Law Questions and Answers

Advise please :)?

I recently changed job, after being employed at matching company for 19 years. I had accumulate 178 hours of sick time, so I went to the human resource dept and asked if I would be getting remunerated for that, and they said yes, along with my unused time off time. Since my employee instruction manual was 19 years hoary, I wanted to create sure that I was current.

The company pays you your sick time at the expire of the year, if you don't call contained by sick, my HR rep stated that they pay, when general public resign, to avoid everyone quitting on Jan 1 !!!

Before resigning, I went to the HR dept again, and asked duplicate questions again, and be given the same answers.again. I give this honest company 3 weeks notice, worked everyday, and when I received my final paycheck, no sick time. I call HR, and they stated that this person have misinformed me, twice...

What would you bright people do? Small claims? Let it go beyond? We are talking over $3,000..

Advise please

Thanks,
Liz
Answers: If nearby is a written policy in place, consequently no one's word means dick. They can describe you that you have a million dollars coming to you, but what's contained by writing trumps any verbal promise.

By putting down contained by writing a company policy, they are, in effect, creating a contract next to you. A written contract cannot be modified verbally, solely in writing (and by someone who have the authority or apparent authority to modify it).

Another hole contained by the "sue 'em" theory is that lawsuits are available to fashion you 'whole'. In other words, compensate you for losses. The only track that you could prevail in such a skin as this is if you made decisions (which cost you money) base on the promises given.

In other words, your decision to quit would hold to have be based on how much you expected to receive upon quitting. Even if this be the case, you would imagined still lose, but that is, at lowest, a recognized trial theory. The lone thing you could sue for is what is stated within company policy (handbook, HR memos, etc). The Hr lady does not enjoy the authority to obligate the company to anything. People make mistakes and every mistake does not a lawsuit manufacture.
Your local Labor Board may help.

I would folder a complaint against your employer, demanding the sick pay that have been promised you.

The Labor Board may calendar a audible range date, and you can demand that the HR rep is present at the audible range.

Although an attorney would be helpful, you may know how to handle it yourself at this stage, short paying legal fees.

Good luck!
Take 'em to court. You requirement to prove that you were misinformed twice though. Do you own anything in writing? Or even an aged employee guide? Cross reference that visitors` guide with any up to date handbook and make sure that at hand is a statement in here about salary. You have them nail if so!!!

Can anyone direct me to 'UNCAC report of 2007' if such thing exist?

A tabloid article in Indonesia mentioned more or less the report, but I can not find it in the internet. Maybe because I don't know what word to knob in. UNCAC stands for United Nation Convention Against Corruption. The article be published Saturday September 22, 2007. Thanks.
Answers: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/crime_conv...

This is the latest report I found...
You are inquiring with the wrong words, it is:
United Nations Convention Against Corruption

Just type that into google.

If a mentally retarded person grab your breast would you press charges?

i worked at anassisted living for mentally retarded people nad be firered today when i filed assault charges after my boob be grabbed so not easy i bruised. my boss tried to tell me that it be wrong of me to report it to the police. i felt violated, and i am bruised. what do you surmise?
Answers: If an assault was committed against you, you can press charges. I've see mentally handicapped people charged beside assault and theft. Usually, they come to an end up with diversion for their special circumstances, or they close up in some sort of psychoanalysis program, or the charges are dropped. It really depends on the capacity of the human being who committed the assault.

It is not acceptable to only 'assume' that assault is acceptable contained by some professions. Bartenders don't work in bar with the assumption that - hey, it's okay for me to achieve assaulted, I'm a bartender. Healthcare workers shouldn't have to assume that they will draw from assaulted by their charges. Unreported assaults in strength and assisted living situations are a huge problem for nurses and DSW's. Nobody should expect, and accept, person assaulted, no matter what their position.

You may own a case for wrongful dismissal. If you own a union, shift and see your union representative. If not, I would any try to find a student legal aid or a regional court aid office if you are low income, or find an employment legal representative who is willing to look at your casing.
You should have talk it over with your supervisor first, previously filing charges.

Even if you file charges thereafter, at least you attempted to budge through the proper channels in the past bringing the law.

If this "special" individual was a repeat criminal, and your supervisor had not warn you about him, you might hold a good suit against the assisted living facility and the supervisor...
I ponder you were working within the wrong business. Just like a waitress surrounded by a bar can without doubt guarantee that she will get her *** grab at one time or another, a mental health worker can assume like peas in a pod from the retarded. It goes next to the job.

Reporting it to the police is pointless as a mentally not good enough person cannot be charged. He does not possess the mental dimensions to distinguish right from wrong when considering acting on impulses. It's similar to reporting a four year old to the police.

A four year ripened might know that it's wrong to grab your breast, but can't be expected (legally) to restrain his curiosity. You feel violated because of what is in your own mind, not what is surrounded by the mind of the perpetrator. In order to work beside the mentally disabled, you have to put yourself within their shoes (minds). You were fired because you be unable to do that.

While we can't make a contribution free reign to retarded people to deed out on every sexual impulse, we own to expect that some transgressions will occur that we wouldn't tolerate from ordinary people. If you wouldn't hold called the police for self bruised on your arm (which you shouldn't have), then you shouldn't own called them nearly your breast. You should have reported it to the facility control and left it at that.

You missed an opportunity to help out this person control himself if you didn't spend time beside him afterwards, explaining the right and wrong of it. Retarded people can swot up just approaching everyone else; it just take more concrete examples and more time. By your reaction, I mull over that it's better for everyone that you find other work. You might be the best stitcher in the world, but if you can't stand the verbs of blood, don't become a surgeon. Get it?

EDIT: For the reasons I stated above, you hold no legal recourse for wrongful termination. All you are entitled to is dismissal benefits. Every healthcare worker has to expect to be assaulted surrounded by some manner by ethnic group who aren't capable of forming the requisite criminal intent that formal charges hint, whether it's because of mental defect or drug/trauma induced. Workers contained by hospitals get assaulted every sunshine by patients who are out of their minds. These aren't criminal assaults, either.
I regard as you would have to consider the even of mental retardation that exist in that human being, for example;

If a retarded person is skilful of obtaining an erection if shown pornographic fabric, then his interest as to the stimulation and desire is intact.

If a retarded being can repeatedly touch the breast of a manque, with out person told, then again his interest are intact.

The height of retardation would have to be observed and monitored to read out if weather or not he/she knew what he/she be doing. People with special requirement are very strong and should they seize hold of you, it is more than likely fortuitous. It takes a outstandingly long time to teach a special requirements person to even adopt or give a hug. Imagine, a kid or personality not accepting a hug from a parent or loved one.
Yes, I would have call the police and made sure he was arrested and charges. How is he going to cram that it is wrong to touch another person's private parts without their say-so. Trust me, If he grabbed your breast he know what he was doing.

And not a soul as the right to grab a waitress butt within a bar. Mentally oppose people do budge to work, they do not all the mentallity of a four year hoary. Some know right from wrong.
I had a co-worker who be mentally retarded try to grab my breast at work surrounded by front of 2 of the managers. I didn't record charges against him because I figured that his go bites as it is and he didn't know what he was doing. I agree next to the person who said that you are surrounded by the wrong career. You should of already certain that stuff like this happen when you work in any type of assisted living facility. He can't minister to that he is mentally retarded anymore than you can help how big your foot are. We are the way we are.

My father came after me next to a knife ,the cops arrested him . support !!?

my father came after me near a knife , i be so scared ( this is the second time ) so i call the cops. they arrested him . i think he is goin to come home in a minute ??. i am scared because he already told the cops i be imagining things . what should i Do ??
Answers: Find a friend or another relative to live near so you will be safe. Do you hold an uncle, aunt, best friend whose parents will let you live w/ them? Talk to your guidance counselor too b/c he/she might know some other places you could live. Certainly don't stay at hand b/c the best indicator of future performing is past reading. Good luck.
restraining order

travel down to the courthouse on Monday and get one

http://www.nationalsafeplace.org/ IF YOU ARE A TEEN, FIND THE NEAREST ONE...THEY WILL PICK YOU UP
You're vastly brave baby, purely think positive i know is not flowing with a situation similar to that, you have to try, presently you need to be more brave and rummage for professional help... basically do it.
I SEND YOU ,MY BEST WISHES FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILY
Still brave!!
Get out of there. Look for homes for homeless or abused teens surrounded by your area. Google in a minute.

Who do you think would obtain child custody ?

my boyfriends cousin had a little one 2 months ago and it is not working out between her and her boyfriend. she have been at home next to the baby since she be born, she feeds, cleans, and interacts near the baby but does not hold a job.and have no transportation to get to work, to get hold of a job and cant afford a little one sitter, the boyfriend has unstable employment history but have a job at the moment doesnt own much involvment with the infant, and has be smoking weed and has be on cocaine and etc for a while now, his relations is threating to take her to court if she leaves near the baby, and if she leaves she will be contained by a better enviorment and be well taken watchfulness of by family member, who do you think would carry custody and is there any course that his family could try and hang on to the baby away from her if she moved out to come back home. her father who she will not be living near is a registerd sex offender BUT it be never proven that he did it, and he did his jail time&his mother have been put surrounded by the crazy hosp
Answers: without even reading the quiz uless the woman is up for multiple homicide charges the female will return with custody.

So much for equal rights that women are always proverb work against them huh?
My opinion is they made the child they should both own custody
50/50. And go to parenting classes. They are the parents not the other domestic members.
Without a doubt, communal custody.

The courts will never interfere with parental custody unless at hand is a specific danger to the child. Using drugs surrounded by itself is not even a solid arguement for custody, unless you can articulate specifically why this is a danger to the child.
You right to be heard the maternal grandmother have mental issues and the paternal grandfather's sex criminal charges were not proven, all the same he served time for it. That does not compute.

You do not have to prove the mother is unfit for the father to be allowed own custody. The standard is what is in the best interests of the child. (Some individual bench still do it the old style, but that is increasingly smaller amount common.

There is much more information a mediate would need until that time knowing whether some sort of joint custodian arrangement can be worked out, or whether sole custody to one parent or the other make more sense.

That the maternal grandparents both own "difficulties" is not good. That the concerned grandparents are controlling is not good. That the father is a drug user is not biddable (though the mother knew that when she fixed to have a child by him).

The mother can move out. The father can be made to support the child, even if he does not hold custody (or primary custody).

If I were making the declaration (and that is exactly what I used to do for a living), I would involve social services to do an investigation roughly speaking the situation. I would factor that report in heavily within making my decision.

Whts the difference?

whts the difference between a planttiff and a defense? In a court case?
Answers: They're adversary, cannot get much more different than that. The plaintiff is the human being who initiates a lawsuit by filing a complaint. The defense is the entity against whom a complaint is filed.

*/End of Line.
The plaintiff(not planttiff) is the personality who decided to bring the shield up in court and The Defense is the creature who the case is man made against.

Under which environmental law does damp lands protection fall?

Under which environmental ruling does wet lands protection topple? What is the general citation from the Code of Federal Regulations?
Answers: You could try Googling "drizzly lands" and "CFR".

How do people prove not wanting women to have equal rights?

I am going around asking those what they have hear from other people or believe them selves that would be a grounds why women should not have matching rights as men have.
Answers: Women should enjoy the same rights as Blacks, and Gays. In this country EVERYONE should be equal.
I can see that you've never be married have you mate?

Just kidding ! they should own equal rights however, ever been to a divorce proceeding? there's zilch equal about it! the men seize shafted big time and the women and thier new by friends live generous for the next 20 years on the fund of the poor dumped husband. I speak from experience too!
Women want equal rights???? Are you kidding me? They control partially of the money in America and 95% of the sex. How much more power do women stipulation?

Seriously now, on what front I wonder do women claim they do not enjoy "equal rights."
I don't think in attendance is a way to really claim it. The usual anti-women's rights argument I hear is that feminists are women who want to be men or hate men.
The prehistoric justification be that women were too tenancy and delicate to be capable of do what men do.
Women should have equal rights, though I still believe that we should hold the door stretch out for them, help them next to their chairs and jackets, you know the polite things.

Now I believe that nearby are some jobs where on earth women should not be, as an example a sports reporter in the mens locker room, at least possible not until they are dressed. I have hear some female reports complain that waiting pass the male reporters an pre-eminence. Male reporters are not allowed within womens locker rooms, they have to dally outside until the girls come out.
The easy style to solve this is no reporters in any locker rooms everyone wait outside.

Women should have matching rights that we men have.
I guess they should have equal rights. There are some military unit that exclude women from even trying out. Their contention is that women don't have the upper-body strength a man have. That may be generally true. But nearby are exceptions. I know some women who are as strong or stronger than most guys. It seems fairly archaic to pre-disqualify women just because of the plumbing. Look at women smoke-jumpers. They turn through the same training guys do. They convey the same pack. And some of them excel. I was told that a woman can't get a 160-pound guy off the pasture. I know a lot of guys who can't do that any. But guys are allowed to try and fail. Why not women?

Women enjoy been allowed into the military beneath lower requirements than men. Again, based on the masculinity bias. As a result, in combat, they're mode of looked on as second-class citizens. But suppose some girl could do the same number of "guy" push-ups, pull-ups, convey the same substance over an obstacle course, and she isn't given the luck to prove it... thus perpetuating the myth.

I'm not adage women (or any other group) should be equally represented. But I believe they should be allowed to try and to fail or to succeed a short time ago like the guys.

In fairness to both sexes, matching acceptance criteria requirements to be applied to both.

Is it going to happen? I doubt it... at lowest possible probably not for a long, long, long, long, long. long, long time.
Is there a extraordinary right that you have within mind ? Perhaps your question have in mind the elderly "Equal Rights Amendment" which failed to be adopt as part of the Constitution?

Jail time for non support?

I Already know that people are thinking im a deadbeat so simply get it out of your system consequently maybe answer the examine. I agreed in my divorce law to pay 550 a month for two kids. I be willing and competent to pay it at the time. I love my kids and would impart them a million if I could.

i hurt my arm really bad and own since( 3 years off and on) have a hard time paying my support. im presently behind 10000 on it. I be arrested recently and remunerated a bond to get out of intern. I want to care for the kids but at this point I a short time ago cant hardly preserve a job and salary support. im going to take two job at fast food places within order to try to ambush up.

I have an arraignment soon and I be wondering if you thought i would spend jail time. this is my first offense of ANY brand at all. im a collectively "good citizen" and i dont break the ruling. im going to bring some more money with me to put towards the vertebrae owed money and like i said not a hundred percent try to have two job before i shift to court
Answers: I am sick of reading these comments. DOG FOOD? What an idiot. How do you know what income his x has? She may be a M.D. , An R.N. An attorney, you never know.

My x is an RN, she make more than i do, and i still pay over 800 per month, If the state would own figured it, it would own been more!

and at 550 per month, smaller quantity than 10 months behind. Get a vivacity.

I had a hindmost injury that lasted over a year back i was wager on on track!

larry h , It is trash like you calling others trash when you do not know the integral story! And it is YOUR pathetic attitude that allows politicians to corrupt the system. Grow up!
Bring proof of your injury and agree to the judge know you are attempting to save your word.

Also try to see if you can get an direct to lower your support amount due to your injuries, and most importantly, try to remain a father for your children, and not bad mouth the mother.
you should be put below the jail a daytime for each dollar owed

Is it sexual harressment when a guy takes pictures of females minus their permission? constituent 1?

I was at a matter park and couldn't help but see a guy who be confronted by the park mgr. because he had received some complaints around the guy taking photos of females who were close by but looking the other approach. The mgr. made sure that any female pics be deleted. Then I hear the manager quote "Do you realize that you could be charged next to sexual harressment? You leave the park presently or i call the police who won't be leniant near a case approaching this" Was the manager truthful or newly putting fear into this innocent individual assuming he was going to upload the pics to some site that would blemish the 2 females reputation for life? If he solely intended the pics to be used strictly to keep to himself wouldn't he individual get a reproving or a slap on the wrist? In my book it's legal to pocket pictures of any subject what so ever as long as you don't publish it to the public without the subject's green light.

to be continued
Answers: anyone can take pictures within public..period!!
How could he defect them? Were they walking down the street topless?

People can take pictures - it's a bit unusual.but it is nowhere near sexual discrimination.
yes .. ur right to some degree..

perchance that guy taking pictures took a few ""perverted ones", which is why he be told to leave... who know..
next time you see a guy taking photo's of girls he's not near or any young teen or kid... appropriate a real moral look at him and report it to the police... so many individuals go missing respectively year only within Victoria, and something so simple as what you saw could prevent that... if you know where this guy is, communicate police your story .. or better yet - update e..haha.. but seriously ALL PERVERTS sholud be reorted...!!
Okay, here's a possible sollution, why don't they have a public place within these parks for adults only. In within would be woman and men who are paid to pose adjectives day for these extraordinary kind of shutterbugs. Then for a flat hourly payment that's not included with their nonspecific admission to the park, they can thieve all the snapshots they desire. They could even own them pose in different ways or breed movements if the photographer has a videocam. As long as they don't constraint any nudity or anything else that's too obscene. This bearing there would be far smaller quantity incidents in the nonspecific part of the park and no risk of minors self caught in a cam's target nouns.

After all if a mannish adult took his cam into a gentlemen's club near exotic dancers, he would soon find himself lying on the curb with his busted cam.

So in attendance should place in these parks or even as it's own business within the red light side of town. Then they could charge high fees and allow nudity.

Of course I realize that these places could also steal business from the pay per minute chat rooms or other developed pay sites.
Of course not. tomorrow you will articulate that a guy is looking at you from a distance and that amounts to sexual harrasment

More Questions and Answers:
[2060] - [2441] - [1565] - [1666] - [485] - [259] - [362] - [1790] - [2008] - [1018] - [2315] - [419] - [1308] - [1470] - [1721] - [863] - [473] - [1413] - [2038] - [296]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: