for, why do I need to compensate the state government $1000 a month if I want a house, or even a couple hundred if I want to rent. Where is adjectives this money going??? I wish the comproller would answer, I would similar to to know if she feels she is a crook?
Answers: Bob,
He doesn't can`t bear America, he just hate being gouge by government. Don't consume time trying to convince us you enjoy paying taxes.
Mobus,
Am I not correct that Texas does not enjoy an income tax?
Anyway, adjectives states overcharge its citizens for the services they allegedly provide, Texas is no different.
Perhaps if Texicans quit hiring illegal immigrant, taxes could go down. They don't deduce about the added due burden they have to money to finance the tuition if the children of illegals, or the cost of medical treatment that the taxpayer bears, nor the illustrious cost of keeping them in jail when they commit crimes and get caught. All they can see is that they can hire someone to work frozen and work cheap.
As for the toll road problem, leave home a bit quicker and don't drive on the toll roads. If there is an alternative route, I litter to drive on toll roads.
Texas is not alone in really ripping associates of on traffic tickets. I've heard that my home state of Alabama charges a minimum or $200.00 for traffic tickets issued by State Troopers, and that local fines are not much better. But that is to say hearsay, I've never had a ticket within Alabama. The solution is not to speed excessively. Unless the cop is in a really crappy mood, they unanimously don't give tickets for smaller amount than 5 mph over the limit. So don't drive more than 5 mph over the put a ceiling on and 80% of the time you will be OK.
Doc
If you hate America so much, why not take off? There is nothing keeping you surrounded by your current location.
Rather than moan and gripe, do something. Either leave or shut up..seem simple to me
Evil, evil America how bad we are.
Can you verify your statistics?
Is an advertisement search-engine an infringment of copyright?
I work contained by a very competitive industry (car sales) and nearby are a number of websites that allow family to place advertisements for a charge. I have thought of an concept to bring all these ad into one place in the form of a special 'query engine' that screen-scrapes the car public notice sites and allows a user to search adjectives of those sites at once.The user would also be able to panorama the advertisements on the website.. but is this copyright infringment? For instance, would Yahoo or Google return with in trouble if their investigate results included a thumbnail of each net result rather than a intermingle to the actual site?
I guess it's a complicated legal nouns but if any legal experts could answer this, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Answers: So call "scraping" almost invariably constitutes a violation of some intellectual property protection, whether copyright or trademark.
Here is an excellent site beside some wonderful options for you. Check it out
http://www.freewebs.com/search--engine/
I'm an Indian Engineer, I want to do something for my country (India), what should i do? where shd i start???
I'm proud to be indian, i want to some how give over myself for my country, i'm not physically fit (but not a handicap) to join army,flotilla etc..i have to earn for my people, but simultaneoulsy i want to help my country to be true developed nation, since from my child hood i enjoy learned "India is a Developing Nation" but when it will become a developed nation?
according to our great hero Mr.Abdul Kalam india will be a demanding nation by 2020 but what the things goin on to label that happen? pls suggest me, should i do social service, should i start business or company and bring into play poor n jobless people, should i start a helping organisation, should i sign up politics, should i join Indian Administartive services...
what the best i can do for my country????
Answers: You should referee for yourself because this is a question you are asking total strangers. Nobody will know how to give you a proper suggestion unless they know give or take a few your competency.
This question here seem inappropriate.
Globalization will aid India to become Super power.Because India is the best market place within the world.
First u do ur duties properly and help others
(Like chiranjeevi contained by Stalin Movie)
It is wonderful that you have such well brought-up thoughts and want to do something for our country. I think the first item all of us entail to do is stop calling our fellow Indians by region or by cast and stop combat among ourselves.
There are many things which you can do. For example you can form a group of roughly speaking 10-15 people beside your friends to discourage people from littering as that can solve like mad of problems. If we live in a verbs environment, we will be free of diseases and can live a healthier energy. So you can go around anywhere surrounded by your city and stop people from littering.
The subsequent biggest problem is of corruption. We need to stifle corruption in India. Yes we cannot control everyone but we can atleast clear sure that we ourselves don't get invloved contained by it by bribing or taking bribe. If everyone can play their part, it will progress a long way.
There are so oodles children deprived of education. We stipulation to think of solutions and distribute back to the society. We have need of to raise conscience, first next to starting with our friends and family and donating as much as we can, to promote education contained by our country.
Hope that is constructive and will give you a polite start.
" Love your neighbour as yourself ".
(Bible :Matthew 19:19 )
Anything done with sincerity and devotion benefit the country within one way or the other.
Therefore, you should assess yourself and find out what best you are competent to do and proceed further.
Defence out of question - nearby is no war. But you may die for other's mistakes.
Politics - Basic requirements are illiteracy and goondagiri. You are unfit.
Administrative service - They are supposed to be the genuine rulers but are responsible for present condition of India.One in 100 will get something done. Forget it.
Get a decent employment within India or abroad. Marry and settle, lacking this social service worm bothering you.
Nice thoughts.
Do you have the determination?
unify police department and kill adjectives the terr and corrupt politician. at least.
Reinstating the death cost in the UK?
In the street light of all the sternness plaguing the UK, especially the little baby who be tortured to DEATH by his parents, should we consider the death cost once again?I feel if someone have committed murder, and the case is solid, consequently the criminal should be sentenced to death by impossible to tell apart means they inflicted on their sufferer.
Thoughts on this?
Answers: yes but only incases where on earth their is 100% proof like witnesses to a murder , not on flimsy trials next to poor experst, yes i would agree that the death cost should be re-introduced, but apperently we cannot ever do it , as tony blair signed something saying we couldnt , assume we would have to set out the eu to do it , so its a win win situation.
also the death cost has a 100% nouns rate, noone has ever commited a crime after one killed by state .
bring it on.
9 years for them sick bassards is a disgrace
No. The passing penalty is not a deterrent. Most murders are any not premeditated, or are carried out against a particular target for particular justification, or by psychopaths, so introducing a death cost does not reduce the murder rate - this have been proven time and again.
So what we are disappeared with is assets punishment as revenge - state murder. How are you then any better than the murderer?
Bring it subsidise definitely
yes bring it spinal column, kill them the agency they kill others
Well, it does hold out better justice than the current system here, where on earth basically you can butcher someone and could be out in a couple of years.
But after the human rights act will intervine, as it other does.
Although the government is looking to get hold of rid of that...
NNNOOOOOOOO ...
If we kill them within is nothing that separates us from them, its totally hypercritical, it also make criminals into some form of a marter as well as giving them a jammy way out, within is no chance for redemption or adapt, where's the democracy in that? there's also the certainty that some judge and jury will not convict criminals because there are not 100% sure that they are gulity, so sickos are down-and-out once again. Punishment should be be done out of revenge.
Not to mention its A TOTAL BREECH OF HUMAN RIGHTS!
Perhaps in a terribly few cases. I think the entire sprite system needs an overhaul. It seem ludicrous to me that you get a longer sentence for money appropriation than you do murder or child abuse. I muse the punishment in prison should be more than currently ie no TV/cable and other luxuries along near enforced work to help serve the country and repay their debts to society.
For crimes that gain very short sentences, eg mugging and assaulting an elderly casualty the perpetrator should be made to make/do something whilst imprisoned that raise money - a cut of that money should go to a relevant charity, eg give support to the aged and the perpetrator should be made to have contact and involvement beside the charity.
I don't think we should bring rear the death cost because of all the mistakes that be made in times past.
But a life sentence should denote life
No. We should never reinstate the demise penalty. While my conviction is sorely tested by cases resembling this, there are too lots mistakes made.
Sally Clark, Angela Canning, the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six, Stefan Kiszko, Peter Fell and numerous others might have hang had that sentence be available. Yet all be released after their convictions were found unsafe.
It's no suitable saying simply hang where on earth the case is solid. All the above be convicted by juries, guilty beyond adjectives reasonable doubt, of crimes they did not commit. They can at lowest possible be partially compensated for years surrounded by prison, there's no putting right a death sentence.
The skin of Tahla Ikram did not, in any bag, result in a murder conviction. Both party blamed each other for the child's injuries and within was no process to be certain who be responsible for the child's injuries. They were convicted of "cause or allowing death". Would you hang both party, to make sure?
Yes! The cost of keeping a prisoner within jail is thousands per week, the jail are over crowded and people who should be contained by jail are self tagged and released and are commiting more crimes. There is no deterent contained by the British judicial system for any criminal, let alone murderers. Executing adjectives murderers would free up much needed prison spaces and provide a deterent to other would be criminals. Instead of them geting thier wrists slapped & being sent home they could be jailed contained by place of the murderers.
I don't agree that they should be killed by alike means they subjected thier victims to though. After adjectives, who are you going to get to take out the sentance? The relatives? What if they are Christians and they forgive the killer? What if they hold not got the stomach for it? No, They'd hold to be another Pierrepoint (I think that's his identify, might be wrong tho'.) to do it on behalf of the state. Getting an executioner to pull a lever, flick a switch or 'jack' up a con is one entry, but I doubt the executioner would be as willing to stab the villian 36 times in the past decapitating him and dissolving half the remains surrounded by acid and feed the other half to pigs. I basically would not work.
Even better, make it a reward per view event. Why not? Let the income turn to the grieving familys' and to pay for adjectives the other costs incured in the trial. Why should the public foot the bill when within is a way to verbs the money spent.
i dont agree with corporal punishment because i guess that people should other have a second hit and miss and they could have have a perfectly apt reason for butchery them that they couldnt prove
however we do need to do something the jail are filling up and we cant basically let them free and they entail to be punished for murder whatever their situation
My 'thoughts on this' are impressively complex and probably boring.
However you asked for them, so here they are!
Your theory smacks of the Old Testament!
An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
I am anti religion (all and any religion) so going away religion on one side and looking at the facts .
Although I am anti all religion I am still a fellow human?
If some one in the vicinity and dear to me was 'done away with' surrounded by the manner you described my first thoughts as expected would be revenge.
It's a natural instinct, consequently if I was right or wrong I would be subject to like punishment!
But I was provoked ? Does that concern? I bashed the fellers skipper in beside a base globe bat!
So I was a mental satchel at the time I was bash, does that matter?
Should that be lug into account?
If maybe I could look back within time and find proof that punishment should fit the crime actually stopped the crime human being committed then I would have a tendency to agree with your point .
I cant find any such evidence, so to my simple mind it wouldn't solve the problem, if the interrogate was designed to discover if revenge be satisfied, consequently yes it would be.
As an athiest I would have no religious qualms more or less the base bubble bat cure, but that wouldnt make me right would it?
OK thats what I have a sneaking suspicion that , not a lot of serve is it?
I think that in that should be worst punishment than just going to prison, but resembling you said there wants to be solid grounds for evidence.
I agree with worse punishment...but later I think that if populace can kill, and rape, later they would'nt care if they die anyway as they never have a heart in the first place to do what they did.
Torture and made to live is better.
More Questions and Answers:
[1039] - [1467] - [1190] - [1389] - [168] - [1156] - [2185] - [2269] - [453] - [2125] - [2085] - [325] - [100] - [1227] - [433] - [2160] - [1867] - [1979] - [647] - [1431]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: