Law Questions and Answers
If some one was cought beside mushrooms what would be the legal penalty?
If some one was cought near mushrooms what would be the legal penalty. if the person have a clean story. jail time?Answers: Depends where on earth you are.
Some places have 'mandatory minimums`
for controlled substances.
'Someone` requests a lawyer.
if you be caught, get a advocate
if you havent been, dont do them
criminal penalty, in truth, are a roll of the dice
a lay a wager no wise soul takes
I have mushrooms, fried, they go suitable with fried rabbit, mash potatoes and gravy and fresh corn on the cob.
Is it moral for Police to entrap someone with illegitimate porn?
I would like your assessment as to this practice being done by U.S. authorities when it comes to “catching” child predators.I hold seen heaps episodes of the “investigate news” coverage ‘Dateline’ program where a deviant pervert (on behalf of the program) go online to pose as an underage child to then “entice” the other pervert which is a moron pedophiliac.
My grill is this; what does this do to weed out the real pedophiles on the internet?
Isn’t this entrapment, isn’t it evident that a pedophile will go for a child?
Deep down inside I loathe these pedophiles as much as a loathe these pervs who progress online attempting to entrap people gone to right… I mean, how do we know these undercover idiots are not into dubious porn themselves?
Is this moral to the taxpayers is my actual question?
**NOTE, BEFORE SOME TROLLING IDIOT WHO’S PROBABLY INTO KID PORN THEMSELVES ASNWERS BY EVEN REMOTELY ACCUSING ME OF THE UNTHINKABLE, GO F YOURSELF YOU SICK IDIOT, GET A LIFE***
Thank you adjectives.
Answers: It is entrapment. If a private agency employs kids to entice pedophiles , the private agency is lone pimping. As such the agency should be prosecuted.Making money through enticement also is a crime. A deviant can be punished only if he forces some target to submission.Having a deviant personality surrounded by itself is not a crime.
I'm not sure what morality has to do next to it, but it IS legal. How is this different from an undercover cop pretending to be a prostitute or a drug salesperson? When they're trying to get consistent types of people rotten the streets, they have to be creative within order to "capture them in the act" because the crimes involve unmistaken behaviors that people try to do contained by private because it's harder to get caught that mode. It's not like a traffic ruin or armed robbery where it's recurrently done in broad daylight and near several witnesses.
Sure there is the occasional "fruitless cop" who participates within their own illegal actions on the side, but same as anyone else, we just own to hope that they will get caught in the future. I'm pretty sure Dateline has tricked an off-duty cop or two.
Hope this help.
Is it moral for banks to hold money, which in turn, entraps inhabitants with guns to rob those bank?
Is it moral for women to go out minus an armed escort, knowing poor rapists may be tempted to rape later?
Wow, what a line of thought... I have an idea that you're on to something...
Lets make it iffy for people to hold anything that tempts poor criminals to commit crimes.
We can start next to making banks and women not permitted.. then verbs to other illegal things. Gas, cars, houses, kids, the account is endless.
Or, we could kind it legal to do anything you're big ample or well armed satisfactory to get away next to.
America home of the truly free..
Actually, watching some of those shows,
they seem to step deeply carefully around
"Entrapment".
The "kid" never issues an invitation, or
initiates a conference, that's
always moved out up to the 'perv.`
I don't know that it's moral -- but, is it any more immoral than ancestors trying to have sex beside children?
Is it illegal?
Not really -- police are allowed to pretend to get information.
I find it rather appalling that people are human being arrested just for trying to look at some scrumptious flat chest.
Who's in show partiality towards of the lie detector person brought in as a standard portion of the questioning system?
How heaps hours and pounds could have be saved over the years if we could cut to the chase like mad faster? It's proven to be pretty effective. Why doesn't it take used in probing suspects? Is this considered an infringement on human rights - getting folk to tell the truth?Answers: I'd influence bring it in in a minute!
I don't give a damn give or take a few human rights, that is exactly what is wrong next to the present society, the obsession near human rights of terrorists, criminals and suspects. No one cares more or less all their victims.
Lie-detector test are not 100% accurate, but are pretty close. Can certainly be used as corroborative evidence within prosecution.
I don't think it is potent. A practised liar or someone who is cool underneath pressure can outwit a lie detector try-out everytime.
It's made up to be scarier than it is.
they are completely unreliable , easy to cheat by the one question and the questioner can manipulate the check.. so i would say.. no no no no
to oodles people are surrounded by jail or presently have a criminal register because of it
No one who understands how the item works.
It measures the anxiety the average person
feel when lying.
In a high anxiety situation resembling criminal
interrogation, its accuracy is open out to
question, and since the questioner can
control anxiety level easily, it would be
accessible to abuse.
Lie detectors own improved immensely.
Now they own lie detectors that see fry of the blood vessels surrounded by your face.
Your brain involuntarily floods these vessel with blood when you pretend. The questioner is not involved as the computer is in control.
98% significant.
Add a mix of sodium pentathol and ethanol and the accuracy go up to 99.6%.
But it is an infringement of human rights. Everyone is entitled to their own lies.
There are drawbacks to the lie detector conducting tests equipment in that these devices can be bested by a correctly trained person. This money, should the lie detector become mandator, next a lot of member of the criminal underworld are going to train up so as to whip the machine.
I'm not even sure if a tell stories detector test is agreeable in English Law by and English Court.
I am not opposing the lie detector exam as such, but question it's care.
The most accurate method of detection, obviously after the usual finger prints and very soon DNA, is actually carried out by a trained interviewer who know all roughly speaking body language.
For example, when a entity tells a deceit, there will be a flickering see in the lower lid of [I contemplate the left] eye, a twitch. There are other body language signs too, which indicate that a character is telling a deceit.
Here's the latest on the world of lounge detector testing : -
The Polygraph - Detecting Lies and Finding Truth, polygraph sprawl ...The Polygraph - Detecting Lies and Finding Truth, polygraph lie detector carrying out tests uk, polygraph. Association of British Investigators ...
http://www.theabi.org.uk/press/p0307.htm
BBC NEWS | England | Police consider lie detector testsPolygraph pull the wool over your eyes detector test. The trial is said to be more accurate than the ... the technology - the first time it would be available for forces in the UK. ...
http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2...
Airline passenger face recline detector tests - Telegraph
Get the hottest UK news and World communication from the Telegraph. ... through Russia will soon have to embezzle a lie detector testing as part of clean security measures. ...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jht...
From the above, it looks approaching the lie detector exam is going to be very much bit of our lives, but only if we are taken to a police station or possibly some airlines will insist on us taking a test up to that time boarding. Another hour in departure at the airport.
This subsequent site is probably out of date, but may be worth a stop by if only to find out how things be ten years ago concerening the lie detector debate : -
New Law Journal index 1997—disclosure, English directive and the European Convention on Human Rights, 1306 .. Death of the "lie detector"? Brian McConnell, 1134 ...
http://www.new-law-journal.co.uk/Index/i...
This subsequent site looks pretty dated, but deals swith a great deal of UK legal issues including fruitless naming someone on the Internet for which we can now adjectives get done. Well, basically try to avoid names. All those using the label Mc.Kann etc may be in trouble then on if etc...
News A senior court official have rebuffed pains by Class Law, the legal firm, ... A Norfolk solicitor who agreed to distort a lie detector trial in lay down to ...
http://www.unjustis.co.uk/News/News_Mar2...
the Justice system works on the basis of 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt' and it works it is the Duty of adjectives Law enforcement agencies to investigate to a point where they believe this is so and afterwards to charge the perpetrator of the crime leaving it after to the Courts to dispense justice
the Lie detector is Flawed it can be routed and that too has be proved beyond reasonable doubt so the answer is NO
The certainty that it is not 100% accurate would make me be aware of very discomfited about using it to convict, however to use it as a finances of questioning may be adjectives but again as it is not 100% accurate it could cause more problems - the human rights brigade will be contained by there for start stale.
I agree re the cross examination I a short time ago feel that anything explicitly not 100% is too risky - of course if it help to get 100% next I owuld be all for it.
I'm adjectives for it the simple answer really.
Why do you think Marijauna shouldn't be legalized?
Answers: I don't imagine that.
I think it SHOULD be legalized. And, no , I don't smoke the stuff.
Do religious or other civil rights groups have the right to censor free speech or artistic expression?
A while fund, the video game company Capcom be making a game call, Zack and Wiki, about a treasure hunter. However, the prevalent character wasn't newly any treasure hunter, he was also apparently a Muslim.This prompted CAIR (an American-Islamic relations group) to threaten legitimate action against Capcom if they did not remove the mention to the character's relgion. The phrase "allahu akhbar" was removed from the hobby as well as any other referrences of that quality.
The same thing happen to Nintendo when they were making Zelda: The Ocarina of Time. One song surrounded by the game contained an Arabic croon but they were forced to remove it and replace it next to a Gregorian one due to pressure from religious groups.
As you may know Jerry Lewis accidentally uttered the word "******" a couple of days back and he be forced to apologize after GLADD pressured him into doing so. Don Imus did something similar except towards a female black basketball player a while stern.
Answers: You can say what you want contained by this country (with some government limitations), but you may frontage economic consequences.
Immus and Lewis are public info who rely on advertising dollars to support their shows. Lewis also relies on inhabitants willing to donate to his charitable mete out. By blurting out unacceptable epitaphs, these men risked losing the support they need surrounded by order to be successful.
With the video games, the companies who manufactured the games be probably more fearful of losing sales, and have bad press against their companies, than any physical threat of a lawsuit.
Thus, they could have kept the Muslem reference, however, at the risk of losing sales.
This isn't really censorship but self-censorship. If you engender a game or movie or something that shows ethnic group in a doomed to failure light, those populace will complain. You have to opt then whether or not it's worth it to construct them angry. Usually you are looking for the biggest possible audience, so you will change the objects by yourself, your own decision.
Groups that are traditionally the victims of nouns or slurs are the most able to do this, for reason that are obvious, and I imagine even more fair. Sometimes I have an idea that these groups are wrong, but a lot of times writers or directors or team game designers didn't mean to disrespect them and are only too festive to change their stuff or to apologize.
Jerry Lewis wasn't -forced- to apologize. Nobody held a gun to his lead or threatened to fire him or anything. He CHOSE to apologize because refusing to apologize would enjoy hurt his reputation more than to just generate an unfortunate remark and after stick by it. He didn't say f****t manifestly to piss of gay people.
Years ago, black ancestors protested their kids reading Huckleberry Finn in college. I thought H.F was an incredible book! The in one piece theme of the book is how slavery be wrong, how a boy has a conflict between his religious tuition that supports slavery and his conscience that says it's wrong. So why did blacks complain? Because it have the 'n word' in it. But that's how those talked contained by those days! In fact the use of that word by religious, decent, upstanding Southern people shows how slavery (and see in general) be seen within the south. So I thought that was pretty silly. But typically the n-word just make people foolish these days, and usually that's the complete purpose of using it!
anyone can sue anyone else for anything. None of the people be "forced" to settle or apologize. However, many folks are raise by their mama's to be polite and not cause unnecessary distress to others. Very regularly, people approaching that will apologize rather than fracas and assert (correctly) that they have the right to disrespect whomever they will.
Statistic's on 2255's in the us courts?
2255's are inmate pleadings, resembling for instance " ineffective assistance of counsel" Where might I find how many 2255's are file every year in the court system of the US. How plentiful win and how many lose their cases?Answers: If you are looking for compiled statistics on federal court cases, the federal judiciary publishes them on the net in two places. The sanctioned federal court website (www.uscourts.gov) has numerous statistical reports available free of charge. The reports are available for viewing at http://www.uscourts.gov/library/statisti...
In ornament, the PACER Service Center hosts a number of federal valise statistical reports on the U.S. Party/Case Index. These reports include the F-2, F-5a, and the Civil Justice Reform Act Reports. The historical F-2 reports show the total business and nonbusiness bankruptcy filings for multiple years by chapter, district and circuit. The F-5a provides a summary of the number of business and non-business ruin petitions filed, by chapter of the ruin code, for a twelve month period. It displays totals by county, as very well as each circuit and judicial district. The Civil Justice Reform Act Reports provide summary and detailed information on impending motions, bench trials, three-year-old cases, bankruptcy appeals, and Social Security appeal cases. These files will be updated as investigational data are released by the Administrative Office. The reports are available lower than the menu option 'Statistical Reports' on the U.S. Party/Case Index. The reports hosted on the U.S. Party/Case Index are available for 8 cents per page.
Are real nunchucks risky to own? How would someone obtain them?
Topic...I've needed nunchucks all my enthusiasm and I'm just starting to look into it. Are they illegitimate to have? Obviously, you can't use them as a weapon unless forced into self-defense but I don't know anything going on for it. Where would you buy real nunchucks (non foam)? I've checked ebay and adjectives I can find are foam practice ones. Anyone have expertise about nunchucks?Answers: They are available but you could be breaking the tenet depending on which state you live in. I found a trellis site that sells them (they also put up for sale switchblades) but it's up to you to find out what your restrictions are.
Here is one example:
http://www.eknifeworks.com/webapp/eComme...
They probably won't ship to a restricted state.
No, they're not illegal to own.
You can gain them here: http://www.karatedepot.com/nunchaku.html
I've gotten throwing stars from there. It's a reliable website.
so unyielding to say...
two pieces of wood and a secure.
Is a pastor from Georga liscenced to marry a couple in TN?
Answers: No one can marry a couple rightfully, one!~!
There is a distinct difference between church and state. You do not need a license to practice religion surrounded by a state, as religion has no boundaries. The church give you your authority, not the state. That marriage would be legalized.
Class Action Lawsuit Against Movie Theater?
Hello. I was wondering hypothetically could one sue a movie theater if they purchased a movie ticket for a movie at 5:00 and the movie starts at 5:20 because of adjectives the previews. Is the movie ticket a contract between the theater and the movie goer and since the movie didn't start on time, is this breaking the contract? Is here any liability against the theater for fraud? In addition, isn't near ethical issues in showing the movie twenty minutes behind because of the theater showing commercials? If anyone has any insight or comments it would much appreciated, gratefulness!Answers: I don't think you enjoy anything there. If everyone get sued because something didn't start exactly on time near would be chaos. Mass transit, any sporting event, etc. Nothing starts exactly on the dot. As far as the trailers shown before the movie, if one doesn't close to them, one doesn't have to keep watch on them.
Movie theatres rely on the income from those advertisments. Without them a movie ticket would cost more.
Besides, if you have ever be to court, it rarely starts in good time. It would be tough to find sympathy there, if they are in recent times as bad.
This is why the courts are clogged next to trash non-cases.
The Oath in Court?
Does anyone know how the Truth oath go. When you go to court the "Thruth and nil but the truth"etc.Answers: There are hundreds of variations. My local court uses this: do you solemnly swear or affirm that the nouns you are about to contribute in the thing now future before this court will be the truth, the together truth and nothng but the truth? I have never see a bible used in a courtroom except contained by the movies.
Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth
the in one piece truth
and nothing but the truth
so relief your God.
As this is being recite
you right hand is on the bible
Do you hereby swear or affirm that the nouns you are about to supply in this event is the truth, the whole truth, and nil but the truth, so help you God?
More Questions and Answers:
[2327] - [222] - [1890] - [1221] - [2278] - [870] - [460] - [1975] - [14] - [712] - [2] - [788] - [2321] - [1430] - [501] - [1708] - [951] - [1308] - [645] - [1316]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: