Law Questions and Answers
Ethical considerations?
Should the US government more closely regulate the practice of giving trips or other incentives to foreign manager to win their business? Is this bribery?Answers: Yes, it is bribery.
No, it should not be more closely regulated. It is already a felony in oodles circumstances.
No. The federal government will prevent business from getting done, which will hurt our discount. It's bribery light, what's the big concordat, if it works?
Go Lions! 2-0!
At what age should people first know how to earn a driver's license?
Answers: 18 at least. I conjecture 16 is too young. Did you know that 50% of boys aged 16 and 17 bring in accident during their first year of driving? Fifty fricken percent! We have to share the roads near them! Why do we want to hand license over to such a clearly irresponsible group?
I got mine at 14 (a rural state).
I thought I be old adequate at the time.
Now that I am older I believe 18 is a better age.
Every year there are stories from almost every big school of teenagers dying or mortal permanently injured contained by accidents. I don't want my daughter to be one of them.
Most kids these day's aren't as responsible as they be in the recent past.
So I believe they shouldn't have a LICENSE until they are over 18
Permit yes...license no. until they enjoy some sense
The question is clearly subjective as it have as its base a put somebody through the mill in later life, both from a physical and emotional standpoint. Suffice to vote, an individual generally reach a level of physical later life by the age of 16 which allows them to operate a motor vehicle but the emotional parenthood can take much longer and surrounded by some cases, as with mental disabilities, it's never achieve. My subjective opinion, don't changeover it in North America, 16 is a without a flaw good age to swot to drive and continue implement programs to monitor and develop the maturity side, such as the graduate license program in Ontario.
I see abundantly of answers that are trying to tie driving to education, which is a wonderful leverage for parents but let's facade it, it's a ridiculous idea for the world contained by general. Many rural areas of the world direct to operate motor vehicles despite the dearth of a high college diploma, in certainty, many of our transportation workers, both bus drivers and truck drivers do not own high conservatory educations. It doesn't require book knowledge to follow the value of vivacity and the value of responsibility.
Let's obverse it, there are kids at 14 who enjoy the maturity both physically and emotionally to button the responsibilities of driving, most do not... That said, should it not be a parents responsibility to know when their own child is ready to drive? If at 16 they aren't nearly in place, hold them back until they are 18, but don't punish those 16 year olds who are equipped to learn to operate a vehicle responsibly.
When and if they graduate elevated school. are seventeen, and they own no felonies in the past that time.
If, however, they have graduate, are seventeen, and they have any type of felony, they should enjoy to wait until they are at smallest a year free of any crime before earn the right to a driver's license.
Because this would give the incentive to finish giant school and to stay out of trouble.
People come across to forgot that a driver's license has to be earn and that it just is not a plain right. When you drive you are required to follow laws and if a juvenile has already be charged near any type of felony before getting a driver's license, it shows the irresponsibility of that youth. What makes you judge that he/she will obey traffic & other law?
The line have to start being drawn somewhere to hang on to our young society out of trouble. This is a very melancholic world to raise children surrounded by today.
Males 18
Woman...when they can pry that damn cell phone from their head. I'm saw never.
Oh, probably about 26 - 30.
Of course, I've met some 35 year olds that couldn't switch the responsibility of driving, so maybe not a soul should be allowed to drive.
I think they should receive it to where you not solely have to own a diploma , but have a trouble free conservatory record during elevated school , I don't stingy petty things , but anything that shows a person as have a mental disorder , or a history of violence , and dearth of respect for the rules and regulations ...
Sounds tough , but I look at it like this , saloon crashes are the number one killer of teens . if they do not behave away from mom,and dad at institution , how can you expect them to behave out behind the controls , I have be on the fire dept for 20 years and the number of dead teen kids I cut out of cars are growing , most of the cause are stupidity .
I would also make everyone re question paper every renewal day , I see plenty of adults who should not be driving as in good health ,
the parents who buy these kids the fast hot rod cars , sports cars etc. I regard as the parents should have to come to the crash site , and remove their kids bodies as capably , after all buying a kid a efficient car is merely dumb .
I am tired of paying high insurance costs because of others stupid driving .
I do not care how weak you are as long as you have a High School Diploma , 17, 18 or 25 it does not situation the age as long as you have graduate..
And notice I do not use the word stroke of luck ..there is no such entity involving a car , it is a crash or a collision because it is stupidity of someone that have caused the crash , and if stupid movements caused it , how can it be unintended ????
Many people hold forgotten that driving is a privilege and it is not a right ..
We have adjectives these various ages for different things- 18 to enter into a contract. 16 to be tried as an grown criminal, sometimes younger. 16 to drive. 21 to drink. 18 to buy cigarettes. It might be better to make it more consistent- maybe 18 for everything- have a broad age when you are considered an adult.
Another concept that might bring in sense is not to base it on age, but on something else. Some citizens are quite develop at 16 and others are quite untrained at 40. There is some research that the brain isn't fully mature until 18 or so, especially in the nouns of judgment.
We should probably underneath driving rights more on the person's ability to drive undamagingly since other people's lives are at risk. Maybe there should be some sort of evidence required that the entity is a safe driver beforehand we let them doing a tour and if they ever show evidence that they aren't safe, such as getting a DWI, they should own to prove that they are safe drivers again beforehand they are allowed to drive again, rather than a short time ago waiting a specific period of time. For example, completing substance swearing treatment and having a series of verbs urine screens would be required after a DWI, to some extent than just waiting a year to receive your license back.
What type of proof would be required to trade name sure people are undamaging drivers? Well, we already have driving test and written tests. I ponder perhaps those could be better with driving simulators- we own much better technology that could be used. Also, a more complete written test could be accepting, more like the CDL examination. Also, more thorough driver's education courses could be helpful- the equivalent of a college-level course.
Then, the driver's license wouldn't be base on a particular age (with some minimum, close to 16), but on completion of required education and courses.
What is considered a "civil" court case?
I be looking up my ex's file online and he have 17 open court cases...the ending one being on his birthday. It say Civil Other. I was a moment ago wondering what that could be. I don't like sending my son beside him, especially with his unpromising record and wanting to know what he could enjoy done now. Most of the recent past cases were traffic infractions. But what is Civil Other. Thanks!Answers: Usually a decree suit for property damage or a bodily injury claim. It can be for breach of contract, faliure to clear bills, or any activity you can regard of that it not a criminal offense.
It is probably a civil lawsuit as opposed to a criminal one. For what that could be, you probably don't hold the access to know, and it could be almost anything. Ask you ex and maybe he would speak about you for free.
If you are concerned about sending your son to him, however, you probably want to try and work out a better arrangement next to him between the two of you first. If that is not an likelihood, I recommend consulting an attorney. The cost of doing so is probably less than you surmise, and, in the long run, smaller amount than the cost it would be if your relationship with your ex turns further south. A family unit law attorney will be best suited to oblige determine what your legal option as far as further limiting his access to your child than myself and anyone else posting free advice online. Good luck.
This way he is being sued or is suing.
How do i get my own put a bet on on a online fraudster...?????????
i have be conned by a company in china, i am within UK, it is now comprehensible i will not be getting my money back.***
I know this sounds childish, but i dont want anyone else man stung by them.
***
Ideally i would like to dispatch a virus but think that is to say illegal.
***
I want to spawn their website crash and burn, and i would love it to be a problem that costs them alot of money.
***
I think its roughly speaking time internet users took a role in policing the internet,
***
i done my bit within finding the site now i want to punish them...
***
Please facilitate with any philosophy computer wizz kidz
***
Thank you
***
***
***
***BE WARNED WWW-ELE-EXPORT.COM***
Answers: To send a virus download to floppy disc
write email attach virus. dispatch
you can download a virus from www. sorry i forgot
regards
ele-export.com
publish the circumstances on the network,but they will change name and details and reappear as another company.The virus in their computor would be the most important,destroy them.They will other get predisposed victims,you cannot stop them.
In the US, U can buy&own a gun but U can't buy&own a military quality bullet-proof vest: Does this get sense?
Does this make sense?"Point Blank's Military edition of the InterceptorTM OTV is manufactured for the sole use of the United States Military. Resale of the Military version of the InterceptorTM OTV to individuals other than the United States Military is prohibited and subject to trial action."
source: http://www.pointblankarmor.com/intercept...
Answers: It make no sense. Iraqis can own fully automatic military rifles, yet American citizens cannot..
The logic is probably that a criminal or terrorist beside a military quality bulletproof vest become more powerful and more difficult to bring to justice. Whether or not this holds any practical relevance is anyone's guess. And adjectives this goes to prove is that logic is not necessarily allied to authenticity.
Hey Ho,
Maggie
No, it doesn't make sense to us but for other citizens do.
Everything in this country is bussinees resembling. If someone gets wipe out they make more money than selling vests. I know various people have an idea that this is crazy but just stop and presume about it for a minute. How much a vest can cost? and how oodles will a regular person buy? But if someone dies, you hold to pay for hospital costs to state someone death, transportation to the morge, funeral services, burial etc etc.
It's a discouraged world we live in, where on earth sand monkeys walk down city streets near RPGs and Kalishnikov rifles, but we Americans can't own such hardware, or even the best devices to protect ourselves from such things.
Will you sign our petition for the right to know if paedophiles live in your district (UK)?
There is so much unjust surrounded by this world at the moment, and the one thing Mr Brown can do, is to allow parents the right of wisdom, the god given right to protect their children, and stop hiding the animals that live amongst us. I don't want a witch hunt, or to go on a vigilante manhunt, adjectives I desire is to know if a paedophile lives in my local nouns. Children need protecting, and if we know that info, everyone would be extra careful of the little cherished ones.http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeactio...
Sorry for the re-post I vanished the link out of the end one
Answers: I can't believe the U.K. doesn't already have a system within place for notifying the public! Everyone have the right to know if a dangerous criminal is living contained by their neighborhood. We all know that pedophiles are occasionally ever rehabilitated and often strike again soon after human being released from prison (usually with the awareness that they have zilch to lose).
For those of you using vigilantism as your defense, we have these types of law in the states and I enjoy never heard of any group giving set pedophiles what they deserve. You shouldn't compare this to some random exploit of violence towards one pediatrician.
Sorry, but they are so disgusting to me, that contained by cases of child molesters, I would applaud lynch mobs. Who really cares more or less their rights??! You who defend the rights of a perverted criminal over the rights of an innocent child baffle me.
How plentiful Madeleines, Jon Benets, and Adams do you need to read nearly in your word before you modify your mind?
ill sign it
i conjecture everyone has the right
its the one entity as a defence attorney i wont defend.
its sick and wrong.
every parent have the right to know if there is one of these monsters within the area. so yes ailing sign and wish you adjectives the best!
Done
Wanted to add that we have a paedophile live two doors from us for years and never knew it. He abduct the neighbours little girl and kept her for the weekend, God knows what he did to her adopt she has tried several attempts to slay herself, she's 14. Maybe if we had set we could have kept a better eye on our children. My children be "lucky" because they were boys and he simply liked little girls. May be you would reflect on twice about not adding up your name if it be on your doorstep
I will sign it but how will you know who is a paedophile and who isnt and if so where do they live??
i guess its a good opinion though
Why can't the UK have a website approaching we have within the US that shows you exactly where they are residing? It would be effortless and they wouldn't even need to develop the software wear. It would be of late loading it with the content and going live.
I am a parent too, so completely get your concern.
But, no, I won't sign it. I don't believe the great British public should be trusted with that sort of information. Not when the home of a trusted paediatrician get attacked by ignorant yobs.
No!
All this does is notify relations of the CONVICTED paedo's.
What about adjectives the evil ones that simply haven't been caught nonetheless?
Let me tell you this, contained by EVERY town there are Paedo's.
You DO own them living near you.
There are these trial inventions that have be around for a while now. They are call cars. These make it natural for evil people to travel anywhere surrounded by the country.
If your petition was to bring spinal column the Death Penalty for convicted Paedophiles, then I would sign in need a qualm.
i,ll sign
i agree with rammie
yeah too right unwell sign it
No, and I'll explain why.
I believe that making public the sex offenders register will put the public contained by more danger, not smaller number.
At present, those on the sex offenders register own to report regularly to the police and probation authorities. There are conditions attached to their freedom, which if breached, lead to incarceration. These people are closely watch by the authorities, who know where they are.
Make the information public, and vigilante groups will hound them out of anywhere they try to live. They will shutting up fleeing and not letting the authorities know where they are. They will still be within your community, but under an assumed term, and without the authorities keeping tab on them. So your children will be in more exposure, not less.
Sadly, the broad public can't be trusted with this information, because they would do these empire harm. Yes, I don't really supervision much for them either, but once we tolerate the lynch mob taste blood, where on earth will they stop.
Remember the paediatrician whose windows be broken .."well, it's a paedo- something; that's suitable enough for me" said the great British public.
No, you are wrong!
I agree next to `Mr Sceptic & Donna M`
Can freight companys legally not pay cheque ot to employees within nc?
Answers: call your state attorneys organization or get within touch with your local eeoc bureau . let them know what is going on or ask them this cross-examine they would know better than most of us . good luck .
Try spell check, but if I read your put somebody through the mill correctly, the answer is simple...NO
No company can not pay human resources anywhere, unless they are holding wages for a debt to the company or garnishment.
OT laws are federal, not state.
There are different OT definition though. Greater than 40 hours per week is one. Greater than 8 hours per day or 80 hours per two weeks is another.
It depends on what the company policy or association agreement is.
I work at wal-mart what is the best way to gain your IPH(items scanned per hour up)?
Answers: smile but maintain moving
omg, I worked there when I be going to school & they hounded us constantly to win the IPH's up - they literally had meeting about it adjectives the time..I knew it be important to them so I started placing people's items where on earth the bar code be facing all impossible to tell apart way after I'd run everything through real high-speed. I got them up alright but when they found out how I be doing it, they said I couldn't do it that way. That's when I know I'd have to alter my career & obtain a real work! ; )
What should i say to my boss??
My boss only called and told me that he needed to verbalize to me and he'll be in department shortly to talk to me. I know what he is planning on recounting me. He's been unfolding other agents in the organization that he'll be letting me and the other receptionist go because business is terrifically slow. But he haven't mentioned anything to the other receptionist about chitchat to her. I am certain that he will notify me that business is slow and he need to tolerate me go because he can't afford to wages me. What do you think i should transmit him after he tells me that? After adjectives, he should've given me notice surrounded by advance because i do hold bills to pay. What should i notify him?Answers: tell him thank-you for mortal up front and honest.. tell him that if circumstances coppers to please consider calling you back to work and after ask him for a letter of guidance. he does not have to tender you notice of termination
You don't generally not know, what you want to tell you. Just continue first and you figure out. If the business dance to slow I guess he try to lay off some ethnic group, but he need to consent to the people know contained by time and they can look for another job.
If you bring back kick out the brief, tell him, you stipulation some time you can find another job and you can't lately quit the job right a means of access you need to discharge your bills. Just tell him that. They own the right kick the culture out the job similar to that and you have the right describing what you thinking about it. So I hope everything will be OK and I choice you good luck.
Unless you are underneath an employment contract or a Union Contract, you are considered an at will employee. An employer can fire an at will hand for anything EXCEPT DISCRIMINATION with or in need notice. That's the canon and it sucks for most people.
Be pleasant near your boss. You WILL need him for mention. (1) Ask him for a letter of guidance. A generic letter of recommendation simply lists the folks name, profession title, how long they worked, and if they would be considered rehireable. (2) Ask him if you are rehireable. If you are being downsized due to scarcity of business you should be. (3) Ask him if he intends to fight your application for Unemployment Benefits. If you are man downsized you DO qualify for unemployment. (4) You may want to ask if he will compensate you for the next week or two, if your termination is today. That means of access you will not have a week lacking pay -- it take unemployment 2 weeks to take payments out.
Finally for you, don't feel unpromising the majority of workers have have at least one down-sizing incident contained by their career. On employment applications put "Downsized" as purpose you left. That is not a unpromising mark against you. As soon as possible apply for dismissal benefits. Good luck.
If you have be there longer than 3 months he owes you interest. If he is not giving you notice than you take vacation clear. Do ask for a letter of citation and should business pick up to call you as you hold really enjoy working with/for him.
*U could also privately swear at him under your breath! :-)
Does having a advocate in a child support crust really matter?
My ex and I draw from along fairly economically but she simply just found someone else. I am surrounded by college and only work on the weekends, so would have a lawyer next to me at the hearing benefit at adjectives?Answers: Yes Most definitely. Best suggestion is to ask a local attorney. Most will NOT charge for a first visit.
Here are some great city-specific trial directories to help you find one:
http://www.san-francisco-oakland-bay-are...
http://www.sacramento-ca-lawyers-attorne...
http://www.la-orange-county-lawyers-atto...
http://www.las-vegas-nevada-lawyer-attor...
http://www.san-jose-ca-lawyers-attorneys...
http://www.sacramento-ca-lawyers-attorne...
http://www.dallas-fort-worth-texas-lawye...
http://www.new-jersey-lawyers-directory.
http://www.legal-advice-library.info
http://www.san-antonio-texas-lawyers-att...
http://www.brokerforyou.com/san-diego-re...
http://www.new-jersey-lawyers-directory.
Unless you own agreed on everything in credit, yes, you should have a attorney.
I am the guy who used to decide these things. While I tried to get hold of all the information I needed, I sometimes be not able to do so. A legal representative can make sure it is adjectives there.
More Questions and Answers:
[874] - [464] - [1931] - [1075] - [631] - [1466] - [1135] - [1901] - [2486] - [795] - [217] - [2037] - [1473] - [1656] - [1947] - [2474] - [1630] - [723] - [2406] - [2320]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: