Law Questions and Answers
Was 911 an inside job?
Professor Steven Jones have actually tested steel sample from the towers, he definitely found thermate traces. The one most important thing he did point out be 'yellow molten metal' flowing from the impact floors. Its on adjectives the news footage so theres no denying it happen. Now the only objects on earth that can flow wan in a solution state is thermate (Im no scientist but I would presume its the sulfur that makes it appear pallid.) Now Ive seen the video, so have millions of folks , most without realising what they be looking at. But Steven Jones is a very widely read man, he studies things like this, and I believe what he have found is definite proof of thermate adjectives charges. If you believe Bush's story or not you need to see a free to air doco call "911 Mysteries" it offers up a multitude of reason why 911 happened the passageway it did, most if not adjectives of them scarily believable..The film architect Sofia Smallstorm cannot tell you that it unequivocally was an inside position, all she does is present the facts and once youve watch it you will start thinking.that much I can promise you.
And one more entry while Im here..the Bush apologists will always argue that the steel didnt want to melt to raison d`être the floors to collapse, thats fair plenty BUT. What they expect us to believe is that the support clips all messed up at the impact floors which caused a pancake effect right??? Seems approaching a reasonable argument, even the officeholder report tells us the floors pancaked. But at hand is one major flaw that they cant explain and Ill communicate you what it is. For a floor to pancake it has to fall over through space to hit the floor beneath it, this breaks the supports holding up the lower floor and so on (about 80 times till the mass reaches ground smooth.) now even if we confer each floor an amazingly speedily half second to travel through that space crushing adjectives the support steel, girders, steel mesh, interior walls, office furniture etc, the actual world time for the impact floors to reach ground even should have be around 40 seconds!!! (thats 80 storeys collapsing within a half second respectively!!!!
That plainly did not happen because THERE WAS NO PANCAKING!!!! The towers dropped inside 14 seconds, almost as efficient as freefal speed!!! And the only course that could have happen was by severing the 48 steel columns at the core, and probably severing the foundation steel surrounded by the basements also, there is no two ways roughly it.
The Bush apologists physics dont hold up to scrutiny, they dont hold up to critical analysis, and why so many video all over the network showing survivors and firemen, cops and reporters all mentioning explosions inside the buildings?
Answers: The recognized govt investigation told us the twin towers pancaked, so you folks who are saying it be just a collapse are limp wrong. How can you defend the govts performance yet state that it didnt start that way?
Just study the free movie "911 mysteries" it will make believers out of adjectives of you.
Here are a few facts about 911;
1.Put option placed in finance and traced back to Buzzy Krongard
http://www.hereinreality.com/insidertrad...
2.Complete Norad stand down
http://standdown.net/
3.No public servant explanation for WTC7s collapse
http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/comm...
4.Larry Silverstein admitted that WTC be 'pulled' (Dems slang for dropping a building).
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter...
5. Silverstein awarded billions in insurance payout for towers collapse.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/silver...
6.Osamas confession video a complete put-on
http://www.911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVid...
7.Saudi hijackers still alive
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1...
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and...
http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
8.Thermate used in towers collapses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wVLeKwSk...
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06...
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/jun...
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/arc...
9.No motion picture released from the 84 security cameras surrounded by and around the pentagon Why not? All we have see is 5 doctored frames which show nothing.
http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm
10.Steel girders found over 400 foot from the twin towers? If thats not proof of explosives what the hell else do you need?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2aJSbSX-...
Scientists own done a study on the WTC buildings showing cars parked half a mile away from ground zilch seem to own had steel parts melt, and yet doesn`t matter what melted the steel did not trash the upholstery or plastic dashboard inside the cars. Dr. Wood also shows that Applied Research Associates were involved contained by the NIST reports, and that they are a manufacturer of Directed Energy Weapons. This shows a “conflict of interest” contained by producing a truthful report.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/shake.html
http://whatreallyhappened.com/9-11_wtc_v...
And folks thats just the start, if adjectives thats not enough to obtain yall thinking then nearby is nothing I can do for you, yall are beyond give support to.
God bless and remember..always deliberate for yourself.
And let's not forget:
-lack of air defense response
-the collapse of Building 7 (never be hit)
-Insider trading
-FBI/CIA coverups
-FOUR hijackings in one morning???
I believe that sulfur is a component of airline fuel -- which would make happen the particular coloration you are discussing -- hold on to in mind that in attendance were lots of other particle in the atmosphere at the time as well.
If something resembling this were even possible, I dream up we would have hear more about it from others.
As to the pancaking -- the time per floor is going to decrease exponentially as the floors fall -- the first couple of floors may bear half a second, but the second ones would take a tenth or smaller number -- which would cause the time conundrum you are concerned almost.
their is proof tat 911 was an inside mission. Peploe who deny it belive everything the ruling elite update them 2, like worldwide warming is cased by teh greenhouse effect and pelople who cant spell are idiots.
~~always dream up 4 yourself.~~
STOP PLEASE.
You are insulting millions of Americans with your crazy assertions.
IF this crazy whoever that "found thermite" on the steel in actual fact tried looking for the it. He would have NEVER in fact found anything looking through millions of tons of rubble.
Plus IF it were detonated here would have be blast caps and Hundereds of miles of rope to do a timed detonations that you assume there be.
Finally, Have you ever seen Mythbusters? Do you enjoy ANY idea how complicated it is to time a simultaneous detonation? With Literally Billions of people watching contained by real time?
It is IMPOSSIBLE.
I believe it. People can claim it be the result of jet fuel...but you're right, it be pretty much free fall speed. The individual way a building can trickle that fast is from a controlled demolition.
Also...MANY buildings hold had buildings hit by planes, & the flames be contained to the few stories surrounding the impact. Those flames burned & festered for HOURS, but those buildings did not fall over.
But your question, be it an inside job? I believe that here are definitely some secret revolving around that day. The opinion, though, of the government self the masterminds astern it is really too scary to imagine about.
Also...deduce about how much time & money be pumped into Lewinskygate. Only a FRACTION of that amount was used for the 9/11 commission report. Why???
Gosh, you must be right...that explains why Osama be bragging about it too after it happen. Osama even said he hoped the towers would fall, but didn't expect them too. Plus, the smoke and driftwood pretty much clouded any real video so the pancake argument is just a best guess contained by my mind. What about newly the center of the structure collapsing and the rest falling in over itself? I'm no scientist, but what are the reasons for it human being an inside job afterwards? No mention of that.
Believe what you want. But I don't think our command is capable of pulling past its sell-by date something this big. Shady deals? yep. Minor things close to a car stroke of luck? Sure. But this is just approach too big for them in my evaluation.
I am really starting to get annoyed at the simple minds that believe this CRAP!
Have you never watch the programmes on tv showing the demolition crews blowing down buildings? Have you noticed the warren of wiring they use? How would a few hundred miles of electric wiring be snuck into each tower, remember nobody saw this, put within place, and hidden? How going on for all the holes that hold to drilled into columns to place the charges? How were those drilled, thousands and thousands of them, next to nobody noticing? How did nobody make out thousands of charges being haul in, placed surrounded by those holes, and then disguised? The logistics are mind-boggling. There would have be hundreds and hundreds of workers required to set this all contained by place, thousands of people when you bring surrounded by to play the planners, engineers, suppliers, carriers, etc. Somebody would enjoy blabbed. Sorry, IT IS CRAP!!!!!!
Every one knows it be a Bush white house conspiracy the aircraft was remote control ed adjectives four of them.and if you people believe this" you will believe anything. God minister to all of us. Aman.
Wow, umm ...wow.
Well let start with that video evidence...
First, adjectives charges do not "flow" as you describe. While I am not familiar beside the specific footage you are referring to, it is not relevant. A cutting charge would not do it's opportunity and then be perceptible flowing out a burning and collapsing building.
Second, the collapse was a hell of deeply more involved than what you are portraying here. The supporting structure was heated to the point it become malleable. In doing so the floors sagged and the structural supports bowed. Clear evidence of this can be see in the video. The first evidence of this is the falling pieces of the exterior disguise. This can be seen adjectives for a significant period of time prior to the collapse. The second evidence of this is clearly see in video shot surrounded by the last few minutes prior to the collapse: the floors above the fire begin to drop down onto the burning floors. There are huge fractures mostly visible within shots showing the corners of the building. Perhaps the most important video evidence is the collapse itself. There is no explosion, here is simply a collapse. The explosion resulting from charges sufficient to cause the collapse would own been clearly distinct in the video, but none exists.
And finally, the nail surrounded by the coffin in this ridiculous view is this statement "the only means of access that could have happen was by severing the 48 steel columns at the core, and probably severing the foundation steel surrounded by the basements also, there is no two ways in the order of it." Again, the video clearly shows the failure origniates at and above the floors tattered at impact, not lower down.
And one more piece...there is plenty of video taken over the entire event specifically close enough to hear both refuse and bodies impacting at street level. There is no audio evidence of any explosions.
As to the notion, it is riciculous in so various ways it is not necessary to verbs. Try doing a little research into what it take to bring down a building in a planned evolution.
The collapse is anarchic, the failure point is clear. The principle it happens so efficient is because the failure mode be the top 30 or so floors collapsing onto the floors below. It was not a pancake down through respectively floor.
If you are going to propose a theory, it is across the world a good model to do so with some forethought and intelligence fairly than blind hatred and idiocy.
Obviously it be. Par for the course for the Bush regime.
Please help, I involve legal push for on a notice of levy?
can someone please share me if they can take my home on a levy of 6500 dollars? what can i do to stop this from scheduled to me , i live in missouriAnswers: I am going to assume this levy is toll related. If so the ultimate answer is yes, but please do not madness. The levy you speak of will not likely do that, provided you pocket action. The levy is intended to confiscate the property to collect taxes owed.
Financial difficulties probably led to this, and most possible you were unsure of what to do, so took no behaviour to resolve the issue. If you can pay you must take-home pay as soon as possible. If you can not do so immediately, you must attempt to find a road to do so. I ahve no idea what your situation is, but within extreme circumstances you may need to give somebody a lift extreme steps to resolve the issue. If you can sustain your household financially were the debt to be self-satisfied, you should consider raising anything cash you can to thrill the debt, through whatever channel you can.
I am not an attorney, and regrdless of what anyone says to you here, you inevitability to contact one. Most will give you an initial consult for free, or for a small charge.
Your question is somewhat muddled -- what type of levy?
If you are in trouble of losing your home, contact an attorney in your nouns (find one at www.findlaw.com) or check with your local permitted clinic (most law school have one. )
If you obligation Legal Advice, try the site below. Watch the movie presentation. This will get you access to a TOP Law Firm.
This is my personal belief, who agrees/disagrees.?
To many family today do not carry valid permit and this hiners law enforcement and cost the excise payers. I believe a mandatory 30 day young offenders` institution term if any directive enforcement official finds someone next to no valid identification.Answers: yes, agreed, unless they can produce one inside a reasonable amount of time. (left it at home or something)
I also give attention to a national ID, or standardizing state licenses/ID's and putting them on a federal database should be in establish.
It already exists; it's called "bomb to identify." But it's not an automatic jail sentence of any possession - that would violate the due process clause. When the person attempts to bond out his identity will become agreed since a bondsman won't bail out an anonymous person (he requirements to be sure he gets his money).
Think almost it: do you really want the cops and courts to have the power to pick you up sour the street and toss you in secure unit without an arraignment or a bond audible range?
enforcing such a rule breeds a police state/dictatorship. I own been places where on earth you have to own your ID papers "on your person" at all times--that purely breeds an atmosphere of fear and suspicion.
You are other looking over you shoulder, wondering when the local police will stop you, just because you "don't belong" and you surface guilty, whether or not you have done anything wrong.
I completely disagree. If you are truly concerned roughly speaking taxpayer money, then the cost to incarcerate them would be ALOT more. They should charge them with something sharp, but certainly not at the cost of the taxpayers. We own paid dearly already if they are unsanctioned aliens, should we pay more?
Disagree! There are too copious people within jail already wasting the toll payers money. No need to increase our cost to take-home pay for someone not carrying identification. Afterall, if they enjoy no I.D. on them, the police will do a search anyway.
Or, how 'bout simply implanting micro chips within every ones hand or forehead?
Here within the UK we do not carry ID to that extent. It is usually required with the sole purpose when proof of age is needed to buy ciggarettes or alcohol I do not believe that we should be forced to carry ID within the UK. Having said that, I think it will become decree as more people from other countries come to Britian criminally. I guess it's just something we eventually own to get used to. I agree next to the others that jail vocabulary are not the answer. It costs taxpayers a fortune to keep these ethnic group behind bar, which I dont mind, if it is for something serious, not lack of 'up to date' ID .
A bit cruel, so I'd have to disagree. The creature who said about tatoos is on the right track. Why don't we adjectives get RFID devices implanted within our bodies so we can be tracked where ever we stir.
That's a bit scary for me. Goverment's power should be fixed because absolute power corrupts absoutely.
I consider it's absurd. I do ponder that is credible to require people to hold ID with them if they are driving, and from a practical standpoint I feel people should convey ID with them when they are out within public lest something happen (i.e. you are contained by an accident) and they need to manage your family, etc. but lock away time for not having self w/ you if you are out walking your dog or a passenger in someone's saloon is absurd (though the practice might be unwise)
If somebody calls the police on someone?
is that call revenge or getting evenAnswers: Depends. If they are reporting an actual crime, its called any doing their civic duty or snitching depending upon whom you talk to. If they are making up a crime, its call filing a myth and is punishable by fine or imprisonment.
Calling police by somebody on some one can be getting even. It should not be call as reveange. If one wants to embezzle revange by calling police the concerned has to facade the music through police for filing a false complaint For taking revange at hand are somany ways , other than calling the police.
Custody and visitation issues?
My childrens biological father was just this minute relised from prison. I gave birth to my twin daughters while he be in prison and he is not on the birth certificet. The children hold my last baptize, and live with me. The singular thing that he have is a paternity test stating he is the biological father.They hold never met their father. I have be supporting them and we do not have a child support agreement as of this moment. We do hold a court date in Oct for child support to be set up.
What I am wondering is does he enjoy any custody toward the children? Can he come and snatch them up from day effort if he finds out where they are and I can do zilch about it? Do I involve to go and wallet for custody for my children and state what visitation I want him to have if any? I live within california.
Answers: I can not specifically speak to the law within California and you should consult an attorney licensed in California to expressly insist on you. In general, the mother is the unprocessed guardian and presumed custodial parent of children born out of wedlock. Many states also hold statutes that once a child support order is enter, the recepient is also considered to be the custodial parent even if the Court order does not say aloud that the payor has any parental visitation or contact rights. However, once a man is deem to be the father by a Court and ordered to pay child support, he have the right to counter-sue or request custody and/or visitation rights. Please see a private attorney to advise you roughly speaking the father's rights. If an attorney from a state child support agency is representing you for child support, that attorney probably cannot give you advocate about visitation. Good luck.
First, if you chew over he would do this, let your daycare know. They should not 'release' your children to him lacking documentation indicating that he has custody or visitation.
You own your court date -- at that time you can expect him to request visitation if he is interested. Keep in mind that these are his kids too and if you want him to support them, he should do so emotionally as resourcefully as monetarily. You may want to show the judge that you are inclined to work with him by setting up supervised visitation (with a relatives member of yours or his, or a mutual friend) even since the court date. You should take the time to explain adjectives of this to your daughters, so they are aware of what is happening.
Also, you should confer to a real attorney, one who can listen to the intact story (what was he incarcerated for, how long, etc.) and comfort you with counsel that specifically meets your situation.
he will return with some kinda custody you dont have to woory in the order of him snatching them there he could do that any be but if he does it is child abduction right now he is individual the bio father wich means jack until adjectives court dates are over
What is the bill number for the anti-harassment in NY school legislation that was human being considered as of 2004
The bill would prohibit harassment and/or nouns students in New York State base on sexual orientation, femininity identity and gender expression.Please cite a source.
Answers: A. 9491--the NYC Dignity surrounded by All Schools Act (DASA), I think.
http://www.pubadvocate.nyc.gov/policy/do...
http://www.stonewalldemocratsnyc.org/Sta...
http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/studen...
Q about duke baggage?
I may be wrong, so if i am, please feel to correct me. I own heard from for a moment bird that the kids who involved in the duke rape shield was going to sue the DA, but that they did not sue the girl who lied. I denote if it was me i would sue the pant off her.appreciation!Answers: That is a good request for information. Jesse Jackson swore he would pay her style through college, whether her allegations turned out to be true or not. Maybe they can garnish her wages after (if) she former students.
If I were within their situation, I'd do much more than suing Nifong and the stripper. I'd also sue the leftist ideologues who signed those defamatory correspondence and the administration of Duke for their movements. I'd also sue the dishonest people within the media who spread libellous claims, even after the declaration of innocence.
There are alot of citizens who who acted wrongfully in this satchel and each of every one of them deserves everything they take as a result of it.
The only relatives innocent in this be the lacrosse players, the attorney general, the defense attorney, and the heroic bloggers that reported the truth.
Why sue someone who does not hold any money?
I need permitted advice concerning property law?
Please individual reply if you are educated within this area or know from experience. A friend of my sister's moved our stuff into storage for us and for some grounds, put it in his describe. He said to pay him doesn`t matter what we thought was generous, for his labor. I sent him rent money for the first month and for a lock. Since then, I've be sending the rent directly to the storge unit for days gone by few months. Recently, I had some extra money to receive my stuff out of storage. We called to consent to him know we needed the key and told him we'd be capable of pay him the subsequent week. He refused to administer us the key or sign over the section, til we paid him for his labor. I agreed to rate him $150, even though that would make it impossible for me to move my stuff that weekend. He surprised me by proverb he deserved $500. After much arguing, he is now demanding $250, which I can't afford. Is in that any way I can nick him to court and retrieve my things? He owns nothing contained by the unit & hasn't rewarded a cent toward it.Answers: you can take him to small claims court and constraint the return of your things plus court costs. Unless you have a written agreement to take-home pay him for his labor, you really don't owe him anything.
You can get free officially recognized advice on websites similar to LawGuru, FindLaw. Check this out for more info http://www.uelp.org/freelegal.html
Is there any permitted recourse I can take because of a fix Coach that I purchased on eBay?
Not only be the bag fictitious, but it was also filthy and not surrounded by 'immaculate' condition as described.The ad stated the pod was authentic and helpfully used, but in squeaky clean condition other than a slight soil blotch on the interior. Anyway, I paid $140 for this case (a style that is no longer available through Coach and I thought I would be nontoxic purchasing a gently used backpack. Obviously I was wrong.
I own filed a claim beside Paypal/eBay and have gone so far as to notify Coach that within is a fraudulent seller (one of many) and provided them beside her name and address.
Is in attendance anything else I can do? Seller is in CA and I am contained by TX. It is highly doubtful that I will acquire my money back, so I want to do everything contained by my power to take as much permitted action as humanly possible. Thank you.
Answers: depending o weather or not the hawker was a top retailer...he might decide to in recent times give your money wager on...upon receiving the item fund..AFTER you pay shipping...insurance etc...
im assuming you bought from a trusted salesperson?
ask him if he is willing to work things out until that time you leave gloomy feedback.just agree to him know...all you want is your money rear legs.that you wont even leave cynical feedback.if he is willing to work near you
i bought a fake pink pony top from e-bay..
i WOULD HAVE NEVER KNOWN!!!!
my husband bought one i *wanted* from dillards..for me for chrsistmas...and i in recent times so happened to own two of them...upon comparing the two..IT WAS SO OBVIOUS!!!
we worked together and things went my track...that was of late a 25 dollar shirt though...i dont know how someone will react to a 140 shoulder bag..
sorry to hear about this in one piece situation...i know it sucked...and im sure you were anxious as hell when you get that box.
best wishes...and dont give up!!!
EDIT~~during the time i bought the top..i come across one of those ebay guides about how to draw from your money back..imma move about look for it!
i'll keep you posted!
!@!@
EDIT
!@!@
okay.i found it..the simply thing for this to work you hold to have paypal and/or a credit card..(which have to be your original settlement method)
here ya go! =)
http://reviews.ebay.com/BUYER-BEWARE-PAY...
.
Yeah, report him for Online Fraud.
It go through the Federal Government, and the Feds don't mess around.
They ask you to submit the bag within question, they look at it, they check everything, and they may even arrest the personage. It's usually just a fine though.
that sucks..i importantly doubt that person will respond support to your emails and give you your money put a bet on...it happend to me last year i bought a set of two of shoes offline for 75.00..should of know something was up because contained by stores the shoes are regular 135.00..months and months passed and still no shoes..i contacted ebay an they said that the person have done this be4 and that its a scam..their account be deleted..pious luck!
Ok why arent the cops doing nothing bout this guy next to a gun?
i swear im scared to turn outside and the cops arent doing a crap. i mean at hand there, they get there guns organized, and there on this roof. i be going to im not even sure if its safe to turn outside cuz of this jerk. and its close to our place too. and also why do they necessitate to block the road with ther police sports car. man im mad. why are they doing nought?! >:(Answers: Sounds to me like they are doing something. They hold the area cordoned stale to keep innocent civilians from self hurt. What would you like them to do, fire a missle into the building he's within? Their main aim is to effect an arrest without anyone getting hurt, any them, civilians, or the bad guy.
you really want to rewrite your question. it does not brand any sense.the reason they block street to to hold other people from entering the nouns. it also prevents anyone insde the area will not be capable of drive out.they can take a report but unless they see it at hand is very little they can do.if you see the guy on the roof again transport a picture and show it to the cops.that will get him arrested.basically realize there is extraordinarily little they can do unless they see the guy. if you know the guys name and where on earth he lives you can make a report.this will ultimitely shift before the dignified jury to get him arrested.
----retired texas deputy sheriff----
More Questions and Answers:
[704] - [1276] - [1167] - [1863] - [1223] - [1095] - [134] - [1141] - [765] - [1985] - [1366] - [1428] - [1890] - [1917] - [1806] - [135] - [2144] - [1982] - [1207] - [2209]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: