Law Questions and Answers

Is it legal for a neighbor to videotape kids for irritation?

I have a neighbor that desires to videotape kids playing in dirt and use it for aggravation. Is it legal for this to stir on? I know these kids have legally recognized rights. No one was getting hurt and adults be there watching the kids have a good time. I see nothing wrong near them playing in dirt...
Answers: Call the cops. Sounds approaching the neighbor is a pervert.
As long as it is can be seen from a public place, anyone can be videotape at any time. Celebrities know that well.

The nation being videotape cannot own the videotape and the person who took the video can provide it or use it in a court of regulation. Many people that live surrounded by high crime rate areas are kindly using video cameras to record drug dealing actions. Police officers can afterwards use the tapes to arrest criminals.
You can photograph or videotape anything you want as long as your camera is contained by a public area or on your own property. Some states forbid audio recordings in need the subject's permission, however.

What would happen if you violate FTC disclosure rule?

Morris Freidman be president of tiny doubles international inc. he sold business opportunities for tiny doubles studios which made small photographic statues of ancestors for customers. Friedman was the primary mediator with prospective buyers of these studios business opportunity. He advised buyers up front that the opportunity were not franchises, and fittingly he did not provide all of the information set forth surrounded by the disclose rule on franchising , although he did provide full answers to all question asked. Much business closed, however because of lack of nouns. The FTC claims Friedman violated its disclosure rule. Friedman disagrees. Decide
Answers: I would say it adjectives depends on if he operated / advertise / treated the business as a franchise.

If you do something in a carriage common to and charactoristic of a unshakable business then you cannot simply claim contained by the fine print that you are not 'really' that kind of business.

And it sure sounds like a franchise bureau. Hope he likes top-security prison.

:)
"hate crime' mode a crime in which the defendant intentionally select a victim, or within the case of a property crime, the property to be precise the object of the crime, because of the actual or perceived see, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, sexual characteristics, disability, or sexual orientation of any person"
"hatred crime' means a crime within which the defendant intentionally selects a martyr, or in the shield of a property crime, the property that is the express doubts of the crime, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national native land, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual position of any person"

.given this survey definition, I'd say Yes.

How do you defend yourself against a coworker trying to ruin your reputation at work?

I own a male coworker who asked me out for drinks. We be flirty for a while. He works out of the office abundantly. It ended up ruined out. I ended it via an email to his personal email addy after he be very plan to me on the phone- he struck me as a bit abusive. I sent the email on my own time from my home computer one weekend. He yell at me at work the next time he saw me and I didn't speak anything to anyone as not to get any of us in trouble at work. We stopped speaking. One month subsequent? He shows his boss and then the president of the company the email- I'm supposing out of spite- and I be threatened with my job- in need getting even a chance to communicate my side of the story. I have not done anything innappropriate at work. The email have nothing to do near work. He obviously did it to be unpleasant. Now his boss (and buddy of 10 years) is trying to get me into trouble for any little mix up that may crop up at work. Any advice on this one? I'm contained by fear of losing my livelihood.
Answers: Too much trouble to try. Time to look for another job. If you do not own the confidence and support of your boss, it is only a issue of time, no matter how unwarranted.
Is his car parked on a washed out line?
Oh i focus it is, you better call a towing company.
try looking for another position within the company away from them or a new living elsewhere, this unfortunately happen quite a bit where on earth boss has his favourites and doesn't concern what you do they will find a way of getting rid of you, sorry, could you speak to the organizer of your department regarding this and tolerate him know whats going on?
I suggest you get HR and an attorney involved.

Write them written an official complaint. Keep a copy. Ask them for a WRITTEN response to your complaint.

They can't do that. And your friend should be reprimanded for sexual harrasment. That's exactly what he be doing. If it was a masculine friend who ended their friendship, it's not imagined he would have done impossible to tell apart thing.

Don't be anxious. If what you said is true, the law is on your side. Make sure THEY KNOW THAT YOU KNOW THAT!
Go away if you can. If you can't at ease yourself and call both and enjoy a truce talk more or less the issue, with respect. The issue be opened and you own both right and obligation on discussion about it and re gain respect.
If you can resign from learn that golden rule on never mixing up work next to love life, that lone that exception that comes from Heaven can break - never flirt on work. Women are culturally in disadvantage on that supposed egalité. Honestly a imitation one, its a pretty barbaric need within my opinion.
Anyway, if ever broke that it is for the best reason. You know all this but merely think a bit on how sullied things at work might come with that sort of behavior
Complain to your boss (in writing). Escalate to the president of the company (or CEO, or anything you call the chief of the company). If that doesn't work, sue the coworker for defamation.

Did I do the right thing?

Today I be in NYC, I rob classes at an art school contained by New York, and I saw a man following a woman and her little grand daughter I have a sneaking suspicion that it was. He followed them for 4 blocks until that time making his move, I only saw adjectives of this because they were adjectives infront of me walking down E22nd street at the time I was walking down it. Anyways, the man kept getting closer and closer to them until finally he hit the woman near a crowbar and grabbed the girl. I without hesitation ran up to him as efficient as I could and whistled for a hackney cab and when it came hard by the license plate said fresh and it had dice contained by the mirror. If anything I can say that this hackney carriage was in danger of extinction, but I thought "nah, forget it, yo holmes to Bel-Air!" I pulled up to the house around 7 or 8 and I yelled to the cabbie "yo holmes, smell ya subsequently!" I looked at my kingdom, I be finally there, to settle my throne as the prince of Bel-Air.
Answers: hang around a minute..I heard that this same piece happened within West Philadelphia where this guy be born and raised. On the playground is where on earth is spent most of his days.
Chillin out.. laxin.. doin all cool.. adjectives shootin some b-ball out the shool will a couple of guys.. who where up to no honest.. Started makein trouble in the.. i get into one lil fight and my mom get scared she said ya movin beside ya auntie and uncle to Bel-Air..

Registering guns?

is there a difference between have a permit for a gun and have the gun registered?
Answers: Yes there is a difference. Having a charter for a gun, is generally a travel document to carry a concealed weapon. This give you the authority to carry a gun, but it doesn't hold to be in plain verbs. Registering a gun, is just that, you register your gun next to local law enforcement letting them know you are the owner of a gun, and that it is within your residence. It also helps you if you report the gun stolen and it's used surrounded by the commission of a crime, it reduces suspicion that you committed the crime.
Guns are not registered, gun owners are registered. This does not endow with you the right to carry a firearm. It just gives you the right to own firearms.

Some states allow with the sole purpose police and security associates to carry firearms. Other states allow individuals to own and pass firearms provided they have a right to transport permit.
A "permit" for a gun is alike thing as giving up your second ammendment right, because you are allowing a establishment agency to dictate to you your rights. Hence they are "permitting" you to own a firearm.
Most permits are for the concealed pass of a sidearm.
Registering your firearm is not the same as a firearm receipt. By registering your weapon you are notifying the authorities that you are contained by possession of this particular firearm. You did not involve their permission to own it hence it is not a "permit"

A minute to the wise. Registration is the first step to nouns. If you think this is purely the rantings of the NRA I would strongly suggest you ask any of the thousands of gun owners in Los Angeles or New Jersey, who with permission registered their firearms, only to enjoy them confiscated 2-3 years later.
Yes, near is; and, the differences are so ambiguous they are almost impossible to ascertain.

From what I have read, most states require a party who is purchasing a hand gun through a retail agent to complete an application that is to say forwarded to the local police agency where a framework check is conducted, and the buyer is either approved or disapproved for purchase. If the buyer is approved, the retailer sends adjectives details of the purchase: description of gun, serial number, etc., etc., to the state where the gun be purchased. Sometimes this information also is sent to Federal agencies. This does not constitute "registering" a gun, as hand guns do not hold to be "registered".

Machine guns, AKA's, and other weapons bar handguns, are supposed to be "registered". Only a legal retailer would ever consider doing this; therefore, at hand are many artillery that are never "registered".

There are so many "loop holes" surrounded by Federal legislation concerning guns, and probably 50 inconsistencies in state legislation regulating guns, enforcement of gun control is almost impossible. The courts cannot even agree on gun legislation. We haven't progressed much beyond the days ofo Al Capone!
As heaps have said... you hold a permit for concealed pass,
but a particular gun [ due to state law ] may require registration, even if it just sits surrounded by your safe. See the registering requirements of Hawaii, for example.

Is a voice mail record sufficient evidence to sue for a loan?

In May of 2007 I loaned $300 to a man that I was dating at the time. He go out of state to visit kinfolk and at some point lost his ATM card leaving him in need funds for the duration of his trip. He asked me if I could loan him the money and I agreed and sent it to him using Western Union. After the money was sent he call me and left me a voice message thank me for the loan and reiterating our agreement that it would be repaid when he returned home or by June 1st at the very up-to-the-minute. Since then the relationship have soured, and he changed his phone number leaving me just an email address or snail mail as my singular means of contacting him. I still hold the voice recording that he departed me acknowledging the loan as capably as all of the paperwork from western league. I have his home address as capably as his parents address which he sometimes also uses to receive mail. Is this evidence sufficient to support a lawsuit contained by small claims court?
Answers: You can sue for almost any reason. The tape may be admitted as evidence or it may not, law lords are strange... but if you serve him with a summons and permit him know you have that CD, it may intimidate him into paying.
i think its honest enough...
unless he have sum type of proof he paid u support..
I doubt it.

Why are die-in protest illegal or better on the other hand what about die-in protest get them illegal?

Answers: I really can't answer your cross-examine, but I wondered the same piece. Sounds about as restful of a way to protest as it can take and yet I believe those are the ones who be arrested.
I assume you're referring to the 190 people that be arrested for jumping a police bar. That is illegal regardless of your status. They primarily dared the police to arrest them, and the police call them on it. If anyone from the pro-victory crowd had hopped like peas in a pod barricade, they would own been arrested, too.

This is a lesson for everyone: don't hop over police barricade. The thing is, profusely of people didn't want that lesson.
What does that mean? Is a die-in close to a sit-in, just ALOT longer? Seriously though, what happen?

DUI-pleAse HelP?

i got a dui ultimate night and i hold time on the shelf for theft by unlawful taking. will this dui clear me serve my year on the shelf? or do i have 2 commit another criminal offense?
Answers: I can't believe thats what you are concerned in the order of. Drinking and driving is incredibly selfish, you could own not only kill yourself, but as it happens more regularly than not, someone else. Families are destroyed every day by this hot-headed behavior.
Stop breaking the law and you wont own to worry.

You cogitate you might learn.

Mustard pack dont work, They observe you for at tiniest 30 minutes to make sure you dont consume anything by that time the effectivness of the mustard pack have worn stale but the alcohol has not

And it is a criminal offense within every state. It takes place surrounded by traffic court becuase it is a traffic violation that doesnt save it from being a criminal offense
buh bye! don't bend over and pick up the soap!




mustard pack...yeah right!
Best advice is to ask a local attorney who does DUI defense. Most will NOT charge for a first call in.

http://www.san-francisco-oakland-bay-are...
http://www.san-jose-ca-lawyers-attorneys...
http://www.sacramento-ca-lawyers-attorne...
http://www.la-orange-county-lawyers-atto...
http://www.legal-advice-library.info/blo...
http://www.las-vegas-nevada-lawyer-attor...
http://www.austin-texas-lawyers-attorney...
http://www.san-antonio-texas-lawyers-att...
http://www.san-diego-lawyer-attorney-per...
http://www.brokerforyou.com/san-diego-re...
http://sandiegolawyerforyou.com/san-dieg...
http://sandiegolawyerforyou.com/san-dieg...
http://www.new-jersey-lawyers-directory.

Is banning "saggy pants" a ruin of our rights?

This is more of an opinion interview, but if anyone knows ruling etc. well it would be nice to see complicated evidence.
Answers: The city council's (and some county boards) are simply over reaching all across the country as they try to enact their little facist regimes.

It is clearly a sacrilege of a person's rights for the government to update you what you can and can't wear unless it has to do next to government employment work rules.

The administration can clearly enforce decency law but we should clearly not let our establishment over step their reach.
Depends...are you an mature, or is this school?

If within school, you're out of luck.
There are no law banning types of nonspecific clothing in public.
Other than possibly school rules.
no, if you are discussion about university or work. It is their right to set standards for the people that attend their work place, institution. Now the law can not enlighten you that you cannot wear saggy pants
Just erudite up and dress decent..
No, its not a despoliation.

It's about time somebody (even if its the government) cracked down on those who dress like morons.
It isn't the pant that are an issue - obviously it's the famine of pants around the genitalia and buttocks that's an issue. And near are already laws within place regarding public decency/nudity.

But beyond that, there's categorically no mention of public decency within the Bill of Rights. So no, it cannot be a 'right.'

It's really just an issue of if most associates want to see each other walking around within underwear all morning - don't try to turn it into a huge political issue.
In schools and other places that enjoy specific rules, it's up to the rulemakers.

However, if you're in public and individuals can clearly see your underwear/butt crack, it's public indecency. Therefore, you have to verbs them up/get a belt. If you have a long shirt on covering the factor that your shorts don't, then it's fine.
Yes, I do.
Although I am not a devotee of the saggy pants, (its extremely objectionable.)
I strongly disagree that making a "law" is wayy out of porportion.
Its kind of approaching banning leg warmers.
Kinda stupid aint it.
I niggardly why waste impeccably good permitted time on this.
If people want to shift be "gangsta" with their pant,
let them brand a fool out of themselfs.
STAY OUT OF THEIR CLOTHING CHOICES YOU NOISY GOVERNMENT!
This is definetly a violation of rights. If you consider clothing to be a type of expression later banning clothing is exclusion expression which is in direct defilement of the first ammendment. Also, for anyone that wants to utter that bagging pant can be classified as "indecent exposure" that is not true, becuase though bag pants are "in" boxers other cover up the butt. Low ride pants are surrounded by, not butcracks.
Plus, it would infringe on bussiness rights. Consider that many bag pants are made next to shorter inseams and longer zippers to facilitate the style. Saying that corporations can no longer produce that particular style of clothing directly contradicts the policy of a free marketplace, and would not be supported as constiutional.
I think you are referring to the directive they were trying to go by in Atlanta outlawing saggy pants. I individually can't stand to see someone's pants flabby but it isn't the governments responsibility to inform us how to dress. Our present day society relies to much on rule to regulate even the most simplest things. Before we know it, the government will be surrounded by complete control of our lives.
You'll probably get mostly opinion here because I don't think there's be too many law about the subject or challenge to said laws as of nonetheless. I think this issue though is brewing - possibly contained by Atlanta but not sure.
Personally I don't think it's a betrayal of our rights but then I also believe that one should attempt to dress appropriately. Seeing young-looking men & boys who walk around near their crotches hanging down to their knees make me want to question what they will turn out similar to when they are older as resourcefully as what they are currently up to. (yes, I know this sounds like a stereotype) But after again I'd also like to see tickets for indecent exposure written to those men who show the cracks of their butts whenever they bend down
Many places are enforce a law pertaining to the showing of underwear contained by public. Atlanta Ga has muted law but Louisiana is getting serious near $500 fines and 6 months in put inside.
Wearing "saggy pants",is not a right,it's a wrong! A stupid, silly fad,that make you all look close to clowns! You poor Lemmings! It's going to be a tough life, carry used to it, you poor dumb"sheeple"!
No such right I know of, so no, it's not a violation of rights.

However, some of the penalty for wearing baggy flaccid pants are newly stupid (Lousiana can give you a $500 fine or six months surrounded by jail).

Six months in young offenders` institution for a fashion defiance? C'mon.
A law prohibiting roomy pants contained by general is probably violative of the rights of expression found contained by the first amendment. However, prohibitng baggy pant with your butt sagging out would probably be approved under the city's nonspecific police power

What if someone knocked down friendly house signs left out overnight? Is that a crime?

Answers: It might be vandalism or trespass, depending on whether they undermined anything and if the signs were on private property.
I would mull over that the only crime to be precise committed is trespassing.if it is on your property. But if the sign is elsewhere...then here is nothing that can really be done.especially if the sign is on someone elses property.

More Questions and Answers:
[471] - [1682] - [1086] - [742] - [1236] - [70] - [903] - [918] - [942] - [899] - [1881] - [683] - [654] - [1436] - [564] - [2425] - [2243] - [1266] - [2142] - [914]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: