Law Questions and Answers

Complaint against former employer? Illinois labor was of no relief?

Overtime pay be paid adjectives straight pay, they are not going to money me the vacation time owed and for misstreatment

Answers: for overtime take-home pay support contact Federal Department of Labor

vacation time not a issue of law unless it's surrounded by a contract or an employee encyclopaedia

mistreatment not defined - see a lawyer
***

Does Canada or Ontario have a bylaw or regulation in relation to the obstruction of a ditch or river course?

Well, It's like this. My subsequent door neibour has support filled a roomy ditch on his property behind the houses. He is Down stream from me and during a crucial storm water presently pools on my lot. I am confident in a serious storm it will basis my basement to flood..The township doesn't seem to be to think it is their problem butr they do agree that it is a risk.HELP...

Answers: I would step back to the township and bring to the fore shi* about it. Tell them that you involve a legal view from their solicitor 'before commencing legalized proceedings' on your own. The suggestion that they may get involved contained by legal proceedings may spawn them take positive motion. Whatever the outcome you should consider speaking to a lawyer for counsel. Good luck!

Help with WA suspended license? Attorneys please!!?

I received a dui while I be sitting in my parked motor in WA. My license be punched and I was told by an attorny that I have 30 days to mail a request to the dmv requesting to maintain my license. He told me to wait until the second day becasue they with the sole purpose have 60 days to achieve me my requested hearing and by waiting I am adjectives into their time. I waited and mail it and I received confirmation from usps that they received it. ...but now what? it have almost been 60 days and I freshly received a letter from them stating that my license will be suspended contained by a few days? but I can send contained by money to request a hearing beside $200? I already did this, but they must not know is that good or doomed to failure?? Now what? If I do not have a audible range date by the 60 day deadline can I a short time ago march within there and draw from my license back? Help!?

Answers: You should speak to the attorney that give you the original direction.

What Can You Do To Stop Someone Who's Intentionally Hindering Your Ability to Get a New Job (Read On)...?

I worked at a place that hired a new store chief just up to that time my seasonal employment ended (I be an Interim Asst. Mngr for the summer). Anyway, this person that they hired never worked next to me and had issues near control. From a legal standpoint, there's no defence that anything negative can be said almost me and the store owner has warm things to say something like me.

Anyway, when this new store regulator was call for employment varification, she said some pretty awful and innacurate things about me as an member of staff and I was subsequently removed from the application process of a place I be hoping to be hired full time.

What can I do to stop this?

Not only is she wrong but she also have NO right to say anything in the order of me as an employee..UGH!

Answers: If you can verify this surrounded by writing, get the information, afterwards go over that manager's principal, to the next rank of the company, and file a complaint. Threaten officially recognized action if compulsory. You will learn, that surrounded by this life, near are people who are not joyful unless they are causing problems contained by the work place, she sound similar to one of those people.

what a DICKFACE!

I voice pour some ketchup on their head!!

How much is my lawsuit worth. How do they put a price on a permanent injury?

I be involved in a catastrophe with a NJ transit bus. He cut contained by front fo me and I hit the side of the bus. He got a ticket and this is his 3rd disaster. I had put a bet on surgery for a burst disc.
My doctor 's report says I own a permanent injury and he signed a cert. of perm. I be out of work for 6 months and still have stomach-ache everyday. Every morning when I wake up I know I have surgery. I have a six inch mutilation on my stomache and two 3 inch scars on my put money on. How do they put a value on a irreversible injury. I have 2 small boys and I am 41 years prehistoric.

Answers: Your claim is valued at medical expenses, lost wages, scarring, pain and suffering, permanency, substitute services (maids, specially equipped vehicles).
The appeal of the permanency is estimated loss of future earn power.
Your claim may be worth millions. Unfortunately, I don't know NJ laws. In PA the parameter of liability on a political sub-division is $500,000. So you could not make a claim for more than that amount.
I suggest you consider hiring an attorney and discharge him a fee to support put a dollar value on your satchel. If the transit authority is going to agree to settle, you don't have to hire an attorney on a contingency reason to pursue the claim for you.

Multiply your health expenses by 3. 1/3 to your advocate, 1/3 to your health fees an 1/3 for for you for distress and suffering.

Should parents be fined for their childrens bad practice?

I think the management should say right adequate is enough and from in a minute on any kids causing trouble destitute will be fined 1000.and if they are on benefits their money will be stopped and they can have food vouchers.I bet near would soon be a reduction contained by crimes commited by these nuisances.
Where i live the parents drop their teenagers off within the village andgo past its sell-by date for a meal after to the pub and do not care, that their children are getting drunk,smashing bottles,window and anything they can see. as long as its not on their doorstep

Answers: Yes, they should, then perchance they would take more of an iterest within what their kids get up to - by the track, I am a parent with an 18 year ould lad, who as have constant grief from me over the last few days!

Yes, parents should be held responsible for the behavior of their children.

After adjectives, it is the job of the parents to initiate them proper behavior in the first place.

I AGREE TOTALLY.

I have an incident in the street contained by NYC just the other daylight, with a group of teenagers who be out for the day contained by the city, creating a disturbance every where they go. They happened to be walking bringing up the rear me on the street, and they were yell, screaming, cursing, kicking over garbage, and newly behaving within an extremely destructive manner. Everyone on the street be looking to see where the commotion be coming from.

One of them ( a girl of about 16yrs.) in truth came right up astern me, put her hands around my shoulders, and scream in my ear.

She will never do that again, because I did what her parents should've done a long time ago. I flay the snot out of her in the street, surrounded by front of her friends. They all without delay turned into "innocent" , frightened young teenagers (..yeah) and tried to suggest that I ATTACKED THEM.

When the cops be finally called, she couldn't do anything anyway, because the officer did not believe that one woman walking alone on the street would incite an incident with 7 teenagers.

I digress.. I love your model.

I don't know if fining them would work, although it would definitely hit them where on earth it hurts (in the benefit book), but clearly the parents have to pocket some responsibility for their kids' actions. Not so long ago, parents would enjoy brought their kids up better because it was the right point to do and so as not to incur shame on the family, but those days are long gone. It's such a shame that we enjoy to resort to the 'carrot and stick' philosophy just to seize people to do the right entry.

Stopping benefits would be a good opinion (maybe we could starve them all to extermination?) although it might just result surrounded by more crime. They should just thump the lot of them up, in my belief, or put them on estates where they are a million miles from wearing clothes people.

I nouns like the Daily Mail ... I know this day would come.

It would be more important to fine Child Protective Services for terrorizing parents out of disciplining their kids.

Yahoo is a great weapon for the spreading of the miracle of America to the world...?

Do you feel that the yahoo censor understand that censorship within name of money is a great loss to American's who enjoy died for our freedoms?

Answers: I think they don't want the world to capture a bad mark of Americans or Yahoo through their venue. If you don't want to be censored, then you can step to another venue. Its their right to censor this.

what freedom

If a woman is raped&impregnated and she asks for& get ch. support from him- would he get visitation rights?

Answers: I don't mull over she could or should get child support, but she may be capable of bring about a civil suit for damages.

Having him brand monthly payments is asking for trouble, because he would likely develop state of mind of ownership towards her and her child. She may even get a court demand to keep him away, but that may not work out as planned.

She would be better sour having no contact next to such a man whatsoever.

In the long run, she should support herself as millions of women do now.

This is despondently also an arguement for abortion.

Weird question.

Child support and visitation own nothing whatsoever to do near each other.

If you be never married to the man I don't think you'll seize any child support. Someone told me her story of having a boyfriend but never marry him, they split, she's got two kids my him and she doesn't win any child support. She took him to court and got in the region of $300 as a one time payment and that be all.

Jena six protest?????

wwhy are people for the most part blacks protesting six kids that beat up a kid and he have to go to the hosptial protesting that ? and the piece about the nooose and abhor crimes? isnt that goong a little to far? i dont comprehend they beat up a kid and judge they should get away beside it?

Answers: That is the mentality in some places . The kids near the noose are kicked out of college and the assailants should go free.

I estimate the protest is for excessive punishment and non equal punishment for blacks and whites. Blacks being punished far more severely while whites go and get very colourless slaps on wrist. This is not a black white issue...its an issue of equal protection under the law. This is a fundamental principle of this country...and we all should support that notion.

No true american would shield that whites gets slaps on wrist when they crack bottles on head of black students, but when the blacks do similar things they get 20 years within jail.

[Blacks individual punished far more severely while whites get highly weak slaps on wrist.]

and so the reverse address the issue fairly? <shakes head>

"Not lone is there almost no medium coverage of the Black violent can`t bear crimes against Whites, but in glorious profile cases when Blacks are prosecuted for heinous crimes against innocent Whites, the White victims are ignored and the Black criminals are turned into “real victims” by the medium.

Nothing more clearly illustrates this point than what have occurred over times past year in Jena, Louisiana and the orgy of hate that Jena has suffered. today, September 20, the town have been invaded by thousands of thugs resembling Al Sharpton who seek to label violent Black despise criminals such as Michael Bell and the rest of the so-called “Jena Six” into heroes. Even worse the entire White population of the town is facing a medium lynching by being labeled racist who are unjustly persecute Black young men.

Michael Bell, who have been convicted of four previous ferocious crimes, (a fact scarcely revealed by the media), lead a group of six Black students to attack and unmercifully beat a White Student at Jena High School contained by what can only be described as a vicious abominate crime. Motivated by racial spite, the six Blacks attacked one lone White student, Justin Barker. They stomped and kicked him to unconsciousness and continued to see him and stomp him as he lay helpless. The attack could have efficiently have taken his vivacity if others had not intervened. Only by the grace of God did he survive.

To show the insane bias of this integral case, newly imagine if the facts be reversed.

If a gang of six Whites motivated by racial malevolence and led by a White beside four previous violent-crime convictions had attacked a lone Black student, kicking and stomping him into blackout, would there any concern that the perspective and the other White gang members could be charged beside aggravated assault? Would not there be national demands to charge the White attackers next to the most serious of federal civil rights violations and abhor crimes? White leaders from all over the country, even the leaders of the local town of Jena, would not be defending the White attackers, they would be condemning the attacks and calling for the harshest of punishments allowed by the decree.

As far as the Media are concerned, oh yes the supposedly unbiased medium, they would be interviewing the Black victim on every TV speak show across the land, discussing his fearfulness, his pain, his suffering. They would be interviewing his crying relatives and friends. They would not be voicing any agitation that the White attackers would be treated too harshly. No, they would be demanding the harshest of penalty.

Federal officials from the President on down would be calling for new serious charges of federal civil rights violations. But you see, surrounded by the America of 2007 Whites are no longer deemed to enjoy any “civil rights.”

When a lone White kid is beaten savagely by a gang of six abhorrence criminals, the media is single concerned about how the Black attackers are person treated too harshly. And if you are waiting for civil rights charges to be file against the Black attackers who violated the civil rights of the boy they almost beat to disappearance, don’t hold your breath.

The entire Jena scenario and the coverage of it by the media show once again that it is not the relations of Jena who are racists. White empire are now the actual victims of racism in America. Once again it is shown that we must hold advocates for our rights and heritage purely as any other group is permitted to do so.

May the District Attorney and the people of Jena stay strong and never tender in to those who desire take away their rights of enthusiasm and liberty as guaranteed by the United States Constitution."

It's not that they ruminate they can get away near it or that they should get away near it.
It all revolves around the charges file against them.

1 of the black kids involved in this overnight case was pummel up 3 days prior to the group beating up this pernickety kid. Only one of the people invloved surrounded by the previous incident was charged and they be given a midemeanor battery charge.
However when the 6 black kids be charged they were intially charged next to attempted murder. Bail for each kid be set for over $70,000.

So what's in cross-examine is not the act of attacking a white kid, what's surrounded by question is the bearing the kids were charged.

This is a exceedingly "racy" issue. Here are the facts:

.The High school they adjectives go to (and also, realize these are high-ranking school kids) have constant issues with see and racism, including segregated party and dances, the whites putting up nooses around trees.adjectives these things...they propitiated this attack by the group of blacks.
.Anyone protesting this is doing it because of the awkward situation, and the HARSH sentences the convicted have received.
.The kid that be "beaten so badly" be at another segregated house deputation later that darkness.

SloMotion Like Snail

This is a very "racy" issue. Here are the facts:

.The High arts school they all run to (and also, realize these are high college kids) has constant issues beside race and racism, including segregate parties and dance, the whites putting up nooses around trees.all these things...they propitiated this attack by the group of blacks.
.Anyone protesting this is doing it because of the awkward situation, and the HARSH sentences the convicted enjoy received.
.The kid that was "overwhelmed so badly" was at another segregate house party following that night.
Source(s):

You prefer whats right man.theres gonna be a lot of associates talking more or less this, who in truth, don't know what they are talking roughly.
(This topic is just starting to "blow up" but some of us enjoy been following it since al sharpton even heard around it)

AMEN AND THANK YOU SWEET HEART! FINALLY SOMEONE WHO PAYS ATTENTION TO ALL THE FACTS!

Whats the Laws on Drinking/Alcohol in California?

I know surrounded by WI you can drink if your spouse is above 21 and or if your parents are with you! Is it one and the same in California! I am getting married subsequent year and my fiance (soon to be husband) will be 22 and I will be 20.. Can I legally drink next to him? Or no? What are the Laws out here?

Answers: I am not familiar beside the Wisconsin law you speak of, but a not too dissimilar California regulation might be BPC 25658.2(a) relating to parental liability for under 18 at home. As far as what is undemocratic goes, look into: BPC 25658(b), purchasing below 21, or consuming on premises; BPC 25662(a), public possession under 21; VC 23224, possessing contained by vehicle under 21; VC 23226, undo container in vehicle for any age; PC 647(f), public intoxication for any age; PC 272, contributing to delinquency of beneath 18.

*California Statutes…
BPC = Business and Professions Code
VC = Vehicle Code … PC = Penal Code

Additional Details:
Apparently California has a liquor police, although they look more to me resembling tax collectors beside badges. I do not have a handle on why a circuit court would feel the entail to legislate, when California's law maker are quite clear. I am going to enjoy to say that bar, restaurants, and stores would have to be not permitted. Or are you asking if you may share the celebratory cup of champagne with him?

*/End of Line.

I don't believe ANY state allows underage drinking beside or without parental consent. And although I don't know the laws within Wisconsin, I would take near a grain of saline anyone who said an underage person could drink if they be married to a person of lawful drinking age. The drinking age in adjectives 50 states is 21. Period. If your husband bought you booze and something bad happen to you while you were beneath the influence, I would think he could acquire into some trouble.

If I am wrong, I would love to see myself corrected here.

looking up could not find if CA has that same little wacky exception that WI does, but solitary handful of states seem to hold this exception

are you asking at your wedding will anyone appointment you on your age and drinking doubt it, trying to go to a local slab restaurant and get a drink it may be a problem

Dunn County Circuit Court, Spring 2006

What's covered by this imperative?
The law covers a catalogue of activities related to the possession and consumption of alcoholic beverages by population under the officially recognized drinking age (21 years old).

It is illegal for individuals under the permitted drinking age to:

Purchase, procure, or attempt to procure, alcoholic beverages;
Possess or consume intoxicating liquor (including wine), except when accompanied by parent, guardian, or spouse who have attained legal drinking age;

More Questions and Answers:
[2166] - [1312] - [2053] - [1729] - [2478] - [122] - [2371] - [77] - [2317] - [2503] - [616] - [743] - [868] - [653] - [1001] - [1760] - [352] - [2476] - [377] - [522]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: