Law Questions and Answers

What effect does federal law enjoy on policy making in Texas?

Answers: Texans are independant thinker but alot of Federal funding influences our policies and laws.

Such as the seatbelt ruling and DWI limits required for highway funding.
The same effect as the other 49 states.
they adjectives start w/ Federal Law and adjust to suit their the state, county, city.

Can you drive in a state thats licinces age is elder if you have a licence contained by state the that age is lower?

does that q make scence?
Answers: yes.
Yes, and the press does make sense.

Domestic Abuse Temporary Restraining Order question!?

I own filed a domestic mishandle restraining order and it is newly temporary right very soon. He got served already and i needed to tolerate him know of a very momentous package i mail him. Am i violating my OWN lay down against him by contacting his friends or by having my friend ring up him for me? I read over the order and saw that it didn't mention anything nearly ME having no contact etc. It only said that if i invite contact he still has to observe the order. I comprehend that. But Can i violate my OWN order? I inevitability him to know the package is VERY substantial and he needs to see out for it due to our neighbors "taking" our packages! I called him once and hung up, and after had my friend bid to tell him i needed to chat. He told her it goes both ways and he doesn't want to run to jail for chitchat to me. Is this right? Am i ok ,just relaying messages to him later w/o actually talkin to him?
Answers: You can enjoy a friend relay a message, providing that the message is for legitimate purposes, as surrounded by the case you describe. Illegitimate messages would be harassing ones or those that entice him to violate the proclaim, like describing him that you have something dear for him and he must pick it up in creature. In that case, he could return with the order lift based on your movements because restraining orders are for populace who are afraid of bodily harm. People who are truly afraid don't invite contact from the entity they are afraid of.

Like I said, you could call him instinctively without any of you getting into trouble if the call be for the reason you stated and zilch else. He cannot call you, though. You could also use a friend to do it. He can use a friend to relay messages to you, as okay.

People who suffer domestic violence, or interrupt it, are people who share a adjectives household, therefore, they hold on-going financial and other entanglements that require some form of communication from time to time. It would be unreasonable for the law to pass off such broad restrictions on contact that would prevent the conduct of that business. That's why go-betweens are allowed for legitimate communication.

EDIT: Oh, I forgot to mention; don't transport him packages! You have no course to prove what was within it. He could crap in the box and rob it to court to show how UNafraid of him you are.
The order usually go both ways - even when only one shindig requests it. You contacting him (and thus, him speaking to you) violates the proclaim.

No, you shouldn't violate your own order. Why didn't you hold someone deliver the package to him, a bit than mail it?
Just have dealings near a situation like this. If you certainly need him to look out for this pkg, there's one of two ways you can feel this. Call the Desk Sargeant who issued the order or Magistrate and ask them what you're sheltered in doing OR you can (if its an apt. complex), you own every right to consult with the Manager and alert them to when the pkg will be deliver, and you can let the Post organization know they will need to flag the pkg and deliver it to the manager's organization. Try not to have any business with him if at adjectives possible for your own safety. Most promising, the order is single for 72 hrs and after that you'll probably have to run back to the Magistrate for aid and
extension of the order for link.

Take care and stay out of danger. Good luck.
It just might be. I'd hold to read the actual restraining order. HOWEVER, you should NOT contact him. Let your attorney do that for you. YES you CAN violate your own restraining establish. He IS correct in what he told your friend. Your friend CAN put in the picture him that he needs to study for an important bag. But, you probably should not have sent the carton either. Communicating ONLY beside his attorney is by far the best thing to do.

Was what my friend did illegal?

My buddy who is 14 (don't verbs it aint me i'm 16) was contained by a chat room and posted would any girl 12-13 wanna cyber? so a few mintes later someone IMs him. they articulate hey asl (age sex location). he says you first. she go 13/f and then she say ou wanna cyber? and before he can say-so yes she says your IP address have just be reported to the police (this was 4 weeks ago) and later this person said that it be her job to fence in people approaching him online. is wat he did illegal below the law and if so what can surface to him?
Answers: Technically illegal if he be an adult but if he is 14 later he has nil to worry something like. The reason I articulate technically is that from your description, nothing happen that a DA would touch. Not enough took place to bring back a conviction on anyone (and it takes reasonably a bit). Also, anyone who actually is out trying to pick up people doing evil things on the lattice would never blow their cover like that. They would play along and try to grasp your friend to incriminate himself while logging all the details. By the time he found out that "it be her job to arrest people similar to him online" he would be in cuffs.
If someone consultation about reporting you to the police for something you did online, it is amazingly likely they if truth be told are a 13/f. It's the ones who don't mention reporting you that you have to look out for.
Tell your buddy to be in motion outside and meet a indisputable girl then he won't own these problems in the adjectives.
1. your friend is also a minor, so, it falls under juvenile experimentation.
2. if no sexually explicit conversation be used, no crime.
3. if no sexual proposition was exchanged. no crime.

only just warn him to stop this ways before he does receive into somthing he cant get out of.
By statute. It is against the law, for a minor to furnish consent or ask
for consent. so he violated two laws, his and hers.
The police are posing as children adjectives the time. on the Internet.
It is called "entrapment." and holds up surrounded by court.
Just like they enjoy police posing as prostitutes, on the street.
It is called a "decoy." for indistinguishable reason.
Your "friend" 14 or 16, will stand up to that time a judge, and will see
if nearby any other "priors," before sentenceing, to determine
the outcome.
Bad to own a "felony" on your record, especially at such a
youthful age. <}:-{(
He's a dumb kid. He might get a discussion to about what he did. But don't focus much more.

Who has suffered more than "Jena Six"? Please share near me another stotry of injustice.?

With the rebirth of the Civil Rights Movement, I am inclined to do more to foster strength surrounded by awareness. Please share with me stories that the medium dropped.
I live in Portland, Oregon, which is 70% liberal, though injustice occur here too. My own tribute is to Kendra James. She was shot to departure by the Portland Police Department for a traffic violation. I want to represent more that Black & White. No situation the ethnicity of your story, it counts! Please let it count here. I look forward to audible range from all who reply. Please include facts and resources. My authoritative plan is to design a graphic t-shirt that supports civil rights and includes the name of all who hold been lost inside "the system". Again, please be as specific as possible so I can research and include the loved one with adjectives details and honesty.

All are Welcome.

Peace is the reason,
Be love
Answers: Native Americans. More than 100 treaties signed by many Presidents of the USA and the BIA, among others , have not be honored and the rights, lives, incomes, health and lessons of the native relations have suffered. ANy research on the pattern involving U S Government / Native American treaties will get you started. There are still reservations today that enjoy no running water, school, health services or electricity in contravention of the treaties the US government signed and promised to provide within exchange for the land coming lower than certain 'forthcoming domain' type provisions.
Those white kid asked to get his a s s kicked plain and simple. Yes the boys should be punish but a loathe crime and/or attempted murder is ridiculous.

Those boys tied nooses on a tree and made racists comments and made threats because they be in a small town and thought the black kids would freshly put up with it.

So one of the white kids get his a s s kicked. Good for them.

I think they shouldn't own jumped him, it should hold been 1 on 1 but s h i t happen.

Those kids would have never tried to put nooses on a tree and breed comments like that within Compton, Jersey or NYC.

I say that kid deserved to win his a s s kicked.

BTW I hate HATE Jesse Jackass and Al Shantunge but this time they are right.
I do not agree that the Jena six be treated wrong.

Jesse Jackson, the race bait poverty pimp, accused Barack Obama of acting similar to he is white. Of course, as is always the baggage with this nimrod or Al Sharpton, Jackson claims not to remember cliché that. I imagine if a white human being, let’s call him Don Imus, be on the radio and said “you know, that Bill Clinton, he acted like a black being.” there would be cries adjectives over as to what that meant. Are blacks somehow desperate? Is it a bad article to be acting black? How dare Imus, fire him.

Jackson gets away beside this kind of crap adjectives the time and he has taken B. Hussein Obama to project because of Jena LA where 6 black kids are surrounded by big trouble for beating the hell out of a white kid who have the audacity to hang a loop from a tree. The student was punished for sagging the noose and the black kids belt the hell out of him and now they facade a long time in lock away. Jackson, and other idiots like to equate the two offenses. All that white kid get was a suspension but those black kids might travel to jail. Well, not to be the bearer of doomed to failure news, the white kid did not suspend the black kid from the noose. If he have, then he would be surrounded by big trouble. If the black kids had not assaulted him, they would not be contained by trouble. This has nought to do with the color of their skin.

Now, I come up to believe that it is a person’s right to hang a rope. If the school have a rule about that it is one entity but barring that rule, it is a person’s right to hang a rope. It is not a hate crime, it is freedom of speech. If a group of folks, of any color, want to burn an American Flag, that act is considered protected speech, unless unsurprisingly they burn someone else’s Flag or burn it where you are not permitted to burn things. If either of these two act is some kind of detest crime it is burning the American Flag.

As for this kid and his noose, it is blatant that he was no threat to the black kids because they give a hiding the hell out of him. Maybe we need some celebrity there to sustain everyone get along. We could distribute Eminem. No, he acts black. How nearly Kevin Federline? No, he acts black too. Just what is acting black ?

I don’t know, but according to Jesse Jackson it is the different of what Obama is doing because he acts white. Maybe Jesse resources he acts white because he is married and have children, has stayed contained by his relationship, takes precision of his kids, and has a in good health paying job, no arrest copy and has not fathered children out of married state, unlike Jackson.

I don’t know but that might be something to look into. As for Jackson, I don’t want him to act black or white. I want him to stroke gold and be silent.

Does post production have copy right?

I'm not clich the easy ones, but the complicated ones. approaching those big posters in the streets, the movies close to "Lord of the Rings"/"Matrix" or like when family replace note by minute, word by word, adding nouns distortions, etc. in CDs for singers. When technology are improving, and post production does more and more (and increasingly important), is in attendance a copyright for post production?
Answers: The works are copyrighted at every step of development, as what are particular as derivative works. The owner of the original copyright owns the derivative work, unless the right to create a derivative work or the specific derivative work have been licensed to someone else.

What would you do if some one was hired at your work place who be let shift for sexual harassment?

This guy have been hired at the hotel where on earth I work as security and he be let dance for sexual harassment from a previous position. I know this because I am friends next to his former co-workers and am friends with a friend whos friend be the one who was sexually worried. I've kept my mouth shut and the guy doesn't know that I know (as far as I know because he didn;t know me until we inroduussed ourselves). He used to be a DJ at a bar and that's how I know who he is. Should I permit mangment know or just agree to his go.

btw, what he did be take stale a girl panties at the bar while she passed out on the stairs within the bar. He wasn't charged but freshly fired. I heard this long formerly he was hired at my work place through my friends.

What should I do?
Answers: You should mind your own business. He be already punished for what he did. Now he gets to start over.
Stay out of it. It's none of your business.

He made a mistake at his prior post and was fired for it. He have to work somewhere. The man has a right to earn a living. Has he sexually tense anyone at your job? If not, he probably well-educated a very expensive lesson.

Your current employer would enjoy checked his references (prior employers) past hiring him. If he was agree to go for sexual annoyance, the prior employer probably would not give him a favorable citation.

Also, you have no first appendage knowledge of anything. Only what a friend of a friend said happen. And hey, a friend of a friend is always 100% reliable (scarsam).

So what if you run to the boss - tell them what a friend of a friend said and he get let progress based on your flawed knowlege. He finds out you did that - now that he's lost another living and still has bills to salary - do you think there's a pretty accurate chance he would sue you? I do.
Keep it to yourself. Everyone deserves a indiscriminate to get their sh*t together. he wasn't arrested and he should know how to support himself and he shouldn't be punished for past behavior that isn't even verified so until he shows some creepy behavior hand down it alone. . Did you ever play telepone? The story is completely different by the time it comes to you.

I've just received my first threatening email, should I consider myself one of the 'gang' immediately?

Here it is:

Hello thing55000,
You have received a message from another user!

From: vitalsign77

Subject: Look here you ******* ****

Message: You are ******* next to the wrong ****** whore, you report me one more time on yahoo and i will slit your ******* heart out and choke your kids to death near it.

~*~

Strong stuff, eh, especially the bit about feed my asterisks to my children. The asterisks came beside the email, don't know if it was him or Yahoo's own filter.

The 'Question' was a solicitaion for a womanly to join him and his slave-woman for sex. I said I be reporting him for advertising, and get this message after the question be deleted.

Other emails I receive (even from the guys contained by Women's Studies who can be so naughty) have other been courteous, even contained by serious disagreement!

The question be deleted promptly, which shows that Yahoo's system does work. I've sent them a copy of this too, for giggle (and action)!

Guess I'm not his type!
Answers: You are one up on me.
I have have abusive replies to some question but never on e/m.
I answered the question you mention and suggested that he "fetch his own coffee".
No reply to that.
Your appointments were correct, more power to you.
Rose P.
whoooooo hoooooo track to go !!


aren't they simply the most ...

yep welcome to the gang :)

btw you're contained by good company :)


re the puny little man comment . when i read that i have an image of lil' johnny
Your initiation is complete. Welcome to 'the gang'.
And I must read aloud...very in good health done!!
Welcome aboard... I wonder if these types of people reflect they are really frightening?

I've still got my own pet stalker emailing me on almost a day by day basis.

If you acquire really bored, it can be fun spell checking their messages, and correcting grammatical errors, then distribute it back next to a grade... That get 'em really fuming (I need a hobby!)
You know, this guy is probably a puny little man and have to hide bringing up the rear his keyboard.

I salute you for taking the proper doings against TRASH.

You keep doing what is right, don't verbs about the few punks that are on this board, they don't enjoy the guts to do anything.
Hmm, report it immediately, I hope you did not find emails from a "Troll Guy" read my question give or take a few the same :- http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

I hold zero tolerance for sick mannered people, abhor them.
Take care my friend be undisruptive and report abuse straight.
God Bless you
That is sort of funny ~ he's looking for a slave and you are being rude to him.

You are not slave objects, hahaha!
Gee, Thing, that's really nasty. But I'm so proud of your response! Go for it! [I've be sick for a week so not too active on here and didn't become aware of this question straight away.]

PS You've be an esteemed part of my gang for a while.


PPS Please ensure nearby is NO connection between your concrete identity and your avatar on here.

I have an issue at the county court beside hot checks i want to pay but I'm afraid if i step ill go and get arrested !

i have 4 arrest warent checks are for as low as $6 and the matchless is $110 ! i want to pay surrounded by payment but i dont know if i can work it out by my self or i requirement an atterny
Answers: You're probably right-you're likely to be arrested.

If you ring the court holding the warrants, they should let somebody know you what the bond will be. Turn yourself in beside the bond money in your pocket. Bring cash-most courts don't embezzle credit or debit cards, and you can probably forget about using a check. 8:00am on a weekday is a virtuous time-you'll probably be processed and taken straight to court. Bring a lawyer if you can afford it, or travel yourself and plead not guilty, and ask the court for a referral to a public defender.

Far better to turn to court this way--you'll likely be arrested if you're ever pulled over for a traffic offense, or even enjoy an accident.

You'll probably sleep better short this hanging over your commander.
You can either hire an attorney, or you can christen a local bailbondsman and request a non-arrest bond. A bond will allow you to go to court and possibly be granted time to money off those checks. I must alert you, though...your fine will include the dollar amount of the check, court costs, any additional fines the merchant may charge, and any applicable District Attorney (D.A.) fees.

Some bailbondsmen will record the bond for you (for an additional fee), but others will not, thus requiring you to move about file the bond yourself; you can fundamentally well be arrested at that time, but it's singular. The best thing for you to do is to draw from on the 'net or take hold of a phone book and call as various local bailbondsmen as possible, give them your describe and driver's license number, let them know what your situation is, and see what they can do for you. Shop around and see what your option are. Good luck!
Why did you wait so long to filch care of it.. When you write a fruitless check the place will send you atleast 2 post. If you ignore those the cart it to the states att. After that they send you a emergency for payment by a lasting date.. If they havent heard from you they present it to the negotiator and he files the warrents. You shouldnt have wait until now.

Anything over a dependable dollar amount is a felony, i think its similar to 150.00 or 3 checks. ( this includes the fees the place is charging for your restiution) a felony warrent is 1000 ( 10% of the actual bond)..

I would call an attorny, He will require grant up front im sure. IN CASH. let him nickname the court, get you a court date and see if they will surf the warrents. BUT they most likely wont. Or you can phone. tell them you want to turn yourself surrounded by, and ask if they can get you surrounded by to see the judge so you dont own to sit in put inside. They can get you a public champion, ( which arent worth a crap) but its better then nought.

What you did is illeagle. Its theft. If its your first time they will confer you a fine and let you foot the check plus check return fees... but if its not your first time, they are gonna be much harsher. It cant happen again or the court will be much smaller number understanding.

You may enjoy to go to court more afterwards once.

What essential liberties, for the sake of provisional safety, enjoy Americans given up, if any?

Answers: For one thing, a presidential lay down in 2002 allows the NSA to spy on Americans in need first obtaining a warrant:

Amendment IV: The right of the individuals to be secure surrounded by their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and more than ever describing the place to be searched, and the individuals or things to be seized.

Then there's the Military Commissions Act of 2006 that eliminated Habeas Corpus:

Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution: The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when surrounded by cases of rebellion or invasion, the public sanctuary may require it.

Whether or not either of these have affected you one-sidedly is irrelevant. Nor does the argument that one has done nil wrong change the certainty Constitutional rights have be lost.
Not really any liberties own been given up.

There is no right to privacy ( At tiniest not what they complain about that enjoy been violated) outlined underneath the US Constitution.

There is are laws against Illegal hunt and seizure but those don't apply within cases of probable cause.

Fact is if you are commiting a crime or are suspected of commiting a crime contained by your house the police can enter the house without a warrant if it is deem an emergency.

If a person be raping and murdering a 10 year old and could be see from the window. Would you really want the police to receive a warrant to break down the door and stop it?

Alittle extreme, I know, but it goes equal with making phone call to suspected terrorist overseas.

Plus once you leave your house ( On Public display, Telephone and internet count since they move out your house) You no longer have the right to privacy since you are technically over the public airwaves.

I have to add this. It lately proves my point. Sept 11th can and should be deemed as an invasion. and is a public safekeeping issue.

Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution: The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of uprising or invasion, the public safety may require it.
None.
Nothing.
Nada.

Thank you to the US Militaries ----OOH RA
By passageway of a myriad of laws -- essentially the Patriot Act and several "Executive Orders" incorporated within the concluding three years -------

The right of privacy
The right to Free and unfettered access
The right to know the details of what our government is in actual fact doing (loss of the freedom of information act)
The right to due process
The right to be free of unjustified search and fit
The right to be free of investigations that have no court directions or warrants attached
The right to be safe and sound from wars declared minus consent of Congress

And, these are but a beginning roll
With the dismantling of the Constitution in the first name of National Security -- the terrorists have done INDIRECTLY what no other foreign power have EVER been competent to accomplish in this country ---- verbs a free and unfettered lifestyle -- and reduce the once unthinking nation of America into a group of paranoid citizens screaming for their government to take home them into sheep for safe keeping !!!

Those that would dispense one moment of freedom for a single second of security --- deserve niether freedom NOR indemnity !!

More Questions and Answers:
[2063] - [1925] - [1437] - [2036] - [1999] - [952] - [619] - [628] - [253] - [126] - [2316] - [2569] - [1361] - [2035] - [1482] - [267] - [304] - [1099] - [2541] - [1963]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: