Law Questions and Answers

Why does it seem that the ACLU singular helps ethnic group that don't need and deserve the give a hand?

I could be wrong but an example The men in Texas that be on Death Row and were released thankfulness the DNA evidenece. Where was the ACLU?

But when Vick is guilty as sin here they come?

So what liberty are they supposed to protect.

Am I wrong or is this a coinkidink?
Answers: The ACLU is a big crock of ****. They mean nil, they do nothing, and they are zilch.

I can't stand them. It's my personal mission to shut them down forever. They need to shut up and procure a life.

Thanks for getting my blood going this morning :) I needed an extra see to the start of the day. I can't stand the ACLU!!!!!!!!!!!!
I haven't see anything suggesting that the ACLU is acting on behalf of Vick. Please provide a link.

As for the DNA cases, the ACLU argues constitutional issues, not evidentiary issues. The ACLU does row the death cost every day within courts all over the country. You should pilfer a look at their webpage to see the cases that they are involved in.
[The ACLU was] established surrounded by 1920 by Roger Baldwin (who candidly stated that “Communism [was] the goal” toward which his hard work were directed...

These adjectives provide great explanations to answer your question...

The ACLU vs. America: Exposing the Agenda to Redefine Moral Values (Paperback) - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0805440...

Why Liberals Always Protect Perverts - http://www.townhall.com/columnists/Kevin...

The ACLU: Enemy of America and Christianity - http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Artic...


The ACLU did not run to the rescue of Vick but, that does not disqualify your cross-examine in my evaluation.
I am not a supporter of the ACLU. I think that they are extremists and contained by many cases spoil our society.

But to answer your question the ACLU is not designed to comfort people as much as they are supposed to facilitate keep our individual liberty intact.
The ACLU didn't come anywhere close to Michael Vick.

You should check the work the ACLU does. Mostly good stuff.
the ACLU is the biggest foe of our Constitution that ever existed. they will sue Christians at the drop of a head covering but defend university installing wash basin for Muslim.

you should read about how and why they be established, the main basis was to protect communists that be being 'outed' by McCarthy. while he may own went too far, copious forget that there be valid reasons for at that time the communists be indeed infiltrating our nation. the communist party of America at that time have many supporters surrounded by Hollywood, the arts, and the unions. it may also surprise some that they are still influential today and you can google their web site and revise a lot almost what they have be able to accomplish here and changed the view of many who enjoy no idea that they are the effect of many liberal view that are spouted today.
The ACLU is not representing Vick. Never was. The ACLU is concerned beside systemic violations of civil rights, not errors contained by individual cases. If Texas law be such that DNA could only be admit by the prosecutor and not by the defense, that would interest the ACLU. But there be nothing wrong next to Texas law, the error be in the evidence, not the statute. So, that is what regular lawyer do, appointed or retained. The ACLU has no interest contained by getting people out of prison, singular in ensure that the law does not violate the rights of adjectives the people.

Repossession???

What is the california state law on repossession??
i enjoy a guy friend who is 73 days late on his saloon payment. he think his car might get hold of repossessed...he has spoken beside his car place and he told them he will be paying the coup in full subsequent month but they told him they can not hold the account until he make a payment of 500 he doesnt enjoy 500 until next month. do you imagine his car will be repoed or do u devise he has time. or what is the statute on this.?
Answers: The law is simple: you miss a reward, they can take the sports car. Anything they give you is because they want to capture paid and believe if they work next to you, they will get salaried.

But 73 days is 2 payments plus, and is usually enough to procure the paperwork started to grab the vehicle.
repoed

Is a contract enforceable when one party agrees not to sue another for breach of existing contracts?

Is a contract enforceable (i.e. is near consideration) when one party (in dutiful faith or contained by bad faith) agrees not to initiate litigation (or not to sue) against the other body for an alleged breach of an existing contract between the parties.

If anyone can point to a site that specifically mentions this or a suitcase where this be resolved, it would be much appreciated.
Answers: As noted in other answers, a contract depends on mutually valid consideration.

Typically, the remedy for a breach is contained by dispute (as is the fact of a breach itself). If as portion of forming a new contract, nearby is some modification of conditions and both sides agree to waive claims under the mature contract, the new contract is enforceable.

If, equally, the party that breached the contract have leverage (e.g. sole supplier of a necessary division for the other parties product) and uses that leverage to coerce a waiver of any liability for previous breaches and additional compensation for resuming its responsibilities beneath the old contract, a court might seriously ask whether or not there be true consideration in the latest contract.
Yes -- a promise not to sue is generally considered valid consideration for that knees-up so agreeing -- of course, the other fte also needs to provide consideration.

As for the casing citation -- that would obviously depend on your country and state/province.
yeah i guess this is for blaw hw. does anyone have any casing to cite for it though, or a link to a website that can be cited that confirms what empire above are saying?

Attempted sexual assault on a minor?

what is the average sentence for attempted sexual assaults?

websites and sources would be great :)

thanks beforehand
Answers: 12 will getcha 20.
not sure, but i know its not worth the risk, man!

..those auxiliary details would have help before I put my initial answer. lol
SHAME ON YOU!!!


stifle:LOL..oh!..sorry.x

haha...sounded like you in reality attempted to assualt someone ans were startled they were going to report you ...so you looked-for to know what you were going to frontage...lol...so sorry..waahahahahaha..
That will be difficult to answer with in recent times the information given.

Most states have sentencing guidelines, but the adjudicate has discretion to filch several factors into consideration. These include prior journal, amount of physical force, and victim input.

You did state "attempted". From a standard standpoint, an incohate crime (uncompleted) is punishable by half the cost of the completed act.
Of course you said 'attempted' and near that in mind the previous response I believe is the correct answer. However, if you intended sexual assaults then...
---------

What Happens to Rapists When They Are Caught and Prosecuted?

61% of rapes/sexual assaults are not reported to the police. Those rapists, logically, never serve a day contained by prison according to a statistical average of the past five years.

* If the rape is reported to police, in that is a 50.8% chance that an arrest will be made.
* If an arrest is made, here is an 80% chance of prosecution.
* If within is a prosecution, there is a 58% kismet of a felony conviction.
* If there is a felony conviction, here is a 69% chance the convict will spend time within jail.
* So, even surrounded by the 39% of attacks that are reported to police, there is singular a 16.3% chance the rapist will train up in prison.
* Factoring contained by unreported rapes, about 6% of rapists — 1 out of 16 — will ever spend a light of day in secure unit. 15 out of 16 will walk free.
Well, since attempted sexual on a minor, shows "intent."
And by decree. It is against the law, for a minor to "provide concent."
You are facing a "felony." The judge will enjoy to determine
your sentence, after he reviews your record, to see if you hold
any "priors" on file.
If you are an fully fledged. You'll have to register as a "sex perpetrator."
For life. What a lavish for such a young natural life, <}:-{(

If someome pressed charges against you for something you did to them...?

& then they don't even show up to the trial/court! my legal representative plans a new courtdate within 4 months, hoping they show up to that one,-what would you do?
Answers: At this point, there's nothing you can do except loaf. They've obviously made it clear you aren't make the acquaintance of in that establishment, and probably at her request, so don't try to contact her. Also, contacting her works against you - if you contact her and apologize, to be exact an admission of guilt, and can be used against you within court.

As for not serious - it obviously be to her. Especially if, at any point, she made it clear she wasn't interested. Drunkeness is no excuse to paw all over someone, or push yourself on them sexually within anyway, and it can be scary for her to be within that position. If I were you, I'd purloin that as a sign that you can't handle your liquor and abstain within the future. Your alcohol problem shouldn't be hers, or anyone else's,
If it is a criminal business -- you have the constitutional right to confront your accuser, and can force them to nick the stand at trial.

However, there is no requirement for the accuser to show up at any other preliminary proceeding -- misplaced a subpoena issued by the court that they appear for certain hearing.

In a civil matter -- if the party bringing the complaint does not appear, either individually or through their attorney -- they default (lose).
I would assume the burden would be for them to plan the court date, since they are making the charges. If they don't show up the accusation should be dismissed unless they have a really good excuse.

Can you answer my question?

why is abortion lawful but when somone kills a pregnant woman they are charged next to a double homocide?
Answers: Abortion is murder whether someone gave consent or not. Thats approaching saying if I give consent for someone to kill my brother its not murder. People want to preserve abortion legal so they dont enjoy to deal near pregnancy. Its stupid I think.
Because one occur with the consent of the mother, and one occur without the consent of the mother.

Just close to sex becomes rape if nearby is no consent -- abortion becomes murder if near is no consent.

Whether you agree with that distinction or not -- that's the drive the law treats the two movements differently.

Does the Death Penalty undervalue vivacity?

why?
Answers: Opposing the death cost undervalues the lives of the victims.
That's the age-old query - does the death cost not value existence by taking it from convicted killers, or does it honor it by demanding the authoritative penalty for taking it?
I hold to admit I'm a bit sitting on the fence but I lean in favor of it, as long as it's judiciously administered. (And that doesn't hold to mean appealed till the finale of time for no reason! End automatic appeals!)
Yes. It assumes that a party is no better than his worst act.

Police had a poke about warrant and took stuff. Am I being charged next to a crime?

I was contained by jail for olden times two weeks. I get home to find out a week and a partially ago the police came to my home near a search warrant and took my laptops, ipods and some cameras. I in recent times bonded out of jail today. If I be getting charged with something wouldnt they own already charged me? and also, wouldn;t I have be restricted from being released from send to prison? Also am I allowed to go catch a copy of the warrant from the police station, or will they try to arrest me?
Answers: It depends on the country you are in -- if you are surrounded by the US, then you are entitled to a copy of the warrant, as powerfully as an inventory of what was taken.

However, within the US -- you must have be charged with something already to hold been contained by jail for two weeks. Bail is solely set if you have be charged and bound over for trial.

And (again, in the US) the police cannot arrest you on the current charges if you hold been released on bail -- but they may know how to arrest you for some other unrelated criminal charge.

Your best option is to enjoy your attorney get the copy of the warrant and inventory -- again, within the US, you have the right to an attorney for any criminal issue where you can be held within jail.
They may still be reunion evidence to build their case against you.

You can bring a copy of the warrant to make sure they merely took what was written within the warrant, but chances are the warrant be written with pretty huge guidelines!
You are entitled under canon to receive both a copy of the warrant as well as an inventoried and itemized detail of properties taken.

You also have the right to emergency the return of those confiscated items if they are not directly related to a crime - stolen property as an example - if anything is destabilized you can file a Federal claim to be reimbursed.
They might be looking at your stuff to put together sure you dont have anything wrong on it. And no, there are things call stautes of limitations, they can take a abiding amount of time to charge you.

Laws not for the Common Good...?

could any name a decree that has be passed that is not for the adjectives good
Answers: Really a tough sound out because it would be so easy to argue roughly speaking both "common" and "good" as separate words and as a phrase. For, example a local Air Force base be saved from closure. It's within a town of only going on for 10,000. Saving it from closure is good for the reduction of Clovis, New Mexico, but is that "common" good for the nation? Las Alamos National Labs is losing jobs--that is to a degree due to more streamlined modern research and a more limited mission. That's bleak for Los Alamos but probably good for the nation. If you go wrong to pay child support, you can lose your driver's license. If you drive on a revoked license, you walk to jail. How can you work and pay packet child support if you can't get to a place of employment? That a amazingly common decree that makes no sense to me at adjectives. Look at DUI laws, too. If you start driving and realize you're too drunk to drive, you may need to pull stale the road to sleep it off. You're still quilty of a DUI/DWI if the key are in the ignition because you're within custody and control of the vehicle. That doesn't seen to be for the adjectives good. Many local law limit the number of pets you can own. If you rescue a starving dog and that puts you over the local decrease, you've saved a existence and you've violated the law. Where's the adjectives good? Here's a thought I get from a question on here a few minutes ago. A 13 year behind the times girl is pregnant and her parents are allowing her to marry. Why is a pregnant child better off married to another child? Where's the adjectives good within even allowing her parents to make that judgment? On a broader societal level, you could whim an argument about marijuana use. I'm a somewhat old guy and not a smoker, but does anyone ever get hold of stoned on pot and murder the liquor store owner? (ok-maybe the Hersey's chocolate owner). Wouldn't it be better to tax marijuana and concentrate on unyielding drugs that either waste people or create them violent? Even free speech, which is exceedingly precious to me, can be carried too far. Should those crazies from the Westboro Baptist Church really be allowed to show up at military funerals and harass the family of our fallen soldiers?
It depends. Do you connote one that really is not for the common devout (many many example) or one that race have never claimed is for the adjectives good?

Many law are passed claiming they are for the common accurate -- in reality, almost all broad public laws topple into this category. There is disagreement -- often vehement -- something like whether a given law in truth IS for the common devout, however.

Some recent federal examples -- the Partial Birth Abortion ban (arguably, an out of place exercise of Congressional authority to regulate state medical practice); the Military Commissions Act (directly violates at smallest four separate Constitutional provisions); the law amending FISA to allow for domestical warantless wiretapping (which violate only two separate Constitutional provisions); and so on.
The adjectives good is regularly regarded as a utilitarian wonderful, thus representing "the greatest possible good for the greatest possible number of individuals".

Subsidies for Archer Daniels Midland or the Chrysler bailout. Any pork vat project and saving Clovis AFB not for the adjectives good.

Remaining contained by Iraq takes money away from nurture

Advertising a yard mart? Is this legal?

If I enjoy a yard public sale, do I have to enjoy permittion by the township, give hand-out sheets of papers hype the yard public sale in people's mailboxes? What more or less putting the yard mart advertisment papers, on people's cars? Do I have to catch permittion, to advertise a courtyard sale this channel? If yes, how can I get permittion to do this?
Answers: Most village and towns make you attain a permit. Sometimes they are free sometimes a few bucks. Mail box no federal imperative. Papers, posted instores laundry mats, ect yes. on cars I visualize it is ok but I would not want you pulling up my wiper blade. It is a personal thing.sometimes you do have need of permission to post though. Ask your township what is the right mode to go. They enjoy the real answers and we here are singular guessing.
You cannot put anything in someones messages box. It is a Federal Crime. You may put a stamp on it and have it mail to them. And you need to dance to your city hall to ask almost flyers on cars. Different cities have different law regarding that. The city law also vary from city to city on endorsement out flyers to people contained by person. Again, check near city hall.

You can place a sign contained by your yard and hype in the broadsheet. You can advertise on bulletins boards that allow advertisement. You cannot place a sign on a pole as that is considered destruction of property and/or vandalism and wishy-washy and telephone companies prosecute in a minute, more than ever before. You cannot place a sign on anyone else's property minus permission and to protect yourself, it must be written authorization or they could say they never said yes and sue you.
you can puff in the thesis.

If you are putting flyers on people's cars then you obligation the permision of the place where you are doing it as it is their property (ie walmart's parking lot)

If you staple the sign onto city owned property then you are suppose to ask for approval. but in veracity they dont usually say anything
Over here almost any hing go, signs with arrows and address, ad in the Saturday broadsheet or signs outside the house.
There is a rumour the tax man looks out for those that regularly own them.
One of my friends who is into that sort of thing say he will see something one weekend at one address, and the next weekend it will be at another, next to a slightly higher price.

More Questions and Answers:
[55] - [58] - [1528] - [1296] - [538] - [1934] - [435] - [2251] - [1479] - [610] - [1360] - [1374] - [1326] - [1173] - [2489] - [1355] - [1959] - [1217] - [1314] - [2087]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: