Law Questions and Answers

Do you think he have a good skin?

my boyfriend got fired from his third shift livelihood from exhaustion...he be taking his hour break and over slept and extra hour...this was he first time violate the rules...his job didn't issue out a alert they just terminated him...adjectives the while his co workers have be caught doing sexual activities and drugs on the opening...so what should we do?
Answers: Sleeping on the job would be grounds for firing from any position beside the exception of sleep study participant. He should find a new profession and drink some coffee when he gets to work.
Sleeping on any mission that I have ever worked at have been grounds for direct dismissal.

Many, many inhabitants work nights -- and self tired is just segment of the package. That doesn't grant him the right to nap on company time.
directory a complaint, get a latest job and be glad he is stopped for a shifty $hitass company like that anymore.

Peace

Jim

.
Really you can be fired for any idea other than see, religion, or sex.

He could actually be fired for departure his hair on the wrong side and you couldn't right to be heard boo about it.
If he be that exhausted he should have informed his supervisor that he needed a longer break. Sleeping on the undertaking, no matter if it be an accident where on earth he overslept from a nap on his break time, is grounds for on the spot dissmissal from most jobs. It is call "At will work" Which means you work for the company beside the understanding you are not a contract hand and they can fire you at any time and you can quit at any time for any reason save for those that would violate discrimination law.
Most states are at will work states, they do not require every employee of every company to sign a work contract stating how long they will work or how much they will acquire paid for the work.
It doesnt business what the other employees be caught doing. That has no effect on whether he could maintain his job or not, it is soley up to the employer to opt who they keep or who they do not. If you took this to court the arbiter would probably decide within favor of the company and it would cost you more in the long run than it is worth.
Best guidance, find another job and capture more sleep when he is off work.

What legal recourse do I enjoy with someone first my mail and breaking court advice?

I've been trying to speak to anyone at CAB or solicitor and not getting anywhere speedily. Summary: left ex 1999. Changed address on everything related to me. 2001,Consent Order from court that the ex agreed he would keep paying the kids' insurance policies, proceeds have to go to the children on old age in 2011 and the ex should do nil to cause them to extremity, be cancelled or lapsed. Last month, one of the policies has salaried out, although not due until 2011. Cue me contacting the insurers to find that all paperwork be still sent to my ex's address, that he stopped paying them in 2002 & I be never informed or I would have kept the policies going. So kids enjoy lost out on policies worth lb2,500 each. Insurers own given me copies & he has have over 20 letters written to me at the ex-marital home from them which he have never handed over & from what he have told the kids, its clear he's opened & read them. Anyone know where on earth the law stands on adjectives this?
Answers: Go to the police, it is a criminal offence to steal/open communication not belonging to yourself not a civil one. plus he has cause you to lose finance which make it theft and fraud also.
I am not sure something like the laws where on earth you are, but here in the US, if you own changed your address and do not live with him anymore, its up to him to toss them, open out them or give them to you. Once you hold moved out, changed your address and notified everyone that should know, any e-mail that goes to his house is his. As long as he doesnt try to use your christen or cash checks written to you that come within those letters within is not much you can do except go down to the post department and redo the address move to ensure your mail comes to you.
I own recieved many pieces of post that belong to the former occupant of my home. If its cast-offs i trash it, if its personal I simply write does not live here on the envelope and put it back within the mail box. I own told her several times that she is still recieving mail and it is up to her to ensure a proper address transform.
You can question him in the region of it, ask your lawyer almost it, but I do not think that in attendance is much you can do to mail that comes to his house and not yours. It would defintaly be evil if he was getting them out of your mailbox, but as far as I can explain to he isnt.
As far as the court order to hold the policies on your children, if he have stopped doing such then you want to take him pay for to court over this and the judge will trademark the descision about how to properly punish him.
STOP RUINING AND STOP THE DRAMA THAT GOES FOR HIM AND YOU, There is children involved, So STOP, and travel get some definite answers and help, Not here, dummy.
If this doesn't frail you up then zilch will!

The DMV convinced me to sign for the Selective Service. Its not the same entity as the draft is it???

I was innards out an application and it stated. "If you do not fill this portion in the region of the selective service then your application will not be permitted. What is the selective service??
Answers: Yes. It subjects you to being drafted, should the draft be reinstated. But **all** U.S. males are REQUIRED to register next to Selective Service within a jiffy frame after turning 18.
Every male contained by the United States who reaches the age of 18 must register near the selective service - it's not a DMV thing it's the imperative.

Yes, it can be considered the draft, but as we have an adjectives voluntary military you are safe --- unless the reinstate the draft. This is in recent times the way the senate keeps track of adjectives the men in this country of age to box should the need arise.
If a draft is enact, then youre signed up.

You are required by decree to sign up for it, you get no choice. As long as a draft is not issued afterwards its nothing.
Wow... I can see here is a real age group gap here.

"Selective Service" is call the DRAFT and, once the election is over contained by 2008, I can almost guarantee you that the DRAFT will be restarted because the military is so decimated presently it's unbelievable and, once the troops start coming home and can take off the service... there won't be 40,000 troops moved out in the military so... COMPULSORY MILITARY SERVICE is on the horizon and YOU, my friend, will later KNOW what the Selective Service is.

About a year ago, Congress VERY QUIETLY allocated funds to reactivate the local Selective Service boards and those local boards even had a DRY RUN to carry all their software and files in decree so they can start DRAFTING 18 to 20 YEAR OLD MALES into the ARMY.
Yes

It is the fancy name for the draft.

You needed to sign up for it anyway other option you can screw up your adjectives. If you don't sign up and reach the cut past its sell-by date date for termination of selective service your won't be able to win federal government assistance for student loans and other programs of that sort.

Don't verbs about signing up, the likelihood of the draft starting up again are slim.

If the s**t hits the fan and they needed childish males for the military, they would just pick you up sour the street and take you to core training anyway.

Prositution is a crime that can be committed only by females surrounded by Malaysia?

According to Malaysian penal codes, prostituition is a crime that can be committed only by females. True of False? Why?
Answers: . I'm sure ALL gender are included. BUT in trueness, men aren't charged.
"...Article 15 of the Women and Girls Protection Act of Malaysia, specifically prohibits trafficking in individuals stating that “any person who buys, sell, traffics in, or procures or brings into or take out of Malaysia, for the purpose of such traffic, and whether or not for the purpose of present of subsequent prostitution…” [NOTE: Malaysia is the only country thus far that elude to trafficking for purposes other than prostitution or forced marriage]. Punishment is captivity up to 5 years, or a fine or both." ..
."quick overview of Malaysian law and their impact on women's equality highlighting areas of Malaysian law where on earth gender nouns remains.

i) The Federal Constitution

The Federal Constitution, unlike the Indian constitution upon which it was base, does not include sex under its enumerated grounds of nouns, implying that it is tolerable to discriminate on the ground of sex. Clause 1 of Article 8 states that “. . .all individuals are equal before the statute and entitled to the equal protection of the law”, .."

Persons of the same sex cannot commit incest near each other contained by Malaysia?

According to Malaysian penal codes, persons of one and the same sex cannot commit incest with respectively other. True of False? Why?
Answers: That is two different issues. Incest is between family member, two person of duplicate sex is homosexuality.
If they only disallow incest between like sex, they are more screwed up than I thought!
False I hope. They are still related. Sister to sister, brother to brother, mother to daughter, and father to son. Disgusting.

Men cannot be victims of rape in Malaysia?

According to Malaysian penal codes, men cannot be victims of rape. True or False? Why?
Answers: Why are you so hung up n Malaysia's penal codes? I don't know them within particular, but going from what I know of backwards cultures, that would nouns like it be true. Modern people know better.
wow! this is modern for me. I think men between men is consensual, is it? is it muslim statute or western law?
is it equal in the west? sorry for more Q.
It's individual been just now that a man can be considered the victim of rape surrounded by the US (unless by another man, and even then, I reason it was considered sodomy, not rape).

The thinking astern that is that a man is strong ample to defend himself, and women aren't expert of raping because... well, because they don't hold the right genitalia.

How much does a double rotor cuff operation cost?

How much does a double rotor cuff operation cost? I got hurt on the career and can't work anymore, the worker's comp is fighting it. What should I be intitled too?
Answers: Very expensive. Better face-off worker's comp to pay for it is documented as a work related injury.

Can I get a restraining charge?

I know this is dumb but I am tired of my cousins wife threatening me...now I found out she is posting actual threats give or take a few harming me on a myspace profile.Can I do anything roughly that or just slight it?
Answers: You can take your concerns to the police. Show them the myspace profile, relate them of the threats she has made to you one-sidedly and try to get tricky evidence that she has be threatening you to help your valise.
Unless she has made arrangements directly at you ( by this i mean physical appointments or words that were said contained by front of you) there is probably not much to verbs about but I would ask the local authorities more or less it.
Yup.
Sue the bitchdog, take her to court and hang down her out to dry.
Your local friendly solicitor needs the business.
Try contacting yahoo..or going to your local police..I know they can comfort you!
But I have hear of stuff like this...Cyber bullying and threats on the web...

but for if you don't get give support to from a yahoo specialist then unquestionably go to the local police and see what they vote..

oh most importantly print off the threats for proof your gonna entail them!!!
You can petition the courts for a restraining order.

Elderly and driving?

I was listen to the radio ( a Sirius station) and Father Paul on the Catholic station had a discussion around the elderly and driving, asking "When is it time to take the key to the car away from your elderly parents/loved ones". I couldn't minister to but call within and give my evaluation. My mother who passed away last year at the age of 87 drove up until she have a major stroke. She be terrifying aft the wheel and to step with her driving to Dallas be like a horrifying scientific experiment that go horribly wrong. I think that once a personage gets to the age to receive Medicare, they should be required every year to own a written AND driving test. I love elder people & respect them extremely much, but for their safety as economically as others on the road I have a feeling they need to be monitored more than they are. Doctors place them on Aricept and other similar to medications for Alzheimers, etc, but they don't mention taking their license away. Teens are tested for their awareness, why not the elderly?
Answers: I cogitate the idea of carrying out tests them annually isn't a bad theory, but I would only require the driving assessment. That's where most of your problems come contained by, with poor eyesight, go together, reflexes or focus.

However, nouns against the elderly is a common problem, and I foreboding this would just front to more of it. To the elderly adults who are still in honest mental and physical health, have to prove on an annual basis that you still enjoy your wits about you is not unbiased. Without having any other common sense, other than age, forcing them to prove themselves is insulting to ancestors who have contributed to society for decades.

So I'm more inclined to believe they should give somebody a lift a test if their doctor have even an inkling they could be a danger to themselves and others when bringing up the rear the wheel.

I'm really torn here. I've one-sidedly taken my grandfather's (my mom's dad) keys from him previously because he continues to drive, even though he's almost completely blind and has slow reflex. When I think more or less him, the plan to routinely require the elderly to take a driving interview sounds pretty good. My dad's parents, however, are ten years elder than my maternal grandparents, and enjoy full-time jobs, social lives, hobbies, and neither of them own had so much as a parking ticket within over ten years. It would not be fair to spawn them pass a question paper simply because they are old contained by age, when nothing else would merit it.
There are some states that require elder persons to own regular driving tests and eye exams within order to see if they are aware plenty to drive. Certian sicknesses actually require the instant termination of a drivers license due to the effects they have on the personage.
My grandfather cant see very okay at all but insists on driving. He is immensely scary to ride near and I refuse to allow my children to ride surrounded by the car when he is driving. He have said that even if they take his license he will still drive because he have been doing it for years and not a soul is going to take that away from him.
I agree that the elderly should be required to do driving test to ensure they are capable of driving minus endangering the lives of themselves or others. Teenagers are given a graduate license, perhaps this is a appropriate idea for those who reach a certian age or conceivably just those whose medical history indicate they would own problems driving.
Age does not always indicate someone will be a fruitless driver, normally its medial problems that wreak someone to become inable to drive properly. This should be considered as a factor when renewing a license for anyone of any age.
I agree with this, it should be a tenet in every state to require relatives over the age of say 70 years prehistoric to take a twelve-monthly eye, written and driving test to retain their driving lisence.

But further, I believe the domestic should do an intervention if they see a serious driving problem with their elderly relatives. Let me transmit you my story:

I was visit my grandmother aged 81 and was warn by her two daughters (my aunts) about her awfully bad driving. I figure it must not be THAT bad if she have not been stopped by police or have an accident, right? So when she insisted we dance out shopping, I went and took my immature 5 year old son along too.
Yep, she be a bit shakey, but all within all, her driving wasn't THAT bleak. That is, not until we got backbone to where she parked her motor, across the street from where she lived at a gas station parking lot that she rented monthly.

There be a sign right next to her parking spot, and when she pulled contained by, she hit the lower corner of that sign, scraping her roof! That startled her so inadequately that she attempted to slam on her brakes, but instead, she hit the gas pedal, which caused the sports car to lurch forward, running off the curb, into the crosswalk where on earth the school crossing guard (who be preparing for school to be agree to out in mere minutes) have to run out of the way to avoid getting hit!

My grandmother again attempted to hit the brakes, but hit the gas pedal AGAIN, cause the car to hop the curb on the other side of that street and we slammed into the mound building! It was not adjectives that anyone was hurt, most minuscule of all my grandmother.

My son be in the fund seat and wound up on the floor of the vehicle, (yes this was previously seatbelts were required by ruling, and back form belts were not on this model). I suffered a whiplash injury which I did NOT choose to sue my grandmother roughly speaking even though I was told by adjectives of my friends that I should have permit her insurance company pay for psychoanalysis.

When the police came, they separated us right away and asked me what happen. I told them what happened. My grandmother told the police that she clearly stepped on the braked TWICE and in attendance must be something wrong with the motor because they did not work properly. HUH?! I asked the police further, what did they recommend as far as getting my grandmother off the street? They said it be up to the family surrounded by that state, (Pennsylvania). So I tried talking to my father, and he become so very angry near me, saying: "How dare you come to ME give or take a few MY mother?" and refused to speak about it anymore.
As a footnote to this fairly long story, her insurance company totalled out the vehicle and only remunerated her a few hundred for the older coup, which pretty much left her in need a vehicle. My uncle refused to buy her another coup.

She died within the month. My father feel it was because she did not own transportation anymore and that caused her to die. He be wrong. But I was blamed for her disappearance, warped ethnic group ya know? She actually died of a blood clot to the lungs, and the post-mortum autopsy revealed she have liver cancer. I believe she also had untreated cataract, that could not have be conducive to driving well any.

Bottom line is the family unit needs to examine out for their elderly relatives. In this accident, children, including my childish one, could have be seriously hurt, maimed, or even kill, just because it be uncomfortable to confront my grandmother in the region of her lousy driving. Quite a pity, honestly!

Could Gerry and his wife possibly feel tht even if Madeleine be alive that she may have suffered totally s?

Do you think you prefer she is alive to alleviate your suffering to some extent than thinking of the consequences if that beautiful child is anyone held and abused. I think from Maddies point she would be better within heaven where on earth there is no suffering. Time is a great healer and yes you are both innocent of any crime I regard as you may have stirred up too much trouble and Portugal have a shady history on child abuduction starting right at the top of the tree.
Answers: You are right on all counts a great put somebody through the mill.
Delighted to give you a star.
prove that Portugal have had a shady history on child abduction?

I lived within Portugal for 8 years as a child and never had a problem.
If as parents they be so worried about "our lovely Madeleine" that they've solitary with the twins for a bit of fun (14 bottles of wine the friends said) and don't afford a s**t for what's happening...
I own a daughter poor child don't even want to think how she feel (kidnapping or murder) before and after.
And if you refer to Portugal next to child abduction (learn to spell), please don't be ignorant, study first, check the numbers of Scotland Yard and you will know that that "history" belongs to England and the Portuguese "history" should be followed from one and the same.
shady history on child abduction. Their child wouldn't have be abducted if they have not left her alone, beside two 2 year olds! Even if they had nought to do with her dissapearence, they should perceive very guilty around not being at hand. Perhaps they will learn that you are ment to look after your children, not a short time ago abandon them alone contained by a strage country.

More Questions and Answers:
[670] - [2046] - [741] - [1788] - [2265] - [1169] - [652] - [1913] - [1808] - [1648] - [1909] - [1411] - [2129] - [333] - [1844] - [636] - [353] - [1525] - [2097] - [1851]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: