Law Questions and Answers
Do you agree about legalization the 12.000.00 of unendorsed alien?
Answers: No.
Where can I find the right lawyer for my deaf son? What advocate would be best?I'm in Ohio.?
I asked a examine earlier, and everyone give me strength and support to fight for my sons rights. He is surrounded by first grade and be denied water as a form of punishment. What everyone didn't know is my sons a competitor too, he told me today that he held on to the school bus and kept prayerful for water, he didnt want to tender up. He finally had to physically be carried on the bus. Jake have had assessment ran to see if he have a tumor for his excessive thirst, but thank God none was found. He layed on the floor that time sobbing and shaking, scared me too annihilation!, I still cant believe they wouldnt just permit him have a drink to quinch his thirst after giving the children an extra bay on a warm daytime, and every other child got hose but my son. My husband got a simple apology from the instructor, but the principal hung up on me. She said I was simply mean, because I be outraged. She wanted to give an account me how nice the teacher be, and I didn't want to hear it. Now I need court help, but dont hold a lot of $. ThanksAnswers: Not every problem have its resolution in a court of imperative.
You have no standing to sue anyone. Your outrage does not constitute damages below the law.
Finally, love him though i'm sure you do, you enjoy to accept that a deaf 6 year dated is not a credible relater of fact. There's no method his story is true, no school would ever deprive a child of dampen.
Don't bother a lawyer near this, you have no suitcase.
simple i want say i am deaf i am contained by deaf school
simle answer or online look deak attorney or ask judge I don`t know they know
Want to save some $. Then why don't both of you clear a visit, surrounded by person, to the institution and ask what's going on?????
Or, has everything come to sue first, ask question later. This probably isn't what you want to hear, but why not hand over it a try???
I read your other question - and I am sorry to say aloud I am not nearly as warm and fuzzy in the region of the situation as the other "outraged" parents.
Your son was denied a drink - not dried up or locked in a hot box on university grounds. He has no agreed medical condition that warrants instantaneous administration of dampen.
His behavior was a problem at the time - and disruptive. I don't have a feeling the teacher acted agregiously. Unless surrounded by addition to deafness your child suffers from other issues as powerfully.
If my daughter came home and stated I wasn't allowed to shift to the drinking fountain because I was acting up - next I am not going to back her glum behavior I am going to reinforce that correct behavior is warranted within school.
I hope you do not find a advocate to take such a frivolous lawsuit. I'm sorry - it be a drink - get over it.
My Heart Goes out to you and your Family,I would enjoy been outrages by this and I would hold jumped down the Teacher throat for this.I can simply Hope that you and your Son will get even-handedness from this.Good Luck
If something is not made in America, does it enjoy to say so on the sign?
Sometimes a label will read Made for 'such-and-such' company, but it won't explain to where it's really made.I'm conversation about products sold contained by the US.
Answers: The laws alter from prodcut to product. Clothing must be labeled with country of root. Many products have no such requirement. But even those near labels can be ambiguous. A car "made within the USA" is often assembled from components made within Brazil, Mexico and Japan. Caveat emptor (buyer beware).
Actually it has to be labeled, esp. near clothing.
What I don't like is that lots things are made overseas and hardly any domestic stuff anymore. As we don't own qualified people here.
Jenna
Yes ! it's supposed to ..
What do you think of so-called recovering alcoholics, and drug users who embezzle over your home?
My 10 year old son and I are human being asked (told) to leave our home, because the owners couldn't deal in the property at the outrageous price of $800,000 for a 4-plex, so have fixed to make it a rehabilitation home for alcoholics, and drug users.Should I be PO'D as heck?
Yes it is legally recognized for them to do this, to good family.
Answers: They have probably figure a way to bilk money from the management by doing this.
hi,
wow that sounds horrible my moms a so cledd recovering acuholic and drug user and they did the same article, it must be really hard, and i would be really pissed if that happen to me, these ppl never get better, there's in recent times some ppl you have to make a contribution up on, sorry for you lose
I'd be POed for sure. this is one of the reasons I bought my house this year. I'd approaching to see them TRY to take my house. I enjoy more arms and ammo than the police department does.
if someone else owns it then you made your home surrounded by their house.
That probably means you are paying rent.
This is some one Else's property and they can do as they close to within the statute.
Its also called business.
Just another inconvenient truth.
Your landlords hold every legal right to do beside their property what they wish for the most portion. Though you may find it offensive, they are probably trying to stay afloat financially, and the property, as it stands, is operating at a loss. They may enjoy discovered that using it as a rehab will help them break even or better. I can't really blemish them for looking out for themselves.
I have rented property up to that time, and when I realized how much money it be costing, I sold it. I had to because I if truth be told needed the money. I was wretched that I had to ask them to move out, but I couldn't be expected to lose money so as to house population no matter how much I like them.
Sorry if I offend.
I'd read aloud the recovering drug addicts are alcoholics are innocent surrounded by this. How would they know the owners had kicked race out of their homes, in directive to do this?
I'm sorry this is happening to you and your son though. I hope you can find a unknown home quickly.
You can not put a facility close to that in a residential nouns without getting consent from the local command. Typically there would be a audible range at City Council, calling for locals to put their two cents in formerly the council decides whether or not the facility can be put at hand.
If there be meetings, you should enjoy gone and protested. IT might not have changed things, but at smallest you know you tried. If there be no meetings, you check the sanction of your area. It might in actuality be illegal!
sorry dear, but it is not "your home" contained by that sense...you are a renter, therefore your manager who actually owns the property and can do beside it as he pleases, subject to any applicable local laws.
it is not merely legal, but it is impeccably normal and not at adjectives unethical...and "what" the intended use of the property is is entirely neither here nor there.
sorry you have to move, but that it the lot of a renter...
if you enjoy a lease they can not break it until your lease expires
if you don't have a lease later you are S.O.L.
if you want to prevent this in the adjectives than own your home
You are a renter, and that is something you own to deal next to. BUY a house, and you won't have this problem.
And dictum "so-called" recovering addicts is totally uncalled for. As a recovered user since 1998, I can tell you that race CAN and DO get better. But lots have to enjoy help to do it. I've be clean for 9 years in a minute (and I OWN my house...)
EDIT: SORRY TRY AGAIN! THE LIBERAL STANCE WOULD BE THAT A LANDOWNER DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO KICK YOU OUT, AND THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE RIGHT TO INTERFERE IN THE ACTIONS OF A LANDOWNER.
CONSERVATIVES BELIEVE IN THE RIGHT OF THE LANDOWNER TO DO WITH HIS PROPERTY WHAT THEY SEE FIT.
SO ACTUALLY, IT'S YOU WHO SOUNDS LIKE THE LIBERAL, WHINING FOR SPECIAL INTERFERENCE IN THE RIGHTS OF A PROPERTY OWNER ..
This is a switch. Blame recovering druggies and alkies instead of President Bush? Wow!
What does your lease say almost being asked to head off the premies?
Wait...so you don't own the home???? well afterwards find another place to live.how on earth is this the blemish of alcoholics and drug users.wouldn't you have have to leave anyways(if they have sold it for the outrageous 800,000 asking price).
It is legal provided they are giving you 60 days thought.
You are renting, the owners are free to do with their property as they please, and apparently they own chosen to set up a business. Provided they give you sufficient identify they are well in their rights.
Think of it as an opportunity to find a new and better home. Anger is instinctive, however it is a complete waste of vigour.
Of course it's legal. They own the property and they can do what they want beside it.
And what's wrong with using it for a rehab? What do you hold against sick people? Would you be this upset if they be going to use it for a cancer treatment center?
Where do you get stale thinking you're such a "good" family next to an attitude like this?
Xeny----I am so sorry your duration has be disrupted in this manner-------however every cloud have a silver lining and my guess is have you stayed there something desperate may have happen to one of you------or perhaps an even better layout will come your way---------------good luck-----we effort!
My boss won't give me my check. What can I do?
I used to work at a restaurant call Qdoba mexican Grill. During that time I had frequent paychecks but lost one of them. After asking them to get me a alien one for a few months they wouldn't contact corporate. Then I found my check, but it was already expired so i still needed to grasp a new one. I brought it contained by and my manager give it to the boss/owner of the store. It has be a month and he still hasn't done anything with it. I check within every week and have departed him voicemails but there is still no stab. What is the best action to hold?Answers: Write Corporate. If that does not work. Write Corporate again threatening a lawsuit. If that does not work. Sue.
Document every contact with the restaurant, the commissioner, the owner, and corporate. All letters to corporate and the restaurant should be registered next to return receipt required.
Contact your state's labor board/department and directory a complaint.
Or sue in small claims court.
Sew him? Sew him what..a shirt, a skirt?
Contact the HR department of your corporate organization and explain the situation to them, and see if you receive any action from that.
Next time - be more responsible near your paychecks. Had someone stolen it and cashed it you would likely be SOL.
SEW HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What does the term "equitable redress" indicate in everyday English?
I'm not a imperative student, but I have to write a rag about malpractice within social work - and I have no notion what this means.Help, Please!!!
Answers: Redress mode receiving self-satisfaction for an injury sustained.
In its broadest and most general signfication, equity denotes the spirit and dependence of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate how individuals treat each other.
In a restricted sense, equity denotes equal and neutral justice as between two those whose rights or claims are in conflict; Justice, that is to say, as ascertained by natural common sense or ethical insight, but independent of a formulated body of law.
Put the two together and ya get it!
It means that the participant is seeking a fair remedy or nouns for their loss.
Equitable = fair
Redress = Relief or Compensation
Edit: Sorry I get Legal redress mixed up with equitable redress. The type of damages or redress that would be awareded would not be monetary but equal to what the pro of the loss would be. This would include specific performance or an injuntion.
A reasonable remedy of law for a wrong or injury.
In other words, the compensation awarded is within line near the damages suffered. It is used mostly in property vandalize cases.
equitable = fair
redress = compensation
In plain English it channel fair and equal settlement of a dispute. Have only just been involved contained by what is called 'Non Judicial Dispute Resolution." No lawyer or courts are involved. You could ask several people that you know that may not no you or the other side to listen to your problem and agree to abide by their declaration.
eq·ui·ty (ek'wi-tē)
n., pl. -ties.
The state, quality, or wonderful of being a moment ago, impartial, and tolerant.
Something that is freshly, impartial, and celebration.
re·dress (ri-dres')
tr.v., -dressed, -dress·ing, -dress·es.
To set right; remedy or rectify.
To make amends to.
To label amends for.
To adjust (a balance, for example).
Should home owners without children own to pay arts school tax? Why or Why not?
Is it really right that an elderly married couple next to children all contained by their 50's have to settle school toll?What about a couple who are within their late 20's who can't own children? Should they have to take-home pay a school rates?
Answers: We as homeowners are penalized next to school taxes,next to or without children. You can own a dozen children and rent instead of own and pay no institution taxes.
The laws really inevitability to be changed where if you hold school age kids you should be the ones paying,contained by fact they would receive more revenue.
I settle up school taxes every year and my son is 30 years weak.
The Texas Lotto was also for the arts school districts and they say they enjoy several billion for the schools, but still no break for the homeowners WITH NO SCHOOL AGE KIDS.
WHAT A CROCK!!!!!!!!!
I can see your point, however, I focus the answer is to give parents who hold children, a school voucher they can use any for public education (full coverage) or private tuition (whatever the voucher amount might defray from this).
I have a indisputable problem with anyone paying arts school taxes if they choose or cannot use the public school system.
I don't own children and I pay excise for schools so I get the impression both ways.
Of course those with children would enjoy to pay lots more (they usually can't) or the classes would hold to be bigger, with no goings-on like tie or sports.
It takes a settlement to raise a child. <-I didn't brand name that up.
I pay social indemnity tax every single paycheck - and within is no way contained by hell I will ever see a social security check when I realize retirement. Is that fair? Not really - but I also realize that elderly are a adjectives population and social security is a obligatory program.
Grandma and Grandpa may not have kids contained by school - but because of wage increases over the years I will put a heck of profusely more into social security than they ever did and never see a nickel
Life isn't open-minded.
Thanks- this is a fun question. I'm really enjoy the responses from people just about "community" and all that crap---the severely same people who burn Hillary alive at the stake for her "It take a village" philosophy.
Which is EXACTLY the point of your question.
America is made up of "villages" and when we adjectives pitch in, whether we reap the direct benefits from respectively and every minute action, consequently THAT makes for a better country.
Hillary is right.
Because an learned population is all that stands between democracy and facism.
Do you believe contained by paying for FEMA even if you never had a unconscious disaster. How about paying for the fire department even if you own never had a fire? In a civilized society, adjectives members settle for the betterment of all. I may never generate use of the highways surrounded by Alabama, but I don't mind paying for them. I may never need the fire department, but I don't mind paying for it. I may never requirement an elevator inspector, but I don't mind paying for it. Paying for services for the betterment of all is module of the cost of living in a democracy. Kansas may not inevitability the coast guard, but I'm sure most people in that do not mind paying for it.
You bring up a very interesting grill and their is no easy answers.
You could argue the literary people cost smaller quantity to society in the long run because they are competent to make money and become export tax payers themselves.
You could also argue that schools should be remunerated for by those who use their services.
Personally, I think we do hold to have public funding of college to provide a basic instruction to all. However, we requirement to eliminate public school and create real competition in private schools. Every parent should hold a voucher to pay for the nurture that is needed for their child.
We adjectives must pay for instruction, but not the horrific public school surrounded by this country.
Yes. Think of it like this: you are paying to coach children who, for the most part, are going to grow up to become contributing member of your community by working in such areas as the utility companies you use, owning businesses that you purchase produce from, and paying taxes of their own for the same services you expect from your community. Imagine if populace with no kids did not enjoy to pay taxes, and that designed there be not enough money for your community train its children. One of two things would happen: you appendage up paying more taxes anyway for state programs like Medicaid, food stamps, and academy vouchers, or the town starts to dry up as parents leave for towns where on earth their children can attend school more confidently.
Educating children is the future for adjectives of us. Somebody's child rings up your groceries at the store, cuts your hair, deliver gas to the station so you can have it for your own vehicle, cooks your food at your favorite restaurant, reads your hose down meter or electric meter- well, you draw from the idea.
Real Estate 101:
Good school raise home values
Poor school lower home values
Paying taxes to help a conservatory district is like ensure the value of your greatest asset: your home.
Also, contained by many communities seniors over 65 can flile an exemption from paying college taxes.
Ya know, as a father of 4 and a grandfather of 5, I don’t mind paying a “school tax”… what bothers me is; that the tax monies I pay cheque are going for programs that are not advancing the upcoming generation what so ever. Our school systems are paying more for sports programs than they are the curriculum; approaching “sports” has be the reason our great nation have become the most dominant civilization known to mankind.
Our nation puts out just about only 50K engineers per year and almost half of them are from other countries! China however, produces approximately two hundred thousand engineers per year! I’m guessing is that none of “them” are migrating to the U.S. for employment.
Is it’s nearly sports or intellect now days?
I don't mind paying taxes, as long as they work for what they be intended for.
I don't have any children. Everyone should enjoy to pay the conservatory tax because we are adjectives better off beside an educated populace. It save us money in the long run. We adjectives received an education at one point. Education is expensive and parents next to children cannot afford to pay for it themselves alone. Like I said, we adjectives benefit from it.
I couldn't agree with you more FBH. We requirement to reduce our beat on sports and improve math/science. But conceivably it's too little, too late??
Companies are ready to hire from China and India because they are educated and they will work for smaller amount money. What other options do they own? The main benefit that we Americans own is our high productivity and our work ethic.
As far as I know, near is no such thing as a separate "academy tax". Schools are just some of the tons recipients of state export tax money. That money also goes to pay packet for roads, public facilities, and heaps other things. There may be other things that are benefiting you but not the parents of those children in arts school. In the long run I think it adjectives evens out. Can you imagine how tangled taxpaying would be if everyone paid merely for what they actually use? Would road taxes be rewarded only by those who own a vehicle or by everyone who lives on a road? Would they pay different percentage? Would people cheat by lying in the region of how much they drive? It's far simpler to just duty people equitably and use the money where on earth it's needed.
[edit]
I also agree with the being above who pointed out that you received an education as a child and paying taxes as an full-grown is just a opening of giving something back while helping the subsequent generation to become productive citizens. I don't own any children and probably never will, but I don't mind paying to support education because I wouldn't be where on earth I am without it.
Are nunchucks legal to enjoy or have next to you on the streets contained by colorado.?
Answers: Why on Earth would you carry them surrounded by the first place? Do you want everyone to think you are Bruce Lee or something? Grow up.
Nunchaka are criminal everywhere in the United States except surrounded by your home as part of an Asian artifacts collection.
Using them as a weapon against someone carry the same cost as if you shoot somebody.
Do yourself a favor, toss them in the trash. I've see more than 1 idiot have them taken from him and be subjugated within an inch of his time.
CalLawg is correct it is illegal to transport them on your person contained by public.
Questions about selling a gun on the internet?
First of adjectives, this is a real query. I am moving to Japan in a few weeks for a year. I am trying to go off my Glock model 21. It is legalized and registered to me. I bought it at a gun show in Colorado a few years ago. I currently live contained by Philadelphia PA, but I have a Georgia driver's license as I merely moved to PA from GA.Anyhow, I am trying to sell it on auctionarms.com.
Anyone ever do this in the past? Any advice? Any suggestions?
I give all the setting stuff as I don't know if that will be relevant or not. Can I purely list it according to the rules on auctionarms.com? I enjoy never sold a gun online before, so I want to produce sure that I am doing this legally and by the book.
Thanks for your support!
Peace
Answers: You can sell it online at that location.
However, you will enjoy to ship it from one Federally Licensed Firearms Dealer, to another Federally Licensed Firearms Dealer, where the purchaser can pick it up. Be sure to include the shipping cost, plus the handling costs by both dealer in your auction price.
When you log into auctionarms.com here is a buyers area and a seller area, check out the restrictions on both and be guided by them
Whatever you do, do not adopt any offers to supply outside the site or ship directly to the purchaser. Undercover ATF agents monitor and pose as buyers on these sites all the time.
Check the ATF:
www.atf.gov
They should own all the rules down and correctly clear.
Shouldn't a special prosecutor be appointed if he and defendant are friends and are in matching clubs, etc.
The wife of a former Michigan State Representative has cheated me out of my energy savings. In civil court she have been adjudge guilty of fraud and unjust enrichment. However, criminally, the prosecutor turned down the baggage, saying that I already have a judgment. They won't clear because they are declaring ruin to avoid payment. Every penny I hold is invested in attorneys and I might win nothing surrounded by return. They have nearly $100,000 of mine and arrogantly brag about the topical Jag and their $300,000 lake home, which be mine. What are some other ideas to fashion them pay criminally. They are low existence criminals.Thanks
Answers: As a private citizen, you cannot "make" the state's attorney prosecute a case. They do not hold a duty to prosecute anyone, even if the case is a slam dunk. It is at their discretion. However, I close to the other answer about going to the media. The State's attorney is elected by the people of the county. Find a county daily and call, write, etc. So long as the casing wasn't sealed by the court, you can dispense them all the court evidence contained by the civil case. They love these stories, especially if it involves political info.
also, as an aside, you can't sue her in a different county civilly. Your impose of action against her be already adjudicated. Plus, if she is declare bankruptcy it won't event. However, if they are hiding assets you can file to enjoy your judgment enforced, which would make a contribution you representation in the ruin proceedings as a creditor.
But, you will need an enforcement directive to do so (which your lawyer should hold already filed).
Good luck.
This smells like crap to me.
If you hold a judgment, after you have an attorney.
If you hold an attorney, then specifically the first place to go for question on the collections, as he is being rewarded more the more you collect.
Just because there is a civil overnight case does not mean within is a concomitant (look it up!) criminal case. Ask OJ just about that :)
That your attorney has not explained that to you any is another reason I guess this post is 100% BS.
More Questions and Answers:
[920] - [2143] - [336] - [235] - [673] - [1369] - [2440] - [1991] - [1883] - [1530] - [234] - [1903] - [37] - [983] - [1162] - [1352] - [501] - [346] - [725] - [1181]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: