Law Questions and Answers

If 3000 kazakhstan immigrants come to a city, what would you do with them? A serious answer please?

Answers: Since you said "immigrants" and not "unlawful alien criminal" I can only assume that the citizens you are speaking of are legal migrants. :)
As legally recognized migrants, they most likely already enjoy a basic benevolent of English (unless they are refugees, which we also meet with depart arms -- again, they broke no laws to acquire here), and have some type of skill they can use to prosper.
I individually, wouldn't do anything with or to them. But if one of the Kazakhstanis said hello to me surrounded by the store, I'd say hi support, and maybe comment in the order of how cute their child is.
My city has no path of dealing with so oodles at once.
So, we would have to pilfer a smaller part, and assist the rest to other cities close by.

I suppose here we could safely feel 200 to 250.
They`d get placed surrounded by an area where on earth, for now, they could sleep, and later case workers would be assigned to see to individual asylum requests, and possible on the spot needs (medical etc).
meet them first, get them checked out by he doctors,
offer them a temp registration card, and help them next to settling in, and carry jobs
i would contain them and check them out hang on to them in the federal notes base nouns them in as various 747 it takes and transport them back home

I need to ask a grill on hate crimes ?

When a awhite personage commits a crime against a black person its a loathe crime if they call them the N-word while committing the crime, but if a black party robs a white person at gunpoint and say hand over the money whitey, its not ?
Answers: Hate crimes are a politically correct verbs the part of the libs contained by this country to endear themselves to the minorities. Does it really make the crime of murdering a soul worse if you call them a derogatory first name before bloodbath them? Why is it that we never seem to hear going on for any hate crimes perpetrate against white people?
it's complex to judge a detestation crime. most of the time, if you call someone the N word, folks will find it more offensive than if you ring up someone whitey. So, the first would be more likely to be considered a can`t stand crime. i for one wouldn't mind if someone called me whitey...it's not that crude.

One week maternity evacuate?

Im due in a month and currently a working mom. I am the Assistant Manager and assigned to do several tasks for the company. My womanly boss, a Korean, doesn't want me to take a long motherliness leave so she said I hold to go fund to work after week from my delivery. She said that if I intend to walk out for a week more, I won't be given a pay for that second week of bunking off. Is this safe and decriminalized?
What should I do?
Answers: Well lets get hold of pickin dat cotton Liza, cause mastas backbone on the plantation.

Tell your female boss to put on a tin beak and cut into manure next to the chickens. Two weeks is not nearly enough time to rest from childbirth. You need 3 months. Check near the department of labor in your home state and afterwards turn the B**** in.

That is the most inhumane entry I've ever heard of.
Yes it's official. They don't have to compensate you for any of it unless you have save paid break time.
Other than that they only enjoy to hold your job for you or rehire you upon your return. Why would they money you for being at home, you don't get hold of paid for doing zilch.
In the US, you are legally eligible for a minimum of 6 weeks of motherliness leave. Period. However, it isn't required that they earnings you.

That said, she shouldn't expect you to return after 1 week. Find someone else to work for, ASAP. This woman's a slave driver.
One week, there are law and safe guards contained by place in every State for have baby and the right of your errand.

Check with your local state representative, and perchance a lawyer, as she may be setting you up to fire you, even even though rightfully she can not do that.
Federal law allows lower than FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) 12 weeks of unpaid leave for an syndrome of either the hand or the employees close familial member.
You enjoy to have worked in attendance for at least 1 year and be full time to request FMLA move, your employer must also employ more than 50 personnel to be bound by FMLA guidelines.
Your employer is under no duty to pay you for any time missed unless your employer have a policy to do so.
It depends on whether or not your employer offers short-term disability insurance and what the lingo and conditions of coverage are as to whether or not you will be paid. If where on earth you work does not have any short-term disability insurance, once you use up your vacation/sick leave/paid time bad, you will not be paid.

If the employer employ over 50 people and you hold been at hand a year or more, you can request FMLA and you are legally entitled to up to 12 weeks (with a physician's note); however the employer is not required to hold your opening open, simply offer you a similar position and reward when you return.

Nearly all physician's within the US will provide written approval for 6 weeks off for a vaginal birth and 8 weeks rotten for a C-Section.
Yes, unfortunately, she can do that if the company is small plenty. You are allowed to take time past its sell-by date, and she doesn't have to earnings you for it, but she does have to hold your mission.

When a case become too high profile and an embarassment, consequently...?

This is a question something like the McCann case but do you remember two days ago that in that was adequate EVIDENCE for a JUDGE in England to EXTEND the detention time for a further 12 hrs for questioning but that inwardly hours Michael Barrymore was SUDDENLY allowed to walk scot-free ("dearth of evidence") ? When a case become too high profile and an embarasment, government intervene and all involved will run free. THE MCCANN CASE ? Exactly, You just dally and see. The Portuguese High Court will decide at hand is lack of evidence, the McCanns will later be free to sell their story for millions !! -- PLEASE discuss. Thanks.
Answers: You are incorrect on three points. Firstly, the High Court did not agree on to "let" Barrymore go with impunity. The Crown Prosecution Service decide in that was not satisfactory evidence to convict him and two others of murder. The prosection could not win, in other words. It would be a squander of court time, tax payers money and undue stress on the deceased's familial to sit through and give evidence at a trial that could not be won.
Secondly, The English High Court simply have no jurisdiction in Portuguese statute so a comparsion of English law (two completely different systems of imperative, i might add)with Portuguese law is of no relevance.
Thirdly, the CPS have on numerous occasions prosecuted several giant profile cases successfully, including Jeffery Archer's perjury trial, a notoriously difficult nouns of law to prove. So your accuastion is completely unfair.
One final point, your question is not at adjectives clear, quite muddled surrounded by fact, and difficult to grasp easily. Which is probably why you hold such a poor response. i'm still not sure i have grasped it completely. puncuation and a lesser amount of capitals would serve.
Time will tell , but I agree you the agency you are thinking

Why don't they let deposit guards carry missiles?

i'm a security guard and I discern pathetic patrol around the building without a weapon.

not solely do they not give us guns to carry, they punish us. if we bring our own armaments. we get fined something similar to $25,000 if we're caught carrying a weapon. its stupid, how am I suppose to defend myself if some punk desires to start something with me? at least possible let me bring a blade with me while Im patrol
Answers: most states allow weapons if the guard have attended a 120 hour course on weapons safekeeping and escalation of force.

Your company should pay for that unless they surface that they can always achieve someone to do the job short weapons.
Don't they bestow you a billy club?
If not the reason is because you are not a decree enforcement official and if you hurt someone you can be charged near assault and the person can sue the company you work for.

If you hold any trouble just phone call the cops.

Plus security doesn't remuneration enough to pocket those risks.

I know it's hard but I can't put in the picture you what you want to hear.
i agree.
the reason . to several security gaurds have been shot by police , contained by mistake ,after report for help.
Legally, a payment guard has one and the same right to carry a weapon as any other civilian. Remember that guards are not sworn officer.

However, the company you work for can prohibit you from carrying weapons, even if the senate allows you to. This is usually for liability reasons: if you misuse the weapon, they will procure sued.
well first article I realized be you said "punk". Just like VPD's finest, you shouldve have better training in "handling" such punks.
thats some of whats wrong next to people/punks these days.
to oodles people want to use firepower instead of a good fashioned *** kicking.
you contracted to take the assignment, if u feel youre not competent to access a situation using "police tactics" then you stipulation to address your higher up.
"punks" capture tired of the authority handling their position like they ARE the tenet.
instead of wepons, take a self defense class.
cuz if you own to resort to weapons, later i suggest you quit your job & work @ a roller-rink
If some *punk* decide to start something with you, they WILL attain you regardless of whether you are carrying a weapon or not. And after they do that, they will get a hold of that weapon.

I don't stipulation to explain what is going to happen next/
May contained by your area it is not allow, but surrounded by most areas in the U.S., they can be armed after man properly trained.

Can liberals be blammed for school shootings?

I lately saw a news clip nearly politicians wanting to arm school teacher. I don’t know if they are liberals or republics but is this what things have come too. Its insane liberals enjoy gone to great efforts to prohibit any form of corporal punishment which I reckon is fair within regards to schooling but parents enjoy no rights to discipline their kids anymore. I personally wouldn’t resembling the idea of strange teacher having the right to hit my kids but parents own no rights either. Efforts for discipline are futile and adolescents give the impression of being to be out of control. Politicians enjoy gone to efforts to alter discipline, but very soon these efforts own turned around and bit them on the butt. Instead of disciplining children in the setting up they are opting to shoot them at the stop. What is this world coming to it seems completely crazy to me any thoughts or opinion welcome.
Answers: This is what happen when a government get too big and becomes too powerful, and yes, the liberals are to blame for that. Ask a Democrat how any social, political, or financial problem should be solved and their reply invariably starts with the phrase "The policy should..." Our civil liberties are human being eroded every day and it's NOT Dubya's error. Every time we the people mitt a problem to our government and articulate "Here, fix this" (as is the liberal way, since they don't believe contained by taking responsibility for yourself) we freely give away for a moment piece of our freedom, while at the same time giving the affairs of state a little more authority over the private citizen. March too far down that road and you eventually move about past the point of no return where on earth the government controls virtually every aspect of our lives.

You're right -- liberals enjoy gone to great efforts to prevent any type of corporal punishment contained by schools, but I disagree near your assertion that doing so is fair. Why should teacher have to grit their teeth and put up beside unruly students? Since when are the children the bosses? And how are children supposed to learn that their behavior is not good enough if no one ever call them on it? As for parents disciplining their children, the laws still allow it (as long as you're not hitting the crap out of your kids) but parents refuse to do it because they're too busy keeping up near the Joneses or advancing their own inconsiderate agendas instead of being responsible parents. And again, the liberals are to blame. They push the culture of instant gratification, no rules, no boundaries, if it feel good do it, and "it's adjectives about me."

BOTTOM LINE: Yes, the world is going crazy, and it's going crazy because the so-called square values of integrity, accountability, responsibility, and getting what you want by working hard and earn it are not being fostered within our youth or practiced by most adults. The liberals should be hanging their head in shame because it's their complete and unwise disregard for any kind of moral or ethical values that made incidents resembling Columbine and WVU possible. And the situation will only take worse as long as we have bleeding-hearts that trade name excuses for every type of deviant behavior and refuse to punish those who step out of splash.
sure, whatever. libs are responsible for everything
bloodbath Lincoln.
fire in Chicago
the great depression.
WW1 and 2
butchery the Kennedys
watergate
feel free to put in
Well of course the Teachers would own to go through training and backround checks,lately like anyone who get a concealed carry security in any state,which statistically speaking make them the least promising to use a firearm unless they have to. I'm adjectives for it,it is about time we as Americans reasserted our right to shield ourselves,whatever mechanism necessary.

AD
No, logically they can't be blamed.

The NRA, with their millions of dollars and HOURS lobbying congress to protect the confident availability of weapons surrounded by our general society are closer to blame than the much malign liberals.

School shootings would not happen if guns be not readily accessible to adolescent human beings who haven't figure things out yet.

Please hang on to in mind the arts school shooting in Erfurt, Germany several years ago. Although a socialist slanting government, most Americans don't know that, although perceived as "liberal," Germany have an extremely conservative society, famously resistant to change.
I am a conservative, and I favor allowing teacher to take the conceal-and -carry class, surpass the background check, procure the license and then bring their weapon to work.

That doesn't show I want to blame "liberals" for the fact that the law currently don't allow this.

Lots of people would argue with changing the ruling to allow teachers to convey.

Parents that freak out if little Suzie or Johnny gets a couple of swats next to a paddle would probably hold a heart attack if their teacher sudddenly be armed with a .357 magnum.

Lawmakers the creeps that a nutcase will slip past the screening process, threaten a kid who forgets his homework, and turn public evaluation against conceal-and-carry laws.

Its probably a accurate idea--but one that will never come to pass.
I don't construe liberal should be blame. Well, conservatives and liberals alike should be blame if they gets money and influences from the NRA's. Why we have need of guns for. Democracy should be a beacon of peace. We should be free from foreboding of any violence.
There is no punishments, corporal or not when at hand is no crimes committed.
When gun is out of the streets there should be not a soul will think of arming themselves. But consequently, someone goin to lose their business. But please don't blame it conservatives or liberals. Blame the politicians who got the money.

Where would police ect,start to look for a body,when it could be anywhere in the world?

they would start fundamental the crime scene?
in maddies baggage,Portugal.so sad,they are presently looking for a body.
Answers: They start near the scene of the disappearance, next they look in dumpsters, they check the local trash dump. Additionally they will, whenever possible, gain a cadaver sniffing dog to check the immediate nouns. They also check with witnesses to see if the parents or anyone who have access to the room removed a suitcase or a large box on the day of her disappearance.
They should start where on earth the body being dumped. If they don't know they hold to steps back and restart where on earth the person later seen. Then broaden the circle of crime scene.

Whats your view on erap conviction (for relations in the Philippines and those who know the case :)?

Answers: Justice other prevails. He sinned against the people whom he owed his power and position previously. It's just right for him to salary his betrayal. It has be decided. He is guilty. I do still own faith contained by Philippines' Department of Justice I know they just did what is right and only.

On the otherhand, I feel intensely sorry for Erap though. I know he's not the only one who deserves this prison term. Sad to know there are still lot of his co-conspirator who are free out there, enjoy freedom while they too must pay what they've done.

Poor Erap. I hope this would serve as an eye-opener to everyone especially to our Public SERVANT Leaders.
Justice should show that not a soul is above the law, except sometimes happen. But his convection should be the warning to the present, and adjectives presidents that if you plunders people's blood money should be put to life detention.
He's being a hero to poor citizens, it will remain. But to the rich people he is their milking cow.
I really dont know anything roughly the law but what i know and believe is whether he is guilty or not he deserves a better judgment than what has be given to him. He is simply a victim of political tyrrany within our country that i The government used its power to covering the more grouesome acts of corruption and political mischiefs surrounded by our country. They cannot hide it because it's so big and co unashamed that they had to overthrow a once powerful man to cover themselves up...Now this is what they phone call a Democratic Country? they must be kidding.
He should be guilty and the conviction simply serves him right. It would be a lesson to those who are corrupt. No one should be above the law and he should be guilty of using Filipinos tariff money as his own. People earn money the hard means of access and pays taxes in command for our country to be better and should not be used as personal wealth. I basically feel really grief-stricken that a lot of ethnic group still believe that he should be vindicated. He created a Jose Velarde bank details for what reasons?? please explain to me the most important reason you necessitate to hide your actual identity specially when it involves money? that basically vehicle that something fishy is going on. Bottomline, he stole money from the people and no thing how old he is or what his form condition is, justice wishes to be served. People should not tolerate this kind of stuff. He is getting special treatment anyway which as it is make it unfair.

My employer has be mispaying me since November 2006, do they owe me compensation?

I have talk to HR and the lady their reckon that not, at the end of this month I will receive the lb5,000 they owe me. But my arguement is that I could enjoy been acquirement interest on this money if they had remunerated me right in the first place. Does anyone know if here is any president or case canon regarding this topic.

Thank You.
Answers: I focus your right, the money has be making interest for them all that time when it should own been making interest for you.

Unfortunately I don't focus there's any legal process you can claim back the interest you've lost from them, as long as they retribution you back the lb5000 they owe you.

Making interest by holding vertebrae other peoples money is a much more common business practice than you might deem, and isn't illegal as far as I know.
None that I am aware of.

I doubt that a tribunal would hold an employer liable for interest payments providing the employer could demonstrate that the error be unintended.
Only if you want to take your covering to a solicitor which may end up costing more than any interest you may or may not own earned.

The just thing the firm owes you, is the money that they hold miscalculated.

How comes you didn't spot that mistake? November 2006... thats almost a year ago!

lol. I think you owe your firm and explanation as to why you be so slow to notice,
You could argue the reality that you've lost out typical interests rates and they would be forced to pay you fund the difference if you took it to court.

However, you'll probably hack them off so fruitless in the process you'll requirement to find another job...

My proposal, take your lb5,000 and look at it as a nice bonus and dont verbs about the couple of hundred interest you would own lost IF you have save ALL the monies...
i really would not recommend pursuing it any further as will rock the boat with you r employer and will not be a large amount anyways.

just delight in the lump sum and treat ya self to a nice holiday / car/ PS3 or something and carry on as middle-of-the-road.
hi, yes you can look here
http://direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/Emplo...

but from my experience the costs involved in claiming it and the desperate relationship encured with your employer a moment ago to gain a few quid. its not worth it

maybe ask them for a upright will gesture on top. (weekend away contained by rome for example)

no harm contained by asking, it worked for me :)

good luck
Yes you could enjoy charged interest on top.

But if they are now going to earnings you and you recieve it (bank the lb5000) then you may be deem as accepting that offer and would not predictable be able to claim interest on top.

No baggage law that i am aware of.of late county court procedure rules .there is a set amount laid down which you could own used as a guideline (even though not using the court)

What is your reaction going on for Former President Joseph Estrada was found guilty on his plunder grip?

Answers: He should've been guilty near perjury too. Also, His son and then-counselor Spirman or whatever his pet name is, should've been convicted near plunder also.

More Questions and Answers:
[424] - [1341] - [2562] - [1972] - [451] - [583] - [981] - [1241] - [2324] - [1854] - [142] - [2522] - [938] - [2086] - [2444] - [1000] - [1079] - [1746] - [1450] - [1208]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: