Law Questions and Answers

How much time will one serve for these charges?

If one got out of prison four months ago (26yrs old) next two months later get caught being below the influence, spent four hours at the local police station and released but never made it to court. Then got arrested for august theft auto two months following...how much time would one serve? Including the time they would be given for violating parole? And they are a California resident.

Serious answers merely
Answers: It is hard to enlighten for sure without knowing what the offense be that resulted in the prison commitment. Being beneath the influence of a drug is a misdemeanor with a 90 year minimum and a one year maximum. (Health and Safety Code section 11550.) Grand theft--auto can be charged as a misdemeanor next to a one year top, or as a felony with a selection of punishment of 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years. (Penal Code sections 487, 489.)

It is predictable with his copy that the charge would be filed as a felony, not a misdemeanor. He can go and get up to one year on a parole violation.

He could bring back an added one year for the prior prison term. (Penal Code article 667.5.) However, if the prior is serious or violent felony, making it a "strike," it would double the possible sentence on the investigational felony offense (but not on the misdemeanor or parole violation).

It is not at all unshakable that all of these different charges could or would result in consecutive sentences.
Well this stint probably won't be so long, but at 26 and someone is still have trouble staying out of prison they are probably going to be in and out for a while.

I'd be more worried just about what the rest of their life is going to be approaching.
not sure if a violations still 6 mos UI..
GTA a bright beef..
If u ask me u should b askin ur self y at 26 r u still runnin about gettin locked up an aswell as that ur not even contained by ur own country ur in England an still committing offence over here so i would ask ur self how long u think it will be till u r deported.

Help!!! Employer stealing hours and always giving runaround, please give support to!!!?

My mother works in this private nursing home within Texas, the owner from the nursing home is someone who could careless roughly her employees or any of their concerns, this is a female who charges from the elderlies families more or less $3500 from each creature staying in the nursing home and she have about 12 of them contained by this home. My mother gets compensated bi-weekly and its always matching problem, she has to count her hours on the time card they punch contained by and out with on some weak school piece of equipment because she always get paid smaller number hours that what she works, this employer pays them pretty much whatever she feel like-an example: my mother will work 112 hrs in 2 weeks and she'll reward her 101 hrs regular time and 8 hrs overtime which is ridiculous, this is the same problem beside each hand, and whats worse is each time they transmit the lady who does the time sheets for them and payroll she say "I have 5 children and that she doesn't own time" which is bs, can anything be done? please help!!!!
Answers: Report this worthless bastard to the department of labor. Also go and get a lawyer because your mom will necessitate his/her services real soon. I use to work for a local drugstore which I will not mention its term would pay me for 15 or 20 hours but I worked closer to 35 to 40 hours. Don't agree to this person procure away with this because he will not stop contained by till he is thrown away in penal complex. I believe it is a federal crime to change the amount of hours an member of staff has worked contained by a week or in a bi week pay-out cycle.
check this link its polite


http://datentryworksworkathomeobs.blogsp...



.
Your mother should document every week exactly how many hours she worked, exactly what she did recieve wage for, and the instance in which she brought this to the employer attention w/ no result. She should then cart this information to the State Labor Board.

Hey, i kinda wanted more insight on whether or not citizens felt free?

Please use the relationship below.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
Its a continuation of my last sound out.
Thanks!
Answers: A simple question which yield a complex answer. Do i "feel" free? By reading your previous post I assume that you are citing freedom granted by a nation, but I feel more freedom is restrained by businesses, corporations, and study institutions. Consider this. In America, the right to bear arms (firearms) is a constitutional right guaranteed to most citizens. This method that if you wanted, you could transport a weapon down a busy city street without consequence. It is an extraordinarily generous freedom. Until you realize that any business, corporation, or any other place that has a toll id number, will not allow you to pilfer them on their premises. What are you supposed to do, leave it on the street? I believe as a country, America grant an extraordinary amount of freedom, but lesser bodies nick much of it away.

Is the following sexual harassment?

I've be having probelms next to my manager. He's a solid, lazy, sexist pig. The other mediator has notcied, but we've adjectives been complaining too much. Anyway, tonight I be washing the dishes and he come over to me. He looked around, I was working near two other guys one is my boyfriend, and he was holding a piece of butter. When he made sure no one be around, he told me we should have a butter time of war and spread it all over respectively other. I was shocked and he walk away. I told my boyfriend and texted my other manager. I call the main superior and he came within and had a chitchat with the supervisor causing trouble, but what if he call me a liar? I swear this happen! I dunno if they will beilieve me cause of adjectives the other compliants. I'm scared of losing my opening. Did I over-react with calling what he said sexual harrying? Help please!!
Answers: You didnt over react. You did exactly the right point. There are weaker people who would own kept their mouths shut. You will not lose your job, if you do you own grounds for a lawsuit and a fat settlement and you will never enjoy to work again. In fact if you be truely malicious or he keep on harassing you go to the corporate organization and complain. They might fire the manager cause trouble and compensate you for your emotional distress. You did the right article. GO to work as normal, pretend nil happened and if it happen again do the same entry. ANd make sure your boyfriend does do anything chivalricly stupid close to beat the crap out of the guy.
Hi starsky, Good or Bad ... Just try to protect yourself by your own... Here the own mechanism your body,mind or even you can call it as soul.

Seek third person's facilitate when the situation troubles you more. In ths case it seem the over reaction. But zilch wrong with you.

In society everyone is culprit within every stage/ any aspect. Try to believe you with the aid of your super power. Here the super power in the sense is your self-confidence.

Take strictness..
I think you did right to complain. And adjectives the complaints would actually work to your favor, not against it. But if you complain again (and if this or anything similar happen again), I would suggest avoiding calling the problem manager any name (like a fat, good-for-nothing, sexist pig).

Say what he did, say how it make you feel (uncomfortable, angry, depressed, etc.). But avoid the name-calling or it may come across similar to you are only doing it because you don't resembling his personality, and not because he make you uncomfortable.

And similar to the first one said, keep a log of the occurrence. Maintain a log of the date and time and what occurred (what be said or what he did). If you can convince others to do so it will help greatly. After you've gotten a few date it may help to permit the top management know you're keeping the log (it may get them afraid you are getting ready to sue). A lawsuit is among the scariest things a business can facade (especially if multiple employees are involved), and this should closing with the problem examiner being dismissed.

I would recommend that if he is fired, even after he is fired you should maintain that log. The management may settle on you get rid of the entire "problem" (which they may see as including you), and the log is evidence your advocate could use against the company if you choose to follow legal recourses if explicitly the route they choose to take.
You own to report sexual harassment. There is a casual based on your work history and experience that they could elect to permit you go. It is illegitimate for them to fire you based on the certainty that you alleged sexual harassment, but that doesn't denote that they can't find another reason. If you are a honest employee and they are qualified manager, they will investigate your claims and make a suitable decision in the order of future recourse. They should also cooperate to other people that be working that night and also look at previous incidents if they become relevant.

As far as the actual incident itself, it is really a tough bid. It really comes down to how it made the people around within feel. You enunciate that you don't really care for the administrator anyway. That could be construed as you trying to find the smallest thing to complain in the order of. I am sure that is what he would voice. Also, it comes down to the tone. I have worked within highly sensitive environments and also places that be more tolerant. In both places I have hear language abundantly stronger than what you have alleged.

Overall I say-so this, if you were honestly offended at the comment and the track it was said and not of late who said it, you did the right thing to report it.
You did the right entry. As suggested, keep a diary of anything that he does or say that makes you self-conscious.

I work for a large company, and every year, at our annual assemblage, this topic gets address.

It's about *your* perception. If it make you uncomfortable, it's sexual harrassment.
I expect the manager know better than to fire anyone for complaining that they're being sexually tense. First, it would open them up to bearing more legal problems, because (hopefully) you would sue the crap out of them. I don't reckon that it was overreacting to share your manager and your boyfriend, overreacting would hold been if you attacked him or demanded that he be fired or something. I've see women sue for thousands of dollars over less -- THAT's overreaction. Just stick to your guns and emergency respect.

Can i keep my neighbour for myself?

i`ve hear in statute if anything (like a football) lands in my garden i can rightfully keep it. if i can seize my attractive female neighbour to hurdle over into my garden, can i keep her as all right?
Answers: If you find her in your garden pocket her to the police. If no one claims her contained by 3 months she's yours.
Is it not a case of possession is nine tenths of the imperative?? Somethings like that! Go for it mate, right luck!

But it might just work the other instrument round too... eg. if you neighbour chucks crap / rubbish / dog poo... into YOUR garden, is it then yours and you own to clear it up?!

LOL
Yes:- It's the same as branches overhanging tour garden,
your allowed to prune, cut, or procure any satisfaction you similar to out of it, but it is still the property of your neighbour, and must be returned to him. in what ever condition you deduce best.
LOL
You failed to mention...does your attractive neighbor (American spelling) hold an attractive husband? If he is smaller than you, keep her if she trespasses. However, if he is bigger than you, you'd better throw her spinal column. Otherwise, it could get gruesome!
no.that is kidnap.
If she has kids, they come too. throw her rear legs quick.
Well if to be precise what the Law say's then perchance. Although the neighbour might have some objection.
Give your theory a try and consent to the rest of us know how it turns out.
if its a good out come afterwards i see a niegbour of mine i think psyche like to hang on to as well, or at lowest have her preserve me when i jump surrounded by her garden.

this is a great theory. hope it works..lol..
This used to be the travel case, but many States hold now adopt catch and release law. Depending on your State, you may be entitled to keep her for up to 3 hours, but afterwards she must be released into her natural habitat. Of course, if you treat her right during that time, she may be tempt to jump the balustrade again.

Who thinks the Geneva Convention rules should not be applied to the time of war on terrorism?

It should not be.
We should not be sending U.S. Troops to Court Martial for what they did to terrorists.

It's not fair.

How can you put rules on something close to war and even worse we own to faollow rules of engagement on an enemy that know no rules.

Example if an insurgent runs into a shcool or a mosque we can blow it up or shoot but if it's one of our guys I'll jus say look at 9/11


There is something wrong near this system.
Answers: I agree with what you are maxim ... to a point. This is not your conventional war where on earth you have a set enemy, you seizure them, get info and after when the war is over , permit them go. This is a period of war where we don't know who the antagonist even is. It could be a small group of people or an entire religions worth of associates OR an entire ethnic areas worth of people. But the United States have to stick with our standards of how we operate with associates and not lower ourselves to their level. If we do that, we are no better later they are. I think we can carry on and someday come out ahead using the tactics we other have that present us dignity and grace. That's what these people are overprotective of after all.
I necessitate no convincing of this as I recall next to perfect clarity the events of '93 and what the Al-Queda back Islamic radicals are experienced of.


I'd waterboard a nun if it were believed she possessed intel that could amass American or allied lives.
That makes us freshly as bad as them and do you conjecture a 14 yr raped and murdered while not wearing a uniform should pay the price for blokes that cant maintain it in their pant.
Come on what happened to person accountable for your travels.
Also the Japanese didn't abide by the Geneva convention in WW2 a short time ago ask the POW's that were contained by their camps and how did that oblige their war try.
We know the realities of a time of war, that is why we despicable it so much that, in the worst scenario, the Geneva Convetion mandate the Rules of War. But if you think fairness demands a "tooth for a tooth" consequently fairness would be a curse to civilization. Knowing that terrorists know no convention, respect no people's rights, and act next to much emotion, it would be foolish to invoke fairness to catch even. In fact, getting even should not even be the conviction of empire wishing to destroy terrorism.

Perhaps our nation's leaders have forgotten, and are not rule us, that the only channel civilized world should handle conflicts is through the negotiate table, where party enter into a compromise to gain each other's respect, and not be in somebody`s space one's will to the other.
Generally war is between two or more nation.The winner have the right to appropriate the land conquered by him and
pinch enemy soldiers as 'prisoners of war'.
On the other paw, the terrorists' attack is sudden and aimed at 'intimidating the polple' only. It is an engagement between police and individuals or groups.So "time of war against terrorism" is like Don Quixote tilting his sword against windmills!
For nearly a decade much ado have been made in the order of terrorists, but no authentic records hold been made nor their profile could be delineate!
It follows that all this elevated talk something like terrorism is a big ploy to hide the TRUE
intentions.

Why only Reliance Fresh stores are asked to close within U.P.? Why not others like - Subhiksha, Spencer, Vishal?

Answers: People are never exposed to super flea market culture. Only operators similar to Reliance can break the middle men network and bring the prices down. No small business man can bye outdo the the strong middle men network who draw from the lion's share just by sitting between producer to consumer.
because near might be huge unemployment within the state.
and after the organised sector starting a retail chain similar to reliance fresh many vegetable wholesaler would be added in the severance chain.
and as for expressly reliance is consent!
the got might own problem with the ambani bothers.
Nowadays the Reliance company is too big consequently subiksha,spencers
if the reliance come to retail sector entairly,most of retailer will be affected by it because most of general public choose the reliance to puchase.the reliance will be attrect most people by their show room and price ect.and another item it is most pupolar among the people so it will arising laying-off to poor retailer and it will be affecting their life also...
U.P management ordered closure of all organised retail stores and set up a panel to review the policy on allowing such outlets - which enjoy become the target of attack by small traders. its not only reliance frenh, but also stores similar to Spencers asked to close. this will help the small retail traders not getting exploited from big shops.
dear friend
if you really want to see the common sense
what is the use
there is feeble saying
don't see the evil
don't hear the evil
don't speak the evil
immediately add an extra
don't think the evil
contained by all forms
It may be because the Ambanis get some special favors from Mulayam Singh in return for money and presently Mayawati wants her cut immediately that she is cheif minister.

Who has the right to pick an auto shop to seize the car fixed?

My cousin just now hit a car by calamity and caused body impairment to the quarter panel of his neighbor's car. Now, his neighbor requirements to take it to a saloon shop and get it fixed for $700 but my cousin's friend, who owns his own shop, can fix it for $650. The problem is his neighbor wishes to take it to the $700 shop and is asking my cousin to settle up for it - Keep in mind that both party didn't report the accident to their insurance company and no police report be written- but my cousin thinks they're ripping him sour soo my question is if my cousin have a right to get the sports car fixed to any shop he wants because he's the one paying for the wrong or does the neighbor have the right to pick the shop because it be their car that be hit.
Answers: I would offer the neighbor $650.00 and tolerate him get it fixed any place he chose.
I hope you don't lug this the wrong way, but I'm going straight to deep logistics and pulling no punches. The neighbor calls the shots, plain and simple.

Well, seeing how your cousin hit another saloon... he's obligated to go the track of the neighbor, especially since that he got by on suitable graces by the neighbor. Whom, contained by fact, save your cousin's insurance record. I don't regard as a measly "$50" savings is a valid point contained by this case. Your cousin would hold to pay a greater amount, if the misfortune went through the regular insurance cycle. I don't think your cousin is contained by any position to play hard globe.
no doubt the neigbor as it be his car that get smashed, now if the place your cousin wishes to take it is a accurate place and is cheaper, the neighbor could be accomodating and take it in that, but as has be stated above the fact that this quirk wasnt reported to the insurance company is pretty darn accomodating in of itself, im afraid your cousin is up the provierbial creek, although he should ask to see the estimate to label sure the neighbor isnt trying to fleece him for a couple extra bucks

What are non negotiable barabonds?

I'm not even sure if its surrounded by the right category
Answers: bearer bonds, in the weak days in the USA be a way ethnic group usually with high-ranking net worth to stash and hold access to large amounts of monies that could not be traced

In common one could purchase bearer bonds from large venue of corporations, state, local government, when you purchased the bear bond on the bottom would be little tickets so to speak that would season at certain times surrounded by which the person holding the ticket could redeem the it for dosh at almost any bank contained by the world no questions asked

thus government could not traced back to find out who cashed the ticket disappearing no trial
It's 'bearer bonds'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearer_bond

A bearer bond is like change, except it represents a share in a company. It's essentially cash to be precise backed by a private interest instead of a management.
That's "Bearer Bonds." They are financial instruments used in significant transactions, for example one company buying another in a different country. "Non-negotiable" process that if they are lost or stolen they can't be cashed in.

Restraining Order-state to state?

I am thinking about issuing a restraining writ against a family partaker in Ohio (I live within Idaho). If I do issue one, would she have to show up surrounded by court here? I would rather not hold that happen. Are at hand any differences or specifics in issuing one from one state to the other?
Answers: No, the other delegation would not have to show up, but most of them want to come to court to contest a restraining lay down.

R.O's are a restriction of someones freedom of movement and cannot be permanently issued in need the restrained party have his/her day within court. If that person chooses to not to show up to contest it, that's their problem and the establish is usually issued.

As to out-of-state issue: As far as I am aware, all states honor respectively others restraining orders. Always check next to your local DA's office for guidance.
Not really. She wouldnt own to show up in court. Provided yo uhave satisfactory evidence to get a restraining charge it jsut requirres the judges signature and that she is informed of the proclaim, usually by an officer of the court. Dont let the certainty that its state to state deter you if it is the right thing to do. If you are not sure, receive one and ere on the side of caution. I am a Criminal Justice student and hold heard adjectives too many stories in the order of people mortal lax with their restraining instructions.

More Questions and Answers:
[571] - [2249] - [2236] - [63] - [2254] - [860] - [531] - [919] - [556] - [1238] - [810] - [637] - [1339] - [2069] - [2559] - [2321] - [1321] - [1631] - [202] - [1842]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: