Law Questions and Answers

Emancipation of a minor?

Can anyone offer some warning to emancipation law in Ohio. This human being is 17 soon be 18 in contained by 9 months. Cannot live with custodial parent due to conflicts of interest. Has be living with other unprocessed parent that just enter to minor hardship but institution is in and child requests to attend. Custodial parent washes hand of the child..help me please?
Answers: In charge for a child to become emancipated they must be living separate and apart from their parents AND they must have an independent way of financial support. They must be able to financially provide for themself.
Gee, conflict of interest aye? Isn't that what every teen have with their parents? Parenting is just about conflict of interest, Teens make conflict, parents hold kids from doing dumb things in their own interest. The being you mentioned has 9 months, and they can fly out that door as briskly as there legs are carrying them, consequently its off into the cold cruel world :)

Do U know of support group in the Bayarea,Ca for non-military chief torture and pain impose by criminal gangs?

No one help us or believe our lives has be distroyed in everyway By Criminals (Insane Gangs) using finance non lethal guns from a distance on inncent civillians who done nothing to them, freshly happend to live next to them within the same neighborhood. Sadly, they are so obssesed next to their victims, It didn't matter to them of how frequent times We moved far away from them to hope they will leave us alone, but that didn't assistance, or stop them from tracking us down and continue harrassing us for years. They steal from us, attack us, put listen and cameras in our cars and homes, hack our phones/cell phones too, vandalize our homes and cars and stalking us on daily argument, as result we lost our secure job, our homes and our money. They think it is a team game to take over other ethnic group lives and distroy them completly. I am aware of many other victims approaching us, So Please Help Us! We would like to find a support group Or to start our own. Any belief? Links? Thanks
Answers: Have you been diagnosed beside a mental disorder? Gangs don't typically spy on you, and certainly aren't going to spend foolishly the time and money placing cameras and microphones in your cars and home. They will of late kill you.

I contemplate you should talk to a doctor around this, I'm not trying to insult you.
Ummm...are you serious? If you are I would go to the police beside some proof of course and see what they will do.

Do you know your rights?

When you are pulled over "The right to remain silent" isn't your only one.
Name a few right that you know of within your state.
Answers: When you get pulled over you do not enjoy the right to remain silent. Your 5th, 6th, 4th, and 14th amendment rights do not kick within until you are ARRESTED and at no time before.
Yes. You also enjoy a right to not let the police investigate your vehicle unless they have "probable motive." Probable cause is not created by a broken tail wishy-washy either. I know seriously of rights but that's just one example.

Daniel must be a cop or a foreigner. Why else would he not want Americans to own rights?
Why would one assume that only a foreigner or police officer would want to deny relations rights. That's offensive to foreigners and police officer.

Especially since Daniel is correct. Pulled over in your saloon, walking down the street or sitting in your home you own the same rights as other.

When you are arrested, or cautioned, afterwards your Miranda Rights kick within.

Re:hostile work environment question?

i did say aloud was be sorry to him this guy has have it "in" for me from the start i put in a two month perceive with the company because i couldnt work next to this form of abuse after today it gets worse
Answers: You've get less than two months to walk. Tough it out.
huh???
Detail might help.

Does it follow me to work justly - where little sum or illegally - within a lot of stipend?

illegally is not channel that for me there can be problems next to a law - simply contained by laws here is a lot of errors which it is possible to use.. but within is yet such article - Conscience..

once.. i made off a college, next university, different additional courses..
Answers: Honesty is the best policy.

Even if you could return with away with it reasonably, you will be worse off instinctively because of it.
Illegal sources of income are always a problem because of the added risks of penalty. And when you are caught, you could face fines, incarceration, and the inability to get a appropriate job within the future.

Stick next to the legal bearing. Financially and in every other channel it's the right thing to do.

Why, we, in nonspecific, more care give or take a few our rights instead of our duties ?

Answers: Basically people are uncaring. They want to acquire more and more and would not like to lose doesn`t matter what they have. Insistence on rights may bring dividends but consciousness of duties involves expenditure of time, money and vigour. That is why people rivet in infractions of decree when an enforcer is not around or the infraction is believed to be ignored / not likely to be detected.
An employer or person availing produce and services would try to delay payoff as long as possible and when any debts are owed to a person, adjectives eforts will be made to collect the same expeditiously.
Inherent acquiescence to law is undercooked.
When I was liberal, I be very focused on my rights.

As a conservative, I know that rights and duties run hand surrounded by hand.

The notion of duty, personal responsibility, and accountability...cursewords to the libs.
You're right near the point you're trying to establish.

to answer your question: People trouble for everything that's free. Getting your right is free whereas getting your duties done you have to work
This is an excellent quiz. I agree that people don't realize that they are interrelated issues. Without war your fight, you won't own the rights to do anything and without your have rights, you won't be able to combat your fight.

I don't know that I agree that it is a Liberal vs. Conservative entity. Typically, there are other going to be issues that these two groups (or any two groups) won't agree on, but just because they don't quarrel for the same side doesn't indicate they're not fighting. Regardless of beliefs, nearby are always going to be givers and takers -- the ones who do adjectives the work and the ones who pretend to do all the work and confer lip service.

Sorry, I got past its sell-by date the topic of your question... why do we aid more about our rights than our duties? Simply put, I judge it's because our society is more of a me, me, me society than a you, you, you or us, us, us society.
Because over the past few years our rights own been taken away from:

Illegal Wire Tapping
Military Commissions Act
Increasing Surveillance
Rights are yours,while duties are those you want then and want for.
That you enjoy Rights,let you own Duties.
Rights are not a consequence of Duty,it is inherent of what Constitute us,"We".
NO one else can give you what is yours,and/or your Rights pro Duty.
Such is the state of indented servitude call Oppression.

Where Rights need to be debate vs. Duties,or else,lays a treat to rightful Status,Constituency already.
I believe that it is anyone taught by the parents of children in our time. I read about it surrounded by the paper every daylight and it seems to usually involve a child at academy who has done wrong and when the child is reprimanded or punished, the parents show up and make higher cane at the college officials.

I read an article freshly this morning involving a girl in illustrious school who be using an ipod. She knew it wasn't allowed and when the vice principle asked her to put it away, she did. But consequently when she went surrounded by to her history class, she pulled it out again and started listening to it again. He come in and told her to provide it to him, when she did not he told her to go to the department. As she was departure the room, she tried to hand it over to another student but the vice principle grab it. She tried to take it from him and he grab her wrist. He did let jump of her but now her parents are surrounded by the paper and want him to be arrested for touching their little girl. Keep surrounded by mind, that the girl has be suspended last year several times for using an ipod within class and for text messaging her friends during classes.

The parents are adjectives over the news showing outrage that the man grab their daughter's wrist and the child has literary that you can do whatever you approaching because your rights come before your duties.

She better thank her lucky stars every darkness that she is not my kid.
rights is what you get
Duties is what you will make a contribution

Sumwhere after being born we hold grown up to forget our true natutre.
Our true nature is togive ,approaching a flower..

Love is about giving ,sharing.There is no offer and take, if near is then it is a settlement. Like a business.
In nature a flower other gives smell,no issue whos around, it does not choose.In fact it does not even exactness if any1 is around.
Similarly our nature is to love, not to expect anything surrounded by return.anything else is a mere deal, a fulllfillment of the desires of our senses which after a while lead to unhappiness.

If we are disappeared true to our nature we would focus on duties not rights,
But since we hold forgotten all that we approaching the rights but the duties.liketo take not bestow
They don't know the following principle :

" NOT ME, BUT YOU ! "


Thank you Ji

Loving sundar ( Sept 12,2007, 11:50 P.M )

**************************************...
hi $@n@t...

az v ppl give our top most n 1st priority 2 rts alwayz next our duties.v think dat duties to will jump on but once rights gone then can never b achieve...wats say???..in good health chill out...tc.sweet dreamz...bye.

*****WheNevER ! f!nd dE kEy 2 $ucce$$ $um1 ch@ngE$ dE LocK...*****.
Traditionally,Indians, those working
in the affairs of state,quasi-government organisations,public sector, municipalities and
other organisations where they are not answerable to anyone are more concerned beside their rights than their duties because they
like their sinecure.Powerful trade union protect
these people's rights without kindly about whether these workers ever execute their duties.When their jobs are in safe hands for life why should these culture ever work?Not only that,
even after they retire they find fat pension and in attachment at least one of their progenies is assured of a commission in the organization from where the parent have retired.When they have get it made,
and their rights protected,why then should they
verbs about their duties?
It is easier to receive afterwards to give. Rights pertain to our own welfare and ably being which is what most populace care roughly.

Duties and obligations pertain to the safety of others, which may not be as much a priority as our own welfare.

Human beings are basically thoughtless as they always put their desires ahed of society and it takes a special character to care more give or take a few the welfare and wellbeing of others to some extent then their own.
hallow, Socrates how are you
we cannot find suitable answer for your
put somebody through the mill - even after 2500 years
even to day we find like peas in a pod Q in yahoo
if we reach a deal at national level , the constitution of any country define the fundamental rights of citizens but i think the duties are not defined meticulously , these are unstable depending upon social status of the individual. so, every individual is clear about the fundamental rights.

and if we parley at individual's level, one historic aspect of remembering rights and forgetting duties is human nature. everyone desires facilities but don't want to work. i will quote here an example. my spouse is individual interested in her "rights", but at hand is no word of "duty" in her vocabulory
Those who do not want changeover in socio- economical & political conservation are after RIGHT.
Those who are in somebody`s debt to perform for moral & allowed reasons are DUTY bound.
There are 2 groups
Today, the thought contents of our minds are 95 % commercial orient thoughts (even when talking amongst close relatives, friends etc)..
A couple of hundreds of years ago, most of the thought contents be non-commercial.
So, we are 'driven', unawares, by this orientation of the mind, the mind-set, the attitude, to 'first' have a sneaking suspicion that about "what is surrounded by it for me?" , rather than, "what can I do contained by it, to evolve myself further?"!
That is why we now obligation 'overdoses' of motivation programs in adjectives fields, (look at cricket very soon, the break up, etc)!

Defamation of Character...do I have an argument?

Had a dispute next to a client. She dismissed me from her home after berating me.

As I went to my subsequent client's home (a friend of the first) I saw that he was on the headset. As I began my work, I saw him way of walking outside with his wireless phone to a spot going on for 75 feet away from the house. His phone conversation took almost an hour past he returned to the house.

As I prepared to leave, the second client told me that my services would not be needed at the appendage of the current term.

This be a week after he had explained to me that his children would most imagined continue working next to me into the fall months.

It would be assured enough to subpoena the second client and his phone history into court to show that the conversation he had on the phone that morning contained by my presence was next to my first client. His change contained by expression towards me was instantaneous, and his decision not to verbs as well.

What are my likelihood here? Loss of wages, punitive action against client 1, etc.?
Answers: Hi

If the second client be on the phone talking to the first client, and the first client said something roughly you that wasn't true which caused you to lose your situation, it is slander. Slander is a form of defamation contained by which someone makes false and unfounded statements tending to damage another's reputation, business, or means of livelihood. For slander to appropriate place, the false statement has to be spoken, and it have to be communicated to a third party, which contained by this case it would be the second client. If she said something to the second client that be untrue and it made you lose your job, it is patently jeopardizing your livelihood, and you would then enjoy a case. But you're not 100% sure that the guy fired you because the first client said something untrue in the order of you, and you only suspect that this is the basis. You need to enjoy proof that slander took place. But if you have several more clients, and if losing those two did not affect your livelihood significantly, later don't waste your time taking the bag to court.
Slim and none. May we start over?

1. You must accept your responsibility contained by the "DISPUTE" with your previous client. We adjectives have disputes near clients but somehow we must be "gentle" with explaining our position.
2. You must remember that the customer is other right. I'm sure you feel that path when you go into a store, and you are not hear by an agent of that store. It gets frustrating on the chunk of both individuals.
3. You need to realize that surrounded by any business "you win some and you lose some".
4. You cannot prove what people speak over the phone - unless it is an agreed to "taped conversation".
5. You may enjoy needed a "time to readjust your attitude" after you left the first client. Perhaps you be upset and the second client picked up on that attitude.
6. Always take a break when you know that a client have upset you. Take time to say "oh powerfully, again you win some and you lose some".
7. Did you know that Thomas Edison (who was credited next to inventing the light bulb) did thousands of things that did not work past he found things that did work?
You cannot give up lately because things don't work.
It is obvious that things did not work for client #1 and client #2.
8. People hold a right to change their mind.
9. I do not reflect on any judge would afford you anything since you business sounds as if you are a salesman and it is dependent upon you satisfying the customer.
10. No one owes you anything.
11. The sooner you realize that your errand is to find a need surrounded by customers and fill that call for, you will then become a great nouns.

GOD bless us always.
MBA-Boston Univ.
CPA-retired
I worked my approach through high institution. I worked my way through college - selling physical estate. I worked my way through graduate university.
NONE OF IT WAS EASY but I needed the money to pay my bills. Sometimes populace treated me very unsuccessfully, but I kept my goals within mind, and went on to the subsequent customer.

I do hope this helps, and if it does, tolerate the "bad experiences of the past" stay within the past. Best of nouns to YOU!
It seems by the votes you've given to adjectives of the correct answers that you only want to hear what you WANT to hear. So I won't dribble away my time.

Suffice it to say at hand are two problems with your "case":

1. You are assuming that the previous client be on the phone with your present cleint, and;

2. What be said was libelous.

First, you enjoy no facts upon which to make such a determination and secondly, even if you did procure a court to hear your case, short proof that the conversation eminated from the first client and was somehow relevant to your skin, a subpoena won't issue.

You don't get to hold the court issue a subpoena for a fishing expedition. Not even a good attorney can do that.

The direction you've been given is accurate.

If countries have to settle up for crimes from terror groups can we sue the US due to a despise crime?

In class we were covering how the US courts ruled that another country be fined for it's citizens committing a terrorist attack. And we were noted to related it to later quarters resume as to the US definitions and the DoD's classification of terrorism. Oddly, human being forms of terrorism in itself. We are reviewing a bag where a US muslim, be attacked by a US soldier who has ties beside a Arian Nation "group". Thus, a racially motivated attack with added threats to the victem's house. If the military sees adjectives enlisted men as representatives of the states, and the soldier, who be on duty at the time, attacked a civilian US citizen, and also has ties beside a group who is listed on the apprehension group lists. Doesn't that niggardly that the US supported a terrorist since the army only give him a fine. The muslim man's report was tossed out and vitally ignored. But he reported several more confrontations and threats if he pursues taking the soldier to court. So can he sue both the US and soldier?
Answers: No.

Amendment XI
The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit contained by law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state
Who is "we"?
You necessitate to provide factual and provable facts to give an informed answer.
That's moderately a stretch, as far as actually suing the US Government for this offense, but yeah, the soldier should unequivocally face some consequences.
That's because as far as I can see, us White "Aryan" American's pretty much rule the world. so I guess we can apply a double standard anytime we want until someone take that control away from us. By the way I am THE ALL AMERICAN!!!!
I'm not sure going on for suing the U.S. government but I know for a certainty that soldier should face NJP (Non Judicial Punishment) at the especially least save a Court Martial.

I know for a fact the military does not pilfer hate crimes weakly.

That soldier would be in gaping trouble if this happened.

but you and I weren't near so remember there is other two sides to every story. plus you know the media cant be trusted.
You can sue, but you won't win. Also, even if you do win, you won't know how to collect on any judgment that you find.

A court/law question?

Ok. I live contained by RI and i was wondering if anyone know anything about this. Someone I know get arrested for a felony back within March 2007. He is going for a pre-trial conference soon but the prosicuter still hasnt sent him a discovery package recitation him what he's been charged near, the evidence, witnesses, ect... I was wondering if within was some nice of law that if the state doesnt endow with this to him (his lawyer requested it several times) that the valise can be dropped or some kind of permitted action can be taken?
Answers: There are time confines created by rule or statute. Ordinarily, all the charges are presented at the arraignment. Discovery must be presented at a correct time before trial. Often it is 15 days, but it vary state to state. If it is late, consequently the judge can compromise all sorts of remedies, but the usual remedy is a short time ago a continuance to allow counsel the time necessary to review the discovery. If your friend have a lawyer, these are question that he should address to the lawyer up to date with local decree and procedure.
Your friend has an idiot for an attorney.

Discovery will bring place after the court sets a trial date.

What can happen for possession of stolen property?

My son be GIVEN a bike from a boy who stole a bike. Cops came to our house and retrieved the bike and took my sons statement as to how he get it.,.he is now charged beside possession of stolen property and has a warrnet out for him. How can he be guilty if he did not know it be stolen?
Answers: That is something he is going to have to prove surrounded by court. It's possible that your son knew it be stolen because common sense say that people don't in recent times give away (nice) bikes because they cost profoundly of money.
The crime involves possession knowing it was stolen or below circumstances by which the reasonable creature would know it was stolen. Your son may enjoy admitted that the other boy told him, or the other boy may hold told the cops that he told your son, or the victim may own been specified to your son. There could be any number of bits of evidence that together allow the judge to verbs that he knew or should hold known. That is not to enunciate tha he will be convicted. At this point he is only accuse. It is the function of the courts, not the cops or the DA, to determine if the accusation is true.
The charge could be any a misdemeanor or a felony. Inmy state, a felony could theoretically result within a prison term. I would recommend that he surrender himself, but with the sole purpose aftr you two rehearse his response to questioning by have him repeat only that he requirements a lawyer present during any cross-examination. If the question is "how are your doing?" He should respond, I want a legal representative present during questioning.
RUN, DON'T WALK TO THE BEST LAWYER YOU CAN FIND FOR THAT PARTICULAR CHARGE.

YOUR SON DOES NOT NEED SOMETHING LIKE THAT TO FOLLOW HIM THE REST OF HIS LIFE. IT IS REASONABLE TO ASSUME HE DID NOT KNOW IT WAS STOLEN BECAUSE KIDS GIVE AND TRADE STUFF TO EACH OTHER ALL OF THE TIME.

TO BAD THERE WASN'T A LAWYER PRESENT WHEN HE WAS QUESTIONED. ESPECIALLY IF HE IS UNDERAGE.
NEVER allow your children to adopt anything for free from other people . Make sure you get hold of your point across about the consequences .
According to the decree : ignorance is no excuse and that warrent is a bad item . It stays on his record . It will cost you some green but do seize it resolved through a lawyer . I have a sneaking suspicion that you are responsible when he is under age .
It be bad luck mostly as I see it and I hope your son bookish a lesson about adjectives the trouble it cost 'YOU' .
if he is really ignorant, yur attorney can deal beside the case &find him free .orelse the judge surrounded by his good mood will exonerate him after a severe warning otherwise , here will b a record as first offense

More Questions and Answers:
[1730] - [2189] - [1159] - [2168] - [802] - [1469] - [2263] - [943] - [2556] - [770] - [1685] - [2333] - [595] - [2084] - [2368] - [1722] - [574] - [1220] - [977] - [2573]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: