Law Questions and Answers

Can you legally come by a photo from the web and post it on your website?

Answers: Photographs are subject to copyright regulation. If you (without authorization) display a photo taken by someone else, you violate their copyright and are subject to federal lawsuit under Title 17, United States Code.
With authorization and acknowledgment.

Would you drink warm alcohol?

what if the stores be not allowed to refrigerate alcohol by regulation?
Answers: Sure.
I've picked cigarette butts out of it and drank it.
Yes, sake is served warm. The English repeatedly serve their beer at close to room temperature, but I approaching it cold.

Wine should always be stored horizontally, contained by the dark, and at a cool heat.

As far as I know, hard liquor desires no special care, but I'd never serve it thaw out.
ever been to a Japanese restaurant and have sake ?

Who exactly is Castor? Is he considered an autocrat?

Is an autocratic the same entity as a dictator?
Answers: Contrary to rumour, castor oil taste quite honourable.
An autocrat is a single ruler whose authority is undisputed, such as the king or queen in a country where on earth all agree to be ruled by a royal family circle.

A dictator imposes his or her rule on the ancestors by force or the threat of force, not by agreement.

Castro is seen by a full-size part of the world as the dictator within Cuba. His authority is disputed by the large numbers of people who have escaped that country since he took over.
As ever, Wikipedia get as far into this as I ever need to progress:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocrat

I would answer you, yes, Castro is a modern type of autocrat.

Are you for or against the death cost??

I just finished watching the movie unconscious man walking which is about capitol punishment. I myslef am against the passing penalty and i be just wondering other people's opinion and why they think that.
Answers: Dead Man Walking is an excellent show.

I was pro-death cost for a long time, but I have changed my stance over the years, for several reason:

1. By far the most compelling is this: Sometimes the legal system get it wrong. Look at all the nation who have be released after years of imprisonment because they be exonerated by DNA evidence. Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. No situation how rare it is, the administration should not risk executing one single innocent person.

Really, that should be aim enough for most folks. If you need more, read on:

2. Because of the extra expense of prosecuting a DP covering and the appeals process (which is necessary - see function #1), it costs taxpayers MUCH more to execute prisoners than to imprison them for natural life.

3. The deterrent effect is questionable at best. Violent crime rates are actually complex in demise penalty states. This may seem to be counterintuitive, and there are abundant theories about why this is (Ted Bundy saw it as a urge, so he chose Florida – the most active execution state at the time – to fetch out his final murder spree). Personally, I think it have to do with the hypocrisy of taking a stand against murder…by butchery people. The parliament becomes the desperate parent who says, ‘do as I read out, not as I do.’

4. There’s also an argument to be made that death is too well-mannered for the worst of our criminals. Let them wake up and budge to bed every day of their lives surrounded by a prison cell, and think just about the freedom they DON’T have, until they rot of prehistoric age. When Ted Bundy was finally arrested within 1978, he told the police officer, “I wish you have killed me.”

5. The U.S. command is supposed to be secular, but for those who invoke Christian law contained by this debate, you can find arguments both for AND against the death cost in the Bible. For example, Matthew 5:38-39 insists that hostility shall not beget violence. James 4:12 say that God is the only one who can pinch a life surrounded by the name of sprite. Leviticus 19:18 warns against settling of scores (which, really, is what the death cost amounts to). In John 8:7, Jesus himself says, "agree to he who is without sin type the first stone."
That is a very powerful movie. Here are some facts to progress with it surrounded by q and a form, with sources below.

You don't hold to condone brutal crimes or want the criminals who commit them avoid a harsh punishment to ask whether the passing penalty prevents or even reduce crime and whether it risks killing innocent nation.

What about the risk of executing innocent associates?
124 people on extermination rows have be released with evidence of their innocence.

Doesn't DNA preserve new cases close to these from happening?
DNA is available within less than 10% of adjectives homicides and can’t guarantee we won’t execute innocent people.

Doesn't the passing penalty prevent others from committing murder?
No reputable study shows the disappearance penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The destruction penalty is neither. Homicide rates are complex in states and regions that hold it than in states that do not.

So, what are the alternatives?
Life minus parole is now on paperwork in 48 states. It technique what it says. It is sure and swift and uncommonly appealed. Life without parole is smaller number expensive than the death cost.

But isn't the death cost cheaper than keeping criminals in prison?
The release penalty costs much more than energy in prison, mostly because of the legalized process. When the death cost is a possible sentence, extra costs mount up even before trial, continuing through the uniquely complicated trial (actually 2 separate trials, one to opt guilt and the second to decide the punishment) surrounded by death cost cases, and appeals.

What about the tremendously worst crimes?
The death cost isn’t reserved for the “worst of the worst,” but rather for defendants beside the worst lawyers. When is the closing time a wealthy personality was sentenced to annihilation, let alone executed??

Doesn't the release penalty abet families of murder victims?
Not necessarily. Murder subject family member across the country argue that the drawn-out death cost process is painful for them and that enthusiasm without parole is an appropriate alternative.

So, why don't we speed up the process?
Over 50 of the innocent general public released from death row have already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent person.

Who is she and get your reward?

With her nephew she be betrothed,
And the greatest among men brought forth

The King precepts she never obeyed,
But next to silver and gold she be repaid

With wisdom and culture she was pledged
To enjoy her boy from her breast be fed!
Answers: This is Law and Ethics, not the Riddle slot of Yahoo Answers.
Lucilla

Can I erase a criminal record and how?

I made mistakes contained by my life, one over 20 years ago and one 8 years ago. One be false reporting the other theft by unlawful taking. Not to maintain what I did, but it was due to person a victim of circumstance and the charges still hide me when coming to get a honourable job. I am Christian woman, but can't capture past these offenses, even though they be a long time ago. ( I have no felonies)
Answers: You own atleast now confessed youeself and realised your mistake, its really apt thing you hold come out with your break open mind. Now I suggest, you cannot bring the old days put money on, self repentation is itself kind of punishment. Please forget your olden and lead restful life and see that you extend useful hands to others within future.
I've hear of getting things "expunged" from records. I'm sure it involves $$$, but I'm not sure how you would jump about this process.

Not to mention, it sucks that employer still hold that crap over your head and heaps others. THEY ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO. ITS ILLEGAL.

I would call an atty. to see if they know how it's done. GOOD LUCK hun, I'm sure you're a apposite person;)
No, you really can't bring your criminal record erased. Sometimes you can win it suppressed, but you'd have to ask a legal representative about that. The best point you can do is be thankful you've changed your behaviors and verbs.

You say you're a Christian woman, if that process to you what it does to me, it means you've asked Christ to forgive you of adjectives of your sin and take over as mortal in charge of your existence. If that happened, afterwards His forgiveness is much more important than the world's.

Most cases when an application or whatnot asks if you enjoy a criminal history, they give you a hit and miss to explain. As an employer, I know I'd be much more willing to whip someone on if they were upfront roughly what happened. If you own that what you did was wrong (as you do), later you weren't just a object of circumstance, but you have the choice to depart from that in olden times and move on. Most employer are really interested if you've ever been convicted of a felony, though.. not a misdemeanor.

Also, they are allowed and it's not bent to deny you work for a criminal past. It'd be ridiculous if a company be required to hire thieves and ridge robbers- think around it, it doesn't make sense.
That is why nation try and keep their nose clean because it does and will come spinal column to haunt.

If any CRIME was committed while you be a minor you can get that taken caution of but not the adult stuff.

You chitchat about shop lifting?

If I be the potential employer and the 20 years ago was the extend of your criminal text I would probably just look to your present. But later 8 years ago you got contained by trouble again and I would wonder when your next "target of circumstance" act might transpire.
I think you'd own to say what they are and what state you live within. For example I had some speeding tickets on my diary and a few other traffic related incidents. But after 5 years they were erased from my register. So, there are guidelines, it purely depends on what you are referring to.

Check the link out for some information on expunging a account.
this is the deal

if you story is in the massive data basis of companies that sell public background to employers and landlords even if you enjoy it expunged that will not remove the data simply a pardon can
First you can never erase a criminal diary. You will have a irretrievable record surrounded by the National Crime Information Center (NCIC). Even if you seal your paperwork which I totally think is a spend in dribs and drabs of money, certain agencies surrounded by this country (particularly Governmental, Law Enforcement) can access sealed collection and or request information from you regarding them. If you go wrong to disclose that you were charged near a crime on a companies application and the company specifically asked you about criminal entertainment. during the application process, your failure to disclose that information will subject you to on the spot termination. This is what I would do in your situation. Be honest and disclose what occur on the job application if it asks question pertaining to criminal activity. Secondly , if the employer doesn't ask question pertaining to criminal activity afterwards you're not obligated to disclose that information. However if they later come to you and ask you any verbally and or by written certification, then by adjectives means disclose that information at that specific time. It's unfortunate that these events occur in your time when you were younger. I deal with cases freshly like yours during my fifteen years of public service and my heart go out to you. Many people who are childish don't realize that their juvenile record carry over into adulthood and adjectives records are accessible. You want to explain to the employer that you're remorseful about former times events and show them that you have corrected those mistakes and maintain a good work copy and or crime free background since the date of your closing charge. Hopefully someone will give you a hit and miss. The only other prospect is to obtain as much coaching as possible, if you haven't already done so. I would certainly suggest have at least some form of big level teaching. That can only benefit you surrounded by the long run. I hope this helps you and flawless luck.

Jena, Louisiana; do you feel that the prosecutor within this case against the black boys be wrong to charge them?

as adults? There are times when I have see teenagers charged as adults in other sitiuations. What criteria does a prosecutor requirement to charge youths as adults?
Answers: 6 on 1, there merely lucky nobody got the incurable punch in, so its attempted...
because of what one or more of them said, and self 6 0n 1...
He was wrong to charge them for attempted murder and as adults.
They should be charged and tried contained by juvenile court, he is 16 years old,

Have we taken lawsuits too far? A woman is suing for $1M because the price of the iPhone was cut.?

What's subsequent? Suing Dillards because they put some of their stuff on sale?

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071002/apple_iph...
Answers: That is insane and unacceptable. Companies reserve the right to lower their costs. It is their prerogative. Lawsuits such as this are going to create havoc in the consumer bazaar as if it is successful companies will be leery of drastic price reductions.

That is great report for business as they can maintain inflated prices however consumers will suffer.

That mortal said, I believe this woman should be smacked. Almost every product is released at a high price because emergency is high.. When emergency wains the price drops. It is basic marketing.
Absolutely. It's a regretful testament to our society.

I want to know how the Victoria's Secret suit came out above!!
lawsuits become ridiculous years ago, people suing stores because a kid made them decline...their own kid. suing because you spill coffee on yourself... coffee is hot, it's supposed to be hot!
people are greedy and morons and that combination is going to be the ruin of america.
It's time for TORT reorganize.
The funny part is she is suing for 1M because she claims "the company violated price nouns laws", but apparently she thinks she should be the just one to benefit from the lawsuit.
That is so retarded! Can i sue because the price of my car is cheaper immediately? Geez prices go down on things adjectives the time. It is her dumb fault she jump on the opportunity to buy the phone when it was first released for a more expensive price and not hang around for the sales which is what closely of people do and inhabitants expect these sales from companies. Everyone know when a product is first released it is the most expensive and then the price eventually drops.
Lazy idiots who brand a living by suing. My best friend is an Occupational Therapist who has worked for 25 yrs within the field. She is the best contained by town and goes above and beyond for her patients.

Now, the nouns is going to lose her because another person on welfare is suing her for some BS. Their group other settles out of court because they don't have the time to accord with these idiots. She's tired of working and kindly so much just to enjoy an occasional lawsuit. Happens to all her coworkers.

I come up with there's a network of these low-income slimeballs who explain to each other what to do and how to craft money with frivilous lawsuits.

We want tougher laws for these things.
It's also approaching suing a movie production company when they put the movie out on video (after you went to see it at the theatre).

It's a in good health known reality that when you buy something RIGHT when it comes out, it's going to decrease contained by price. For this woman to SUE them for dropping the price is ridiculous, but what's even more ridiculous is the fact that she'll probably achieve something out of it.
The people who lurk in file to buy the newest technology the afternoon it comes out know full and well that if they wait even a few months it would go down within price significantly.

This is reality: untried technology is VERY expensive because people WILL pay cheque the higher price because they simply "have to hold it". (Personally - I would never pay that benevolent of money for a phone!)
She may or may not have a satchel. Rebates were offered from the company. It be not stated if she took advantage of it. I agree that frivolous lawsuits are presently the norm. The woman mentioned in a previous answer who crashed the Winnabago while contained by cruise control and making a sandwich, got a different motorhome and over $1 million in damages. Winnabago have to change the owners almanac to let citizens know it shouldn't be done. DUH.

I need help out! If anyone has a regulation dictionary at the moment, please, I need definititions of some words?

de bene esse
deposition
deposition de bene esse

Black's Law Dictionary is the best chance! Thank you!
Answers: DE BENE ESSE - A technical phrase applied to reliable proceedings which are deemed to be in good health done for the present, or until an exception or other avoidance (i.e., 'conditionally'). For example, a declaration is file or delivered, special bail put within, witness examined, etc. de bene esse, or good for the present.

DEPOSITION - The sworn nouns of a witness taken before trial held out of court near no judge present. The witness is placed lower than oath to tell the truth and lawyer for each bash may ask questions. The question and answers are recorded. When a creature is unavailable to testify at trial, the deposition of that party may be used. Part of the pre-trial discovery (fact-finding) process.

The 3rd definition is just a combination of the two and is described contained by the 2nd link (below).

PS - Black's on-line is solely available thru West, but you probably knew that.
Try these

http://dictionary.law.com/
http://www.legal-definitions.com/
De bene esse is a Latin phrase goal "of well individual." In an American legal context, it mode "conditionally," "provisionally," or "in anticipation of adjectives need." It can also plan "A phrase applied to proceedings which are taken ex parte or provisionally and are allowed to stand as well done for the present." [1]

An appearance de bene esse is designed to voucher a party to a proceeding to reject to submit this person to the jurisdiction of the court unless it is finally determined that he have forever waived that right.[2] Such an appearance is for this reason a special appearance designed to allow the accused to come upon and discharge the contractual requirement of making an appearance, and at the same time, to refuse permission for to submit to the jurisdiction of any alleged plaintiff (and therefore of the applicable court), unless and until some judicial department prosecutor make all disclosures, specifically by producing a complaint of mar or injury, signed and verified by the injured party. [3]


[edit] References
^ Black's Law Dictionary, 5th edition
^ Farmers Trust Co. v. Alexander, 6 A.2d 262, 265
^ Janet Mary, Wallen, Sui Juris, Citizen of Arizona, All Rights Reserved lacking Prejudice


2nd
In law, a deposition is evidence given underneath oath and recorded for use within court at a later date. In lots countries depositions are given in courtrooms, but contained by the United States they are given outside a courtroom in faultless well-defined circumstances. In the U.S. it is a part of the discovery process surrounded by which litigants obtain information from respectively other in preparation for trial. Some jurisdiction recognize an affidavit as a form of deposition

3rd
De Bene Esse:
a occupancy literally meaning as okay done. This phrase typically describes the practice of obtaining a video tape examination (done by deposition) of a witness, or a gathering, in anticipation of adjectives need, to preserve the sworn nouns for use at a later time. This practice is especially critical if the deponent will, or might, be subsequently exclusive at the time of trial.

In the old days in that was 'the system' after people begin to manipulate the system...?

result = zilch is straightforward and honest anymore. For example the system says study easier said than done and prosper, the manipulators say cheat and lie results, lie on resumes, bargain fast, verbs the truth. Honest people the true backbone of society are dragged down carrying others. Am I right?
Answers: I guess it would depend heavily on where on earth you work. I have worked within many job the were offered me by smaller number scrupulous business men. Since they be without honesty, honesty be not important to them. they be about themselves one and only and honesty had little importance to them. As such, honest workers were not see as savvy. They were overlooked contained by promotions.
I have also worked surrounded by jobs that not with the sole purpose valued honesty, but reallied upon it. You were a expensive part of the squad and your honor was a requirement. Your advancement size was constrained if your honor was wanting, due to the trust requirement.
Certainly all society is undermined by criminals and dishonest or unscrupulous businessmen, but that makes the honest ones stand out adjectives the more. You may be right, but I am not sure that makes any difference. Challenge make for a good tutor.
I believe you are basically right; I own felt the horrible burden of this myself. However, I know that Honesty is the best instrument to go and will discharge off contained by the long run.

More Questions and Answers:
[2536] - [1512] - [993] - [799] - [410] - [1075] - [2341] - [687] - [1906] - [1097] - [389] - [665] - [932] - [483] - [223] - [907] - [209] - [2386] - [1369] - [1523]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: