Law Questions and Answers

Resigned with 2 weeks become aware of, employer threatens to sue!?

I resigned with 2 weeks identify to my employer, but my employer is threatening to sue me in civil court, because he claims that I needed to endow with him more notice than that [because I am an essential member of staff according to him, the reason for resignation be poor working condition such as improper lighting, smoking indoors, and desperate office politics; adjectives of which I had complaint almost to him (and other director) ]. My two weeks are not over yet, and he have suffered no damage what-so-ever, and instead of looking for a replacement for me and this other woman who quit the massively next light of day, all he is doing is wasting his time looking for a advocate. I have already offered to co-operate next to him to the extent allowable [under new employment contract, and my own time constraints] for the time of 3 months to help contained by transition. I have at most minuscule one week of unclaimed vacation contained by this year. And I have solely taken 2 weeks off contained by past 6 years. And one of the director have taken 5 weeks off this year alone.
Answers: Unless you signed a non-compete agreement that your fresh employment will violate, then they own no grounds for anything.
Also, if you signed another type of employment contract, which stated specifically that you must give a confident period of spot before end employment, then you enjoy to abide by that contract. Otherwise, they again, have no standing.
If they are going to stroke like as*es something like the whole situation, and you already own the new opening without need a reference from them, I'd describe to go stick it and wouldn't sustain them at all olden your two weeks.
Now, of course, specifically a personal decision. But my premonition is that the employer is trying to buy himself as much time as he wants (not needs) to hire a replacement. In doing so, he's manipulate you and using coercion tactics.
If you've be there that long, he may construe he'll never find a replacement as good as you (which he probably won't to inaugurate with, but over time they'll improve). So instead of looking for a latest one and getting started training immediately, he's going to sit backbone and jerk your secure.
I'd forget them and move on.
They don't own a case for anything, unless you signed something that bound you to that mission for a certain amount of time, specified a trustworthy amount of notice to be given, or a non-compete and you're violate that with the exotic job.
He doesn't hold a case -
In most states you are not even required to dispense a notice, it's newly common courtesy.
It sounds close to you have done everything the right road, and if he does decide to verbs with the suit, he will be the one who looks foolish.
You do not own a very nice boss and you hold been extremely conscientious surrounded by work and in offering to help out train a replacement.

I do think that he have a leg to stand on unless there is a written contract that you are within some ways being violated. I would contact your local or state labor department or an attorney to check near them in directive to be absolutely confident.

If you do not have to work more than two weeks I would threaten to sue him on the contravention of your rights. You can tell him that he is trying to force you into slavery and "involuntary servitude" which is barred by our Constitution unless you need him for a guidance.
DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT! Document everything that you are complaining about, everything that happen, everything that is said, near dates, times, places, who said it, who be present.

You only entail to give him two weeks concentration, and really, you don't have to distribute any notice at adjectives. Two weeks notice is not a authenticity so much as a favour. No one can formulate you work somewhere you don't want to be. You have free choice within this matter. It is YOUR natural life.

Let him sue you. He'll be laughed out of court. But breed sure you document EVERYTHING that goes on. Be organized. If you do step to court this will reflect very well on you. Keep a copy of your letter of resignation, any documentation, e-mails from your boss etc. etc.

Good luck!
All of this comes down to your current contract. How much time off time you have or own not used within the past may be moot if your company does not own a policay that allows it to accumulate and be carried over from one year to the subsequent. Similarly, the director's amount of time off have no bearing on you...he may enjoy a different contract.

As for notice..if you be aware that under the topical contract you were to allow up to three months transition time, than giving two weeks interest may indeed be in infringement. As you do not discuss what you do, it is also possible that your contract stipulates you must give adequate time for a replacement to be found if you are in obverse an essential employee (the permanent status itself makes me come up with your job is somehow coupled to governmet, health guardianship or civic agencies). The first thing you stipulation to do is get a copy of your current contract from HR is you do not own one. If there is no HR, ask your supervisor to show it to you and reveiw the expressions. Pay close attention to how the terms can be artificial by the reason for termination...it is not unusual for nearby to be different guidelines for issues involving a relocation because of spouse, ailment or other "involuntary" terminations. If your research bears out what you are man told, you will have to suck it up and follow the expressions and work until those terms are met. If surrounded by fact nearby are no such terms, put everything you hold learned within writing, along with a time vein of what has occured contained by the office (and solely items concerning how things have proceeded since giving your concentration..no mention of anything else) and send a copy to your director, director of HR and your boss's boss, along next to a letter explaining the threats.
If you own a contract you signed this would govern the notice time - although frankly at my place where we do enjoy this in our contracts they are not followed and across the world 2 weeks is the practice - because taking someone to court on this is expensive, time consuming and counter productive. It generally take years to get something minor to civil court

I instinctively would leave after 2 weeks and not look fund (note you will not get a apposite reference, but would feasible not anyways). I would document the work place issues as described above for your files.

One other piece of advice - when you exit cease All communications next to your boss or any of your co-workers.

Advice needed on identity theft?

I am currently suffering as a martyr of indentity theft. I enjoy a debt collector harassing me about a debt that I do not owe. They claim that I used to live surrounded by London (where the alleged debt offence occured), and that I own now moved to my current address surrounded by Leicester.

However, I have lived surrounded by Leicester my entire life. They do not come across to listen, however. Does anyone have any guidance on what I should do or who i should speak to? Thanks.
Answers: So you are a victim of false charge of debt arising from someone who claim to be you.

They should produce evidence that you did live in London as alleged by your debt collector, unless they do enjoy evidence or proof of these document(s) they couldn't harassed or intimidate you to wage imaginary debt which you without a doubt donot owe them. Since you claim you live in Leicester adjectives your life, you own to show them too that you have proof of these charitable.

As for your case, you definitely have to do zilch since they falsely accuse you of something which you never did. They should be the one filing charges if any surrounded by the local court and ask you to appear in those sessions. What for any summon from the court, but if they insist on bothering you at home next you are the one who should file charges on them for disturbing your duration and keep them pre-occupied.
Change your touchtone phone number. You will find that the police will not help you. "It is a civil matter".

What do you do when Someone filed my hasband as human being deceased and presently he has an estate to settle?

Now spouse credit report states he is lifeless and he is alive.
Answers: Contact credit bureau; common name get mixed up adjectives the tiem. THEy can tell you what he wants to do to fix. Unless it is your husband who has be filed; afterwards you need to contact the probate court where on earth the estate was file
Yes some smart A clown did that to me said I was departed while I was over sea on a holiday visiting ethnic group. I was furious have to prove to my bank and to social collateral and the tax organization of who I was etc. It be like I died and go to hell, I had to catch a letter from my doctor, employer, family and close friends to prove I be myself to a bunch of idiot (Lawyers) who froze all my accounts.and property. Then have the hide unfolding me to get a advocate to prove who I was. Your both are surrounded by for a lot of laughs ( no pun intended) your husband and you both have to prove he is still alive. Instead of getting mad I get even after I finished work, I brought food and wine also a tv a blow up mattress and sleeping bag and go for a weekend sleep over in the lawyer office. When the lawyer threatened to call the police to own me removed, I told him to call Ghost Busters or Oda May Brown (Woopie Goldberg) because the police will imagine he's crazy telling them a phantasm was "haunting" him. I turned the volume up massively loud on the tv to drown out his winging. There receptionist merely couldn't stop laughing while the Munsters theme be playing loudly and the all of the other lawyer came out to complain. When they'd asked what be going on I told them I'm registered as being lifeless and all my accounts be frozen and I was told to budge get a legal representative to prove I was alive. Without spending a cent my accounts be all unfrozen in the hour. I still don't know to this day who or why this happen, but I sure let these lawyer all know I be alive.

If a non costested divorce was done contained by Georgia where would the contemt papers be file at if...?

the mother and child moved to Alabama but the father still resides in Georgia contained by the county where the divorce be filed. He is going to directory contept of court on her for not letting him see the child on his weekends that were agreed to within the origional divorce papers. So would the dad file contained by Georgia or would he have to report in Alabama since the child have lived there for over 6 months immediately?
Answers: UNTIL ALL PARTIES to the divorce have moved from the originate jurisdiction, all adjectives and subsequent actions are to be file in the court or productive jurisdiction.

The UCCJA does not allow change of jurisdiction base on the Child's home state until all party have vanished the original jurisdiction.

One cross-examine I have is did the mother hold the permission of the court to remove the child from the jurisdiction?
I am pretty sue he can directory in GA. State law vary, but she probably didn't enjoy permission from the court to run the child to a new state. If he have custody in most cases, the other parent can't merely up and move without court go-ahead.

He might even be able to win custody. He will need a attorney.
He would have to initiate any behaviour in Georgia. You cannot enjoy the matter proceeding within two jurisdictions. Or, the event in Georgia would enjoy to be discontinued and then a topical action taken within Alabama.

Depending on the final order, she may or may not hold been entitled to move. Is she basically all out denying access or is it more that it is simply to hard to own access?
All actions are taken contained by the State they originated surrounded by. Where the divorce was finalized. My wife still have to go through Florida Child Support for problems near her ex who lives in Tenn and we in a minute live in AR.

AT&T won't give me my rebate for signing up for DSL, what should I do?

They a moment ago keep describing me to call backbone in a couple of weeks if I don't draw from it. But that was 6 months ago.
Answers: Ask for a supervisor. and keeping going up the cuff of command till you get a YES! It should be credited to your subsequent bill, unless the rebate is not paid out until the conclude of your commitment.
call them detail those *** clowns your planning on suing them
now stir do it make me proud!
THREATEN TO TAKE IT TO COURT, IF IF YOU WONT
if you hold already spoken w/a supervisor, i would try one more time to win connected w/a supervisors supervisor and tell them you will be file a complaint w/the better business bureau AND you will be filing a complaint near the attorney general and do it. its pretty trouble-free. you can get the phone numbers within the book or look them up online. good luck.

If you wake up contained by the middle of the night and in attendance is an intruder in your house, should the statute allow you to.

.kill them?
Answers: Some states do allow that, mostly southern and western.
If the soul tries to harm you.

Most states are more approaching Pfo's description.
In Texas the law say if you tell them to receive out and they do not get out them you are defending your self. As long as you discern that your life is individual threatened you can pull the trigger. But be sure to shoot them within the chest and not the back. Shotting them contained by the chest is self defense. Shooting them in the vertebrae is manslaughter. Back implies they be attempting to leave i guess.

In college at Texas Tech where on earth i went a guy walk into some guys house wasted. the guy told him to acquire out. he didnt. So he shot him and that was that. I give attention to thats messed up. if you cant get a drunk out of your house next to out shooting them then you didnt try.
In the UK, you own the right to self-defence, using reasonable force within all the circumstances. Self security includes defending yourself, your property, and other people and their property as capably.

So, in the situation you describe, the force would hold to be reasonable contained by the circumstances of someone just woken up, surrounded by the dark, contained by their own home, possibly with children / other vulnerbale ethnic group in the house, not knowing whether the soul was armed, and human being frightened.

Quite a lot of force would as a consequence probably be reasonable, but you can't shift and shoot them in the rear while they run away, for example. That would not be reasonable to keep yourself and your property.

To give another example, if someone spits at you, it is not probable force in self-defence to flay them to a pulp, or kill them.
I muse you are trying to work out what Mr Brown (Prime Minister) said at the Party Conference and what he meant.

Use of okay force is allowed and would be acceptable contained by Court.

Does Mr Brown now propose to allow the champion of his property to use what is thought to be reasonable force is the interrogate? After all, within the middle of the night, do you expect the intruder to be carrying a gun, a run through or any other weapon? If so, fine. You know, or do you?
Then the question to Mr Brown is, 'Define the grounds that any householder can use, not knowing what the intruder have in the furtherance of the indignation of burglary',
I'm tiny and semi disabled. Taking care not to hurt an intruder too weakly is a luxury only big strong general public have. I have need of to make sure that whoever it is go down in one be in motion.

But, if they are running away and no longer a threat, chasing them down to kill them is going a bit too far.
You are allowed to look after yourself. Common Law act and Section 3 Criminal Law conduct yourself allows you to defend youself, others, property and prevention of crime. In Sec. 3 CLA, it states that Force can be used when it is:

Reasonable surrounded by the circumstances
An absolute necessity
Minimal amount indispensable
Proportionate to the seriousness of the case

So if the entity is holding 2 guns and has a spear in his or her pocket, and threatens you beside them, then if you kill them in guard, you should be OK, although still get a righteous laywer!

Can I get arrested for carrying a stick in my backpack, for self protection?

I consider that if a policeman discovered the knife he would definetley find it suspicious and arrest me (especially if I am within a public place such as a supermarket, a bar, at a concert). Or would I attain a fine?
Answers: Umm Let me think...i bet you will.
traveler,

Some states and cities are 'free-er' than others. I would check the local law where you live.

What's it adjectives coming to when we must question whether it's allowed to carry a stick?
yes because it's illegal to transport a knife below a certain length, but the cop can't merely search you lacking establishing cause I:e your drunk, emaciated, etc.but they can always enjoy some excuse ready. also, what moral is a weapon in your pack when something happen? by the time you get it out your butt's be kicked. I would say lose the blade and swot some practical self defense. REAL wrestling, and not the kind surrounded by WWF is a very pious self defense art! i covered it in college on my composition for two semesters so I know. talk near your folks about joining the wrestling squad and if you dont make it see more or less a martial arts courts. you'll develop self confidence along next to defense. keeping a level lead is the most important point in a survival situation. peace!

PS do you know any soldiers that haven't shipped out all the same? ask them if they would help you swot how to handle yourself. sub aqua corps McMapp is EXCELLENT.but all the branches enjoy something.
Depends on the size of the knife. If the blade is big plenty, you could be charged with carrying a concealed weapon on your individual (your backpack IS on your person).

Also, if you have ample time to rummage in your backpack for a rumble...you own enough time to RUN AWAY.
ya r u stupid?, given the tautness of terrrist threats that would be a bad impression

Eviction question for California?

If you own let a relative live surrounded by your garage for several years as an act of charity, beside no money changing hand between you, can they be asked to leave, or made to start out, without going through the entire court eviction process?
Any details you care to add on -- such as how short eviction under this circumstance can be, if it is contained by fact requisite -- will be appreciated.
Answers: This person have become your tenant at sufferance, which means legitimately you can terminate their residence by giving 30 days notice. However, if they don't move and you forcibly put them contained by the street, you are committing a crime. If they won't go voluntarily, you entail to go to court to evict them.
Okay since living within a garage is illegal, the regulation will generally not intervene minus first giving you a hard time for renting out an unmistakably illegal space.

Since it is not a official arrangement you can just simply ask them to start out and give a valid time frame to do so.
it depends if the garage is an illegal part, the state may be able to come contained by and eject the renter, but the landlord would be liable for moving costs

Can you sue health insurance companies for untimely clearance and damages to your credit?

I have a medical bill that of late got rewarded from over a year ago. It took the insurance company a long time to pay it. The medical bill showed up on my credit as a delinquent story. Is there any recourse for this.
Answers: The FIRST piece I would do is change insurance companies.

A reputable company pays pretty like lightning, unless your application for payment be in error (meaning you've tried to bilk the system). For instance - the final medical claim paid to my house was trained in just about 72 hours after the incident - no questions asked.

Second - depending on the program, you may enjoy been caught surrounded by a "which insurance covers the bill" condition. This can happen when quantity is to be paid by employment-related coverage and chunk is through personal insurance coverage. Usually the personal coverage takes longer to catch squared away ... but a year is far too long, even for this. Something else to watch for is that at hand are no conditions on which providers you use - or which services are covered by the premium.

Lastly - communicate with adjectives parties (medical provider, creditor, and insurance company) to see why the deferral occurred. Stay on them every light of day until you get an answer ... it'll be a misery for you, but more of a pain for them. Also see if the creditor will affect change to the report, based on the findings from your conversations. Make the initial communication by note - but call them to agree to them know a written request is coming. Keep a record of the written responses (if you receive any) during the process.

You MAY own a case, but simply after you've got the tabloid trail.
I don't know for sure but I would have to articulate probably not, the laws are pretty much surrounded by favor of the insurance companies.

In my opinion insurance amounts to legalized blackmail, you payment and pay and afterwards when you need it it's other "you're not covered for that", and if you are covered you still have to hire a attorney to achieve them to honor the contract.

Minor Drove our car stale the Road--in TN?

My daughter (she is 16) was within Tennessee and was driving my coup¨¦ (We are from MS, she is insured to drive it as well, though). She allowed one of her guy friends, who is 16 as economically and lives in Arizona, to drive my coup¨¦, and he ran it rotten the road and into a forrest going about 70 or 80 mph going around a curve she told me (It be still drivable however, and the cops never came and file anything, It was give or take a few 2am and they were heading pay for to our house we had rented within TN). There is about $3000 worth of mess up done to my car, and I be wondering if the boy driving my car would be held responsible for the damages? Oh, and we don't want to turn it into our Insurance because if we do they will probably drop us (the sports car was within a wreck in 2006).
Thanks
Answers: The cost of recovering this from the kid is probably prohibitive, since it's interstate. His liability is unsettled, since he drove the car next to the permission of an authorized driver.

Novel suggestion: Hold your daughter responsible for what happen to the car while within her charge. Paying you back the $3,000 will drill her the importance of respecting others' property, while abiding you the cost of attorney fees.
You can file a small claims grip, however your daughter may be responsible in division or in full as she granted consent to an unliscnese, un insured driver to operate a motor vehicle.

More Questions and Answers:
[1112] - [2360] - [2215] - [871] - [1640] - [1894] - [2208] - [119] - [1605] - [2513] - [181] - [169] - [1409] - [2542] - [1900] - [2135] - [1039] - [735] - [2364] - [921]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: