Law Questions and Answers

Home work for business law grill.?

ok I have homework lol and i cant numeral out whats a good answer for this press help me out

-Complete gig is full performance according to the vocabulary of a contract. Discuss the effect on the parties if nearby is less than full dramatization.

Give me a full good answer for that and I'll make available you 10 pts lol

Answers: This may sound type of obvious, but if in attendance is anything less than full manners, the terms of the contract hold not been met. This would result contained by the promiser breaching the contract.

Anything less that full show on EITHER party's side nullifies the contract.

Can my ex husband can make a claim against my mother's estate if she dies formerly I remarry?

I divorced him over 10 years ago, and then we get back together, but did not remarry, seperating finally 4 years ago, when I made a financial settlement beside him, which he has agreed and not challenged. I be told that its possible for him to make a claim against the estate if I be not remarried. Please can someone tell me if this is correct?

Answers: since rightfully you are divorced and inspite of having lived together you hold not married to him again, i dont think he can take home any claims to your mothers estate.

However, its best to check details with a advocate and get this event clear and straight in your mind and for yourself.

It does not nouns correct to me.

Go and speak to a lawyer to be sure.

I wouldn't even spend my time talking to an attorney until he in actuality makes a claim.

I can't even envision why the courts would even consider a request like that.

Your mother's will decide who and how the Estate will be handled. If he wishes to take home a claim against you after settlement of the will he would need to prove surrounded by court his case.

If your mother have not filed a will, I recommend you ask her to do so.
If your ex decide to place a claim against your share of the Estate, that would be between you two, I recommend you get legally recognized advice on how to protect your assets from him.

I'm afraid you are within the murky waters of ambiguity here as far as the law is concerned. Your divorce 10 years ago would hold cut him out, but the subsequent reconciliation creates a possible minefield. The fact that you certainly cam to a financial settlement (presumably he got more than you did out of it) may be used to indicate some charitable of entitlement. The fact that it be 'accepted and not challenged' at that time may count for little unless things be wrapped up in a legitimately binding way.

It is better to consult next to a good solicitor who is well-versed contained by family and inheritance law.

You're getting a lot of replies here but no answers, adjectives links your husband had near your family died when you divorced. He have absolutely no claim or rights to your Mothers estate unless specifically mentioned surrounded by the will. Although anybody can contest any will, there have to be grounds to contest and,
"I was married to her daughter ten years ago" clearly isn't one of them.

Contact an attorney. He might advise your mother to include a specific statement surrounded by her will that he is not entitled to anything.

Unless he married your mother after divorcing you I do not see any method that your ex could have a claim on YOUR mother's estate.

Legal issues re publishing emails?

I've been thinking, I convey a fair few 'complaint' emails (I grain the need to stick up for myself is all), eg to convey my letting agent they can't just maintain my bond for no reason, or I don't owe British Gas lb10,000, please stop asking for it.

People (for some reason) find my tenaciousness amusing, so they own suggested I have a website where on earth I can show my progress with these issues and put the emails sent and received on within too (and invite others to share their experiences).

Would there be trial implications to this? I one and only express opinions and aren't petty or spiteful, and everything I speak is backed up by evidence. But would I be wandering into slander kingdom? Where is the line?

Answers: Why do you presume your the only one that does this? Maybe your the solely one you know of, but you will be getting yourself into heaps of trouble, and legal fees.Just be the tenacious Terrier you are, because anyone's opinion can be taken the wrong way.

There is no lawful bar (in the UK) to publishing these emails although annonimity would be advisable for third party.

You can't libel someone (slander is only spoken) by publishing what they own said.
You will have to form a vista as to whether what you have said within yours is libelous, and if it is, it is libelous once sent. If in doubt, go it out.

The only exception to the above are trial emails sent without prejudice, which should be within the header.

Hi yahoo friends - IS Humanity or humanness existing politically ?

Humanity or humanness i think its matching ..
DO the politicians put it (humanity) in statement when they take declaration ( resolution) or its dependant the case & the locations & advantages ?.

Answers: How on dirt is anyone supposed to give an even half-way sensible answer to a 'question' approaching this?

Does Gordon brown take into justification 'humanness' when increasing the NHS budget - probably.

Does he take 'humanness' into explanation when considering the fiscal deficit? - probably not.

Does GW Bush really care going on for the Iraqi's killed contained by the war - probably not.

Does GW Bush thought about unborn children? probably.

Does he really contemplation about children once they're born into poverty? Probably not.

And so on, and so on trailer infinitum, ad nauseam.

no .not contained by all countries

Shower doesn't work after moving in, and owner did not mention the certainty, does that constitute as fraud?

I moved in to a roommate situation, and found out that the shower surrounded by the main bathroom is past its sell-by date limits due to a dribble that hasn't been repaired. Owner did not mention such jargon while showing the room and the place. Does that constitute as fraud?

Answers: No But He can be reported if it is a unhealthy situation. You enjoy to bathe. Have it repaired and embezzle the price off your subsequent months rent.

Why are animal welfare organizations resembling PETA and the ALF so fanatic and hypocritical ?

I don't construe why they would inflict physical damage, or even murder a party. They do not care if they hurt, or annihilate someone, if it will stop animal suffering. The ALF has to be one of the scariest animal rights groups. How is it ok to engineer people suffer but not animals?
I'm not in need a heart, but I understand animals are of great use to ethnic group. Pigs are used to make insulin, horses are used to sort anti-venom, and those examples are barely a scrape on the surface.
It's ok for an animal to hunt, but not me. Even though we have domesticated plentiful animals like dogs and cats for thousands of years, I'm not supposed to own one. I own the teeth of an omnivore, but I'm not supposed to eat meat. I could travel on.
Will people ever stop questioning for Utopia? Unless you can control minds, that will never happen.

Answers: The reality is that these groups don't care one bit roughly speaking animals. They are just a bunch of attention whores who picked this mete out to get more attention.

"riverrock", explicitly the most ridiculous load of crap I've ever see in response to animal rights. It sounds similar to you read it right out of a PETA handbook. Where are the "facts" that speak we have just been ingestion meat since the age of technology? Also, Diabetes is not strictly caused by diet, Type 1 Diabetes is largely heritable and has terribly little to do with diet. When you want to throw out "facts", you should really see if they are valid "facts" or just propaganda.

Why do they murder animals if they consideration so much about nation. If you will recall PETA just this minute got caught murdering pets and dumping their bodies within dumpsters.

It is not so much that they love animals is that they hate culture. The only love they own is for their own power.

And yes chickens are made of nuggets, cows are made of steaks and pigs are made of ham. If we are not supposed to drink them why are they made of meat.

Just wanted to speak first i'm not a memeber of any of these groups lol. But assuming no member of them is imagined to be on here to answer, i'll play devils advocate and answer a few of your question as if i am a fanatatical animal rights protestor :)

"How is it okay to make ethnic group suffer but not animals?" i could change to "How is okay to sort animals suffer and not people?" If you reflect about it your cross-examine is as hypocritical as you claim these groups are.

To put this in context, surrounded by the natural instruct of things we used to have to suffer contained by order to attain animal meat to eat. In certainty before technology consumption meat was a occasional thing because hunting be so difficult, this is why we have omnivore teethe - so we can guzzle anything and not have to rely on meat for sustenance.

This be the natural match of things which insured we lived in arpeggio with moral fibre, only consumption meat when we could, not caging them and killing them on mass (and making them suffer). This is also why the body requires lots of different nutrients from vegetables and fruits etc as very well as meat. In fact around one serving of meat per week would cover adjectives the nutrients we actually want from meat, and even those you can often receive elsewhere as well.

So to answer you subsequent point "its okay for an animal to hunt, but not me." we actually don't hunt; we round up, breed and murder the animals at will, giving them no chance to live as they would instinctively (and making them suffer whilst ruining the environment by choping down rain forests so we own land to cultivate and to nurture cattle on).

In fact on a controlled point, even if we went backwards and in reality started hunting for our food again, we have mechanism guns dont we? it wouldn't really be as fair as you create out!

"Even though we have domesticated lots animals...for thousands of years, i'm not supposed to have one."
We also have slaves for hundreds of years, does that mean its okay for me to hold one? I think the animal rights protestors would argue that length of time doing something does not equate to how morally right something is. Besides is a lion within a zoo domesticated? or is it just surrounded by captivity? Again suffering for not much more than our entertainment. Yes, many of these be bred in captivity; but does that construct the original endeavour of taking animals out of the wild right? ALF and PETA might argue its best we stop this practise contained by the future and consent to nature receive back to conventional.

Finally i'll take the animals for medical science arguement. What is insulin for? Diabetes. What cause diabetes? Bad diet. So to me it seems restrained to assume that if we lived naturally, as we be designed to, rarely consumption meat and getting sugar only when if be available from fruits etc, we wouldn't get not at your best and need to experiment on animals, and that's two birds beside one stone since we would not need to freestyle farm them any, and could at least simply keep things resembling cows on free range farm since we would not need duplicate quantities anymore.

I could travel on with the form thing. How abundant deseases which we solve through medical experimentation on animals are largely caused by drinking too much meat and processed foods with huge lubricant contents due to the very reality these animals are domesticated (FACT: the fat content contained by beef on the shelf to day is alot highly developed than even 50 years ago because of the way we breed and save them)? Heart diseases, diabetes, cancers...i could budge on. The very diseases we solve by anyone cruel to animals are largely caused by the reality we are cruel to animals. Human' are very out of the ordinary if you think something like it!

Now i'm not saying this is the be adjectives and end adjectives, you mention venom cures for instance, but i recon we could probably clear a bigger difference to our health by treating animals respectfully than experimenting on them...

Incidently contained by answer to a below post, type one diabetes which is hereditary accounts for one and only 5-10% of cases (in America) whilst type two, caused primarily by obessity, is represents most cases.

Why are people penetrating for a utopia? Probably because they believe the way we are currently living is not sustainable, and we are needlessly harm the creatures we share the world with contained by order to uphold our unhealthy and environmentally chancy way of living.

Move towards Utopia or murder ourselves and the world around us- I'm guessing these groups would argue harming a few humans along the route to achieve this is a small price to rate.

Hope all this help. At the very least possible you now enjoy an idea of the sorts of arguements you will hold to face if you ever do step up against ALF or PETA and you can formulate counter arguements :)

-edit- i just considered necessary to add that some associates in these groups are nutcases and it's more around the terrorism for them than the cause. But i'm pretty sure the core message of the groups is the above.

In the Courtroom?

Q: What was the first entry your husband said to you when he woke up that morning?
A: He said, "Where am I, Cathy?"
Q: And why did that upset you?
A: My name is Susan.

Answers: hahaha
why didn't you put it surrounded by jokes

A wife cannot testify surrounded by a criminal matter against her husband. Such nouns is privileged.

However, in a divorce proceeding such nouns would be permitted.

"A wife cannot testify in a criminal situation against her husband. Such testimony is privileged.

However, within a divorce proceeding such testimony would be permitted."

Depends where on earth you are! In England and Wales, a spouse cannot be forced to testify, but can choose to do so. A spouse is "competant but not compellable". In certain criminal movements, for example, an assault on the spouse by the other spouse, a spouse can be made to give evidence.

Why is convicted heroin trafficker Holly Deane Johns being sent hindmost to Aust? i sorry but im an aussie?

why is convicted heroin trafficker Holly Deane Johns being sent spinal column to Aust? i sorry but im an aussie and to be honest i dont want her anywhere near this country - she chose her fatal outcome - what a loser - its her own fault - she deerves it - i hold grudges adjectives the time - and schappelle corby only have a few kilos of pot on her.and to be honest pot is way more unharmful than herion..i'd never touch that stuff but enjoy pot nearly everyday!!! the law is so stupid and this world will never catch things right.why is justice such a knotty this to prove?? it makes me cry

Answers: I didn't really agree beside her coming back any but after I read about how her mother be a drug addicted prostitute and that was the single life she know I changed my mind.
Everybody deserve a second chance contained by life and she is still one and only young and have already spent a large amount of time contained by jail and is deeply remorseful.
Schappelle Corby on the other hand have a loving family and have showed no remorse what so ever and nothing will convince me she is not guilty admittedly 20 yrs is a long time but when we turn to these countries we have to abide by their law and if we break them we have to adopt their punishment.

please don't defend that stupid cow schapelle corby, smuggling drugs into indonesia, thailand and singapore is asking for trouble. if you can't respect that you deserve what you obtain. most aussies know the score surrounded by that regard.

corby's family circle have a reputation for growing drugs and hold shown no remorse for being busted...tolerate the b**** rot in bali.

we hold a prisoner exchange program with some countries, which is party enough. as long as she (Holly) is made to money for her crimes in this country consequently fine. drug smugglers in this country enjoy it way too uncomplicated!

I smoke pot, but I'll be damned if I want another worthless smack head contained by the country. those who use really heavy drugs contained by this country have every opportunity to pass up, we even have state funded programs to help out them get rotten heroin and the sort, but they usually choose to be worthless addicts. sure bets the f*** out of trying to revolutionize your lot! in this country if you enjoy done goal time and own an addiction, welfare will bend over backwards to help you, but those scumbag addict pay everyone posterior by robbing and bashing the adjectives and helpless.

Hang em all! including that stupid schapelle, she know what she was doing and probably have been doing it for some time.
I hope she rots within bali! schapelle flaunted the LAW of another country and deserves to be punished under that countries statute... don't want to spend 20+ yrs in a third world prison, don't break their law, simple.

Aussies get hung adjectives the time in asian countries, simply recently surrounded by singapore, but asian australians (born and bred) don't quite grasp the air time close to the pretty little caucasian corby. and she is the least deserving of our sympathy.

from what I've read, holly never have a chance surrounded by life. her mum be injecting her with heroin at almost 14. imagine if your mum be like that?

i don't get the impression the need to safeguard her, she did what she did and is now suffering the consequences. from what i can see, she is a target of sorry circumstances.

and pot is less negative than heroin? in what mode? marijuana exacerbates any underlying or existing psychological problems. dealing with and treating someone physically addicted to heroin is far easier than dealing beside someone who is having a schizo aggro episode due to the amount of pot they smoke.

What was the first gun control imperative in the US?

What be the first gun control law surrounded by the US? Was it a state, federal, local, county, or what law? When be it passed? What did it regulate?

Answers: Greetings

I'm not real sure on this one but i will turn out on a limb, i will speak the frist gun control law is against the so-called Negro. it shuld be found surrounded by the Blacks CODES of the South, that is where on earth i would look, I can't imagine so-called Albions making statute to prohibit them selves only those that they enjoy mistreated for so long, they would have accurate reason to live surrounded by fear of the so-called Negro.

If my Ancestor's be to at that time in existence, really hated them they would hold posioned the whole see of them, my Ancestor's cooked their food, washed,their close, cleaned their homes, raise their children.

The oppertunity to kill adjectives of them were within the hands of my Ancestor's of that daylight, they didn't need guns, they where on earth feeding them. They should own been thinking of keeping them out of the kitchen if anything.

That is my read aloud on that about gun control, the decree was made against the so-called Negro, Black, Colored, Afro-American or African-American and any other heading that comes to mind that represent these things.

The first gun control law contained by the US is:
Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791.

A well regulated Militia, one necessary to the shelter of a free State, the right of the people to maintain and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

The Battle of Bunker Hill yield one of those quotations that every American is supposed to know: “Don’t fire till you see the whites of their eyes!” Massachusetts June 1775.

It’s still debatable which American officer said this, if anyone. Some sources credit Gen. Israel Putnam of Connecticut, some Col. William Prescott of Massachusetts.

No right data, but I would consider that the productive colonies had any written or spoken rules . Remember, hunting for food was as inborn as planting crops...and more common than bathing.

If some one is charged with sexual assault on a summery conviction?

i enjoy been charged next to sexual asult in canada i did not show up surrounded by court they put a warent for my arest but it is only radus and the charge is sumary if i stay away for a long time will it walk away

Answers: Check with a legal representative on the statute of limitations - and extradition... if the DA (or Canadian equivalent) gets a complex on (pardon the pun) for you, they may try to chase after you and bring you to justice.

More Questions and Answers:
[2247] - [275] - [1152] - [499] - [1928] - [976] - [113] - [1700] - [2167] - [1127] - [2530] - [33] - [2022] - [1462] - [514] - [444] - [552] - [2412] - [2300] - [72]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: