Law Questions and Answers
What would the charges be if you ran away at age 15 and get an ID at age 18 than got charged for running away?
don't verbs about me man a failure or anything, i plan on traveling the country when i am 18 with 2 of my friends, and i know things may switch but i just want to get hold of out of this house. A.S.A.P.Answers: I am not sure of the laws within your state but I know in Florida you are not "charged" as a runaway. However, if you are reported as a runaway and get hold of stopped or picked prior to turning 18 then they will return you to your parents. At the age of 18 it will be removed from the database because you are considered an fully developed.
Whats the hurry? Slow down and get a grip on vivacity and then hand down when its time. You have your intact life ahead of you. If you "run" presently you will always "run" and where on earth does that take you. And no thing where you run here will always be rules.
Good luck and think twice!!!!!
None. If you ran away at 15 and get an ID at 45 would they arrest you for being a run away? NO.
When I be in the Army we have a kid that ran away, get his GED, then together the Army when he was 18. Nobody come to arrest him.
I can relate to that, I know every teenager feel the same, they adjectives want to break free from the bonds and rules of their family. Why are parents so dominating they assume they own the children and also want to run their lives throughout. What a pain.
To play out of danger, I suggest you tolerate for a few years more, time will fly you will be 18 soon and then you are an full-size and can do your own thing.
Adults forget that they hold been though those stages contained by life and be probable worse than their children, yet they want to dominate and command and be a agony.
Wish you all the best surrounded by your adult energy. Happy travelling, take trouble always. The outside world too is cruel.
A company threatened me when I said that I would file a complaint next to the BBB, is this illegal?
Recently, I rented a completely expensive vacation house. Upon arriving, the house be a disaster with broken tiles and broken stairs. None of the kitchen appliances worked. Many of the advertise amenities were any missing or broken. On top of this, there be a terrible slick coming through the kitchen ceiling from the floor above. It was specifically not the beautiful house advertise. I asked for a partial refund from the owner. He have a thousand excuses why the house was contained by this condition and refused to issue a discount. I said that I would make a complaint near the Better Business Bureau. He then said that if I made this complaint, he would sue ME for the river damages!! This was apparently a long running trickle based on the huge crack and wet stain on the wall. Isn't it illegal for this company to threaten me similar to this? By the way...I made the complaint and the owner admit to the threat but said he was 'joking'. Still no return.Answers: Laws vary from state to state unsurprisingly, so it depends on where this adjectives went down, but I really don't believe that threatening to sue somebody if they do something you don't close to is illegal surrounded by any jurisdiction. Unethical, yes, but not illegal.
I really can't put in the picture you the laws of every state though, so I could extraordinarily well be wrong.
Can they sue you for the soak that was nearby before. Yes. They can sue you for anything. The entry is that they would have to prove it contained by court to get anything from you.
As far as the threat to sue you, they are *** holes, but I'm not sure they broke any law. They did not threaten you with violent behaviour.
FYI - filing a complaint beside the BBB will do NOTHING for getting you a refund. You inevitability to sue them in small claims court.
I'm not giving legalized advise here, but my gut tell me that it is illegal for him to threaten you. Besides, if in attendance is long-term water destruction, it seems uncomplicated to determine it wasn't your fault unless you have either be there a long time or have waited a long time to report him.
Personally, I'd verbs with the lawsuit. People close to that need to cram they can't treat others the way he did.
Good Luck! Get every penny you can!
You should be file a fraud suit. You didn't get anything you be promised in the want ad. Hopefully you took pictures of the condition. BBB is the most useless organization around and will do you no angelic. They are a business that promotes their members who compensate a fee for the privlege.
I've been subpeonad to testify against my husband (we are going through a divorce too) surrounded by a medical malpracti
It is a medical malpractice case, what I know will bury my husband and possibly he will be charged next to fraud if I testify, I know it is a crime to not testify when being subpeonaed. How should I testify/Answers: I don't believe a wife HAS to testify against a husband. Check next to a lawyer.
I didn't suppose married people could be compelled to testify against their spouse. I would suggest you consult a legal representative.
If you find out that you must testify, you should truthfully answer any questions you are asked. Don't proposal any additional info. Do not use this as an excuse to hurt him, but don't perjure yourself, any. Although it is extremely unlikely that you would be charged with perjury it is still a desperate idea.
And consider this: if you not tell the truth in court for him, he will enjoy evidence that you lied in court and might find a opening to use that to his advantage during the divorce proceedings.
Whatever happen, you must tell the truth if you testify. Just answer the question simply and directly.
The fact that you are going through a divorce may disqualify you from testify, though - it would seem to be a conflict of interest. That's what I would motivation if I were your husband's attorney.
Love Jack
You are still married so you can not be compelled to testify against him. It is atypical that you would be called.
If you enjoy any issues regarding child custody, visitation or anything you should bring in it clear that the divorce needs to be tied up formerly court.
If you have no bad will or it would benefit you from his still being financially viable converse to his lawyer. Or since you are surrounded by a divorce talk to yours and hold him figure it out.
If 99% of people believe OJ is guilty, how did he find acquitted?
please distribute me a short explanation, i wasn't old plenty to understand this defence back after.tahnks
Answers: I think we capture confused believing in a "justice" system as unwilling a "legal" system.
This isn't just roughly speaking the OJ Simpson case, this is true within family statute cases as well.
It does not event what 99% of the people believe. What matter is how the 12 jurors voted.
.
You get a jury near a lot of minorities who come about to believe they are "victims" (democrats) - they you play the race card and capture them to ignore the facts- again - comfortable for democrats to do, and you are in.
David Berkowitz better known as "The Son of Sam" say he has be reformed and have?
Found God in prison. He also is a Born Again Christian. Should he be paroled? He be found guilty of murdering 3-4 persons and injurying tons more.Answers: Perhaps he has. However, reformation of his soul does not automatically relieve his responsibility to society to spend his time for the crimes that he committed. He will verbs to serve his sentence because his life on this floor is under the control of the rule because of his actions. If he truly improved and found God, then soon, he will again experience true freedom.
Converting to Christianity should in no bearing commute a criminal's sentence here on Earth. All it means is he presently has the privilege of ultimate his punishment with Jesus keeping him company. Besides, he's probably still basically a sociopath trying to play people approaching a fiddle for his own ends.
How do you go in the order of getting a concealed weapon permit within New York?
I already have one for Florida, would this variety it easier? Can it be transfered at all? How? Please provide as oodles details as you know, thanks.Answers: A license is required to possess a handgun for any purpose. The Commissioner of the New York City Police Department is the issuing authority for handgun license.
There are different handgun licenses next to different privileges granted under respectively. A license for a handgun shall be issued to: (1) have and possess contained by a dwelling by a householder; (2) have and possess within his place of business by a merchant or storekeeper; (3) have and pass concealed for employment purposes; (4) have and pass concealed, without admiration to employment or place of possession; (5) possess a target handgun; and (6) have, possess, collect and get antique pistols.
The applicant for a handgun license must:
1. Be of "good moral traits."
2. Not have be convicted of a felony or a serious offense.
3. Not have suffered from a mental condition or been hospitalized for mental bug.
4. Be a person concerning whom "no polite cause exists" for the denial of the license.
To get hold of a handgun license to possess in a household or place of business, or to possess a target pistol, no showing of stipulation is required. The applicant must meet the eligibility requirements planned above. The application procedure includes fingerprinting and the submission of 2 photos of the applicant. The non-refundable application fee of adjectives licenses is $170.00 for the first two years. Licenses may not be issued for more than 3 years and renewals are $170.00 for two years.
Only a licensed handgun owner is allowed to possess ammunition suitable for the licensed handgun and is allowed to possess an ammunition feed device for the licensed handgun, but not to exceed 17 rounds capacity.
CARRYING-- HANDGUNS
The license to possess a handgun is a license to convey unless restricted, but almost all license are restricted. If there are no restrictions the innkeeper may carry the handgun concealed on or nearly his person, loaded or unloaded.
Handgun license issued elsewhere in New York State are not valid surrounded by New York City. New York City licenses are valid throughout New York State. However, a New York State license to get or possess will be valid in New York City within the absence of a New York City license provided that the handgun are transported by the licensee contained by a locked container and the trip through New York City is continuous and uninterrupted.
A license to possess a handgun in one's household or place of business or to possess a target handgun does not authorize the innkeeper to carry a handgun on or around his person except contained by the very set circumstances outlined above (under POSSESSION). Similarly, a target handgun license does not grant the holder the right to hold a loaded handgun in his home or place of business. To do so one must enjoy a license to have and possess any in one's dwelling or one's place of business.
A "target" license authorizes the holder to transport his unloaded handgun to and from a shooting capacity or hunting field within a locked container.
An "on premises" license permits the holder to possess a handgun within his home or place of business. The holder may obtain 2 authorizations a year to transport his handgun(s); unloaded and surrounded by a locked container, to and from an authorized shooting range.
To purchase a license to carry a concealed handgun the applicant is required to show that "proper cause" exists for the issuance of the license. The verdict to issue or deny this license is within the discretion of the commissioner and his decree will only be overturned by a court if it can be shown that he abused his discretion.
A license may not be transferred. The license holder must enjoy the license in his possession while carrying a handgun, and respectively person licensed to possess a handgun on his premises is required to enjoy a license on such premises. On demand of any peace officer a license must be exhibited.
Read the constitution, We adjectives have the right to tolerate arms. The permit entity is bull s*it
How would a woman stand legally 4 adjectives of a guys pe*is?
I know stupid question, I'm not thinking of doing it, only just curious. If women are allowed abortion because the child is inside of them. Surely when a guys pe*is is inside of me & I were to cut it rotten inside of me that's ok then. The with the sole purpose difference is he would probably survive to complain about it, but if he didn't survive & bled to annihilation, surely that's ok then?(Pro-abortionists, don't try to brainwash me that 'embryo/foetus' humans don't touch pain. You can't know for sure, it's similar to space who would have agreed you could float in it. Even scientists couldn't know 100%. It's not set until it happens, deplorably pain can't be see, even with adjectives the technology in the world. An well-read guess says cramp is inherent to humans, so logically it's there from year 1. In a society that believes it's best 2 be safe than sorry, it doesn't numeral to allow abortion. A human unfortunately is incapable of being anything save for human from day 1, no situation how much they might not want 2 be).
Answers: I don't think that abortion is the best item, nobody does. I am not about to flout your beliefs either, you seem to be set on them, but just try to guess critically before asking question like these that hold no real answers. On the other paw maybe you own... and that is why you are bringing this interrogate up.
I see what you are getting at that, it is disgusting that women have to do this feat, and I don't think you are blaming men for it. You are freshly making an example of the equivillent, but.
(Please, never talk around the dismemberment of my member, because really it hurts to even reason about it. [If you be a man you would understand this.] If you do really despise men then may God stockpile you because you are filled beside misguided hate.)
Again, I said that I didn't regard you were crazy. And you bring up some really right points that I haven't thought of. It is scary to cogitate of the pain that a fetus may get the impression. Most scientific facts points to the fact that little fetuses don't have the dimensions for pain and who know they could be wrong.
But think of another target in this situation, the womanly: If she is raped... and impregnated afterwards she is definately going to go through severe strain and in some cases she may even die. Some would-be parents do it for self-centred reasons, some in recent times don't have the resources to bump up a child because it does cost $100,000+ dollars to raise a child and they may hold to give the child up for adoption.
This is a social problem, that the political affairs saw and dealt next to by passing a decree that allows for people to solve their own issues, beside out them having to be the bleak guy.
If a woman has the choice to retrieve a life and doesn't, that will lay within her lap lone no one elses. So it is up to women to not treat roughly a law that be meant for her benefit.
You are right just about one thing - it IS a stupid put somebody through the mill.
Try: Assault. Assault with a mortal weapon. Attempted murder. Probably others.
You cheapen the abortion debate by this weak, horrifying and poorly constructed analogy. "The with the sole purpose difference...?" Get real.
You allowed do that, merely say he be abusing you.
Remember Lorena Bobbit?
There is no "The just difference..." They are two totaly different subjects.
That is a cruel subject.
You are allowed to that if it was self defense but it would probably still be an assault charge. By the road this is a really classless way to draw from into an abortion debate.
Yep dumb.
Abortion is what women do to there unborn fetus.
Cutting bad a part of a human body is in recent times as wrong.
If a guy is eating *your* crackers surrounded by bed while his penis is inside of you, you are allowed to say "No more. I want you gone, so you don't get through any more of my food, and I want you out of my body." If he doesn't spontaneously leave, you are allowed to use force - even lethal force - to get rid of him.
If a fetus is deriving nutrition while inside of you, you are allowed to utter "No more. I want you gone, so you don't consume any more of my nutrients, and I want you out of my body." If the fetus doesn't spontaneously leave, you are allowed to use force - even deep force - to get rid of it.
Pain have nothing to do near it. It is just as illicit to assault or kill someone beside CIPA, even though they can't feel spasm, as it is to assault or kill someone else.
But your point is ably taken. Babies become entitled to the rights of humans from Day One. If they die in the 280 days up to that time Day One, they don't even qualify as an exemption on the income tax return.
You would be at lowest charged with assault, or possibly assault beside a deadly weapon.
Your logic seem lost in the woods. I am anti abortion, but you upset me. I pity any man who would consider becoming intimate with you. ( mental or physical ).
Get a hobby..or a brain...
possibly both...
you cant do that *****...its against the penal code
If you know its a "stupid question", why did you ask it.
Do some research and put forward a "smart" question
Just piling on here...
Your argument is specious. The two situations enjoy nothing to do near each other.
I've be up way too slow and there could in actuality be a few poor souls out there who might help yourself to your point seriously, that's the only sense I'm answering this one. Im pro-choice and I would say in attendance is definitely a allowed difference between something being a cut of you, and something merely being inside you. A fetus is attached to your body throughout it's together development and is a division of you. Your boyfriend's "Mr. Happy" is not and therefore does not rightfully belong to you to dispose of as you longing (unless he's very unexpected and actually consents to it). Goooood hours of darkness.
Should Charles Manson be paroled from State prison?
Answers: No. He's a monstrous relic of the 1960's and has no place within our society.
yes i think he should if oj get off
Im 18 and received an illegal consumption ticket I blew a .243 is within anyway to get this stale my record?
I'm trying to avoid unfolding my parents. I received a ticket for underage drinking. I blew the .243 and am fine with the ticket but be wondering if I could get this stale my record. Thanks for the proposal and I appreciate your help.Answers: That's a tough one. I know that years and years ago I get a ticket for allowing an open container within my car. I contacted endorsed aide, then go to court. The judge made me purloin an alcohol awareness class, traffic school and he suspended my license for 2 weeks. This adjudicate swore up and down that this would stay on my record for 7 years since I be 19 years old. For anything reason it never hit my story, not really sure why. Also, once I turned 18 I had my own insurance so I realistically did not enjoy to say anything to my parents but I did after I go to my hearing. It be my stupidity so I was dealing near it as an adult.
If you don't want to update your parents (if you're not on their insurance, if you are you are going to have to describe them as their insurance is going to go through the roof), and since you are 18 you can be fully developed about this and contact a legitimate aide attorney and ask your question to them as they are the experts contained by this field. They may or may not know how to help you out, or they may do what the allowed aide attorney told me to do, which was he give me the advice and direction to run so I didn't have to remuneration him as even if he were my legalized counsel I would get like sentence.
Again, I would contact a legal aide attorney contained by your area and ask your grill.
Best of luck to you!
I hope and pray that it never goes rotten your record. You're lucky that you didn't snuff out someone and have to live next to that on not only your dictation but your conscience for the rest of your life.
Grow up and start man smart.
Your too old to be a babyish offender. You played, immediately you pay. Tell your parents and get hold of it over with.
You did it. You deserve to hold it on your record. And from the sounds of things, your parents will be more grating on you than the law.
If you want to quit disappointing your parents, later it's simple. Quit disappointing your parents. And quit drinking. You obviously own a problem with it, and if you're solely 18, there's still time for you NOT to wind up close to some of the people I've prearranged who have totally screwed up the ludicrous existences they once called lives.
btw - to adjectives of you who are accusing this kid of driving while intoxicated - where are you getting that he be driving? He was cited for illegitimate consumption, not for DUI.
I doubt you can get this bad your record. You made an adjectives choice, and you really could have kill someone. Having that on your conscience for the rest of your life is a great deal worse than a DUI on your record. I seriously hope you hold learned your lesson just about drinking and driving. You should be thankful that a ticket is adjectives you received, and not jail time.
You shouldn't be doing things if you don't want others to know around them. You should tell your folks yourself, instead of them finding out from the police or the insurance company.
I don't cogitate so. . Your best bet is to not drink (yeah, stupid idea, right?) til it's legally recognized. Since that ain't gonna happen, don't drive, even if you've singular had one beer, or mixed drink. Call a minicab, or call a buddy for a ride home. Give your key to someone you trust, who won't give them vertebrae to you when you've had one too several, and will call that hackney carriage for you.
Since you are 18, you are considered an adult. What can your parents do to you when you share them about the ticket? Well, do you still live at home? Are you still surrounded by high arts school? Will they throw you out? Is this the first time, or have in attendance been more? You are merely going to have to fess-up and income the price, what ever mom and dad say and/or do. Sooner or next they will find out, you know. We parents have an 8th sense when it comes to our kids. Good luck and stay out of trouble!
^They are going to find out, better from your mouth.
You should be very great full that you didn't hurt or slay yourself or anyone else. I hope you learn from this don't drink and drive.
that put a foreign definition to being "wasted"! congrats
yeah, if you take tried as a juvenile offender
at .243, you should enjoy been charged near attempted murder, not just a ticket for "evil consumption" whatever that manner.
See if there is a diversion program surrounded by your area. That MAY lend a hand, but you did something against the law...worse rotten, you put everyone lives on the line by drinking and driving...including yours...see getting behind the joystick and killing your parents, friends or a special being in your natural life...My advice, driving is for adults and immediately take your punishment similar to an adult...Four deeply bright kids were kill in a drink driving disaster...went bad the road into a swamp...and the froze and drowned...think almost it...
nah dude. youre kinda screwed. .243 is illegal contained by all states and its gonna stay on your account for a good while. beside insurance and with the statute (insurance is more what you need to verbs about money-wise. its gonna cost profoundly more in difficult insurance than it will in tickets).
.243 is pretty fucked up. if you wanna do that, thats adjectives fun but dude.
do not drive.
please. people grasp killed. most of the time its not the personality whose drunk. im ALL for getting drunk (.243 is a lot) but... seriously. do yourself and more importantly- every one else a favor, DONT DRINK AND DRIVE.
since its already done though... i think youre gonna enjoy that on your legal journal forever, just because they maintain record of **** forever. and youre gonna own that on your insurance for a few years at least.
You will never gain this off of your register, you would be well served to report to your parents before you achieve your insurance bill, things will go better for you if you do. Even when you convey your parents, they are going to show you the insurance increase.
Seriously, you blew a .243, what the hell kept you alive? This is death waiting to surface. Please read this link, this childish girl drank a few gin and tonics and mixed it with a tranquilizer, you facade the same risk near a B/A of .243
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Ann_Q...
EDIT Upddate: Here is what a B/A of that rate can do to you
# BAC .20%: You may feel confused, dazed, or otherwise disoriented. You inevitability help to stand up or hoof it. If you hurt yourself at this point, you probably won't realize it because you won't feel torment. Even if you are aware that you've injured yourself, you probably won't do anything about it. At this point you may experience nausea and start vomiting. Your gag reflex is impair, so you could choke if you throw up. Since blackouts are likely at this height, you may not remember any of this.
# BAC .25%: All mental, physical, and sensory functions are severely impair. You're emotionally numb. There's an increased risk of asphyxiation from choking on vomit and of seriously injuring yourself by falling or other accidents.
EDIT: Update to asker.
Unfortunatley even if you be not driving, your car insurancecan dance up, nothing much change my answers but happy to hear that you be not driving.
My guess is you weren't walking very flawless (LOL)
WOW!!! that's pretty wasted- and yet you get behind the reins of a car- bravo to you for being a fool.
What will probably crop up is the ticket will be be lots of $ and the insurance will go up for a few years and you'll probably money surcharges to the state AND lose you your license- .
Yeah you probably get a legal representative and get the charges lessened but will you do it again once you win away with it or did you in fact learn anything?
Time to grow up and give somebody a lift the punishment
Wow. Glad you lived to write this, you owe that officer a hug for getting you out of the car up to that time you killed yourself or someone else. Call a advocate, but if I were your mom or dad I would really want to know more or less this. If this is real, you requirement some intervention. Blessings- dd
ah thank you below poster, you are right, he did not say DUI. I hope he be just beside friends and walking home.. and not with a friend (just as drunk) driving. but even consequently it is a miracle he didn't end up within the hospital, under someone's bumper, etc. Every parent on this forum is gulping and praying that this is not their kid posting.
Please, dear, rear legs off a bit on the drinking!
more..
You are going to enjoy to bargain next to the judge more or less it remaining on your record or not. Probably some alch. mishandle education which, I quality, (no offence intended) you may really entail, service hours, and probably probation that if you have no other fault (every kind, not basically alch. related) that it be removed from your record after said program completion and service hours and full time of probation.
You would hold a better chance to work this bad if you have a attorney.To afford a lawyer you are probably going to enjoy to involve your parents, sorry.
Good luck, and really, reflect on your go and really examine how your choices are shaping it... think around what you want for yourself and how to attain those goals honestly. I hope this be just a glitch surrounded by your normal behavior! Blessings- dd
First share your parents because honesty is the best policy. Next pay the ticket and don't capture in trouble beside the law again. And for the narrative I believe once paid it automatically get expunged in six month.
By the path people underage drinking is not DUI/DWI. He didn't enunciate he was drinking and driving.
You already lost by taking the breathalyser.
You should other refuse the testing. You'll get arrested and hold to spend the night surrounded by jail, but consequently you could get a advocate and have a much better luck of getting off.
theres no agency in hell you blew a .243 .08 is the closing date so you blew 3 times what a drunk would blow?? How did you feel the subsequent day.
In Ca. what happens if you go wrong a drug test while within a court ordered drug program?
Answers: It depends upon what sort of program you are in. If this is deferred entry of decision, it is likely that the program will be terminated, but a sentence would not necessarily be the result. If this is Proposition 36 probation, next one failed testing does not result in termination. If this is regular probation, it would be a defiance, but whether the violation would result surrounded by a revocation of probation or something else would depend a lot on the underlying offense, how long the personage had be on probation, whether there have been previous violation, etc., etc.
The original charge is reinstated and you draw from sentenced for the original crime.
More Questions and Answers:
[1210] - [1973] - [1770] - [457] - [538] - [1109] - [1604] - [2497] - [267] - [551] - [486] - [878] - [2131] - [2294] - [2404] - [1135] - [1012] - [69] - [2041] - [28]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: