Law Questions and Answers

On 9/11, should the American Flag be flown at half-mast to honor the dead or at full-mast?

Answers: I judge at half flagstaff to honor them and to remind us of the danger of terrorism.
idk ... but I tried to scrutinize the movie 'United 93' last hours of darkness, and I got roughly speaking half opening through and had to turn it past its sell-by date ... it still hurts too much

... and bin laden roams free
It's half-staff.

Personally, I believe that the best style to honor the dead is to bring the troops home from Iraq and use our resources to carry bin Laden so the poor people who died on 9/11 can really be honored.
at Full-mast is my nouns
I think if we fly the flag at half-mast for the victims of 9/11 later we should fly the flag at half-mast for every soldier that gets kill in Iraq.
after the flag would be flying at half-mast everyday
Full-mast.
We are 6 years past the terrorist attacks. The ethnic group who died were victims of an awful tragedy but we usually do the memorials and allow the world to verbs, why on 9/11 should we have to verbs flying our flags at half-mast.
Maybe we should have our flags at half-mast everyday to honor the soldiers dying surrounded by Iraq right now.
Full flagstaff. While it was a tragic event and we adjectives mourned there comes a time when, although we should not forget, we inevitability to move foreward. I don't need a flag at partially staff to remind me of the tragedy just as I don't want one to remind me of the assassination of JFK and I lived through that too. There is a nice memorial at the site of the World Trade Center and soon there will be one within Western Pennsylvania too. Maybe a plaque or monument at the Pentagon would be in direct if there isn't already one. That should be enough.

Freedom from oil dependency, contained by one simple step "Industrial Hemp Production" what do you think?

If you don't know what I suggest by "Industrial Hemp Production" google -"Hemp as fuel"- and you'll see what I mean.

Sonojudan
Answers: I guess it is a good notion.

However, there is a substantial majority of idiots who think that hemp = marijuana.

So for that grounds, it will never be allowed.
Biofuel isn't going to end grease dependency until oil prices jump waaaay up. Even then, any acre of crops devoted to fuel subtracts from an available acre of food crops and drives up food prices.

Hemp manifestly makes more sense though, if you're going the biofuel road, than say, corn.
Sounds great but 1 big problem. Do you really reflect on large grease companies would allow us to shift from our dependency in oil/gas. There's billions of dollars at stake and let not be naive..the grease companies and the rich rule the world. Mess with their money and finishing up in a pine box. I know that sounds cynical but its the truth. The grease companies pay sour our politicians and they abide... If you came up beside any idea that would exterminate our need for grease it would be squashed...

Work related- IS this illegal? Can you recompense someone who doesn't work there?

My boss is a deeply nasty man and doesn't distribute raises or bonus. (I am going subsidise to school to seize a new amount to get a brand new job but I am stuck here until I finish.)
He have the company pay his daughters’ salary and they don't work here; they don't even live in the state. I be told this is illegal because of levy reasons- you can’t pretend a family member’s work for you and settle up them a salary. Is this true?
I know you can work for the company and only just do anything because that’s what his son does but at least he comes contained by for a couple of hours and pretends to work.
Answers: They would be considered officers of the company ( I know even if they are no agency involved this would be his reply) and it is legal.
There would be be no export tax issues for your boss as long as they were compensated above board (meaning recieving a payroll check) rather than as an independent contractor( consequently the daughters would be responsible for their withholding and medicaid in full).
The corporation (which is different than your boss, by the way) can properly choose to spend its money in any whim that it likes, as long as it is itemized correctly within their accounting and the relevant taxes are paid on it.

If it is your boss (the man) who is "expensing" the company's money this process, and you know (for a fact, and can prove it) in the region of it, you are legally an auxiliary to fraud ... while your boss is the actual criminal. It is your duty to report this to your accounting (and HR) branches, as well as the corporate go before ... otherwise, if it comes up later, he can other indicate that YOU knew just about it and therefore you deserve a slice of the punishment as capably.

If he is employing his children rightfully, there must be some "proof of return" for money invested. Let the accountants (and his bosses, including Human Resources) ascertain whether there's adequate benefit to justify the expense ... after adjectives, it's their money.

In the extreme - companies hire consultants all the time. The consultant does not necessarily work contained by the plant - they may be hired to produce a report on something specific, and choose to do the actual writing elsewhere. But they DO have to produce the report, within order to be compensated.

I've got a definite problem.its isn't even my doing. my mom's husband had his brother co-sign a loan for some

I've get a real problem.its isn't even my doing. my mom's husband have his brother co-sign a loan for some car that be $9,000..it was repossessed...and the company still desires the money for it.so now the company is getting a advocate against them. But the thing is.My MOM be NOT married to (bob) when he got the sports car. The car is within HIS name and his BROTHER'S NAME!!!!! NOT my mom's nickname.

I am afraid they are going to take HER paychecks from her.and we'll be living out on the street somewhere...

Please support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answers: the husband is responsible for repayment of the loan. if her checks are in her label, i wouldn't worry.
Good report and bad report.
The law firms can one and only go after your mom's husband (bob) and his brother for the money. That's the appropriate news.

The desperate news is - depending on how your parents folder income tax, they may be JOINTLY responsible for adjectives debts incurred ... including actions taken against them from an incident in the past the marriage occur. Also, if the bank explanation is held jointly (and includes income from your mother and "Bob"), it may be depleted to settle up the outstanding debt.

If the car be repossessed for lack of return, and the co-signer was the brother ... that make the one who initally defaulted on the agreement "Bob", not the brother. The current lawful proceedings are because the brother can't (or won't) come up with the payments NOW.

Check your state law regarding division of property; some will respect the difference between what be agreed to occurred back the ceremony and what happened afterward ... and some won't. Get a physical legal assessment ... for the relatively low cost, it will certainly serve to luxury your concerns - or at least allow you to take objective control of the situation by letting you know what your option are.
Sorry to hear about your problem. Especially when your mom have nothing to do near it.I wish I know the law on this one but I am not sure. But I contemplate once married all bills become the responsibility of husband and wife. I hope I'm wrong. Is he working? I would surmise they would go after his paycheck first. My best direction to you is get your phone book and start contacting lawyer in your nouns. Most will give you a free conseltation and explain what the tenet says, after you will know for sure where your mom stands. And you can google that put somebody through the mill. "Is a wife responsible for debts incurred by her spouse before they be married?" something may come up. Good luck wih that.

Some1 got a position using my SS# & I believe the employer knew it wasn't legit. What can I do? Sue? Police?

Basically this personage earned $10K and in a minute the IRS wants me to settle these taxes and penalties. My own investigation found the person's given name and work location -- the employer is not helpful and I suspect it is because he know the employee be using a stolen #. Does the law allow me to run after him in any channel if he did in reality know he was employ a person using a stolen SS#?
Answers: resourcefully here's what I would do. Call the police and file a fraud report. Call the credit bureaus and wallet a fraud report. Then call the IRS beside all the info you enjoy and ask what the next steps are.
Get yourself a angelic attorney (One that is virtuous with dealing next to the IRS.) and file a lawsuit against this individual and the employer. Have your legal representative issue a subpoena duces tecum during discovery on the employer. During the deposition, have one of the IRS agents present as an onlooker. Eventually the truth will come out. Make sure either the employer or the individual pays for your official fees.

GOOD LUCK!!
You say you"believe", "suspect" that he know about someone using your social guarantee number.

Do you have any proof?

If here is suspicion and not proof you can do little against the employer.

What you should do now is to clear yourself beside the IRS and put a credit block on your credit reporting agency records so that you are not charged beside accounts opened contained by your name or other items. I would report the appropriation of your Social Security number to the police and keep a transcript of it in crust there be future problems.
That is identity embezzlement. Put a fraud report on your Social Security Number. And talk to an attorney. You may own recourse against the individual and their employer.
Below is are some links with info roughly identity theft.
The 1st one is Social Security Administration - but the others enjoy related info as well.
Good luck.

Is it legal to charged more per gallon at a Sacramento CA gas station for paying beside credit instead cash?

I go to a gas station and was charged $.05 more per gallon beacuse I did not retribution with currency. The sign posting this information is small, hard to read, and really easily missed. I do own pictures to confirm what happened.
Answers: Yes it is official as long as it is posted. Even small print counts.

Sorry.
Yes.
When you pay next to credit, the gas station actually get charged a fee for that transaction. They are getting stern what they lose in directive to use credit. Most businesses just rob the loss as part of doing business. If you use dosh, they do notincur the charge, thus they can charge you less. With the small amount gas stations spawn on selling gas ( they make almost no profit. Profit comes what what they deal in inside), I could easily see how these transaction fees could eliminate the profit from gas.
LOOK AT IT LIKE THIS...

you would have remunerated LESS if you used cash but you remunerated the NORMAL PRICE because you used your credit card.

was the price you salaried when using credit the same as other gas stations around. or be it $0.05 less..

wawa did this for a while but the lolly price was WAY cheeper next any other stations ($0.30) and the credit/normal price was just about the same as other stations close by by.
Sure is legal. We do not live within a police state ..yet.. so the vendor can price his goods as he see fit.
If you don't like it, walk to a different seller.
yep.. decriminalized.. it is more expensive with card bc they charge the gas station for every credit card transaction
Yes, because you are paying more for gas when you charge. Credit card companies charge the gas stations around 3% per $1 charged plus some other fees. That money the credit card companies are charging the gas stations are self passed on by the gas station on to you. Every business that you can use a credit card has to any absorb the fees or miss the cost on to you.
it is not illegal, the service station contained by question have chosen to pass the service charges of using a credit or chech debit card on to the customer. if i be to guess it was an "arco am/pm" right?
It may be unprincipled, but it can't be considered illegal per se when a sign is posted. If the sign is not clearly posted, which sounds resembling your situation, then a shield could be made. It does, however, violate the contract that the vendor holds near the card company. The same violation occur when a vendor forces you to spend at smallest $5 in writ to use your card.
Merchants who accept credit cards are usually prohibited (by the credit card company and by tenet in in no doubt states) from charging a fee when customers use that credit card. They can, however, contribute a discount for those who pay lolly. So, it depends on how the sign was worded.
No. Ever time you settle up with credit/debit the wall makes the gas station owner repay service fees. So they that on to the consumer.
Yup, It is legal. Any posting that give a disclaimer for additional charges make it legal. As other culture have mentioned, it is most potential merchant fees that are passed on. It is unfortunate that they aren't absorbing it, but contained by Sacramento the drive off rate (where inhabitants pump gas and then depart without paying) is astronomical. That reality alone drives up the cost for each station.

Not that it make you feel any better, but the profit border on gasoline is really low.

My suggestion is to use the ATM, that way any charges are clearly posted to your description and you aren't paying any additional within interest.

Child Support Question-California?

Hello,

My soon to be ex has only sent my employer a request for wage garnishment for child support. I have never be late on a reimbursement and do not owe any back support payments. Can she do this? I am paying everything on the dot. She says it is the ruling to garnish my wages. But I haven't done anything to deserve this. Is she merely being spiteful?
Answers: She probably is human being spiteful, want assurance she is getting payment, requests control of you and your money ...etc!!!

Here is my suggestion:

I CAN NOT STRESS ENOUGH:
DOCUMENT ~ DOCUMENT ~ DOCUMENT
WHO
WHAT
WHEN
WHERE
WHY
DATE
TIME

PROOF such as cancelled check, money order receipts & stub.

If you repay by check in the note make a VERY detailed roll of what the money is for.

Keep copies of checks, receipts of anything purchased.

Good record of adjectives payments.

Make payments on time.

Do not endow with cash if you do afterwards go seize a money order and document on it and the money establish receipt a detailed message what it is for.

Paying directly to child support enforcement they will hold a print out of all received payments BUT STILL KEEP YOUR OWN RECORDS rationale they can make mistakes.

Here is a pattern site that can be helpful to you.
It is for incarcerated folks so don't attain upset that I gave it to you. It have good info.

http://www.fcnetwork.org/library/p3child...

Be wise trying to modifiy to a lower child support payment because lots times they do not lower it but make it complex.

Child Support Enforcement can not do anything to you if you is making his payments on time every month. But if you are ever tardy they will become your worse enemy.
In California, that's right. But the garnishing order comes from the DA's department in the county where on earth the payments are to be made. When that went into effect, contained by 1980-something, my ex had the garnishment made from San Bernardino county. Then she moved to Riverside county, where on earth I lived, and filed on me in attendance. However, when they contacted me, I told them I was paying through SB Co. and SHE get in trouble for that.
__________________________________
KrazyKyngeKorny(Krazy, not stupid)
Most of the time the garnishment have nothing to do beside the custodial parent. In Virginia, any case that go through Dept of Child support Enforcement is an automatic wage garnishment. The courts can make other arrangements if they direct the support. Most states are now moving to wage garnishment as standard. When my hubby and I married we didn't hold his kids and he was paying child support. He other sent it in on the dot and was never overdue. About 6 months after we got married they started taking it out of his check. He call and they said it was untried policy. After we got custody, child support be immediately taken out of her check..it's purely the way they do it here.So, it may not be anything that your ex is doing.

Mail fraud?

is it illegal to get underway a letter contained by someone elses name if it is sent to ur house?
Answers: extremely much so. If it is not specifically addressed to you consequently you should give it put money on to the post office unopened. Just because it comes to your mailbox, conscious or by mistake, does not give you or anyone surrounded by the house the authority to open it.
It is dubious to open communication addressed to someone else, even if the street address is indistinguishable as yours.

As for the other issue, I would STRONGLY suggest that your mum IMMEDIATELY consult an attorney.

If I'm living with someone, would another party living there enjoy a right to use violence on me?

For not listen to what they tell me to do? I'm 24 very soon, but last yr., I be living back near my former foster family after Hurricane Katrina so I can finish up my college amount, since my home was destroyed. My former foster brother within law told me to turn sour my mp3 player & stop listening to it. That be my former foster mom's house, & he could've gone back to his own house. Nothing be wrong with his home. When I refuse to stop listening to the mp3 player, the foster mom told me that he have every right to knock me off my @$$. I'm not a kid, & I wasn't harm anyone for listening to my mp3 player, & after there be a foster boy who was 16, & he would blast his music @ 3 AM, & when I told my former foster mom, she would awaken him to beat me up. If I'm an fully fledged, why do I have to observe other adults, JUST for the hell of it if I'm not doing wrong? My foster BIL was NOT the man of the household, so why did my FFM spawn me obey him? ***& YES, this IS the full & true story!
Answers: If it happen again call the cops but if you are contained by the New Orleans area still you may own to defend yourself since the police is more terrifying then the criminals nearby. (I should know because I was born and raise there) You said you "were" living there ultimate year and I assuming you are not living there anymore
If you are living beneath someone elses roof and not supporting yourself they can tell you what to do. adjectives you have to do if you don't resembling it is leave.

they can't however hit you, you should be an full-size and if it happens christen the police, of course, after you will have to take off and support yourself.
Are you kidding me?????

My solely question is what state of affairs have brought you to a place where you stipulation even to ask this question. NO ONE EVER HAS THE RIGHT TO HIT YOU.

Call the cops.
Nobody have the right to use violence on another human anyone. It is permitted as a form of punishment in small children (via parents) but what you are axiom is just incredible.
Let me be undeniably clear about this. If they touch you hail as the police and get their hineys locked up.
And from me to you, I would look for another place to live as in a hurry as possible.
Nobody, I mean NOBODY have the right to use violence against another human being, adult or child. No thing what the relationship - DO NOT ACCEPT this behavior EVER! Please get yourself out of nearby, even if it means putting your coaching temporarily on hold. (Please don't give up on getting an childhood - it's too important to your adjectives.)

If anyone assaults you, you should call the police and own the person arrested. Please speak next to a counselor at school. Maybe he or she can help out you find housing and financial assistance. Contact a battered women's shelter or a crisis center. These may be in your phone book.

Good luck and bless you. You deserve far better than this situation. Please, please never estimate you deserve to be threatened or assaulted.
Do not ever tolerate anyone using violence on you. I grew up next to my dad hitting my mother and I never let him carry away with it. I ALWAYS call 911. If I hadn't called the cops, perchance it would have happen more, I don't know. But seriously, don't ever let anyone hold that power over you. You are better than that!!!

It sounds like you have a sh*tty foster family. I'm so sorry roughly that. I don't know why some of these people clutch foster kids in if they are not going to be angelic to them. I am so sorry.
No she did NOT! SHE DIDN"T HAVE THE RIGHT WHEN U WEre A KID!

OMG, call the cops or something! you're an aduld! she cannot control you
NO one should EVER enjoy the "right" to use violence. This is wrong, wrong, wrong. You be doing nothing to physically injure them; they should have never hurt you.

Granted, you be being a *bit* rude by not complying beside what they were asking, since they be a foster family.

However, as I said beforehand, using violence is not a solution. The loved ones should have said that A, B, and C are what be bugging them about the MP3 player, and that conceivably you could do D, E, and F to fix it.
Yes unless you walk away.

Can a sales presentation be copyrighted or patented?

I hold used a presentation to make sale ( NOT - NOT HIGH PRESSURE ) that I have "come up with", and my sale contract closures averages 80 to 90% ( Residial and open land). I am not a licensed valid estate professional, however, I act as a "contracted sale representative".
I am not worried about self a real estate professional surrounded by the state of Texas, however I wish to get hold of some sort of protection for my "sales sermon, deleavery".
CAN I GET MY PROCESS COPYRIGHTED / or PATENTED??
toro gringo
Answers: AS to those portions that have be reduced to a fixed medium; ie. workbook, pictures or recordings; the text, pictures or recordings themselves can be copyright protected. A "sale talk" or "delivery" probably cannot be.
A 'human process' cannot be patented. Your presentation can be copyrighted.

More Questions and Answers:
[1729] - [2493] - [1434] - [906] - [2505] - [1532] - [2062] - [2390] - [1550] - [2366] - [2030] - [1325] - [1081] - [445] - [25] - [2511] - [815] - [1943] - [2140] - [502]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: