Law Questions and Answers
Is my employer required by law to repay me for bereavement time for family member in state of Ohio?
Answers: depends upon who your employer is. There is no statute contained by the state of Ohio requiring general employer to offer, much smaller number pay, breavement set out.
EDITED FOR TOM'S WORLD:
Actually, for state and federal employees, and for union and other associated semi-governmental agencies, there IS bearevment salary and leave requirements.
Hence, my qualified answer.
Employers should not be required by establishment to do anything, nor should employees be required to do anything pertaining to work by "canon."
It is a private contract between two consenting adults to enter into legal work, and they hold the right to make the conditions, themselves,
If empire want to change that, they should lower the stars and stripes and put on a pedestal the hammer and sickle.
Now, any sensible employer should exercise his freedom of choice to allow time bad for anything sensible, according to his freedom of choice that liberals believe in. You can also choose to walk out and shop for one that does.
I'm sorry about your loss, within any event.
No. And bereavement time depends on the status of the deceased to the member of staff - for example, my husband works on navy ships; if I or a child or parent be to die, he would come home on bereavement. I might be wrong, but anyone more 'distant' (sibling, cousin) might not qualify.
It also depends on the employer to make individual decision, like when my grandmother passed away and I be given bereavement time.
Can Pardon the gift of humanity break the regulation? If yes, how far it does? Explain. Give a philosophical...
Can Pardon the gift of humanity break the decree? If yes, how far it does? Explain. Give a philosophical defination of humanity and law.Answers: Your grill does not make any sense, please explain what you niggardly more clearly.
Who is pardon ? Are you refering to a creature or to the quality of forgiving i.e exoneration ? what is the relation between pardon and breaking the directive ? do you mean can we mercy a person who breaks the imperative ? what is the relation between pardon and grant to humanity ?
i love only sexi girl
Does anyone know the status of the REAL ID act??
papers please.Answers: As of immediately, it goes into effect on May 11...I own heard lawmaker are rethinking this idiocy, but I am not yet aware of any repeal legislation...if anybody know of any, I would also be interested.
I don't think the problem is the REAL ID. All they are looking to do is create consistency between states. I lived within New Jersey and needed more documentation to renew my license than I did to change my license to Virginia. There is nil wrong with requiring proof of address, and documentation of birth, ect. Everyone who is here properly and entitled to a drivers license should already have the required documents. If you don't, you should carry them anyway (eg. you lost your birth certificate).
Where the problem could be is in how states use these investigational IDs. Do I need an ID to walk to a national or state park? Can I be detained for not having a valid ID? But those scenario could just as smoothly happen today minus the REAL ID than with it. For example, Mannassas Virginia is cracking down on undemocratic immigration, they can check ID if you are in a city or county park. This have nothing to do near REAL ID.
Atleast with REAL ID I will know everyone near a drivers license or on my plane are here legally.
Also contrary to what lots people reflect on. REAL ID is not a national ID, it is a set of standards that all states must follow when issuing a state ID. If they do not follow these standards that states ID will not be valid outside of that state.
Can a person surrounded by prison time get lessen for marrying someone?
Answers: LOL...is this a jape?
No it jsut means they hold someone on the outside supporting them
Usually marriages that are started while one spouse is incarcerated completion up in divorce.
Of course not.
POLL question?
would you resembling it if all the law we are supposed to obey be written in an smooth to understand pamphelet just IQ of 70 necessarry to understand. solely to be revised once in ten years and hand to every citizen. with other stuff like drivers liscencinig seperate booklet same unforced to understand law given to every driver.Answers: ummmm.most laws are adjectives sense laws. Just respect the road and you won't achieve in trouble...it is that effortless!!
aren't you tested on the laws up to that time given a license? I know in Canada you are, so I would vote...
No but it wouldn't it if they did.
The imperative is too complex to be reduced to a 'simple' pamphlet. And a restriction that the laws can merely be revised once every ten years? Absolutely not.
What are some questions to ask culture who dont want english to be the official speaking?
Answers: Como?
how about why they touch it should not?
or what should the official terms be?
should there be more than one allowed language?
age/ethniticity might be a produce thing to history
how will I find my way to Los Angeles or San Antonio if adjectives the signs are to be in english?
What part of an arrest is considered initial detention?
When i be arrested for DUI over the weekend there be a long wait from the time the police arrived and the time my breath audition was administered...Tennessee ruling states that chemical tests should be given inside 2 hours for evidence to be admissible in court.(straight from the Tennessee law if anyone disagrees with that statement) My query is what definies initial detention? is it from the time that the officers set off to question you or does initial detention inaugurate when the cuffs go on? Thanks within advance for any clothed answers.Answers: first of all, specifically NOT what the tennessee statutes say. I suggest you read them completely this time.
Secondly, near is nothing within your post on which to determine when, or if initial detention was initiated or if an arrest be made.
Therefore, any answer you receive would be wrong based on the drought of facts.
A 'long time' is not a measurable entity for the purposes of a legal evaluation.
Best way to explain a Menacing charge on a livelihood app?
I was convicted of a class A misdemeanor "menacing." When asked on a post application / interview, what would be the best way to explain this? I can't trademark the case for a couple more years...Answers: The best course is to just narrate the truth, your excuse is young and dumb
how feeble is the charge? did you serve time? did you serve community service or a supervised sentence(jail)? i hire people and these are the question i ask. have you hade any more run ins near the law? explain the circumstanes..just if i think i want to hire you.
Florida Student tasered asking Kerry a question - Were the Police mortal the criminals?
Andrew Meyer's rights of free speech were violated. He asked tough and unpleasant question. Obviously the Police didn't like nor did some of the other students.Yet quash Free Speech is as un-American as you can get. Especially when it comes to political Speech.
His opinion might be annoying, but they are protected speech.
His reaction to the police and their banned actions be more than reasonable and would qualify as extremely restrained self caring actions. He be assaulted by a gang of cops that were out to deprive him of his rights.
The Police are the criminals contained by this scenario. I have contacted John Kerry's department and demanded he come to Andrew Myers aid and demand a criminal investigation of the police.
You can too:
HTTP://kerry.senate.gov/contact/email.
Answers: I may not agree next to a lot of things folks say but we gotta uphold their right to say it.
[Yet quash Free Speech is as un-American as you can get. Especially when it comes to political Speech. ]
What does that utter about adjectives the deleted posts contained by this forum?
Free speech is dead, if it ever truly existed contained by the first place. People are arrested or condemned everyday for their words and actions. Why? Because it hurt somebody's mood.
Personally, I've read the consitution and have even so to truly see a mention of hurt feelings mortal protected. (Life, yes, liberty, yes, pursuit of exuberance, yes, feelings, no.)
As an added facts, The student was an idiot, possibly paranoid if he truly believed surrounded by the Skull and Bones secret society. Trust me, he might be better bad in reformatory.
Unbelievable.His free speech rights were not violated, you idiot. He be asked to leave the stand and he RESISTED, next was getting arrested and be swinging his arms at the officers. Are general public idiots? You don't swing your arms at officers when you are anyone arrested.
Police were doing their job, otherwise events would become free for alls with anybody doing anything and everything.
Answers needed??? in CALIFORNIA?
I be wondering if this takes deed to a 17 year old since it single says 16 and younger not 16 and elder ?d) Any person 21 years of age or elder who engages surrounded by an act of unlawful sexual intercourse near a minor who is under 16 years of age is guilty of any a misdemeanor or a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment contained by a county jail not exceeding one year, or by captivity in the state prison for two, three, or four years.
Answers: To speak more shortly what eat_urself said in length--You are reading just one subdivision of a statute which has oodles subdivisions, Penal Code section 261.5. In short, it is unlawful for anybody to own sexual relations with anybody below 18 in California. The age of the participant, and the difference in age, will affect the seriousness of the offense, but it is other illegal.
if you are asking if you can enjoy sex with a 17 year hoary legally if you are over the age of 21, next the answer is yes.
if you are asking if you are 17 and whether or not you can have sex near someone that is 16, consequently again, the answer is yes.
it means precisely what it say however the absolute age of consent within California is 18 though the penalties money if they are over 16.
" For the purposes of this section, a "minor" is a creature
under the age of 18 years and an "adult" is a entity
who is at least 18 years of age.
(b) Any human being who engages surrounded by an act of unlawful sexual
intercourse near a minor who is not more than three years
older or three years younger than the perpetrator, is
guilty of a misdemeanor.
(c) Any being who engages contained by an act of unlawful sexual
intercourse beside a minor who is more than three years younger than
the perpetrator is guilty of either a misdemeanor or a felony, and
shall be punished by detention in a county send to prison not exceeding one
year, or by imprisonment contained by the state prison.
(d) Any person over the age of 21 years who engage in an conduct yourself of
unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor who is lower than 16 years of age
is guilty of either a misdemeanor or a felony, and shall be punished
by confinement in a county young offenders` institution not exceeding one year, or by
imprisonment contained by the state prison for two, three, or four years.
(e) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, an
developed who engages within an act of sexual intercourse beside a minor in
despoliation of this section may be liable for civil penalty in the
following amounts:
(A) An developed who engages within an act of unlawful sexual intercourse
next to a minor less than two years younger than the developed is liable for
a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000).
(B) An mature who engages surrounded by an act of unlawful sexual intercourse
near a minor at least two years younger than the grown is liable for
a civil penalty not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000).
(C) An fully developed who engages within an act of unlawful sexual intercourse
beside a minor at least three years younger than the grown is liable
for a civil penalty not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
(D) An fully developed over the age of 21 years who engages contained by an act of
unlawful sexual intercourse next to a minor under 16 years of age is
liable for a civil cost not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000).
(2) The district attorney may bring actions to rest civil
penalties pursuant to this subdivision. From the amounts collected
for respectively case, an amount equal to the costs of pursuing the doings
shall be deposited with the treasurer of the county surrounded by which the
judgment be entered, and the remainder shall be deposited within the
Underage Pregnancy Prevention Fund, which is hereby created in the
State Treasury. Amounts deposited surrounded by the Underage Pregnancy
Prevention Fund may be used only for the purpose of preventing
underage pregnancy upon appropriation by the Legislature.
261.6. In prosecutions beneath Section 261, 262, 286, 288a, or 289,
in which consent is at issue, "consent" shall be defined to parsimonious
positive cooperation in feat or attitude pursuant to an exercise of
free will. The person must conduct yourself freely and voluntarily and have
experience of the nature of the conduct yourself or transaction involved.
A current or previous dating or marital relationship shall not be
sufficient to constitute consent where on earth consent is at issue in a
prosecution underneath Section 261, 262, 286, 288a, or 289.
Nothing in this division shall affect the admissibility of evidence
or the burden of proof on the issue of consent.
261.7. In prosecutions under Section 261, 262, 286, 288a, or 289,
contained by which consent is at issue, evidence that the victim suggested,
requested, or otherwise communicated to the defendant that the
defendant use a condom or other birth control device, short
additional evidence of consent, is not sufficient to constitute
consent.
"
More Questions and Answers:
[302] - [2279] - [1361] - [1187] - [2436] - [1364] - [2469] - [1289] - [1643] - [208] - [1696] - [550] - [1375] - [502] - [1376] - [1410] - [911] - [963] - [85] - [571]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: