Law Questions and Answers

California won the right to regulate vehicle emissions but can they in actuality enforce it?

I thought that only the Federal Government, via the Environmental Protection Agency, could set the standard for vehicle emission and how many miles per gallon vehicle are to maintain.
Answers: Barbara,
as a proud Southern Californian I can bring up to date you that the State will make the deadline as they propose and will set standards according to what "they" feel level are legally pleasing and environmentally sound.

The environmental impact reports (EIR) surrounded by California are likely the toughest within the nation (with the exception to possibly Hawaii). The State has the right to run beyond the Federal Government guidelines and as long as the Federal minimum standard is set - the State is allowed to make those standards better than the Federal Guidelines would allow.

I can update you from first hand experience that the foundation desalinization (by way of example) is so slow surrounded by the State of California is due in hulking part to the EIR phase (in totting up to permitting) pertaining to a) Brine (aka "blow out") that requires disposal and b) the temperature of the lagoons in the vicinity by for the entry of water to the system. This go on to much more detail and is different from the question you ask; however, similar surrounded by that EIR reports also impact vehicle emissions contained by the same rage they do with clean construction of anything whether building, plants, factories, and even stores and school.

With the population density between Los Angeles and San Diego onto San Ysidro and the Mexican Border town of Tijuana - I will attest first hand to the vital vehicle emission regulation base on this same density. Traveling the 234 or the 110 from Pasadena to L.A. as one approaches from the San Gabriel Mountains or traveling due West from the Inland Empire you literally see a stream of smog hovering the highway route. This is true also driving the I-5 (Interstate-5), I-10, I-15, I-215, I-405 (aka the 405), I-610, the 710, the Hollywood 101, or the 91 between between the Counties of Orange, L.A., Riverside, and San Bernardino. (By the opening all the highway I listed above are the key thoroughfares through any part of Southern California - Interstates finish in "5" move North and South, those climax in "0" move traffic surrounded by a West - East fashion; and I would articulate East-West only on the West Coast you technically are as far "West" as you can get).

Hope this help a bit.
My state has a vehicle emission law i.e. slightly stricter than the federal guidelines. All cars made after 1995 have to pass by an emissions trial during the yearly inspection. It have actually sustain cut down on pollution and is bringing in more levy money since the emissions inspection costs 20$ more than the regular inspection for cars made since 1995.

Can i smoke legaly if i am on probation but have a medical marijuana card in need gettin in trouble next to my po

I was lately placed on probation and will start getting tested by my probation officer. I am currently 17 and turn 18 in a couple of months. If when i turn 18 i bring back a medical marijuana card, can i possess and smoke marijuana legally in need getting in trouble beside my probation officer / the court?
Answers: what is the illness that you possess?
Yes, as long as you can provide the card and your doc will verify that it is legit. You cannot be judge for a dirty drug test when you enjoy a legal symbols for the drug. This isnt just for marijuana, but any other controlled substance. As long as you own a legit rx, you cannot be prosecuted or judged. It also cannot hold on to you from getting a job and cannot be used to fire you from a errand.

It is legal.
articulate to po first about this. I never hear of that for tendinitous.

Does any one know how long a stop on your DL is from child support?

in fl or ohio
Answers: As within your dl was suspended? Probably until you ensnare up on your payments. You may also need to set up a payroll conclusion.

How do I know which state I am a resident of? My drivers license is from Washington state and I am?

registered to vote there. I hold not worked in 10 years and enjoy not paid any taxes. My husband is contained by the army and his state tax status is from TN even though he have a Missouri drivers license and is registered to vote in New York. Thank you for your facilitate.
Answers: As a military wife, unless the rules have changed, your end stateside residence where you are registered to vote and your license be issued is your state of residence until you return to the states and change both.

ex mw... :) Have fun, what a great assignment you enjoy!
you are a resident where your primary residence is. you should own a drivers license for the state in which you reside.
it does not event how many states you own property within one of them is your primary residence and that is where on earth you are to be licensed, vote, pay federal taxes et-cetra.
Where do you stir to bed at night? That's your residence.

Am I responsible to pay for my son's eyeglasses if the court orders me to wages medical?

My ex-wife called and demanded I settle 80 percent of my son's glasses. I told her I would rate half and she said i needed to remuneration more. I'm just curious if sight is considered medical. I will pay what I own to pay for my son to be capable of see, however, she consistely threatens to take me to court for everything. I rate exactly what I'm supposed to and much more. I'm just curious what the directive is. Thanks for your advice. Oh i live within NY.
Answers: I think the other answers did a obedient job of answering what portion you are required to settle for in the divorce law. But I will add, that if say aloud vision and dental are not specifically mentioned contained by the decree, than a adjectives definition used by a court to define "medical expenses" is (and I won't give all the other legalese that go with this) roughly anything important to return the body to functional status. So, what would be required in this situation would be doesn`t matter what is necessary to return your son's mirage to "normal." But you should remember, this doesn't aim that you have to repay whatever your wife tell you to pay. For example, if the cost of specs is say $100, but she picks out a designer twosome (without your consent) for $200. You are only required to reimburse your share of the item that is "compulsory to return the body to functional status." So, in this skin if your share was 80 percent, than $80.

Now beside that being said, by adjectives means if its your son that desires the item (designer glasses) and not your wife's doing, talk to your son just about the value of money, etc (however, if the straightforward glasses look ridiculous, don't consent to the poor kid go around looking silly.)
What loving of an *** doesn't take caution of his son to spite his wife.

You're a real smash.
Yes vision is considered medical.

There is no lawful liability other than the divorce agreement you are bound to. You enjoy stated that you are responsible for your sons medical expenses so yes, under the contract you are required to take-home pay for glasses.
I suggest it depends on your decree. Mine states i wage for "health" insurance and then 50% of anything that insurance don't cover and this includes figment of the imagination and dental, but i carry adjectives 3 just to be locked and save money since those are cheap programs to be contained by.

So i guess it would really depend on how your decree is worded.
Yes, specs are considered medical - so it would be covered under the percentage you per your decision.

For example my decree say I pay 60% and ex pays 40%. So if they said they be $100.I would pay 60 and he would settle up 40.

I don't think you are trying to catch out of paying for you son I think you are purely tired of your exwife nickel and diming you and threatening. This is why we have divorce decree and child support orders..it covers these silly little scenario.
Read the Decree again. The ones with which I am familiarized say the party are to split any unpaid or uncovered medical expenses.

I strongly suspect the Court would consider corrective lenses a medical expense even though not covered by insurance. If it is more than corrective lenses, like some eye disease, consequently the court would definitely consider it medical, and the insurance should also.

** Note: This answer have not created an attorney-client relationship. This is a general discussion of the subject issue of your question and not legalized advice. Local law or your particular situation may renovate the general rules. For a specific answer to your cross-examine you should consult legal counsel beside whom you can discuss all the facts of your travel case. **
It's medical as far as I know.
Maybe next time of late take your son for eyeglasses yourself.
It's get to s*ck to have an other threatening ex. good luck
and unusual choice of avatar.
You aren't reasonably responsible. Vision coverage is separate from medical, just similar to dental. I know, because I have be in this situation individual a child with the separate coverage's from parents insurance policies.

You are morally obligated to money in my feelings. I think 50/50 is specifically fair since you already provide her the court ordered support.

The family giving you grief on here just enjoy cold hearts or haven't lived surrounded by a broken home. I did and my mother was markedly fair to my father. You are a polite father, keep it up.

Is it illegal contained by Tennessee to use a cell phone while driving?

Answers: If you are driving on a learners area monopoly or intermediate license, yes. http://www.state.tn.us/tccy/tnchild/55/5...

(n) (1) No driver possessing a learner permit or intermediate driver license pursuant to the provisions of this unit shall operate a motor vehicle in motion on any highway while using a paw held cellular telephone, cellular sports car telephone, or other mobile mobile phone.
Apparently at least within certain cases, yes. People beside learners permit and "intermediate licenses" can not use cell phones in TN

See:
http://www.tennessee.gov/safety/publicat...

and

http://www.michigan.gov/documents/michne...

Is illegal to post pics of an ex when she took em near your camera and put them on your laptop without u?

i be gone and she took nude photos with my camera put em on my laptop and later made a movie called for my man. afterwards when we broke up she didnt want them back. so is it iffy to post em
Answers: Yes it is illegal to post them because they be intended for private use not public. This would be her valid arguement if you were to post them and as within have be cases of this in days gone by where someone get sued and had to repay for the damages they cost by posting these type of pics. I would not recommend it.
She gave them to you. They're yours to do near as you see fit. But you're not going to win any friends with that conduct, and you may curl up paying in ways you never expected--especially if she have a brother who would think nought of engaging contained by a little assault and mobile.

** Note: This answer has not created an attorney-client relationship. This is a nonspecific discussion of the subject matter of your cross-examine and not legal direction. Local laws or your faddy situation may change the broad rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult officially recognized counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. **
You own them and may do next to them as you please

If the article of conderations were still within effect how might article II restrict powers the federal gov't has

Answers: First and foremost, the Federal Government could not recount any state what to do. Since the states retains in itself as a sovern nation, they would want their own fate, not the federal political affairs. There would not be the huge sweel of agencies to handle everything. The federal Government would be really limited contained by its power to do anything including the collection of taxes. The federal government would not be within the business of prosecuting crimes. In summary, the Fedral would be very small, fixed in influence and power, and have remarkably little say within the day to afternoon working of the states. Too bad it doesnt work that agency right now!!!

Why isn't this a felony?

I think this should become a felony. If you drive in need at least liability insurance you step to prison if you have an catastrophe. If you aren't responsible enough to continue proper insurance then you aren't responsible satisfactory to drive.

The main grounds is that insurance companies are probably protected by our government. It's a big money initiator to have responsible driver's grasp not only liability but also uninsured coverage.

If you can't afford to repay insurance then ride the bus or amble. I am very irritated that I enjoy to pay to protect myself from these ancestors. It's wrong and people should not be capable of get away near it.
Answers: The situation is a little more complicated than you appear to understand. The premium rider for underinsured or uninsured protection is because some U.S. States enjoy lower minimum coverage requirements than others.

If you're in an disaster with a motorist from one of those poorer minimum coverage requirement states with a vehicle registered near ... you're protected for the difference. Vehicles registered in your state must be insured for the minimum coverage required contained by your state. Insurance companies can not issue coverage for less than the state law's minimum.

There will other be irresponsible people who drive lacking insurance. We need protection against accident with them. Of course they shouldn't be driving, but they do it anyway. They normally get thrown surrounded by prison for it if they are a repeat offender or hold a serious accident (loss of life span or great bodily injury). It's a sad state of affairs, but they exist. Police within many states verbs random check points ... looking for uninsured motorists and they arrest them. I've be through these quite regularly.
You're right.
Roughly 60% of your insurance premiums are due to Uninsured Drivers. Unfortunately, this has also lead many family to generate increased hostility toward Illegal aliens, since they are more inclined not to enjoy insurance as well.
Its a huge issue!!!
I do agree that within should be a zero tolerance policy for driving in need insurance. However jail time contained by an already overcrowded penal system may be pushing it.

Driving without insurance, even if here has not be an accident should get a minimum penalty of your vehicle person impounded (with a hefty levy) and you license being suspended.
Hey I get a "habitual offender" on my license and disqualified for a DUI in 2001. a driving below suspension in 2004 and 2007. Three unrelated offenses contained by over six years. Now I dont know if I can EVER get my license put money on. Is that fair?

Got caught shoplifting?

I get caught shoplifting a few days ago and I am 19 years ancient.
I came to the U.S. to swot English and hopefully in the adjectives to get a assignment. But I stole some food and got caught. I know I shouldn't enjoy done it, and I really regret it now. The guarantee took me to someplace and took my picture and had me sign on a serious newspaper which said that I couldn't go to that store for a year. At that time, I have my student ID and I don't have a social guarantee number and citizenship. And a cop came and said that he have to call someplace close to my country's embassy to sue me but he wouldn't do it because he didn't want to do that crap. I am afraid it will be on my permanent diary.
They only know my first name and address and phone number and didn't say anything going on for court order. Even if I don't enjoy us citizenship and social security number, will it be on the copy?
Answers: I dont think so because you dont hold a social security number to fire up with, therefor you dont hold a record.
No social wellbeing number so no record. Be appreciative they DID NOT sue you otherwise you will be deported.

next time, respect the country's tenet if you want to stay there. I'm staying here within Saudi Arabia and the laws here doesn't brand sense, but I still do follow it since I don't want to be deported.
I can understand your plight and the cop did too.
It isrough when you don't own money for food, but begging is safer than stealing.
If you have been arrested and adjectives the paperwork had be filled out, you not individual would have a everlasting black mark, but you would also hold been detained and deported as an undesireable alien.
You stipulation to find that cop and store Manager and thank them on bended knee for the favor they did for you.
You don't seem to be to realize just what they hold done in the designation of Samaritanism.
Shame on you - the rest of us, most of whom work hard for a living, remuneration inflated prices to pay for what you steal. I hold no sympathy whatsoever.

More Questions and Answers:
[625] - [2399] - [71] - [97] - [912] - [1750] - [1422] - [1688] - [1901] - [902] - [1834] - [642] - [1308] - [1956] - [1619] - [1704] - [2430] - [2008] - [1061] - [832]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: