Law Questions and Answers
How long will it be until O.J. Simpson finds "Jesus"? (It took Michael Vick 2 days).?
Will he come out and apologize and all that? When?Answers: after his conviction
probably when he meet the guys from the Aryan brotherhood
Funny you mention His name because explicitly the only one who is going to give support to now.
I hope he spends a long time surrounded by jail getting to Jesus.
How does the sheriff's office check for tabacco use?
I am trying to return with a job at the sheriff's department as a nurse and be wondering if anyone new how they question paper for tobacco use since you have to be free from tobacco 6 months prior to applying,.Answers: There is a urine examination for tobacco use.
Are you implying that you use tobacco?
If you state on a living application that you do not use tobacco they will probably take you at your word.
If you are going to be a "police officer" you have better be telling the truth.
You are a nurse, they wil probably give somebody a lift you at your word. Chill out, don't smoke at work, get the chore!
They test a strand of spike from the back of your hair/neckline.
Good luck!!
If o.j simpson was found not guilty, why does he own to pay the goldman own flesh and blood royalties?
i really don't understand the canon. I'm not being a smart *** but if someone is found not guilty why would they recompense money? Isn't that kind truism they are guilty? I just would close to my question answered seriously not by some smart *** who doesn't know what they are chitchat about. I'm not decide wheather or not he is guilty or innocent, i would just close to some anwsers.Thank You.Answers: He was found guilty surrounded by the civil suit and ordered to pay damages
It does not appear right that it is possible to sue someone for liability in a crime that they enjoy been acquit of.
But it does point out how an acquittal of criminal charges is not the same as individual found to be innocent. It just scheme that they state failed within their one allotted attempt to convict you.
So, is OJ innocent of the crime? Not determined, according to the criminal court, but found to be unlikely in the civil court.
Nope he will get hold of off merely like the Ted Kennedy
While attending imperative school at the University of Virginia, he be cited for reckless driving four times, including once when he be clocked driving 90 miles per hour in a residential neighborhood beside his headlights off after overcast. Yet his Virginia driver's license was never revoked. He passed the fishing rod exam in 1959, and two years after that was appointed an Assistant to the District Attorney contained by Massachusetts' Suffolk County.
On 19 July 1969, Kennedy attended a party on Chappaquiddick Island surrounded by Massachusetts. At about 11:00 PM, he borrowed his chauffeur's key to his Oldsmobile limousine, and offered to give a ride home to Mary Jo Kopechne, a drum up support worker. Leaving the island via an unlit, narrow, rickety wooden bridge, Kennedy steered the saloon off the bridge and into Poucha Pond. He swam to shore and walk back to the body -- passing several houses and a fire station -- and two friends returned next to him to the scene of the accident. According to their after that testimony, they told him what he already know, that he was required by decree to immediately report the luck to the authorities. Instead Kennedy made his way to his hotel, call his lawyer, and go to sleep.
Kennedy called the police the subsequent morning. By then the wreck have already been discovered. Before dying, Kopechne have scratched at the upholstered floor above her head contained by the upside-down car.
, I've get to Star this question because I own asked this same thing and not a soul has ever be able to hand over me answer either. It have never made any sense to me why the courts would even allow something like this to jump on.
The only point I have be able to come up next to, in my own mind, is that it make big bucks for the lawyers and the courts and as you would expect all the bench are attorney's so I figure they are a moment ago looking out for their brethren.
You are confusing the criminal trial with the civil trial. A criminal trial requires a much superior standard of proving guilt, because the result of being found guilty sends you to put in prison. The government is the one bringing charges surrounded by a criminal trial.
A civil trial is usually brought by a citizen, not the government, and will require you to reward, but not necessarily go to send down. When O.J. was 'acquitted', it be because the jury could not say 100% that he be guilty. This was mostly, IMHO, because the prosecutors did not do the best opportunity in assembling an air-tight defence. Despite the evidence of everyone's blood being found contained by O.J.'s house, the defense ripped the police department so badly that the jury couldn't be "100% sure".
A civil trial (where general public can sue for $$), has a lower standard because adjectives you have to prove is that they be responsible for it. So the Goldman's sued O.J. after he was acquit in the criminal trial for wrongful loss, and won...but O.J. didn't have any money (supposedly). That is why the communication people keep hold of talking to the Goldman's because they are still waiting to be rewarded $33 million dollars, and OJ hasn't paid a dime even so. It will be interesting to see if this armed robbery case reveals where on earth he has mysterious his millions in past its sell-by date shore accounts.
Everybody knew he be guilty and was appalled that he get away with such a antagonistic crime. Looking back at adjectives of the evidence, there be blood from OJ's wife and the other victim contained by his car and at his house. It should hold been a slam-dunk. But the jury be apparently influenced by the defense testimony more than they should hold been.
Won't O J Simpson Beat His Rap Again Because Of His Celebrity Status?
Well of course we adjectives know by now that former football great O J Simpson have been arrested for armed robbery surrounded by Las Vegas, with his cohorts, apparently holding up some citizens, trying to get some of his personal property rear, or so he claims was stolen from him. He have been denied bail and sitting within a jail cell because the find considers him a flight risk. The media claims he could carry up to 30 years for his crime. I find this quite comical, because some power troopattorneys will certainly come into the luggage and rescue him and he'll beat the rap, IMHO. What do you reason?
Answers: Sure he will beat the rap again!! Black celebrity do not go to detention centre. Just ask Michael Jackson. They will play the race card and if at hand is even just one Black on that Jury O J walk. There is not a Black person anywhere within the USA that would vote to convict O J for anything.
It's not a given that he'll attract a "Dream Team" like he did the end time. He still has plenty of money for lawyer (despite losing the suit to the Goldmans), but nothing close to the money he had for the first trial.
If the police hold a strong case, it will be slightly a fight. If not, it should collapse hurriedly.
At this point, most of his celebrity comes from have been the expected killer of his wife and her lover, so I don't see that helping.
And I don't infer a jury in Las Vegas will be as sympathetic as a jury surrounded by La-La land.
In the judicial system today, anything is possible. You can bet the Goldmans and the Browns are circling, they smell blood.
As it stands in a minute, the evidence is a mix. I don't think he will go and get a dream team of lawyer like the ultimate time around as money is scarce for OJ.
In the court of public opinion, in good health he got away once but, not this time.
I don't ruminate he'll get the full rap but will see some time.
not this time.
What are the legal rules for taking breaks inwardly work?
At work we are only allowed breaks if we work a 6 and a partially hour shift, is this right? Where I use4d to work we had to carry a break after every 4 hours. If we want out for a cigarette break we can only be in motion if it is quiet, is this right, surely near is some law that say we have to hold a break whether be a cigarette breaks or 10 minutes to chill out.Answers: Generally no, in most places you cannot justifiably work more than 4-5 hours consecutive without a break.
Labour decree is different in every region, it may be something you want to look up.
logically it doesn't matter contained by what state you work right?
get the point?
It vary from state to state. The employment office or labor board can answer this for you.
I need information on the line emegency leave accomplishment?
Answers: http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/fmla/
12 weeks unpaid leave . can be taken adjectives in one lump sum or intermittetly.
you involve a form / doctor fills out and signs/ return to your employer / employer approves/ rejects or challenge to 3rd opinion at their expense. you help yourself to the leave.
you are said to own a job protection that you take off from work and come back to a opening. it does not need to be your same chore. the truth is that your employer can make your duration a nightmare. it is best to never let anyone know you hold a serious health concern if at adjectives possible.
you are guaranteed the 12 weeks .. so you can buy time with insurance / variety decisions .. depending on your form issue , it might work for you.
it might be a good opinion to talk to an employment attorney before you swarm out the forms... discuss your reason next to the doctor / what is necessary to disclose on the front side / not the final side.
good luck.
Is this a terrorist threat on Phoenix ?
this was posted contained by Newborn baby box Y/A i read it as he is threatening to detonate something in Phoenix for a religion? how to report this crap to Homeland Security ??http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
Answers: It does nouns like someone speaking something like terrorists who blow themself up and he is trying to figure out why. It be probably found in the unmarked born section because beside that writing, it sounds like a child asking that examine.
I would not worry too much just about it.
This is the problem with cons, your terrified of that it not a threat. Your paranoid and should seek professional aid.
Did any one see the video of the police tasering a young man for asking Senator Kerry a quetion?
in that was a video posted on aol report. It shows a young man asking Kerry a cross-question then he is dragged away by the police. I would approaching to here what your thoughts are on this.Answers: Learn this: It's alway best to cooperate with police. When you spar with cops and resist physically they will do doesn`t matter what it takes to gain control. They be absolutely doing what they needed to do and following procedure. He be uncooperative and resisting violently. The full thing would enjoy been a non-issue have he followed police instructions.
A link to the video on this one would not hurt. It would be nice to know the circumstance earlier forming an opinion.
'
OK I saw the video.. He wasn't asking a request for information, he was lacking coherence on. He would not stop when asked to, or when the mic was cut. It be a forum, not a one man discussion.
After listening to his rant I would say it be case of shock dream therapy.
Consparcy nuts need more of it perchance they would get a grip on realness.
Yes I saw it and I was disgusted. I see this every AM and PM and one time is too several. In my opinion, Police are unchecked. Citizens must get them into check.
A citizen should never be worried to right to be heard anything/ freedom of speech.
The kid was given sanction to ask the last ask. Not that he needs approval to speak.
The question he asked be re: Bush's impeachment ?
Looks like cops be supporters of BUSH or in a hurry to bring to dunk and donuts that night ?
I do reflect on Kerry should have interceded, he be the host after all. Any right host in a situation similar to that would have taken control of the situation. Andrew Meyer however, be in the wrong. He be belligerent, disrespectful and was not sharing time next to the rest of the audience. When asked to leave; he resisted. These are not prudent courses of action to pocket, even if you have an defining message (that happens to be a collection of lies and internet propaganda).
I need to seize a form notarized in the UK. Where can I find the UK equiv. of a notary public?
I entail to get a form notarized within the UK.Where can I find the UK equiv. of a notary public in the US - are they call something different?
If you're feeling incredibly helpful, could you point me to a indication UK notary statement?
Answers: Most solicitors are also notaries public
Here you go: http://www.thenotariessociety.org.uk/fin...
Where does the constitution authorize national health watchfulness ?
Is it ileagal to try to provide health trouble or regulate the industry and require taxpayers to foot the bill ? The federal government can't write law that are not explicitly authorized by the constitution. Am I wrong about that ?Answers: it is surrounded by the constitution. the liberals wrote it in next to crayon.
i think they are in recent times given the overall power to tax ?
how they spend the money is up to them. the inevitability not be accountable. they know how to slip law in when populace are not watching. they know how to package a decree to us / make us deduce that the law will be accurate to protect us or something and really it is just "spin" , they enjoy an ultimate gain , common sense for the that usually always involves money. they want our money.
We the People of the United States, surrounded by Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the adjectives defence, promote the common Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
--------------------------------------...
They are twisting Promote the common Welfare. It means protection. The Idea is small elected representatives. but they don't think nation are responsible enough to steal care of themselves.
It doesn't hold to be specifically authorized, as long as they don't break any constitutional laws implement it.
WC Steel: I agree with you, however a ample part of our population have proven that they aren't responsible enough to meticulousness of themselves. That being said, the burden still shouldn't be placed on the taxpayers, especially the middle and lower class. There is satisfactory wasted spending within our budget to take effort of this.
Hillary has the solution:
Clinton Takes $1 Million From Insurance Cos, Plans to Force All
Americans to Buy Private Coverage
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/healthca...
I am against any govt run healthcare (the govt never does anything resourcefully or cost effectively) But it could be argued that in the Preamble is the covering for govt healthcare ("provide for the general welfare")
More Questions and Answers:
[508] - [1492] - [1977] - [844] - [1403] - [237] - [1271] - [32] - [473] - [1666] - [2424] - [1912] - [274] - [1659] - [2020] - [2227] - [1757] - [1758] - [1440] - [422]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: