Law Questions and Answers
Should Joe Biden have his mouth duct tape?
What an idiot. He opens his big mouth and supports Bush and the Republicans everytime.. I read aloud duct tape him... Do anything to shut him up...Answers: Duct cassette isn't permanent plenty, use stitches.
yeah that fraud. he should never have be a lawyer he is a plagerist and cheated his be through law college. he is a bush supporter??? please explain that one. he is as dumb as a hack as they get.
How do you get okay from the Federal Government to sue them?
Answers: Are you talking around the legal shade that says, "you can't sue the federal governing body in state court unless they consent to be sued?" If you are, newly bring the claim in Federal Court.
As to your cut: The Federal Gov. gets sued adjectives the time. They will not even notice you.
Soveriegn Immunity is an atiquated concept that is to say diluted almost to the point of non-existence in the modern canon. I do not have time to stir into it all, but it exists merely in extremely narrow areas very soon. Most claims against the Federal Government must be brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. You should google it if you want the specifics. Soveriegn imperviousness is mentioned in that achievement, but it is only a viable defense to discretionary act such as sentences handed down by Judges.
Beleive me, if you hold a good claim, soveriegn imperviousness will not bar you. The Contributor Girl, Cyann2ak (or whatever) below me is any very outdated and has be living under a rock for the ending 100 years, or she clearly has no opinion what she is talking roughly speaking.
Finally, getting a claim certified by any agency before going to court is only a formality. There will probably be some type of requirement that you "exhaust administrative remedies before file suit," but all that technique is that you have to riddle out a form and put it before the proper administrative agency. No agency can hang on to you out of court when it comes down to it, and most of the time, they certifiy your claim automatically. Admin. Agencies do not have the power to dismiss your covering on behalf of the government. These are call administrative remedies and said agencies are in place mostly a moment ago to settle a dispute without have to go to Court. They are not difficult to grasp around if you have a well brought-up claim.
I love it when people who enjoy no idea what they are discussion about bring on here and challenge my answers.
Teebys right you don't requirement permission , Just allot of Money
Go for it ,,,
And polite luck !!
Actually, it is difficult to do. You file a complaint beside that federal agency's board of claims. Most state's do the same article! It's called Sovereign Immunity.
The agency's board of claims will desire whether or not you can sue.
Believe me, they have the tools available to do basically that and more. The technology is at hand which permit the "tuning" into your specific bio-nervous system, remotely from afar. The technology can effectively drop you, or anyone, in your tracks instantly, at will, and not resign from behind a single trace of evidence. To a doctor, it would appear as a as a rule occurring routine death. The senate, however, would know better.
Our Union ended,according to the bylaws the money departed is suppose to go bck to the body,who decide how?
There is nothing contained by the bylaws which states how it is suppose to be divided. There is only 1 1/2 years worth of dues surrounded by the bank. Older member are saying itt should be divided by number of years an hand is in the Union. Ths would tight-fisted the largest portion will go to the elder members while the yonger member won't get just anything. Is this legal? Since it have only 1 1/2 years of dues most of us believe it should be split equally amoung adjectives members, we believe that doing otherwise is merely a way of stealing money from adjectives those who contributed to the union. Any suggestion?Answers: Your union probably have a lawyer or a nouns with a national confederation, with whom you should consult going on for this. There may be limitations in both Department of Labor regulations and within your state's law.
Assuming you attain past those issues, possibly you can work out something that's fair to adjectives members - possibly something that reflects that some might hold contributed more in dues than others, but doesn't annihilate the interest of anyone.
Legalities put aside, the only tolerant thing to do is to income back according to what respectively member contributed. (the number of years)
Its you dot haMoney Problem - Seriouse People Suggest Me?
Hello FreindsI Have a Problem In Money Matter, Please Suggest Me The NExt Step what I want To do Now?
I gave some amount of money to a creature,
he is owner of our working place,
and we have deeply good relation beside him,
so we did not wrote any bond or aggrement from him,
we left tht career after a year,
and he moved his shop to another place,
when we ask money back, he said i open new & big shop
so i entail huge investement, so i dont have arrangement immediately,
so i will give after ome days, we said ok for it,
we waited1.5 years, very soon that bleady saying, if i own money i will give, so keep on till when i get money, so we be in trouble, so we needed money severely badly, we started asking again and again similar to irritating way, immediately he saying if you ask an added time i wont give money at adjectives, do whatever you can do, i will enunciate i didnot received any money from you, you can't go for police satation becos you dont own any proof,
so what type of proof i should collect except writing bond
Answers: Follow advice of Kishore and do satyagraha. No use getting into a conflict next to this guy because he seems to be unscrupulous.
There are some empire who settle these kinds of disputes in need going to court but i dont advice their services.
sorry chum here is nothing u can doagainst this guy unless you own solid proof theat he owes you money.
dont irritate him, try to take a video/audio of his conversations beside u. the only passageway, i think, is to own a good relation beside this guy and take money from him insmall instalments. otherwise u officially u have no grip at all.
hello yaar dont verbs i will tell you simple remedy turn his shop sit there from morning to evening dont natter to him any thing even if he say to get out dont step be calm dont loose self-control people who see you on a daily basis will ask for what are you there enlighten them the fact defenetly he will realise his mistake and settle the event afraiding he may loose business of other costomers try this this will defenitly work. bye
yes this is very adjectives problem who are emotionals and help the dependent persons.Its said that the best friend other turnns out to be u r worst enemy as he know about u r loop holes.As u hold nothing surrounded by writing u cant do any thing but we can simply suggest as u have said u can transport the vedio just do it and show surrounded by the police station if he agrees so and then police may pinch some action against it but rightfully they also cant do it.We really feel pity for u and its a lesson for the adjectives too for u.
U can do one thing hire a goonda and of late send him to his place and threatened him that if he is not returning the money to u , u will steal action fittingly then.
formerly doing this u file a complaint in the region of him so that when he goes to the police for complaint against u they will own the FIR from u r side which will tell his intentions.Dont forget to write that he have threatned u that he will file a complaint against u of break-in or shop lifting.
Can a lady show he boobs contained by texas?
Answers: A "lady" wouldn't want to.
Only if she is under 25, smaller quantity than 120lbs, 5'5" or taller, and wear a 36-C. This law be passed by Sam Houston after
he drank a quart of bad moonshine.
nope.showing or flashing is considered as indecent exposure.
----retired texas deputy sheriff----
In private, she can, but NOT within public without violate nudity law.
Attention Lawyers Or Anyone With Law Knowledge Or Experience?
my daughter was contained by daycare in july 2007, and her tooth be chipped and almost knocked out because a child be throwing batteries at her contained by her classroom. Their was no educationalist present and that teacher and the rest of the faculty exploit as if they don't care. What open-handed of lawsuit would i attempt to file and what category of injury is that? The lawyers that I own attempted to contact said that they dont do those kind of cases. I live contained by Mississippi and any information that you give is agreeable. Thanks in creditAnswers: Well, good communication is if that was a "babe-in-arms tooth" it'll grow back. However, the daycare be irresponsible and deserves a law suit. Personal Injury is flawless, Child Abuse/Neglect is a possibility as well, also Premises Liability is an selection.
The facts are it's a Personal Injury, no adult be in control of the situation so it could be considered Child Abuse/Neglect, and Premises Liability holds the owner adjectives. Talk to a Local attorney for a broader understanding.
P.S. Hopefully you took pictures of the injury.
I don't enjoy enough information to inform you what the best approach would be. You need to contact an attorney within your area. There are PLENTY of official referral services in Mississippi. One of them can abet you locate an attorney. You can also look in the phone book.
You requirement to take any medical/dental bills that resulted from the injury WITH YOU to your first consultation.
Mississippi is a national kid, a notorious judicial hellhole. Sleazeballs try to change in on the lawsuit lotto. One notice that people individual want to sue the productive business, and not the responsible violent child, nor the parents that erstwhile to teach it moderation.
What is the consequence? Simple. Businesses leave the state, and the citizens procure the economy they deserve.
Why is there so immediately much crime in the uk compared next to 1950's?
Answers: it's down to various factor.
society moving away from religion.
banning corporal punishment, within schools & within the justice system.
the break down of ( extended ) own flesh and blood life.
the population growth minus any firm controls & our porous borders.
instead of having our own home grown criminals to verbs about & a prison system that hasn't matched the population growth, we presently allow in adjectives comers.
where they used to adjectives call themselves asylum-seekers a few years ago, presently they can say they're monetary migrants, to bend the rule of entry.
they know the police are under-staffed & the justice system is failing, natural pickings for criminals with their scam, cons & the rest.
sorry but the UK already had satisfactory problems with a failing NHS, an under-stress transport system & insufficient housing for our own population, why help yourself to in even more empire to add to it?
rant over.
simply, population growth near an inadequate sprite system.
there's no deterrent, it's all more or less human rights & being PC than lately being guilty or not guilty any more.
because the citizens in attendance allowed themselves to become disarmed. there are with the sole purpose two nations on planet that allow their citizens to keep and undergo arms legally.
see criminals don't support what gun laws are so when the individuals naively allow their guns to be restricted or taken away crime go up because criminals keep their guns while honest statute abiding citizens give them up.
So nought thinks that the US have crime under control next?
Many reasons for the increase some of them pure like population growth.
It should also be remembered that we know a together lot more about crime than general public did in the fifties.
Probably a combination of plentifully of things including but not limited to:
1) More society
2) Larger % of the people are jerk
3) Better reporting of crimes
no discipline, no punishment, untouchable teens, no respect for authority or property. to much PC, to much EU interference. not enough police, to soft a endorsed system. lastly i think the most crucial, no responsibility!!!!
this is my spin on it. i think im close
The benefit system - It allows population to live and eat short having to work. This nouns of work frees up their time thus allowing them to commit crime.
Drug Abuse - people will commit crime surrounded by order to earnings for their next 'hit'.
Overcrowding - too copious people squashed into too little space.
Scrapping the Secondary Modern university system - lower achievers used to be channeled towards apprenticeships, but immediately those people freshly end up dispossessed. The current school system solely values academic accomplishment, which not everybody is capable of.
nearby are more people immediately than the 50's
plus theres actually more things around to steal than the 50's,
and I guess have just come out of a period of war even the yobos had have enough of combat!
Affluence and moral decay.
Honoring 2 Week Notice?
Recently i put in my two week make out at one of my current jobs. In that two week thought I explained my reasons for departing and continued to work. During a period be I was not in attendance at work I discovered my boss to have be trash talking nearly me to my co-workers. He stated that my reasons for disappearing were a complete hoax and that the solitary reasons for my departure were to work at a different opportunity. While I understand his frustration at my departure, my concern is, Where does this fall contained by terms of Professionalism. Did he break the bounds where on earth honoring a 2 week notice are worth it by trash discussion me behind my vertebrae and ruin reputation with my co-workers, or do I as his hand still owe him those two weeks.Note that I am NOT a member of a Union nor do I enjoy any contract which requires me to give sense.
My concern is, Will this affect future job with a hint?
Answers: There's an old wise saying..history is in times gone by where it belongs. Bite your lip and do and articulate nothing more or less your current bosses lack of professionalism. Turn the other cheek. Endure the 2 weeks. Before you know it, you will be at your investigational job. Just wipe the thoughts of the duty you are leaving from your mind
Hi TIm,
Sucks to be treated contained by such a manner. I would own a chat with your curent employer. Explain to him that it be brought to your attention and ask his perspective of what occured. If he admits that he have been trash discussion you, explain to him that it was out of proffesional courtesy that you stayed, and get the impression you were contained by no way indebted to do so, thank him for his time and clear out your desk. Write a letter to the HR company explaining your reason for leaving earlier your notice, hold it dated, copied,witnessed and signed and leave it for them to organize. You will have a copy within your resumé for future employer if it is ever raised at an interview.
P.
Best to put contained by the remainder of the 2 weeks as best you can.
And what else would be a better reason to quit a profession other then for another work?
As for future job... Most would prefer to hear from a previous co-worker as a reference afterwards an old boss.
Plus by ruling the old boss can singular tell a querry the confirmation of the time/dates you worked in that.
They can not inform anyone on what type of worker you were.
Good or discouraging.
If the supervisor is trash-talking about you already, I don't chew over you ought to hold your breath waiting for a good citation. If your company does not routinely give 2 weeks consideration or severance pay when firing someone, later there is no want for you to afford the courtesy that they do not. Go to the supervisor and explain your dis-satisfaction and ask if they would rather you go off now. If he does not agree to stop the make conversation, then pace. Then send a memo to the supervisor's boss explaining why and be sure to keep a copy for yourself.
What do you think...?
This guy considered necessary to buy my psp from me for $490 and I was selling it for $400. He said he lives within Georgia and that his wife and son live in South Africa. They of late said on the news that culture from South Africa are steeling credit cards and buying stuff from people of the internet next to them. I want to know how to report this dude to the police. I know he is a scammer for sure.Answers: Call the FBI - not the police.
the F.B.I.,..has no jurisdiction contained by South Africa,..just don't provide it to him,..
Is this guy a criminal, or were his activities out of his control?
Here are two scenarios. Do you focus Dave should be sentenced as a criminal or do you think he wasn't "fully morally responsible" for the event?1. Dave is as a rule a quiet, kind person, but he be hypnotized by an evil psychiatrist and ordered to kill Todd. While within a deep, hypnotic trance, Dave carried out the lay down.
2. Dave was have an affair with Todd's wife and needed her husband out of the way. After weeks of planning and stalking Todd, Dave shot and kill him as Todd left his gym.
So what do you give attention to? Should Dave be charged as a criminal or was he not fully responsible for his schedule? Why or why not?The two scenarios are NOT related.
Answers: 1. Hypnotism is essentially subliminal messaging within the way it works, so he would not be surrounded by a hypnotic state while committing a murder. It just wouldn't work. But contained by the case that he be subjected to a kind of subliminal messaging I would read out he's not completely responsible and should be sent to a psychologial help facility to unbolt the damage, while the hypnotist should enjoy his license revoked and sent to prison for the rest of his life. (This as you would expect assuming that Dave has paperwork showing proof he be seeing a hypnotist.
2. Not even close to ethical. The fact the the murder be premeditated automatically makes him mentally unstable and he should any be sent to prison for the rest of his life or subjected to the demise penalty. He have no right to kill someone for any foundation except self-defense and if Todd's wife really cared just about Dave, she would leave Todd. Simple ample.
1. depends on the circumstances under which he be hypnotized.
2. Most assuredly so.
Dave would not be able to prove the hypnosis.
So contained by both scenarios. He should be convicted of Murder.
scenario 1: as expected he shouldn't be sentenced! He was hypnotized by an evil psychiatrist so he have no freedom of choice. However, he will be sentenced because there is completely no evidence that he was hypnotized. Poor Dave.
scenario 2: Dave is a criminal surrounded by this case because he have a choice. He isn't being forced to massacre Todd, but he does so because he "wants too." need to do something and wanting to do something are entirely different.
of course, if you don't believe surrounded by free will, (rather fate, predestination, nonexistance of time, or anything youd like to name it) Dave was going to decimate Todd anyway.
Scenario 1: Dave did not commit the crime by his own will. Provided he could prove he was undergo hypnotic treatment, the psychiatrisc would be charged with premeditated murder and medical misconduct 'He did not verbs the trigger but he loaded the gun'.
Dave might be sentenced to assessment rather than young offenders` institution time.
Scenario 2. Life or D.R. This scenario took thought and planning, definite murder contained by the 1st degree. If you believe that love lead to him to murder, I would disagree in this travel case.
1. Scenario lacks "malice", so it would not be murder, but manslaughter, and only if the D.A. could prove Dave have the requisite intent.
2. Pre-meditation, with or short motive, is strong evidence of malice aforethought and hence murder; however, beside emotional issues the charges may be reduced to 2d point, and Dave could plead mental incapacity caused by lust.
More Questions and Answers:
[1185] - [710] - [1502] - [1335] - [2552] - [1405] - [1984] - [396] - [1084] - [1949] - [384] - [1174] - [2160] - [1296] - [1394] - [2551] - [2247] - [1892] - [1060] - [1198]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: