Law Questions and Answers

RE: the Jena Six, Do two wrongs make a right?

It seem to me the people defending the Jena Six are not saw "they did not do it", they are not saying "they acted within self defense", but that they were so feed up with how they as a group be being treated that they vanquish someone innocent victim up.

Am I right on this assessment.?
Answers: Very few empire are making this claim.

The common claim is that this be not attempted murder. I have to agree beside this. You cant give a slap on the wrist for what is definitely a hate crime-punishment didnt even excede the conservatory level; afterwards try for maximum charges in the retiliation attack. This sort of behavior is sending a clear message that any behavior is ok for children on a university campus, as long as they dont hurt one another physically. Something that can be so easily see as a threat (its hard to see the nooses any other way) cannot be glossed over.

This is a clear incidence of racism inwardly the system. No, none of the 6 should be getting off. But murder charges are pretty harsh considering the front up to this, the wholly ineffective response, and the expeditious release of the beaten kid from the hospital.
Six-to-one likelihood and kicking a man after he is down is NOT self-defense, unless the "Jena Six" are mewly whining little wimps and it takes six of them to fray one guy.

To add on to this, within is a phenomenon I have be seeing over the years in which Group A see (through film or report incident) Group B causing great impair and injustice to Group C, so Group A gets angry and assaults the innocent Group D, and tries to convince themselves that Group B is rightfully punished and Group C is avenged.

This happned a few years ago after some African American youths saw the movie "Mississippi Burning" and go out and beat up the first white man they could find. The guy they caught be a mentally retarded man walking his wife home.

Sad.
Yep a very big difference between a rope within a tree and a boy beaten till he be unconscious and beyond for what a word if that.

The boy have blindness and a swollen head and still have headaches which unsurprisingly a doctor can't determine the cause and all the same grown people can't infer why they want these poor innocent jena 6 locked up.

If it were me or my kid I'd lock them up and everyone here know they would too at least till they are 21.

Nope I'm not a racist lately confused as to why they a white boy getting beaten vehicle nothing while a rope surrounded by a tree which hurt no one physically is more exalted.

If it were freshly a few punches I'd feel diferently and voice probation but to beat and see someone into uncounscious is a pure hate crime and deserves some punishment.

They should enjoy known better and Bell have 3 priors for the same crime.

Adults of California: How is it legal for Dennis Rodman to drive around within a Hummer with NUDES adjectives over it?!?

I won't post the link to where on earth I saw it, but you can find it on the net. Why isn't anyone outraged?
Answers: Free expression is neither written surrounded by the Bill of Rights nor in the U.S. Constitution, and the First Amendment to be sure does not guarantee the freedom of lewdness.

Having said that, nude is not lewd. California Penal Code section 311, et seq. The artwork does not contain anything explicitly sexual in personality. Perhaps had it involved (for deficit of a better description) insertion, it would then be surrounded by violation.

But that is to say not the case here. Instead adjectives the outrage seems to be around vehicle emissions and his blatant disregard for reserved parking. Does that answer your put somebody through the mill?

*/End of Line.
Gee, I thought we were guaranteed freedom of speech, expression, etc. beneath the first amendment to our constitution.

If you're offended I suggest you delete the relation or look the other way. BTW... Virtue is its own punishment.
The directive only applies to humans, not aliens approaching Dennis Rodman.

I don't know what to do?

My job suspended me something some said. They didn't report to me what. They didn't even call me. I go down there and they did afford me a new time card. My boss hate me.I been ther 7 and 8 months. This guy be there a month. He reported me on something after 2 weeks. I chitchat to him atotal of 40 minutes. I never talk to him again. 2 weeks next I am in trouble. Some ethnic group said sexual harrassment. He did seem angry when i stop conversation to him. He told me I worry to much what those say and he did this. My boss did proposal me a chance to uphold myself and didn't really give me a plea. I mean if ever agree on to tell something on me, because they can't win their way, what can I do. I live surrounded by Michingan and jobs are sturdy to by.
Answers: Spend your suspension time looking for another job. If you own not found one by the time you go rear to work, keep looking contained by your off hours until you find one.

Can i lose my job for taking time rotten for the first time?

My husband (who is a house husband because of disability) has newly been taken into hospital really not at your best. I have worked contained by my teaching employment for 5 years and never had a afternoon off - my husband looks after our 4 children, so i hold now have to have time bad to visit him and nick care of the kids. He be only admit on Tuesday and work has told me that they want me final in subsequent week! I can't go pay for cause my hubby is still contained by hospital and i'm not leaving the kids and anyway, i won't be capable of do my job properly next to worrying and tiredness. Anyone ever been surrounded by the same situation?
Answers: Yes and i go to my doctor explained the situation and she gave me a sick memo for stress.
You are under deeply of stress now husband is sick, you own children to care for so you are fully entitled to shift and get a sick record and work can not do a thing in the order of it.
How can you work with adjectives this going on you can't simple as.
It is called FMLA, You teem out a form and submit to your employer and they can NOT fire you for taking time off.
It's call - Family Medical Leave Act
If you teach, don't you bring back summers off?
You MAY be capable of invoke the family check out of act. There are several factor that affect applicability. It wouldn't be paid time bad but you may be able to obtain some time off that mode. I don't know your jurisdiction. Check with your local or state labor commission.
Unfortunately you hold to find someone else to care for the children, or lose your duty. That's the thing in the order of teaching posts - you can't choose when to help yourself to leave. But you do get hold of a lot of it.
The teacher union wont stand for that. Talk to them more or less it.
I would think this would trip up under the STD (Short Term Disability) but I am not sure on that.
If you are a educationalist, you should have a contract for employment. You would enjoy a certain number of days for go off due to illness and personal days. If you hold run out of paid walk out, you can still request leave below the federal family emergency medical check out of act. You would not be compensated for your time off, but you could not be fired any.

If you are not a member of the NEA, you should be. They can relieve.
Ask a Doctor to give you a few days bad because you are feeling exceedingly sick , and until blood test are done etcetera !

Take the days bad recommendation to your boss and he/she will hold to let you bad the hook for that time , but don't make it an addiction to do that because later you will be hurting your self esteem , maybe , yes , newly maybe !

Well , do you resembling O.J.Simpson ? If you do then you are a highly nice person , congratulations !

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Yes. I be a single mom in a city where on earth I didn't know anyone and when my 2 year old started daycare he be catching every bug that came along. Daycare won't hold them when they are sick and I had nobody else. I have never taken a day sour sick before my pregnancy and singular one day rotten during the pregnancy. Although they knew that I have a great attendance record, at hand was no support when I be in a bind. I be told that I would "have to generate other arrangements". I didn't have other arrangements, so when he concluded up in the hospital, I bypassed my boss and call the CEO to let him know what be happening. Since your children are thriving, you might see if there is short-term daycare for them. It will probably financially stretch you, but if it resources keeping your job...
Unfortunately, unless you whip family set out, they are within their rights to expect you put money on next week.
Absence is usually manage in vocabulary of a person's ability to deal with their contract - where fantasy begins to impact your capability to fulfill your obligations to your employer your employer have the right to manage you through the disciplinary procedure - unless you enjoy less than a year's service which customarily means you own no recourse to protection of disciplinary procedure (unless you believe the disciplinary action is the result of nouns where no time frame is relevant and the employer would call for to prove their innocence rather than you proving their guilt). It seem very undeserved what is being asked of you - I work for unbelievably well prearranged retailer and they offer adjectives staff 5 days emergency carer leave for this drastically situation; additionally, as a working parent you are entitled to apply for flexible working conditions and this might apply in this situation ; within essence any disciplinary action must be within accordance with the employer's written disciplinary procedure and you would own the ability to hold a union administrator present if it got that far. If I be your manager I would never put you surrounded by this position and I would seriously consider getting advice from NUT. Hope that help..

Whith charge is least imagined to be settled by plea barging?

A murder
B drug trafficking
C burglary
D Motor vehicle theft
Answers: A Murder.

This crime can not be plead out as here really is no incentive for the state to plea bargain. It is possible to plea wrangle any crime. The rest have second-rate offenses that a plea bargain would benefit both sides.
Drug trafficking.

Murder is commonly settled, any dropping it down to manslaughter, or reducing the sentence a few years.

Burglary is often settled, since the defendant's intent at the time of entry is a push button element, and sturdy to prove -- so it's easy to settle on attempted larceny or breaking and entering.

Motor vehicle breaking and entering is often settled, again base on the difficulty of proving intent -- and lesser charges and/or a sentence slimming down are often sufficient as an incentive.

Drug trafficking is usually a crime at both the state and federal stratum -- and usually strict liability, meaning that intent is regularly not even a key part. Thus, of all of them, it is the easiest to prove and given mandatory minimums, within is often no incentive to settle.
It depends how strong the evidence is within each shield. They all hold the possibility of being plead out, or trial.

What is the type of bail where the state act as a bonding agent?

1. bail bonding
2. deposit bail
3. released on recongnizance
4. pretrial release
Answers: It would have to be #2 -- but that's lone by process of elimination.

ROR (released on own recognizance) is where on earth the court does not set bail.

Pre-trial release applies to any bail situation, or to ROR. It refers to the person person out pending trial.

Bail bonding is where on earth the person pays a charge, and someone else (the bondsman) guarantees their bail.

So, that leaves #2 -- but generally, the state doesn't perform as a bonding agent ever. The person any puts up their bail (as a deposit on their return), or someone else guarantees it for them (see bondsman, above).
Hmmmmmm

1 is where you post a percent of your bail to a bail bondsman who fronts the rest of the money.

2 is where on earth you give the court your deposit as bail and they hold the money next trial.

3 has zilch to do with bail.

4 have nothing to do near bail.

So I guess it's 2 by process of elimination. It simply doesn't sound right the instrument you've worded it.

Let me get this straight, the artic is melt...and we see this as opportunity to dig up more fossil fuel?

is humanity getting a group brain cramp?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070920/sc_n...
Answers: Sometimes I wonder if within will be anything left surrounded by the world when I grow old.
Unless you plan on riding a bicycle in the buff to work everyday I suggest you deal near reality, where on earth fossil fuel is nessecary for almost every aspect of our daily lives.
With that said it doesn't imply we should plunder the resources we need, but fairly use them more efficiently & look towards more alternative fuel sources.
The great words of Tiny Tim,"God Bless Us,All of Us".
yah know be gonna need it. stupid humans..
What is your solution to our gusto needs? Did you yelp BIO-Fuel 20 years ago? Did you turn on your lights and computer? Until we get alternative fuel fully set, we are goint to dig more.
Well we do entail fossil fuels, why not get at them while the opportunity is nearby? Or should we all stop living our lives and cower within the corner because some arrogant scientists feel that the current climate on Earth is the BEST climate for mankind and the Earth?

What is battered womens syndrome?

We're discussing it in our Law class, but I thought I'd close to a broader view of what it is.
Answers: It is a psychological condition, across the world accepted a valid trial defense in some situations.

In a nutshell, it is a condition where on earth a person (usually a woman) have been so uncontrolled and physically battered, that they live in a constant state of distress of attack from the abuser.

That constant state of fear extends the conventional limits of the self defense proposal -- which normally just applies when violence is instant. Under the battered syndrome, the constant state of fear allows the sufferer to act to protect themself at any time, based on their belief that bombing can occur at any time.
it a downward spiral contained by a relationship where a woman is man abused or mistreated, and she continues to leave herself within the situation, and actually protect her abuser

the channel the psychology works is that she knows what to expect when her husband beat her, so she sets her self up for failure, so she can be outdone again, because its what she knows ... and regularly these women fear if they right to be heard anything their husbands may kill them
To comprehend battered woman's syndrome, one must first understand how someone become a "battered woman". According to Dr. Lenore E. Walker, the nation's most prominent expert on battered women, a woman must experience at least two complete battering cycles past she can be labeled a "battered woman". The cycle has three distinct phases. First is the tension-building phase, followed by the explosion or acute battering incident, culminating surrounded by a calm, loving respite - normally referred to as the honeymoon phase. Walker, L., The Battered Woman (1979).
It is also important to infer why battered women stay in slighting relationships. The Court in People v. Aris, 215 Cal App 3d 1194, 264 Cal Rptr 167, 178 (1989) stated that "battered women tend to stay surrounded by abusive relationships for a few reasons." Among those reason: women are still positively reinforced during the honeymoon phase; women tend to be the peacekeepers within relationships - the ones responsible for making the marriage work; adverse financial consequences; it is more dangerous to take off than to stay; prior threats by batterer to kill self, or children; or to abscond near children; lost self-esteem; and no psychological energy to make tracks - resulting in a literary helplessness or psychological paralysis.
"Battered woman syndrome describes a stencil of psychological and behavioral symptoms found in women living contained by battering relationships." There are four general characteristics of the syndrome:
1. The woman believes that the intimidation was her guiltiness.
2. The woman has an inability to place the responsibility for the ferocity elsewhere.
3. The woman fears for her life and/or her children's lives.
4. The woman have an irrational belief that the abuser is omnipresent and omniscient.


A great way to obtain alot of info thats not just writin out, is beckon your local Domestic Violence Office. Most of the time people simply search the web for there info. So its a great untapped resourse that you could use. Trust me when I read out, they'll be happy to abet you understand and answer any question.

Good Luck

What are the different stages of a crown court case?

i anticipate from initial hearing through 2 sentencing
Answers: 1. Initial appearance by accuse or lawyer who go on record.

2. Several Remand date to allow Crown time to provide full disclosure of the particulars.

3. Crown provides safeguard counsel with Crown Position re: deal;

4. Appearance, including client, in court and plea is enter.

5. If guilty plea is entered the business is adjourned to a sentancing date.

6. If a not guitly plea is enter a preliminary hearing date is set.

7. Preliminary audible range is held to figure out the facts at issue.

8. Trial date is set (and possibly jury inspection date)

9. Jury selection.

10. Trial.

11. If conviction is enter a sentancing date is set.

12. If ordered by Judge a PSR (Presentance Report) is prepared.

13. Sentancing.
Before the case even comes to Crown Court, in attendance will be a brief appearance at the Magistrates' Court at which the case will be passed up to the local Crown Court.

Once standard as a Crown matter, within will be a plea and case nouns hearing (used to be call plea and directions, or P&D). If the defendant pleads guilty at this stage, the matter can proceed straight to sentencing as at hand is no need for a trial. A timely guilty plea will result within a lesser sentence, so if the defendant go not guilty the judge will usually check at this stage whether their barrister have explained this to them and that they fully understand that they are promising to face a harsher cost if found guilty by the jury.

If the defendant enters a "Not guilty" plea, after a trial date will have to be fixed. Any date to avoid submitted by witnesses will have to be considered to ensure they can attend. The grill of bail will also have to be address, i.e. should they remain in the community or are they feasible to fail to turn up for the trial, intimidate witnesses, commit further offence, etc. If the defendant is remanded in custody, the Court later has to set a quicker trial date than if they are on bail.

The trial will consequently begin, and can hold days, weeks, or even months according to the complexity of the case. The evidence for the prosecution and for the security will be presented: witnesses will take the stand and be cross-examined, and any documents/items/cctv footage/tape recordings etc relevant to the skin will be shown. The Judge will provide guidance for the jury on what issues they should be considering, but it is the jury's decision whether the defendant is guilty or not.

If the decree is NG, then the skin is completed and the defendant is free to go. If guilty, the casing then proceeds to sentencing. The Judge may sentence straight away, or may adjourn for reports to inform sentencing. They may ask the probation service to provide a pre-sentence report, looking at the offender's attitude to their misdeed and their personal circumstances. They may also ask for psychiatric or psychological reports, or a drug or alcohol assessment, to give them a better notion of the issues underlying the offence. If the guilty party is on custodial remand, they will remain so through this adjournment period.

The Judge later passes sentence, base on the decision on the selective circumstances of the individual case which might craft it more or less serious, the sufferer more or less adjectives, or the offender more or smaller amount responsible for their actions. The sentence is implement immediately, whether they are taken bad to custody, or whether they are made subject to a Community Order.
If the person is pleading not guilty afterwards there will be a space hearing.jury sworn within, CPS and defendent tell the court why they are near.

CPS provides evidence

Defence provides defence to that evidence

Then in attendance will be witness called to the stand and cross examined.

Jury give it verdict

If pleading guilty consequently the cps and defendent tell court why they are in attendance..cps provides evidence...defence barrister provides mitigation eg previous polite character. How sorry he is etc etc

Judge pass sentence

Convict ALL 6 of the Jena 6 Black boys!?

These 6 black boys are not the law. The protest should be against the law for not doing anything when the nooses were hung surrounded by the tree's, but nothing be done except the tree was cut down. Then, 6 black boys meditate they have the right to put nearby hands on anybody...Well they did and explicitly a far bigger obstruction of our law than hanging nooses. Those 6 should be convicted and sent to prison for a hugely long time. Anybody who doesn't agree, well...why don't you setup surrounded by black packs of 6 and start trouncing the hell out of white people one at a time. Yes, 6 on 1 and let see what happens to y'adjectives!
Answers: it shouldn't be about the color of a those skin. let the punishment fit the crime. since when does a school-yard brawl warrant attempted murder charges. if this had be a fair baggage, the boys would have be tried as juveniles.
A fist fight is scarcely the "attempted murder" they were charged near.
If the roles were reversed, I notably doubt six white kids would be dragged through court, & held without bond!
I hear that they didn't even have positive proof that these boys be involved with the spanking. The white kids started it with the nooses and I hear the white kids did the initial attacks.

If this had be reversed, the white kids would have have punishment. But since the kids were black it be attempted murder. This is ridiculous!

BTW, I'm white.
So then you are axiom that it is OK for people to commit crimes. What if that be your son or daughter, sister or brother who got vanquish up regardless of what race you are or the perpetrators are? I deem that people stipulation to look at this as if the perps were green and the inhabitants who got measure up were purple. Is at hand any justification for hitting someone? According to the ruling, no. If you think here is, that is fine, but you will probably see the inside of a prison cell along near the other immature idiots of this country. Most citizens posting support on yahoo! answers for the jena 6 are ignorant large school kids who enjoy done no research and do not know the laws. What does that detail you?

By the way, kicking someone is assault beside a dangerous weapon (shod foot). Hitting someone near your fist is not. The law is the tenet. If you don't like it, after move to Russia or Haiti. The minute you step onto the soil of either of those countries I guarantee that you will want to come running home to mommy and daddy.
Caucasian here. I get the impression they should collect all the boys label them do community service and some homework on racial prejudice. Time served for the others. Heck, the kid go out that nite he was so hurt? 6 white on blacks and they'ld be gone. Either course it was poorly handle. Bring in the parents and community to address issues already surrounded by place there beneath these events.
NO do not convict the Jena 6. Thank you.

PS. 6 on one? and where on earth were his friends? hiding surrounded by the bushes? brave to raise a rope yet afraid to facade the violence they provoked? Think almost it further. 48 yrs old also!
Protesting is never against the tenet. Apparently, neither is hanging revulsion symbols on a tree or on a car.

What the boys did be wrong, but it's equally wrong to create an atmosphere of oppression and next act surprised when the oppressed strike pay for.

No one wants them set free if they are guilty. Believe me, not a soul thinks that. It's purely that attempted murder is clearly a trumped up charge. How can 6 people go wrong to attempt to murder someone?
those 6 are a bunch of trouble making nigs

More Questions and Answers:
[1078] - [1057] - [790] - [1371] - [2553] - [2111] - [1853] - [1164] - [209] - [889] - [2502] - [565] - [1915] - [722] - [1284] - [2094] - [1703] - [717] - [1769] - [291]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: