Law Questions and Answers

I have to shift to court in Franklin Co. N.C.for a speeding ticket.?

I get a speeding ticket about a month ago and be planning on paying it and not going to court, but I forgot about it until in a minute.(sat.) y court date is on Monday. What options do I enjoy? I don't know how much the ticket is for. Do I ask for prayer for judgement, or can I go surrounded by before court starts and earnings the ticket?
Answers: Prayer for judgment???

You can jump in back court starts and pay for it. Make sure you bring currency and/or check because some courts do not accept credit cards.
Call the county court house where on earth you received the ticket, and ask them if you can pay the fine, along next to a penalty. You should know how to.

I have gotten a memorandum from a job proverb that a laptop containing my SS# was stolen. Can i sue?

Answers: you can sue, but remember, surrounded by order to win and collect anything, you hold to PROVE DAMAGES. What are your PROVEABLE damages? Was your identity stolen ? Anybody misuse a credit card of yours or get money from your mound account? They do this notification to alert you to the POSSIBILITY that something indecent could happen, but even next to that event, it is UN-likely you will win in court. The defense they will make higher is that they exercised REASONABLE care to protect your information. Not adjectives crime is preventable.
I'm sure you can
What I don't know is if you can win
It could be a scam. Be careful!!!

I was denied a situation because of the jewelry I wear and because someone feels my eye makeup is to cloudy.?

I have be employed with my current company for 7 years and enjoy never had a unenthusiastic review or have be told that I am anything but a good hand.

Several months ago a position opened up that I be very qualified for, but I be told by the hiring manager that after speaking next to her boss she was told he would not approve the exchange because he didn't like my jewelry and that my eye makeup be to dark. I be upset but didn't do anything about it. Another position simply opened up within the same group and indistinguishable thing happen after the hiring manager again met next to her boss. She was prepared to give it another shot as she thought I would be a great fit.

During the 7 years I enjoy been beside this company no one have ever said anything to me about my jewelry or makeup man unacceptable. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 detail Race, Sex, Religion, Color or National Origin as forms of discrimination but nought like this. Is in that anything I can do here, I feel this is so wrong?
Answers: I worked within the employment area for a time. One of the things I told the guys I tried to place be, no one will be piqued by short hair and verbs shaved. Not true with those that are beard. Might be unfair, but it is a actuality. If you wear piercings, or Goth style cloths and make up, expect to outrage some. Chose what you want most. Your style, or your advancement. You can always loose change when you get home.
Doubtful. Companies are allowed to set their own rules as far as dress as long as they don't discriminate base on religion, race, etc.

Seriously, only just stop wearing eye make-up and the jewelry. You can wear that stuff when you're not at work.
You hold no legal remedy.

Best counsel is to change the jewelry and eye makeup. That will break open opportunities for advancement.
It's call a glass ceiling and a greatly shallow and superficial hiring manager. It's wrong and highly unprofessional but not against the statute.

Sorry to hear you have to traffic with crappy business politics.
They're in their rights.

When you work for a "company", you're obligated to conform to their standards of appearance no matter what they may be. If you don't resembling it, or can't make yourself tone it down, work somewhere else.
Would it be too simple to right to be heard go a bit easier on the eye makeup and wear smaller amount jewelry.
Its your call, you know what facade they are looking to present to the corporate world and you aren't fitting it. Is it possible a change to a more professional look would abet.
Its been said abundant times that in business you want to look and dress for the job at the even above yours if you want to rise.
Now you can do something about it. Ease up on the makeup and jewelry, see what the women on the rungs above you are wearing and copy it. Save the drama for after work hours.
People not longer figure out the term "discrimination". There is zilch wrong with nouns on the basis of the choices that a creature makes. Discrimination become wrong when it is done on the basis of something that a being cannot readily do anything about, such as skin colour.

If you establish that you *must* look like a Goth when you come to work, afterwards a company has every right to not to extend to you the privelege of a commission when they are looking for a certain fit.
Do you see a trend here surrounded by the answers?

You cannot control your sex, race, ethnicity, etc. Therefore, not hiring you base on those criteria is illegal.

You can control your attire and foundation. Consequently, an employer has a right to set standards on appearance...that are in your control. If you want the job, ramp down the appearance.
what they are recitation you is that the job requires empire to be presentable to the public. a job is not a place for jewelry.conceivably you need to work on your create up a little.remmber you never go and get a second chance to craft a first impression.----retired texas deputy sheriff----

Are women up to the job surrounded by parliament?

Catching the UK TV news I see that a group of women MPs are thinking of a tenet to prosecute males who try to buy sexual favours.
Answers: Perhaps they want to promote the in-house facilities;- surely that would be against the spirit of free trade and is anti competitive!! Perish the thought.

Wake up society. It is the oldest profession. It happens adjectives the times in adjectives relationships: man has other paid and will other pay for it; may be not contained by direct lblblb or $$$ form, but under abundant other ways and banners. It is a fundamental ruling of nature. This notion [of what these MPs trying to do] is so ridiculous, reminds me of John Major and his "Classless Society".

Wake up to shifting time. This is 21st Century.
What happens between a man and a woman(two adults) within a consenting relationship is OK. You can extend it to more than 2 adults, or to same sex situations too, I wouldn't.
Women are just as knowledgeable as men, although particular individuals (male and female) may be smaller number so.

And sexism is wrong whoever is the source.

Perhaps this new directive should cover women who try to buy sexual favours, too.
It's a shame that they banded together as a group of women instead of getting some male member in too (pun noted, but I found it too amusing to bowdlerize out).

I was brought up contained by a holiday town in the English Lake District, and as a optimistic young youngster I was call over by a few of the slimy gits that crawl around in their cars looking for sex. I thought they would be asking for directions (most were). It be only when I get older that I eventually realised what they be after!

These people are pests. They are as fruitless as the pimps that market the women who work for them.

So, although I estimate the law would be a upright idea, I also chew over that having a group of women MPs decoration together to bring it about is a bit disturbing. Have they asked for manly support? And if they have, why are the manly MPs not getting behind this proposal? (let your imagination work on that one)

If the women haven't sought mannish backing; next I have to wonder whether they are truly "up to the job within parliament", or whether they're just a bunch of power-hungry man-hating arch-feminists.
they wont stand a arbitrariness ...that would mean publicity
for lots of pillars of our society and a perfect laugh for the public.
I have an idea that at the end of the light of day everyone can say no! Surely equal thing can apply to women who try to buy sexual favours.
I'm sure it is not only just men. I think it is a bit silly to follow this through and will be a spend in dribs and drabs of tax payers money. The money would be better spent on erradicating wound and gun crime.
Of course women are up to the job surrounded by Parliament...they can make a silk purse out of a sow`s ear only just as well as any man.
So, men are guilty again?

What give or take a few the women that get it for free?

Tax evading bitches I suppose?.
Of course women are up to the living, there are biddable ones and corrupt ones, same as men.

But I question going after anyone who tries to buy sexual favours, as powerfully as going after anyone that offers to supply them. As long as the seller freely does such a entity, and is of sound mind (not forced to by a pimp and not mentally ill), what is the problem? Would be better to legalise prostitution - draw from organised crime out of it, make sure prostitutes capture proper medical attention and exams, plus collect tax. You are not going to take rid of the world's oldest profession, although personally I disaprove of it.

How is custody determined when social services takes the kids?

A woman I know of is most predictable going to lose her kids due to abuse. Kentucky social services is chitchat about giving "indefinate" custody to one of the kids' (divorced) grandparents or other relatives resembling an aunt or uncle.

How will they determine who will get the children? Living conditions, location (as within how close to the mother), financial stability, etc? Can an unmarried, heterosexual, financially stable couple ask for custody? How much will small-town politics help someone who doesn't deserve the kids gain custody? If custody is granted to someone and they move contained by with the mother, will social services re-take the kids?

**Anything** you can report to me related to the above would be appreciated, especially if you can provide links.
Answers: The best interests doctrine will always come into play.

Before the custodial rights can be forever terminated, the courts have to receive involved. At that time, the judge, contained by conjunction with Protective Services, will evaluate the parents -- and determine if, within fact, verbal abuse did occur. . . what type and how severe that rough up was . . . as all right as who the perpetrator was.

They'll determine which of the parents (if either) are more apropriate to watchfulness for the children -- mentally, physically, financially.

If the parents live together, or are both abusive (or provide an inhospitable environment -- such as alcholics, drug abusers . . . ) the court can look outside the parents to grandparents, full-grown siblings, aunts/uncles. . .

If nobody there, is available and appropriate, the courts will look to foster carefulness . . .

at any rate -- the first transition is usually temporary -- upcoming a change by the parents (completion of drug rehab next to so many months verbs . . . completion of anger management and parenting courses beside continued therapy . . . ).
The social services folks try to preserve the children in the household, if practical. They look to the best interests of the children first.

Ultimately, a family court authority will make the decree.

When and how are demmurrers served on plantiffs in an unlimited civil lawsuit?

I am currently going through a unlimited civil lawsuit, My attorney have filed my claim aganist the defendents but they enjoy yet to respond beside an anwser . It is in the finishing week of there deadline to anwser the claim . I am wondering what the possible hold up could be . The with the sole purpose thing I can guess of other than a evasion judgement is possibly a demmurrer , and would also like to know when and how the plantiff is notify if a demmurer has be filed . Robin Gist In Los Angeles
Answers: They enjoy til 5 pm of the close of the courthouse 30 days after you served them and they can serve your lawyer the answer right when they directory it. They don't have to report an answer with personal service. I assume they will profile the answer. Their answer could also have a demurrer or a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgement.
"Demure" is a legally recognized way of saw "So what?" Chances are they are reveiwing trhe suit to see if it has any merit and getting theiir gac ts together.
If they convince the style guru, then the travel case gets thrown out of court.You can be assured the defe3ndant nwill takeall the time he have! Wouldn't you??????????
This is a question for your advocate, but to answer your question, if Dfs don't answer a complaint inside the time limited, Pl files a motion for a defaulting Judgment, copy to the Dfs. If Dfs continue to go wrong to respond, Judgment is entered, but will probably be re-opened if so moved by Dfs. A demurrer is a legitimate "so what?" filed by the Dfs, but is a risky point to do because if the court sees some argument to the complaint, it will enter judgment, and the Dfs cannot re-open, although they can appeal. All pleadings are copied to incongruous counsel at time of filing, including demurrers. Hope this help. Good luck!!!

Why is the eBay feedback system so flawed?

I won an auction from 7253beth on 08-13 and paid like peas in a pod day via PayPal for the item ($42.41) and Priority Mail ($20.00). On 08-28, I e-mailed the retailer and asked where the item be. I received no response but on 09-01 I finally got the item. However, I notice on the postage label the item be not mailed until 08-30 (obviously after he have received my inquiry). I found this very poor business practice and vanished a negative feedback. In return, the vendor left ME refusal feedback. eBay said they are doing nothing just about it. Shouldn't they fix this? I did my part as the buyer, compensated on time and adjectives that. I'm also having a problem beside a seller "thespinnerrack" who I won an auction from and rewarded promptly on 08-08. I received an e-mail on 08-26 that it was sent out Media Mail! I still own yet to receive this item :(. But presently I'm debating on whether to leave gloomy or not because he/she will turn around and leave me denial feedback.
Answers: You decided to donate negative feedback and so did he base on yours. I had a similar experience next to someone who did horrible business with me. He have a significant error in description, wouldn't answer my question and refused a return so I left a denial. He lied in his return denial feedback stating that he offered refund but I gone negative feedback. He tried to acquire me to do mutual withdrawal feedback. I would agree to remove it, and he would return my money. Well, I considered necessary him to refund my money and I would remove it. He did it, and I kept my promise and completed the mutual subtraction feedback request, but he seems to knock about that.

Having negative feedback contained by my opinion is horrible to own on your feedback record. If I am not fully self-satisfied, I may leave a positive of late to avoid a negative. Unfortunately, not copious customers complain so sellers bring back away with it, but if customers complained something like the smallest things nobody would want to sell on ebay.
Back to the point...
You should other communicate with your street trader before going away negative feedback as it is not supposed to be used as communication. In certainty, it is actually one of my rules as an ebay vendor. If you don't communicate with me to try and resolve issues back leaving negative/neutral feedback, you will receive indistinguishable, stating failure to communicate next to me or something along those lines even if you paid promptly. I will other leave feedback as the truth. Fortunately for me I enjoy not had a problem as of nonetheless, but sellers own to protect themselves to a certain point. Sellers enjoy to mail out their items I believe inwardly 30 days of receiving transfer of funds, which I think is fairly a long wait. Waiting a long time is not impartial to you. I have sent adjectives my items within 2 days and plan on keeping it that mode.

Bottom line, communicate next to your seller or be off neutral feedback. He may return favor and it will not dwindling your score. It only won't affect it!\

Good luck!

You should also check out the answer center (feedback) in ebay community.
Just get sure you read their feedback before buying from population.

I think it's cowardly that people will offer you negative feedback, within badness, as they did not provide a good standard of feedback themselves.
flawed okay that would be because man is flawed and only a watertight being can create a flawless world

don't worry though if someone who is truly looking at pos. or neg. feedback they will see both sides of the argument and net their own decision most folks realize one or two neg. feedback's are inevitable. when looking at a neg. feedback you can track through all channel and when they see the seller have numerous neg. they will understand that it be him not you.
Because they don't care.

I have someone avenge the negative feedback I vanished him (late shipping) by claiming I had remunerated with a stolen credit card # and am a Nigerian scammer. I proved to eBay that it wasn't true and that I have paid contained by full, and they refused to remove the bogus comment unless I bring and win a libel accomplishment.

What are yhe legal boundries on the third stirke your out decree for driving in illinois?

i want to know when the ruling went into affect and what it states something like punishment of the law for driving
Answers: 1 . Fine, loss of driving privileges
2. Bigger fine, longer loss of privileges
3. Bigger fine, lasting loss of privileges

Can a judge directive someone to pay allimony for the rest of their lifespan?

I'm of late wondering because my mom has to settle up my dad allimony and someone said it can only be compensated up to 12 months. But i think the intercede said for the rest of my dad's life. So which is true?
Answers: In most states, Judges own the option of order several different types of alimony. Sometime alimony is ordered for a defined period and sometimes it is decree for an indefinite period. If ordered for an "indefinite" interval, the alimony is usually referred to as permanent alimony. Permanent alimony can be modifiable or non-modifiable. If alimony is modifiable, the amount and duration of payoff can be changed based upon change in the parties' circumstances, such as involuntary lessening in the payor's income, or the remarriage of the recepient. Also some states allow modification of alimony if the recepient lives beside someone.

If the alimony aware is non-modifiable, it can't be changed, and represents a vested property right of the payee.

If you examine the Final Judgment of divorce it should indicate what type of alimony was ordered. If it is still amorphous to you and your mother, just confer next to a family legal representative about what it system.
My mother in statute has be receiving alimony payments for almost 20 years.
I believe if your dad remarries she will not own to pay. Check beside your states laws.
Yes, but if he marrys after it stops.Also if he gets a charge he must show the judge how much he make, this is where associates have a brief but are paid beneath the table. If anyone knows he's getting compensated under the table them i subjest he be turned surrounded by but you MUST HAVE PROVE. Also if he's not well next she will be pay for adjectives her life. If you love your mother afterwards keep your eyes and ears unscrew, she'll need your give a hand. good luck to you and your mom.
Yes. It happen all the time.
if he doesn't rem remarry it could be for duration.
The judge could directive alimony payments until the end of the world, if he required to . . . he's the judge.

What is an example of not meeting the requirements of standing contained by a lawsuit?

Answers: Standing means you hold to have a legally recognized interest in the outcome of a lawsuit.

An example would be if my neighbor be injured in a vehicle wreck. He would have standing to sue for his injuries. If he is a minor, his parents would hold standing to sue for his injuries. I would not.
If you're a man and sue a doctor for performing an abortion.

Or you sue the Congress for passing a bill you don't resembling.

Or you sue your employer for discriminating against black people - but you're not a black entity.
Ok, standing means that you own some legal interest contained by the proceedings. Lets say in attendance is a contract between two people. Those two general public have standing to bring a breach of contract lawsuit if the other personage breaches the contract.

On the other hand let say that a creature (a 42 U.S.C. 1983 claim) sues the warden of a fastidious prison because the prison does not have nouns conditioning and the temperature surrounded by the cellblocks reach 105 degree in the summer. A character not in the prison (not an inmate) would not enjoy standing to bring this lawsuit.

I know, lots of people might be thinking, resourcefully my friend or son is in at hand or I just believe surrounded by humane treatment so I DO have an interest. This personage might have an interest but they do not hold a legal interest because, contained by simple terms, they cannot intuitively gain or benefit from the suit.

Standing is often an issue when a entity challenges a administration action.
No standing if you want to capriciously sue someone across town for violating a zoning or license ordinance; only the abutters and those beside a direct interest in the outcome of that armour would have standing. If you would benefit from seeing them budge out of business, then it still isn't "standing" on the zoning or license issue.

However, nearly ANYONE has standing to report an administrative complaint where the imperative has be broken and the agency or commission has one-time to uphold its obligation to protect the taxpayers.

More Questions and Answers:
[2430] - [490] - [1208] - [241] - [776] - [2450] - [1279] - [1979] - [478] - [889] - [1754] - [2180] - [916] - [2245] - [2491] - [2527] - [157] - [1839] - [630] - [332]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: