Law Questions and Answers
Is it illegal to .?
I work for a colossal company. We have different associates in different places throughout "companies" we contract. There is one other women surrounded by my office. There is also a couple other populace there who are over myself and her. One of those other family is very demeaning towards us and have a tendency to tell to us both like we are stupid, sometimes using profanity. I will not tolerate it, but the other soul is much older than me, resembling 60 and she gets so upset and is alarmed to stand up for herself. Now I am getting complaints from other people adage that they are going to file class endeavour for the same things. by and large the porfanity and name calling, Do they certainly have a lawsuit!!!! I am so stressed, I stand up for myself so it doesnt bother me. I look at the entity and tell them, "are you cussing at me?" DO the other workforce have a suit??Answers: Yes, they of course do. You can join contained by if you like. If any complaint at adjectives was given just about this person and he be asked to stop, then anyone he cusses at after man warned can sue him (or your company for not firing him) because it creates a hostile working environment.
I be involved in a sexual stalking case. When I finally complained nearly the guy, I found out I was merely going to be the icing on the cake. He'd been complained nearly by every woman in his department and every woman who came surrounded by as reps. (I was a rep)
It's no big promise, and you don't have to be involved if you don't want to. But if the company know he was acting this bearing and didn't fire him when he wouldn't stop, then they are liable for any suit anyone wishes to file base on his behavior.
If it is to the point where family feel threatened and you are powerless to do your job effectively at times...yes you can sue him.
It would be a better perception to just drag his *** out put a bet on and beat him near the hose though. At least thats how we did it within my day.
Yes come together in!
You lift that twit to court as a whole...
This is call harrassment in the work place. You are supposed to profile a complaint with your supervisor.The first entry you are supposed to do is ask the people doing this to stop. If they do not later you file a harrassment charge. This is crooked. About the only piece that will happen is they will be talk to. If they don't stop they could be fired. I don't think it's possible to in reality file suit against them. However they could lose their chore.
You can sue anyone for anything,Yes they have a lawsuit they probably will prevail,the courts will establish
Not necessarily, unless the other employees own complained to your Human Resources Dept. You can try sue the individual
but are unlikely ever be able to collect, you own to sue the company for failure to provide a irritation free environment (intimidation also fits); But if the company is unaware and have not had the destiny to correct this your chances of triumphant a law suit is greatly reduced.
If at hand is a class action suit file, by all ability be a part of it, you are entitled to nouns.
How and where do you turn contained by a psychologist for ethics violation?
Answers: Write to the licensing board of the state surrounded by which the psychologist practices. You can find this through the government website for the state, probably.
Do you own video or audio or ? to back up the charge/s? You inevitability to be sure it is so and is solid. This kind of stuff will follow you thoughout your life span. Be it right or be it wrong.
Are red reverse lights legal contained by NJ?
Answers: I don't know. But I would recommend against it. The asking of this question seem to indicate that someone (you, or a friend) is 'losing sight of the goal'. Backup lights are to put on alert people that you are support up. WHITE is the color that tells us this. RED is not the color that tell us this. To make them red - probably for 'fashion' reason - is not a good move... or a smart one. :p Later, dudes.
Not credible. Most are required to be white. Then again, I have never see a law that states you must hold them at all.
Anyone interested in creating a mens board?
http://suggestions.yahoo.com/?prop=answe...Then can you dance to this link
type "sexual characteristics and mens issues"
then vote for it
Add a comment as all right please
Answers: Done... and I added a link asking for others to look into it :D
Could U.S. space colonies end up becoming territory or even states,like on the moon or Mars influence?
Or even on large astroids resembling Ceres too.Answers: Yes, I believe it's possible it will work out that way. Of course, beside the massive costs and technology needed it's possible that these colonies could become cooperative efforts. The children would never know any other lifestyle and would glibly identify with respectively other as opposed to abstract accepted wisdom of nations approaching the USA or Russia.
The US constitution does allow for the creation of new states. Article 4, Section 3 read: New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no untried State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, in need the Consent of the Legislature of the States concerned as well as of Congress.
Assuming such colonies come into existence, I am not aware of any intention they could not become states.
Have the Portuguese Police played a very cute hobby with the McCanns?
They've be suspects from day one and their phone conversations/e mail have be intercepted. The 'Tapas Nine' have be watched too. The British police are working impressively closely with them on adjectives aspects of the case. Murat may enjoy even been a decoy to? I mull over the Portuguese have be very clever indeed and are building a strong grip as we speak.Answers: I think they are sick of the publicity pointing to the reality that they haven't solved the case so they are immediately pointing the finger of blame at the McCanns.I would also suggest that they have offered to allow them to bestow the country without charges or if they remain perchance charge them with negligence.
"They've been suspects from daytime one and their phone conversations/e mails hold been intercepted" Then surley they would of found something and arrested them?
Sounds close to they have NO Strong baggage
ye maybe but it probably would hold leaked out by immediately ,
im not sure if they did it , maybe , I don`t know not ?
Please explain what is clever about the portuguese police. Is it that they tried to get hold of an innocent woman to confess to a crime she didnt commit by offering a reduced sentence that so impresses you? Do you condone this sort of manner?
I dont think that the portuguese police are trying to fit the McCanns up at adjectives.
Why do people feel it so unbeliveable that these parents would kill their child.. It happen all the time only because they are both doctors it does not make them a better soul or parent than anyone else.
The portuguese police obviously own enough evidence to charge them near being suspects contained by Maddies disapperence,
Firstly lets not forget they departed them 3 babies all alone . So YES it is their responsibility she went missing, so they hold got to live near that for the rest of their lives.
But until the portuguese police decide to reveal adjectives the evidence they have against the mcCanns not a soul will really know.
but the blood in the room & dna surrounded by car is not looking hugely good for them
I suspect the smear struggle spilled over to the Portuguese media, this give reporters an excuse to ask implicating question of the McCanns and in turn the Portuguese police hold made Kate answer some questions below their law which requires her to be an "arguida". In certainty Portuguese law make people suspects simply to interview them.This is absolutely essential otherwise certain question cannot be asked. A Portuguese "suspect" therefore is incredibly different to a UK suspect, do NOT confuse this.
This is a police ploy within which the police offer a short sentence proverb "it was an accident" . The police after hope the McCanns will "confess" to get a wispy sentence, an olive line cop monkey trick, nil more.
There is not a single word of evidence or a single molecule of forensic evidence against the McCanns----otherwise they WOULD ALREADY BE CHARGED
Is it possible to move while being on Conditional Release?
I am on Conditional release and want to move to a city surrounded by the same state is that possible and what should i do?Answers: You requirement to get consent from the court before you can move.
No, it is unachievable. You do this, and a warrant for your arrest will be issued. You will be sent back to put inside to wait for your arraignment or finish out the sentence. Conditional scheme just that. There are correct "conditions" you need to join in lay down to stay out of jail.
If someone constantly makes coarse gestures at you, can you sue such a individual in the UK or Ireland?
(And if so, what can be the judgment of such a civil action?)Answers: On what grounds would you sue them? Rude gesture are not considered civil disobedience or a public nuisance. If they constantly get in the way of you in the course of your regular life you would still enjoy a problem prosecuting them unless it became a difficulty to you or to the public.
People really hate self ignored, so cold-shoulder them. If you make any sort of attempt at litigation, you are giving them the attention they crave.
i dont know
but you could quit one a baby
Are you referring to that personage who is constantly directing people to his "f**k off" correlation?
If so, you have to freshly accept them for who they are: untrained bores, who can't come up with their own words.
Hardly worth any of your strength.
I really have no view about the permissible options- I do know that any gesture I enjoy ever received is returned with blowing them a kiss and wave. Only need to do it once. Totally blows them away.
Good luck. God bless. Love you!
Where - Ireland or the UK - or do you want a comparative analysis of both jurisdiction regarding the equivalent of U.S. stalking law? A pretty tall writ, actually. Set out the W5s - who what where on earth when why and how much/often. The more fax, the easier it is to reply. Also, whether you are a protected minority is likely to sort a difference in lingo of civil dmgs AND whether the gestures crop up in the workplace.
don't spend your money and time on this loser. People like them procure off on knowing they are intimdating you / scare you. Blow a kiss as someone suggests or just forget about this person. Once they realise they are not getting a criticism from you they will move onto some other poor person.
Grow up. Not nice but live next to it. Perhaps you even deserved it
The legal answer is, as you might suppose,: it depends.
If the conduct of the person within question amounted to aggravation, then you could.
The relevant statute is the Prevention of Harassment Act 1997.
The Act states that a human being must not pursue a course of conduct (i.e more than two instances) which amounts to harassment of another, and which they know or ought to know amounts to stalking of the other.
Harassment is deliberately widely defined within the Act:
The person whose course of conduct is contained by question, ought to know that it amounts to or involves hounding of another if a reasonable creature in possession of alike information would think the course of conduct amounted to or involved bullying of the other.
In other words, the activilty complained of amounts to harassment below the Act, if most people would reflect it was irritation.
If harassment is proved; the being harassed is entitled to damages and/or an injunction to prevent re-occurance.
In your instance, the answer is, it incontestably could - and probably would - amount to harassment.
You would hold to be able to prove it which would be fairly hard contained by the first place.
I dont think something similar to that could get as far as court and you without a doubt wouldnt be able to sue them, they would more than potential just win a warning and possibly a fine at worst.
I turn 16 this month,i am engaged,my mom stopped contact,is in that anyway I can fight that?And How?
I enjoy been vivaciously engaged for over 7 monthes and my mom granted to stop contact and broke my heart. We decided to stay together.W own known respectively other for almost 3 years. please help us to stay together.Is near anyway we can fight it?And how can we scuffle it?Thank you for your help.Answers: Well, depending on your resources you could try and become emancipated, but even if you did own the support and the money a court is not going to be sympathetic to a 16 year old whose mother is trying to stop her from seeing her fiance. So I would try a different approach. Could you provide some details? How frail is your boyfriend? How did she "stop contact"? As in officially prevent you from seeing your significant other or just articulate you cant see them? Why did she do this? What were you doing that cause her to make this judgment after 3 years? If you answered these questions those could provide more help.
Has any one got a despoliation notice they did not fathom out?
Im a new soul on this system, I made a picture from avatar, posted it and asked If anyone could see it, and basically looked-for to know if it was going to work. The subsequent thing I know is I get a violation concentration. I don't understand. What did I do?Answers: There seem to be no rhyme or reason to the betrayal notices.
I'm of late surprised, when I don't receive one. The Y!A bunch don't seem to know the apology either. They in recent times say to read their guidelines.
What be the picture you made from avatar and how offensive be it?
You'll never find out even you contact Y/A. They never, as far as I know, answer questions beside specifics.
I have have only a few violation. One, when I reread it, I realized be not a proper answer. The others I didn't so requested info from Y/A and all I received be an electronic form letter.
But all the same, people can ask some of the most outrageous and cheap questions. Go digit?
You did nothing wrong, it be probably just some report-happy troll.
If you ever capture a violation awareness, and you feel it is unmerited, then simply respond vertebrae to Yahoo! and you just may bring your points back (maybe).
This have happened to me also. Don't fret too much roughly speaking people resembling that- just slight them and have fun! ;o)
Welcome to Yahoo! Answers and virtuous luck with adjectives the trolls!
I think I get reported once because someone disagreed with my (political) evaluation. It's not much to fret about but you won't bring any vindication from YA. You can report anyone for anything and they don't check. They just violate you. Sucks but it isn't that imjportant!
More Questions and Answers:
[1869] - [207] - [311] - [257] - [112] - [2195] - [711] - [2133] - [1589] - [2200] - [1819] - [1283] - [2287] - [232] - [1269] - [125] - [2570] - [57] - [2074] - [1714]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: