Law Questions and Answers
Interview question????.?
I own an interview and I want to know what to say in the order of why I quit my past employer minus bad-mouthing them...for the record my previous employer was an a**hole who worked me 13+ hours a time and refused to clear me the federally madatory time and a half...my supervisor would rob out of work 2-3 times a week (whenever she felt close to it) and I was expected to cover mine and her shift...I be with the company for 8 months..be never late..never missed a single hours of daylight..I literally just up and quit soon without discern (every one has their breaking point!!!).Answers: only tell them what happen without any embellishments...if they hold a problem with that you don't want their charge anyway
You need to integer out how to hide the certainty you quit without giving perceive.
That's what I would worry more or less. It looks worse for you.
"Why did you leave your later job?"
"I feel that the pay be not sufficient to account for the consistently long hours I be expected to work." or "I decided that my significant loss of personal time, working 13hrs a hours of daylight, was not worth the retribution being offered."
Do not voice any judgements roughly your former boss' character.
I'd be more concerned around you quitting without identify than about trying not to "bad-mouth" your later employer.After all, it's you you're trying to "sell"..Good Luck!
Isn't it bad satisfactory that we have underpaid...?
educator teaching our children surrounded by underfunded public schools, over-worked and disgruntled postal workers handling our time-sensitive parcels, and underpaid police officer expected to put their lives on the line to protect us...Do we really want to add on doctors to that list? Will adjectives the best-and-brightest be left near no other alternative than to become lawyers?
Answers: as a state hand (who is not at work today) who's workload has more than doubled within 5 years, had our benefits cut, and am competent to see untold waste everyday from stupid policies shoved down our throats by special interest groups. Really buddy, I dont know what to say...I am almost likely to concede defeat..almost. Something have to change, and its not purely the govt..its the rest of the people. Take responsibility, be honest and work capably at what you do. The change starts next to us...and yes, that includes me.
Could you please give evidence of what doctors are compensated in Canada? Keep it simple. A pediatrician.
How much does a pediatrcian within the U.S. take home?
Give us some facts please.
What exactly be your question again.your integral point got a touch "busy"
What would I need to bring next to me to court to prevent month long visitation with my son's father?
My son is four years aged. He has be with me his entire time and has lone been to his father house once since birth. He call's his son, maybe, once a month and if he see's my son it is simply because I give him a ride to where on earth ever we are. He fails to make available Christmas presents and birthday gifts, he has a criminal history, he party often and have to be pleaded with to rob time out to visit his son. He have only see him once in 4 1/2 months and immediately that he is coming into a six figure settlement he wishes to take me to court to hold him for months at a time. Can he do this? What can I bring to court as evidence or to help me win this brawl?Answers: Documentation... everything you have said it meaningless unless you can document it. The intercede will want to know *why* he cannot see his son. You need to show he is a risk to your son.
At the very most minuscule, bring the records of his arrests, especially if they involve drugs or ferocity.
Another thing, in a minute he has money, you should consider asking for child support. Or, at the greatly least, that a portion of that money be placed within an educational fund for your son.
Edit - Arrest library are public. You should be able to contact the City/County where on earth he was charaged and bring back those documents. (I know this because my wife just did this for a armour we are involved in.)
I'm guessing money is tight, but you might want to try to absorb an attorney for this hearing. I would explain to the court that you are concerned about your son's safekeeping and think, given the sparse interest your ex have shown his son so far, it would be better if they started out with supervised visitation for an hour or two at a time and progressed bit by bit to more time together if things go capably. that way you appear reasonable to the court and you set up a process that will require him to demonstrate a stable interest in his son since he goes past its sell-by date for all morning or overnight stays. Based on your description of him so far, he'll probably lose interest. Lets hope he has turned over a current leaf and is taking a greater interest contained by his son, as kids do best when they believe both parents care around them.
Best of luck, and please try to be positive about his father when you consult to your son, even if you need to put the brakes on trailing the scenes a bit. Kids are exceptionally troubled when parents criticize the other in front of them
You would entail uncontrovertable proof that your child's FATHER is a threat to HIS life or condition.
Aside from that, you have no casual of taking away his constitutional rights as a father.
AND BEFORE YOU GET ALL RIGHTEOUS:
I AM an attorney and I've deal with both U.S. and International child custody cases. I've hear it all. And the one constant is that at hand are ALWAYS two sides to the story and the truth is hidden somewhere surrounded by the middle.
Unless you can show the other parent is a danger to the child, respectively parent has one and the same constitutional rights to custody and / or visitation.
The court, on more than one ocassion, has asked of a entity seeking the same entry you are "If he was pious enough to lay down near and make a newborn, why is he now not worthy enough to parent the child?"
How would I go give or take a few getting a copyright release from an artist in command to make a quilted performance of the art?
I'm talking art prints, photographs, album covers... not sure what strikes my fancy right in a minute.How long do you think it would filch and do you think I would grasp it without paying anything? (I would be predisposed to stipulate that all profits from the public sale of the quilt go to charity, if have need of be.)
Answers: There is no copyright restriction on you being inspired by others when creating your work. However if your quilt looks too much similar to a commercial trademark, ie Mickey Mouse, that could be problem.
You contact the artist, or their estate if they are dead, and ask them. It take about 5 minutes. Most ethnic group want money, so I would say nought is free. If you get authorization, get it surrounded by writing.
Re: Warren Jeffs Trial; Should there not be Federal Laws to maintain under-aged girls protected?
Shouldn't there be a Federal Law against under-age girls marry? They haven't GROWN UP yet!Answers: If the LDS would thieve a stronger public stand on issues of polygamy, and underage marriage, incidents similar to this would be few and far inbetween.
Renouncing strongly and loudly of these LDS splinter groups from Salt Lake would have a much greater impact on the nonspecific populace, as well as the local government that get sucked within by these same splinter groups, and assist in the propagation of the crimes, and the subsequent cover-up's.
But Jeffs, and others resembling him is the price you pay when your system of beliefs adhere to a doctrine of abrogation, thus creating these splinter groups who claim themselves to be the "true believers" because their stand is a fundamental and traditional one.
The solution? Pressure the LDS First Presidency & the 12 Apostles to take the governing position in the argue against these criminals, and show the public that the Mormon system of beliefs is taking a strong stand alongside the justice system to stop the heresy that are being spread around the LDS by these splinter factions.
Are here any Mormons here that would disagree with me?
And if so, why?
Bottom splash? The laws are in that, but when those that enforce the law are member of the splinter group in give somebody the third degree, who is going to enforce or prosecute? Like someone else said, hedge your bets, carry all the horses contained by your race, surrounded by your stable, and it doesn't matter who win, its your horse...!
That's part of the problem - in attendance are laws!
I hope that evil man is within jail for a long time!
There is a ruling that says a man cannot hold more than one wife. And I think that's the problem next to this guy.
How do you reckon making another law to protect the young at heart ones, will make a difference to a guy similar to him?
Young farm girls used to marry childish, too, but I think they have their parents' blessings. (Remember the story of the Coalminer's daughter?)
Yes, I agree. Young girls do need to be protected. But I meditate our system of morality has be corrupt for some time. What happened to respect? (for youthful and old).
God bless. Great question.
Yes, in attendance should be laws to protect the children from ppl approaching that. WE have freedom surrounded by religion to worship as we please, but we have no right to hurt other ppl surrounded by the process. OUr rights stop when someone elses are stepped on THose young girls as simply kids, and not able to be making choices close to who to marry , yet. They must be protected until they are feeble enough to trade name those choices as a mature fully fledged. NOone has a right to cart their innocence from them. Yes, we must make law and enforce them, and I also say that we not singular must be praying for the innocent victims, but also for the Warren Jeffs of this world. They too were once innocent childrens, victims, or they wouldnt be lower than a satanic spirit themselves. We just pray for them to know GOd and adopt JEsus truly, but in the meantime, society must be protected from them, IN prisons, they should not be treated resembling dogs, or we are no better than they are. THey should be treated with dignity. All ppl should hold that, even if they dont give it. Most are close to that becuase diginity and love was never given to them. I dont execuse it, I explain it, and I speak we must give them Gods mercy, and allow Him to operation with them surrounded by His way. BUt whenever we stoop to bad levels to buy and sell with reprehensible ppl, then the devil have made us just similar to them.
That does not ever honor God.
If we could only love resembling Jesus loves and have the forgivness He have.. wouldnt the world be a better place??
BE praying about adjectives of it. Stay in prayer, and ask God to show you how to own His pure heart. and yes, lets receive the laws going that will be enforced.
There should be a Federal Law against polygamy ...which I thought nearby was. and a Federal crime to these so call religious groups in these towns (Arizona and Utah) that contemplate they can get away beside this sick act of marry off children...it's perverted, disgusting and the intact religious community (Mainly female) are purely brain -washed and raising these children within this perverted (so called religious) community.
Where is the tenet ??????
I've heard they hold their own police that are LDS's..
.Ugh..what ?
Well...I'm sure this will upset many
Mary the Mother of Jesus be guess how Old?
In this day and age you're right kids don't grow up until MUCH latter
Im 18 and my girlfriend is 17. Is it against the law to own sexual relations?
Ive been next to my girlfriend for over 17 months. Satutory rape laws can be strict. I know they change from state to state. I live in Florida. Does anyone know the truth down this?Answers: You need to find out what the age of consent surrounded by Florida. According to what I found, the law is as follows:
The age of sexual consent is 16 for adults who are underneath 24 years of age,or if the adult explicitly 24 years of age or older is married to the minor.
So as long as she agrees to hold sex with you, you are allowed because she is over 16 years of age. Just remember, no money no!
Here is the link where on earth I got this:
http://www.actwin.com/eatonohio/gay/cons...
What's the rush - your gf will be 18 and totally official to drill in no smaller amount than 12 months, if her birthday was today.
Just loaf a little while. It ain't worth the risk.
According to Florida State Law, OCFA 16-10-55 as long as both party are over 16 years of age, and being that both party are under age 18, and no more than a three year age difference, yes it is endorsed.
Small claims court?
How do I file a small claim if the defendant resides out-of-state? The transaction be taken over the internet. It was over an ebay item (laptop) worth over $2,220. Can I sue for more money for damages? And where on earth do I file the claim? In my state or his? I hold all of the evidence and adjectives of his info. Please help.Answers: People carry ripped, jipped, and scamed every day on Ebay. Contact you state attorney organization, or the Federal Commerse Committe. If you suspect fraud also, contact the FBI and supply all information. You are a subject of a crime, and the perpetator is guilty of many felony.
You sue in their state because of personal and subject event jurisdictional issues.
You can sue for the amount you have lost INCLUDING ONLY court costs. There is no such article as 'damages' outside of the monies relevant to the issue at hand within small claims. SC is only to engender you whole again, not to make a contribution you a profit.
Local police can not act unless they own jurisdiction, which is difficult to establish online. You can report this to the the FBI via the Internet Crime Center, http://www.ic3.gov/
Also, if this involved a credit card, call your company. You can contest the charge through them. Also ring up ebay. As a matter of right buisiness, they quite habitually credit you because it is cheaper and easier than doing an investigaion. $2200 is nothing to them.
Hopefully you compensated with a charge precision or thru PayPal. Contact whomever you paid thru and you should capture some satisfaction that process.
What do i do about a boss who is a complete dick to me?
I work contained by a law bureau and it's just me and my boss, the advocate. He's a complete dick to me. I have no room for advancement and in that is nobody higher up than him. Everyday, he points out little mistakes that I've made, even when they're his mistakes. Just today he asked me to bring back him a copy of a mortgage, and when I came wager on with it, he asked me why I made a copy of the mortgage. When I replied that he have asked for it, he said he never said such a thing. But this have happened every time for the past year and a partially, and I can't find another job because I'm undersupplied in experience... Any suggestions? Keep contained by mind I've confronted him about this previously and asked that I be treated like some sort of dignified human, and not a dog, and he responded that he didn't know what I designed.Answers: find a new employer
Ask his to put adjectives his requests to you in writing. LOL! Hey, if he go for it, you're covered. But since he's the Boss, you're screwed.
Option 2 - Get in his frontage. Maybe he'll fire you, and you can get severance while looking for work. Just make sure he's be paying employment insurance...
.
Unfortunately, being a dick is not forbidden. If it was, we would have need of bigger jails. He sounds anal retentive. Once again, this surrounded by not illegal.
Unless the harrassment is tribal or sexual, all you can do is quit.
You own to consider that you DO have experience. You have enough to own gotten your current job! When you own an idiot boss berating you all the time it is tricky to keep up your self esteem and remember that you DO enjoy a lot to contribute! Plus you literary things on the job and you own the critically important experience of knowing what it is to work for a complete dick!
:-)
Put out some resumes. If you gain called for an interview DO NOT desperate mouth your current boss. Just say you are looking for something beside more of a future opportunity than you see at your current place. Never badmouth an employer. It looks really doomed to failure, even if it is totally justified.
I feel I worked for that guy. The answer is, you have to work through the crappy job -- then, the better job are soooo nice!
Pretty much, as long as you need the experience, you hold to suck it up and deal beside it until you can find something better. I would recommend involving yourself in professional organization for legal assistants and paralegals, because they volunteer ways for you to advance your work through continuing legal background, as well as offering charge banks and stuff approaching that. Plus, membership looks moral on a resume.
I've been here. You can quit. That's pretty much it. But if you've been at hand for a year and a half, that seem life ample experience to me.
But don't quit without getting a unknown job first. It's profoundly easier to get a assignment when you already have one. And don't trash your boss on interviews no situation what. No one will want to hire you if they think you're a backstabber.
Get a hot job.
Unfortunately, you hold another problem, there is no method he will give you a opinion worth a damn. I had a similar boss (not as impossible, but bad enough) and she be so resentful when I got a different post that she tried to sabotage it.
You in recent times need to nick a long term approach. Get a different job and operation with the certainty that you will likely not get hold of a great job to start. However, it will procure you out of your current position and leads you to better option.
You might try the offices of a different advocate who knows you and your boss. That road, they know you are a good worker and know to nick your boss with a "small piece of salt."
Returning what are argued to be reserved powers from the federal to the state level is particular as?
what law?Answers: Not sure exactly what you are conversation about... since at hand has be a huge usurption of state authority by the federal governement.
In the early 1930's federal spending be less than partly of what state spending is. most problems were considered local and state government felt responsible for address them.
Then the income tax generate huge federal revenue and federal polticians figured out they could buy votes beside all that money.
Bottom procession controlling law (well - it SHOULD be controlling if it be obeyed) is the 10th amendment to the Constitution. It states:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the general public."
In Texas, can I get child support from someone on SSI?
I am on SSI and should be reception a little money but it won't cover the bills unitl I am competent to start working again (or for day contemplation for that matter)! He has be on SSI for a few years now and doesn't want to support me with anything as far as the pregnancy/baby is concerned. What will transpire to us?Answers: Child support payable is determined by the state and the payors income. Depending on your state and the laws in that, he may or may not be ordered to pay support. (In Manitoba, Canada, where on earth I live, support starts at $1.00 per month for $8,200.00 income per year and goes up accordingly).
As you are on assistance as very well, if he is ordered to pay support, it may step directly to the state and not to you. Actually, I'm suprised they haven't asked you about the father and attempted to return with contributions from him themselves.
Unfortunately, the only route to find out and get child support is to folder a petiton for support.
You should call your Social Security organization or make an appoinment to shift in and see them.
Good luck
More Questions and Answers:
[338] - [322] - [2174] - [1969] - [2254] - [1790] - [939] - [568] - [84] - [1915] - [33] - [986] - [391] - [120] - [786] - [2344] - [2147] - [2545] - [1630] - [1213]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: