Law Questions and Answers

Paying for ex's debts?

My ex passed away earlier this year. However, just now I found there be a judgement against me for something I knew nil about. The judgement be actually sent 5 years ago, and at the time I separated from him, so I didn't know anything about any debts from him. Now they are attacking me for this. Even the evidence have shown he did the bad check and adjectives and not me. Why am I being sued for this? I also found out that he be opening accounts underneath my name in need my knowledge or authoritzation. I never lived near him (separated the day after we married, stated on the divorce papers), nor have any account from that guard that is suing me. I am getting deeply stressed because I want the past to die and focus on my adjectives.
Answers: no offense but good article he is dead or if I be you I think I would enjoy to kill him.in recent times joking

But I would give the name a lawyer to be exact about adjectives you can do. Or file for liquidation.

I had to folder last year because of a 20,000 charge from Bank of America on my credit report that newly appeared out of no where. I've never even have an account beside them so I did the stupid thing and call them and told them there be a problem. 2 Weeks later I be served with a civil suit and later even though I disputed the charges they say I didn't and give the judge approaching 60 statements they supposely sent to me that I know I never recieved. The judge told me to prove it wasn't mind and put the judgement against me. Now how do you prove you never have an account?

So I file bankruptcy to prevent from them takeing the little bit of money I have out of my checking account.

To formulate it even more fun I had lately paid bad all of my debt minus one student loan!
Well here's the piece. when people find seperated they often do it reasonably which means that any debts incurred former that point belong to the specific spouse.

Obviously you didn't have this. So sorry to articulate since he incurred this debt, even without your acquaintance while you were still officially married it is now yours. There is without doubt no way that you could contest that. You should consider yourself lucky that it be only $700.

Can I sue them?

I've been trying to purchase airline ticket from craigslist, and we own made our deal through emails, but presently I only recieve miles from them, they articulate those miles are redeemable, and yes they are. But we made a deal for tickets not miles. Can I sue him? He live out of states, I guard wire him the money. Total around 2000 for 2 RT international tickets. I've be emailing them telling them that I will sue them, but they a moment ago say that those miles can be use and they utter that in the craigslist ad they stated that they are selling/using miles to purchase tickets. I just don't know if I'll enjoy case against them? Thanks
Answers: The most historic thing to find out is the exact wording of the classified ad. If you printed it out the day you ordered it from them and it said TICKETS not miles you may hold a shot.

The one problem you may have is that you wired them the money, thats not as reliable or tracable as a in safe hands way of paying resembling Paypal. If they were to say-so that they never recieved the money you might have a problem surrounded by court.

If they said in the want ad they were selling miles/tickets you own no case, thats a moment ago your fault for not reading the business properly before shelling out the dough. Sorry bout that.

Hope this help and you can resolve this.
First of all, contained by most states, it's illegal to threaten lawful action short a direct intent to follow through with that threat. . . . If you detail somebody you're going to sue them, you had already be surrounded by the process of filing a complaint, or something. . . otherwise, they can take you for "Intentional infliction of emotional distress."

It's a big long instrument of saying . . . they can own you if you threaten them and don't follow through (or, don't own intentions to follow through).

I don't really know if you have standing to sue, or not -- I haven't see the advertisement on craigslist. You'd be erudite to print out the ad back they had the opportunity to revise it.

I'd also keep a copy of respectively email sent to them and received from them. Take all of these things, along beside verification that you wired them the money to an attorney, and ask him (or her) if you enjoy standing to sue.
Wire fraud. But you may have to sue surrounded by federal court in the locale of whoever get you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_fraud

Time between filing divorce dissertation and final divorce hearing my ex-wife did not clear her bills (her name only),?

will I own to pay them surrounded by order to hang on to from getting my credit ruined?
Last night a collection agency call upon my work asking for me but I was gone so the owner(talk roughly speaking embarasing) left me a data to call them today, which I did. The collection agent told me that since I live within WI which is a joint propery state I am responcible for the bill too and that they already posted it on my credit(without even consulting me formerly hand) and that if I wanted it removed I would own to pay them. I payed them immediatly. It be for her apartments electric bill and for a doctor bill neither of which I signed for or had any experience of until today. I have three question: 1. Did they pull a nifty one on me and trick me in to paying her bills? 2. May I sue her to restore your health the the money I am now out since when we file for divorce I distinctly remember the lawer telling us that one of the papers we signed stated that from that moment on we be responcble for our own finances his example was
Answers: If it is a community property state, that's a sticky one. If the debts be created after separation theoretically she should be responsible for them. Some states may consider the file date the separation date and some the date of the divorce.

If you pay the bills you can budge back and sue her for them. Your attorney may know how to get them incorporated into the divorce, depending on how far along the process is.

What are your thoughts about the No Child Left Behind Act?

Do you surmise that NCLB should be repealed or not? Why or why not? How could NCLB be made better? Sources please!!!!

Thanbks in credit!!
Answers: It's horrible.

To begin beside, each state is allowed to choose their own standards. That system some states have chosen awfully low standards, while others have chosen impossibly large ones. Neither is good for the children. One doesn't stand up against the average child while the other overwhelms them. Literally, a failing kindergarten in California could be on the third position honor roll in New Mexico! I know because my 2nd level niece and my third grade nephew walk to school contained by New Mexico and I teach contained by second and third grade within CA.

Since NCLB only test language and math, contained by many school these are the ONLY things that are taught. In my district they are so petrified that teacher will "waste” time teaching things that aren't tested, that they hold an hourly pacing calendar. Teachers catch written up if they are teaching something at the wrong time of sunshine or the wrong day adjectives together. Literally. my friends and I have be written up for teaching math surrounded by the morning, (the allotted time for math is 45 minutes in the afternoon), for culture social studies, (not part of the core curriculum and did not relate to the core curriculum story of Hats, Hats, Hats), for explaining a word to a second dialogue student, (it wasn't English Language Development time and the word wasn't part of the serious vocabulary listed for that week's instruction), for schooling a sound that be taught a previous week as in good health as teaching one that wasn't slotted to be qualified for two weeks, (the only time we can remedialize or enrich instruction is during "intercontinental access time"). We have also be written up for providing classroom time for children to think and analyze different problems. We be told that it took too long for the child to get the answer and a better use of their and our time within the classroom setting was to simply tell them the answer and to move onto something else.

Throughout the country, near are two main failing subgroups; English learner and learning disabled children. Are we really surprised? How can we expect someone who is research something to be as proficient as someone who already has mastery of it? The together situation screams of injustice when we realize that to be sticky label as an English learner a child is tested; their low score earn them the label. As soon as a child become proficient he is “redesignated” as “English proficient” and his scores don’t count within the English learner subgroup any longer.

Similarly, to be labeled as “learning disabled” children must score so poorly on undisputed standardized tests that in that is a three year discrepancy between their chronological age and his academic proficiency. Is nearby any wonder why six months later they adjectives don’t have indistinguishable score as their counterparts that did elapse the test? Is it truly a shock, or a statement roughly a teacher, university, or district when six months later that child doesn’t evaluation as well as a child who did overrun the test initially?


Tell me how this is adjectives of this helping our students? The advanced ones are bored to tears, the low ones are floundering, and the average ones are learning to sit melodiously and regurgitate what is given to them. Science, social studies, history and geography the very subjects that can spark a child's interest contained by learning, and are critical to understanding the world contained by which we live, have be swept under the runner. Before NCLB the appalling but true fact be that the average American couldn't find the US on the map of the world, now, next to no science, social studies etc. at all surrounded by the classroom how ignorant are our citizens going to be?


Moreover, the program looks at singular ONE test that be taken in five consecutive days, (at smallest here in CA) to determine how capably a school is doing. It does not lug into consideration how far the child has individually come, what personally is taking place in the student's existence, or how long that child has truly been contained by that particular arts school. Here are just a few anecdotes from final year's testing.

One student moved out the test surrounded by the middle of testing because his brother be sick and his mother was picking him up. She didn't want to come wager on after school to pick the student up. He be then kept out of institution for three days that week, and then the subsequent week, (the week of make ups), because his mother be too busy taking care of the brother.

Two brothers once in a blue moon came to arts school. Their parents were divorcing and their mother worked three job. She slept in the mornings and didn't stir them up. Therefore they were singular in class almost two days a week the whole academy year. We worked with social services adjectives year and they were eventually placed surrounded by foster care, but not until that time they took the NCLB tests.

A loved ones of 7 children, all of whom have been "home schooled" their entire energy entered our institution on the first day of conducting tests. It had be their mother’s belief that an ancient Babylonian devil inhabited thin black lines and so none of the children could read and they be afraid of pencils, yet it be mandatory that all of them be tested and their grades counted as a weighing up of our teaching even though none of them have even had one hour of instruction within our school.

One student go to Disneyland the week of testing. His mother said it be the only time she have off and needed to be there minus the crowds. He was later sick the week of makeovers.

I could go on, but you return with the picture. We have NO control over these circumstances, but these students’ grades are painted as a reflection of our training, our schools are labeled as “failing”, and our days further scripted. Moreover, the “pass” and “fail” label aren’t based on the average check scores. They are base on the amount of growth made in EACH of 36 subgroups IN ADDITION TO the number of children labeled as “proficient” respectively year in respectively subgroup. In other words, a whole college can make growth, but if one subgroup doesn’t craft as much growth as deemed crucial by NCLB guidelines, the WHOLE SCHOOL is labeled as failing. The school is later forced to send notice home to parents informing them that their child is attending a “failing” school and that they hold a right to move them to a “non-failing” school. Often the inventory of “non failing” schools contains school whose average scores are lower than the failing university, but since they showed the proper growth according to the NCLB guidelines, aren’t “failing”. How misleading is that?



Lastly, NCLB mandates a great deal of things. Then it takes away money from school it has deem as "failing", as it puts more mandates on the failing academy. How can a school beneath such sanctions survive? Last year my conservatory had $200 per classroom to buy adjectives the paper, pencils, erasers, Xerox copies, and so on that it needed, (forget things similar to balls for PE and niche, we haven't seen those for years). This year it be lowered to $100, but new WEEKLY 10 page test are being mandate. We don't have the money to pay cheque for these mandated test! People say, "Cut your budget." But where on earth? We have already done away beside art, music, assemblies, field trips, and plays. Our classrooms are vacuumed just twice a week. (And we aren't allowed to vacuum our own classrooms because of all the law prohibiting teachers from using powered devices on the school premises.) We no longer tutor history, science, geography, social studies. (They aren't on the state wide test at our grade plane.) How can we expect all children to succeed when the teacher, especially of our poorest and most needy, aren’t given the scheme to supply our students with rough learning supplies, agree to alone all the money to fulfill the requirements of the NCLB mandate?

No, Public Law 107-110, misleadingly known as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2000, is out of commission. Don’t let anyone transmit you that it is.
Thank Ted the drunk manslaughter Kennedy for NCLB
Let it stand and the teachers own up to their poor or accurate teaching.
Thats a cover up for adjectives the other garbage that the management is doing, when they get trapped within interviews with the medium, the politicians talk roughly speaking the "No Child left bringing up the rear act" Paloci, did that and so did Bush.
The whole item just doesn't bring in sense, or help kids. Like, within PA, if a school's students do poorly year after year on the standardized tests, the gov. will cut that school's funding. So, the school that really need serve aren't getting it, which does not help the students at hand, obviously. Also, adjectives the public schools newly end up taking a huge chunk of the year for coaching to the tests, mostly things that the students at a rate of knots forget. It's only for the test. The schools don't really supervision, they just obligation the funding.
I don't think it's doing anything.


meh, I feel it's a pretty crappy thing.
it improve scores for reading/writing and math, but adjectives other activities are cut spinal column or removed completely (ex-physical education, arts, or foreign vernacular classes are removed to make room for long math/English classes).
Also, teacher now solitary teach what they know will be on test, so anything outside of that material isn't person touched on, which is completely unrealistic.
I won't even mention the military recruitment issue.
It is a quip. It is intrusive and meddlesome for states by dangling federal money only if the states comply beside NCLB. The standardized tests involved distract teacher from teaching what is noteworthy and have them focus on principle for the tests. Also, it narrow school curriculum beside an emphasis on math and reading at the expense of science, ohys ed, and more. It also requires that large schools provide military recruiters equal access to students as higher schooling. Schools are required to provide contact information for every student to the military if requested, and schools are not required to narrate the students or parents.

How's that? NLCB is a disaster.
anything the government dose fail

Can i file a lawsuite?

hello to adjectives. ok i work for this benefit administrating company, in the cove area, my boss have been such a unprofessional supervisor for the ultimate 2 months he has be calling me things i don't appreciate like blind, slow, dumb and so on. i own spoke with HR but they relate me he is going to be himself. what can i do to protect my rights as a employee? please support, he has even call me dumb in front of a printer technician who does not work for the company, he have called other society dumb and dumber, and i don't like that. i don't hold that much money for a lawyer what can i do to get him pay for what he have done to my self-esteem. thank you
Answers: Get another job!
Every whiny little newborn wants to sue these daytime, be an adult and suck it up. "But.he hurt my self esteem" Get valid, grow up.

Maybe your boss is right, I mean you don't even know how to spell lawsuit.
God...why does everyone have a feeling the need to SUE????

Apply for other job!!
Work harder than the idiot boss and make him look discouraging!!
Stand up for yourself!!
I believe the equal employment opportunity commission handles nouns in the work place. You don't stipulation to be a minority to seek redress. They are federal and can hand over free advise and possibly take endeavour for you. If they feel you are defensible you would file a complaint near them. Document dates and times and exactly what be said. No one should be treated like that!

I'm sorry other associates are so incentive. The boss is wrong and does not have a right to be wounding. He may actually want to fire you but hope you will quit first because to be precise easier.
kick his ***, and later tell him to move about screw himself, but only after you find a hot job.

I be kidding in the region of the first paart, but you could just do something to his sports car or something like that when he isn't around. I 'm again kid.

Talk to him and see what he says, communicate him he is being unprofessional, or parley to the HR people and mention a suit I bet they will work them if they hear that. I don't think you should sue not for that, they are right everyone sues for no root, but you shouldn't let him obtain away with it any.

I'm saying of late say something don't be confrontational and don't really see his ***, or do anything violent.
You can check to see what the requirements are for laying-off. In my state, if an employee can prove that in attendance was an indecorous or illegal environment, and that despite his/her attempts to remedy the issue by bringing it to management's attention, the issue remains . . . he/she can quit and collect severance.

You could see an attorney who charges on a contingency fee idea (which means s/he'd attain a portion of whatever you won). In that armour, you may well hold a claim against the supervisor (and against the company) for "intentional infliction of emotional distress."

If you're really upset, I'd save a log of what is said/done. If you alert management, I'd do it contained by writing -- so that you have a mode to verify that it was done (you could even ask them to sign it truism the got a copy, next copy it for yourself).

This type of documentation would support you either course (unemployment or a lawsuit).

You could potentiality even record him making statements to you . . . .

If you perceive that your self-esteem has be damaged because of this, you should see a mental form professional (if you decide to step to court over this, the health professionals evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment can be used surrounded by court -- and the costs of the treatment can be added to the damages awarded to you. . . in extra to court costs, and stuff like that).

Can my company force me to transfer to another location within the same city specifically further away from my home?

There is a dispute at work between myself and 2 other managers. I go to executive level HR regulation and they said that no one is 100% right. They run their investigation, and told me that they decided to verbs me. They did not ask me if I was comfortable beside it. Is this legal? If I waste to do it, can they terminate me? Should they enjoy to compensate me for my additional mileage and driving time?
Answers: It's permitted, they can do it, and if you decline the transfer, they may permit you go lacking anything more than that which your employment contract expressly stipulates. Compensation for additional mileage and driving time is a event for negotiation if the offer or employment contract does not already expressly buy and sell with it. You would unlikely be entitled to it as a thing of law but you'd hold to check the law to create sure. Don't think so, though.

All that said, however, if the dispute be not handled duly and according to the law of your jurisdiction, within your view, you might awfully well nick the matter up next to an employment atty. Depends on the facts.

Caution: If you are considering pursuing the matter next to an atty, for goodness sake, shhhhh! and stay away from your department HR people. They represent the company, not YOU. It would be weak advised to offer the company any heads-up about your plans.
Yes, it's permitted.
And it's not uncommon.
If you don't want the verbs, quit.
samantha.arnold: The 50 miles has to do beside deducting moving expenses on your Federal income toll return. It has NOTHING to do next to ANY requirement for the employer to pay anything.

Your choices are devolution locations, or change companies.
Management wishes to retain you as an employee, so is giving you another nouns to work at. In alot of other cases like this, the creature would be seen out the door. You ask if they can cancel you because you don't want to go to the other location, settle for yourself go to the other location, remain at one and the same location and be happy beside what you have, start out the company and find employment somewhere else, nothing else.
You're complaining in the region of additional mileage and driving time to the other location, be comfortable that you still will have a career to go to.
There's more to this story than what you want to write, headship let you know what they be willing to do for you, rob it and stop crying about what you can't toy with.

Brother lives in FL... have warrant in MI, can't move state to take caution of it... we need counsel please!?

My brother lives in FL. He simply found out he has a misdemeanor warrant surrounded by MI. He needs to win it taken care of asap, so he can gain his license back. The MI circuit court contained by the city where the warrant be issued told him he MUST come in for a court date. He can't afford to travel to MI and he is on probation within FL, so he is not allowed to confer on anyway. The MI circuit court has told him going to court is the solitary way to clutch care of the warrant. There have to be another option, does anyone own any information??
Answers: An attorney is a good hypothesis but has he thought of asking FL probation authorization to go to MI if he have to? I would have thought that attending court within another jursidiction is an acceptable rationale for being out of state.
advocate, or you could do as my parents did at one point, I was contained by NJ and had a ticket contained by NC, couldn't go, a year subsequently I was home, have a warrant because of it and parents were visit city from which I had a ticket and they somehow be able to clutch care of it themselves and compensated it for me, without describing me, told me when they got put money on and asked me for the money to pay them support though, just be in motion and talk to them or hire a legal representative. a lawyer will probably be roughly speaking $500.

What is a class 1 misdemeanor?

i am trying to get a available job and they are asking about class one misdemeanors. i hold been convicted of driving near no licence, possesion of pot under 1/4 ounce, no proof of insurance, stealing below $100 is any of this a class 1?

oh by the way i no longer break the imperative instead i am trying to be a cop and going to school for it i straightened up as i get older.
Answers: It depends upon how your state define first degree misdemeanors. You'll enjoy to look at your criminal record to see if any of them are first amount -- each state classifies crimes differently.

It's angelic that you're turning your life around. Kudos to you.
Misdemeanors are divided into three category: Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3. Class 1 misdemeanors are the most serious and Class 3 are the least serious. The maximum penalty are:

Class 1 misdemeanor: up to $2,500.00 fine and six months in detention centre;

Class 2 misdemeanor: up to $750.00 fine and four months in send down;

Class 3 misdemeanor: up to $500.00 fine and 30 days in send to prison.

so to answer you questions, no none of those crimes count as class 1
Find it a LITTLE complicated to believe cops would entertain the notion of a prospect beside a record as multi-varied as yours even if it is ancient history as you claim. But angelic luck with that nonetheless. Strongly suggest you spend more time on your permissible training. Misdemeanors are classified differently in respectively state. Here's a good overview of Viriginia classifications, for example: http://virginiacriminallawyers.vatraffic... To find the classification system of misdemeanors surrounded by your state, Google 'misdemeanor class one I and the name of your state'.

Is the legal drinking age noticeably going to be raised to 21 (UK)?

I lately heard more or less it, not impressed! I turn 18 in 2 weeks and presently I hear this!
Answers: Short English Law answer: ' No it is not '.
Questions like this are frequently on Q & A . Ever since the brand new Licensing Laws came into effect within November 2005 there have been concern and claims that binge drinking and alcohol related offence have increased. Depends on whose information you accept but the issue most not long came up beside the Ch. Constable of Cheshire Peter Fahey who in August 2007 said the age hinder should be raised from 18yrs to 21 yrs. A Ms.Meg Hillier a Home Office formal said then that raise the age limit would not solve the problems.
Again, on 26th Sept 2007, and reported on column 27th Sept 2007 in The Independent News < communication.independent.co.uk/ uk/legal/article2866728.ece> she rejected the call and is quoted as dictum ' it would demonise or prevent a lot of adults who are drinking pretty sensibly'.
The Govt. can off course other change it's mind and next to a new Prime Minister rejecting much of the Blair years policies anything could come to pass but the present Govt's attitude is that there are ample powers and penalty in force already and it is up to the police to use them.
So to recap, No, in attendance are no steps in place at the present to tilt the age limit.
Edit; 'Granfathered' or 'Grandfather rights' is an expression explanation that if a law change the people who already wallow in the right can keep it even if the imperative changes and deprives others. This would not apply to a changeover in drinking age ends because, as in smoking decree changes, the difficult law age define applies to all .. it would be muddle if you had two different age groups, some competent to buy, others refused, a short time ago because of when their birthday happened.
Well contained by two weeks you better buy all the liquor you can achieve your hands on!

I muse if you are 18-20 at the point of inception of the law you are grandfathered contained by though.
That's a joke. Some of my best drinking be done between the ages of 15 and 18. The minute I hit 19, the hangovers started kicking within, so I cut down on my drinking.

I bet more kids will turn to the weed because of it. You mark my words!
Hmm. Wl Here contained by the U.S you hav to be aleast 21 to drink.. idk.. I reli don't think Britain wl transmute the laws.. N if they do I doub it wl be inwardly the next year or so..

If you have to do jury service but normally pass out, would they reject you as a juror ?

Answers: If you own a medical condition which may interfere with your Jury duty, you should get the clerk of the court aware of it as soon as possible, and if needs be, draw the attention of the clerk to the Jury at the earliest possible moment the daylight you arrive.

In the criminal court, each 'session' last from 10.30 - 1.00 and 2.00 to about 4.30 respectively day.
That is the maximum.
There are regularly breaks and often things start behind schedule and finish early.
You may find yourself contained by your two weeks doing very little time sitting contained by the jury box.

I would suggest that if you can do it, you should. it is important that as masses people as possible serve on jury and it is the last few remaining areas where on earth citizens can have a say aloud on what happens to their fellow citizens. .
Yes.

More Questions and Answers:
[780] - [136] - [911] - [724] - [2226] - [1380] - [515] - [30] - [1301] - [537] - [715] - [904] - [469] - [1011] - [2367] - [1402] - [1938] - [2283] - [1222] - [1757]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: