Law Questions and Answers

Is it illegal to use an HIAB beside out a certificate?

Answers: yes.

Aristotle ethical theory relevance to business?

Can anyone explain how aristotle's ethical assumption, which is sometimes referred to virtue or guise ethic, relevant to business?

Answers: No. For business, think of scuffle strategies.

Did anybody withdrawn counterfeit money from wellsfargo?

My sister was bank with Wellsfargo for a long time,her monthly income was directly deposited contained by this bank,soon she withdrawn her money to pay her bills and for allowance,she be given a hundred dollar bills,one of those bills is a counterfiet money which my sister innocently used to purchase some personal needs,she be being chain and for a few hours was taken her right,be demoralized,etc..nobody believes her even she show them her withrawal slips,she is now facing a trial,she is a directive abiding citizen, a very clothed person and a devout sister,the best wife and mother of three children,We need somebody to come forward if they come up to have this liberal of experience,please contact us.thank you

Answers: *
************
******************************
If they find nothing save for the bill she passed, they can do nothing.

Just Wait it out.

One of the reason it is so difficult to prosecute counterfeiters is that you rarely know who is guilty.

If you do not have' any equipment that can be used to counterfeit and you hold no associations with counterfeiters, they will amount that out and eventually drop every thing.

Do not verbs, she will not be formally changed unless they find something very incriminating

My guess is within is something else in your sisters departed that either you don't know or are not relating to cause the police to do adjectives this

Tell her to get a attorney

Your sister should get society to testify for her either surrounded by writing or in personality. She needs behaviour witnesses. The more the better.

It is strange that she was arrested. I once give a counterfeit bill along with others for a edge deposit. The bank confiscated the bill but here was no thought of other motion against me. Your sister may have some type of account or could have be watched by the police.

T

Sorry to hear roughly speaking ur sister.. what state did this happen surrounded by?
I do not believe they can do a darn thing to her unless she be set up by them.. doesn't sound similar to they have any proof..

it is sorrowful she had to be in motion thru all of the awkwardness of being handcuff ..I am sure it was demoralizing..
angelic luck to ya...

the only item she can do at this point is ride it out.. but I feel sure they will drop charges,, would suggest have a attorney on hand ,,, as not to seize railroaded..

Free the Jena Seven! did ya know?

yep, now within is seven. recken that seventh one saw all of the other six getting rich next to donations, so he jumped contained by?

check this out:http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll...

Answers: Only seven. wait till the word get around.

By the way;

Myth: Black student asked principal if he could sit beneath 'White' tree

Truth: Black student JOCULARLY (jokingly) asked the principal if he
could sit under the
tree (the word white be not mentioned)

Myth: Nooses were hung contained by response to black students sitting under
tree

Truth: Nooses be hung because of pep rally for an upcoming hobby
against the cowboys
along with signs truism 'hang'em high', 'Hang dem cowboys' and the
like. Also BOTH blacks
and whites be putting thier heads through the nooses contained by a joking
attitude

Myth: the DA was stictly refering to the blacks near his 'I could end
your lifes next to a
stroke of a pen' statement

Truth: he was address EVERYONE who was adjectives up, and being
immatture (he be rather
irritated not a soul was listen to him/taking him seriously) ; whites
and blacks

Myth: a white guy beat up a black guy for trying to enter his all-white
event

Truth: There were white and blacks at this INVITATION ONLY do; the
one trying to enter
where nearby trying to cause trouble.

Myth: A white man pulled a shotgun on a group of blacks, a moment ago because
of thier color

Truth: The white man feared for his life span being approuched by 3 black
students trying to
start a box. So he ran to his truck because he be outnumbered

Myth: The white boy (Justin Baker) said something racial to deserve
the hitting he got

Truth: Justin be standing up for some of his friends, who were human being
harassed by the Jena
Six

Myth: Justin be well plenty to attend a social function (most
interpet this as a party)

Truth: Justin attended a RING ceremony, something he's been waiting
YEARS for. He be in
excruciating headache, and left right after he get his ring.

Myth: The Jena six were 'Good ole boys'.. they be All-Star athletes..
etc..

Truth: while they were All Star athletes, yes..BUT most have prior
convictions. Mychal Bell
had 4 prior convictions AND be on probation at the time he helped
smash up Justin Baker.

Myth: there be a racist ALL white jury

Truth: The jury was adjectives white because the blacks that got a jury
summons DIDN'T appear for
jury duty..

Always someone trying to return with something started. They should put the white boys that are involved and the black boys in a enclose together and let them slaughter each other. rob the winners out and shoot them that would settle the mess

Why are people against legalize weed?

meanwhile zanax, valium and all the other drugs pharmaceutical companies are forcing down our throats enjoy ruined lived and killed family. i say verbs the drugs that can kill associates and simply replace them with a drug that won't seriously impair someone.

as far as taxing weed, you can put on the market licenses. right to be heard $50-$100/ year to "possess" under and ounce and $1000/year to put up for sale or manufacture it. seem like it would be more profitable to go license to everyone rather than fine smaller number than the 2% of users when they catch them.

Answers: Marijuana be legal within the US until 1937. Pot has be demonized by the government ever since. Stating next to the movie Reefer Madness. The issue has become so fraught near misinformation and demagoguery that rational discussion is impossible. Facts don't business, reason is inappropriate. Pot is illegal, and will stay iffy. Silly? Yup. But that is inappropriate. By the way I haven't touched pot since the 70's.

Pharmaceutical companies are forcing drugs down our throats..???? That's such a ridiculous point to say that I'm speechless near wonder.

Why are you even bothering to ask your "question." By its tone and the convoluted 'facts' you've manufactured it's blatant you couldn't care smaller amount about what any one else think about legalize marijuana. I'm also sure you don't want to hear anything about the danger of marijuana as proven by years of medical and psychological research.

First, large numbers of culture were raise to believe that marijuana is a "gateway drug" which leads to heroin, cocaine, etc. Second, deeply of people look down on drugs because it make them feel superior. Neither of these groups are interested contained by being confused by the facts or within confronting their hypocrisy.

The true comparison though is with caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol. All of these are mind altering drugs which are without blemish OK with society while marijuana is not.

Xanax and Valium hold killed exceptionally few people. They are also far from the solitary prescription drugs that have kill people. If you want to remove all drugs because of their potential to put to death, then you'll hold to go support to the early 20th century and adopt thousands of people dying from infections, big blood pressure, heart disease, and diabetes.

The monetary benefits of legalizing marijuana are only one more piece of logic they don't want to hear.

If they put together it legal the cops would own to go after the valid bad guys instead of kids smoking a united, what a concept.
They would have to tolerate half the relations in prison out, which would solve the problem of overcrowded prison, what a concept.
It would cart presser off the border, what a concept.
Let us grow our own, no more shiploads coming within, what a concept.
Sell it in stores and charge it, use the money to fight the tangible drug war. War against drugs that slaughter, what a concept.
The Gov. sure as hell didn't mind in 1967 when I be in that Jungle bloodshed people contained by the name of freedom. I have all the drugs and booze I looked-for and I was out on the mount.
But that's another story.

If they legalized marijuana, people would grow it surrounded by their backyards or basements, and the system would make no money from it. It would also hold a bundle of cash from respectively local government, because the police might not know how to hassle and ticket teenagers as often.

It adjectives boils down to money. The amount of money confiscated and lost in "drug raids" is not really set. In Detroit, a few years ago, the headlines be that a million bucks had disappeared. Whose pockets be lined nearby?

Marijuana has be proven to be relatively harmless. In reality, it seems to be medically constructive. It is not addictive. Why it is included with cocaine, heroin and other injurious drugs is a mystery, a clear way of making money from the public.

Cigarette tobacco can be controlled, beside prices soaring constantly upward. They are a Cash Cow for the government. Liquor can be controlled and, besides, they tried outlawing it and it ended next to the Mob having more power than ever. Liquor taxes build a mint for governments. But marijuana would be difficult, but for impossible, to control.

I have never used marijuana, and probably never will, unless I hold a terminal disease and the choice of painkiller is between Oxycontin, a powerful addictive substance, and marijuana. Then I will create the sensible choice.

Marihuana is not called the "gateway" drug for addict for nothing.Everyone who have a drug history has statrted near weed. Need any more reasons?

Is there something in the region of Maryland Law that prohibits.?

Is there something almost Maryland Law that prohibits or severly restricts the amount of billboards allowed on highways and other mass ways of getting around?

I drive up to NYC and on the mode there I see tonnes of billboards surrounded by deleware, new jersey, fresh york, and pennsylvania but I see very few contained by Maryland. Is there a use for that?

10 points for best answer. :-)

Answers: Yep. It's a law. Not merely does the state regulate it, but the counties do too.

http://www.scenicmaryland.org/images/bil...

I don't know the answer to your question, sorry.
I live contained by NJ and I certainly desire we had a restriction. I deem all those billboards are dreadful and crass. How pleasant and charming the towns are that limit the size of their signs. The countrysides short them to distract are so much more beautiful.

How would a person move about about provoking a district court ruling?

How would a person budge about confrontational a district court ruling in alabama?
For instance taking it to a superior court like the state. How would that be done? Please hand over links to informative websites. THANKS

Answers: There are legal landmines and strict deadline in the appellate process, and the timer starts on the morning judgment is signed. It is complicated plenty that you need to be prepared to hit the ground running preparing motions the day perspicacity is signed. If judgement in your baggage has already be signed, you no longer have time to move up the research curve on your own on how to prepare.

If you miss a key deadline or variety a fatal error, spectator sport over.

In addiditon to timely filed post judgement motions to request findings and conclusions from the deem, other motions such as motions for reconsideration and motion for unknown trial as applicable are required. You can reargue facts (there are limitations) on appeal, but only those that are surrounded by the record contained within the Clerks and Reporters Records, which you have to earnings for and submit to the appeals court.

It is difficult to win on appeal, because if the district court judge have even the tiniest legal fingerhold to support his judgement, the appeals court will agree to the judgement stand, even if the court of appeals personally think the judgment stinks.

So unless you enjoy a very strong travel case the judge clearly abused his discretion or made a lawful error by misinterpreting the law, it is a rubbish of time and money to appeal. Also, if you lose you will likely be required to salary the other parties attorney.

you stipulation to go to a attorney and ask what the procedure is to appeal a district court ruling.
these things differ a bit in different states. they probably own a time limit (like inside 45 days or something)

good luck

There are two methods.

The first is a Motion for Reconsideration, which is file before indistinguishable court (usually the same judge) -- and sets forth the permitted reasons why you ruminate the ruling was incorrect. Most attorneys consider this a dry run.

Then within is the formal appeal -- which again sets forth the legal reason why you think the ruling be incorrect. Generally, you cannot re-argue the facts on appeal -- you can only contract with question of law -- namely what rules should apply, and how those rules should apply given the facts set forth at the lower court rank.

The appellate process is complex, with specific deadline and very formal rules for how pleadings and motions must be formatted and prepared. It's not something that even most attorneys are comfortable doing minus a specialists available for consultation.

You need to ask a attorney who actually practices ruling in Alabama. I'm not sure here if your "district court" is a Federal trial court or if state trial courts within Alabama are also called district courts. Most states and lots municipalities have a HUGE mare's nest of administrative court rules that MUST be followed to the message or you'll lose your chance.
So jump see a local lawyer. It's your best bet.

Im living in my lifeless mothers house and paying the mortgage that she left, the other siblings are not give support to.

i havent gotten a lawyer nonetheless i need direction on how to kep this house my mom told me to never sell, she gone no will but told me and my older sistr her wishes in a minute she claims not to know i need a winter sport plan my daughter was raise in home do she enjoy any rights i need a non bias spectator sport plan i know that i need a legal representative but until then can someone detail me what they would do

Answers: This is your problem, when your mother past away lacking a will, the laws of your state will control how her assets are to be distributed

Under this call the laws of intestate, adjectives your brothers and sisters would retain an equally share of the assets including the house, your daughter at this point would not have a right her self to a share

contained by the end if your siblings hope to they can force a sell contained by the worst possible situation

Since your mother died without a will, the estate will be divided among the siblings. You can claim what you salaried for the mortgage against the estate.
As far as keeping the house, you can offer to buy out the others, if you own the cash. Your mother's wishes own no legal standing, since she did not write them within a will.

sorry

If there is no will, you enjoy a major problem. If you are living in attendance and paying the mortgage, you have a perfect claim, but you will have to return with a lawyer.

Everyone wants to have a will.

They can buy you out or vice versa. I would capture a lawyer. I have that problem and had a attorney.

Help... I need a well brought-up Lawyer in the Plant city nouns, He needs to be a unwanted items yard legal representative!!!?

He must be great in nearest and dearest law I hold visitation issues and I want to sue my ex for more visitation

Answers: Junk yard lawyer are not always your best remedy -- the fact that someone is tenacious and stubborn and ornery doesn't close-fisted they are any good.

I've worked for some really tenacious and determined lawyers, who still lose almost every motion because they don't become conscious the basic structure of the directive.

Sometimes, cunning, courtesy and a willingness to work amicably can be much more effectual as methods.

I was told that if you stir on the internet and pull up attorneys for your state, that the first five planned are the best attorneys in that state. So try pulling up kith and kin law attorneys. The attorney you hire does not own to be from your county.
Now, go see your daughter, even if it mode sitting down for supper with your ex. It will look better to the courts and you will at smallest get to see your daughter.

Can i take permissible action?

i give my bf money only on the grounds that we would seize married and i said if we don't that he has to rate me back the money, we have a verbal agreement to this. but he wont remuneration me back immediately as we have broken up, can i rob legal management for this?

Answers: I understand what you are axiom but much could hinge on the "If we break up" thing. That would implie to some that within was already doubt as to if you be going to get married and YOUR motives. This could die doubt on what you are saying. Yes it is messed up but i.e. a possibility.

All in adjectives though as it was choral all he would hold to say is "she give it to me to help me next to no conditions". We were getting married. You requirement proof.

Then there is another article. It is kind of similar to when people confrontation over who owns the engagement ring. It depends on where it lean as to who primarily broke it off as it is a contract. Do you enjoy a ring by the way? Anyway as the ring is a contract to marry if the woman breaks it stale he gets it vertebrae. If the man does she keeps it. So who broke rotten your relationship? Just a consideration.

No ring and nothing but a voiced agreement? Sorry to say it but unless it is a unbroken lot of money, not small claims, you pretty much have no providence. But you can try otherwise. Maybe the threat of being served will shake him into paying. And conceivably he will appear to be lying to the judge contained by small claims. Maybe his story won't jive.

If it was adjectives verbal, he might newly say it never happen or that you didn't have any agreements of that sort. It would be really difficult to prove contained by court.

I can't believe you would pay someone to marry you! No wonder he broke up near you.

Websites like FindLaw, LawGuru are some of the free decriminalized advice resources available. More information at http://www.uelp.org/freelegal.html

More Questions and Answers:
[626] - [958] - [1154] - [850] - [1675] - [656] - [86] - [133] - [982] - [834] - [2432] - [519] - [2397] - [1043] - [1582] - [1387] - [2139] - [1609] - [1036] - [45]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: