Law Questions and Answers

My boss tells me i be overpaid and they want the money back,what do i do?

I've be working for a company for over 4 years and have put up beside a lot of crap by the manager. There had be so many times when they cut the "extra pay" i could hold gotten. (bringing in strange employees,hourly rate etc.) I also work stale commission and ranking out of all the cashiers that work for the company.
So yesterday my boss take me in the department and asks me if i had notice that i had be overpaid for the past 2 months!!! I said the checks be bigger than usual, but nothing seem wrong since i was putting contained by 45 hours a week, and compared them with other force that had almost indistinguishable pay. So he tell me that i owe the company $1300!!! I was similar to WHAT??? He says economically you can either hold 25$ taken out of each check to repay us, and if you desire to quit we -probably- won't go after you.
What am i supposed to do??? I doubt that they have been overpaying me, and if they be, i shouldn't be paying for their mistakes, or should, i? Help someone!
Answers: This is a really low act from your employer especially working for them for over four years. It shows to me that have no respect for you what so ever. I know working adjectives those hours each week leaves you totally exhausted also you do the hours so you can rate your bills and cost of living. Lawyers do cost a lot and would filch time to sort this mess made by your pay organization. Rather risking loosing all of your holiday income and job. Tell your boss you will fully agree to the $25 compensate back singular after you receive every copy of your of all your web and gross payslips and time sheets for the last four years. Also request for a statement surrounded by writing of this payment error. Stating if this error have been made how abundant other errors have be made with your wages surrounded by your four years working for there company.
Tell your boss beside the wages they claimed you have received by error you also would own been tax at a higher excise rate. You need this to pass by all of this information onto IRS levy office of "There" clear error which "You" have already fully be taxed at a superior rate. Also you want every receipt of these weekly $25 wage repayments and a full copy of your hourly rate rate which, your legally entitled to request your employer to supply adjectives of this to you. Once you have adjectives of this Call your local tax organization and tell them especially the stripe " If you quit we wont go after you!" (Sounds unbelievably something isn't right) I promise you will fully receive back every $25 money you made from the IRS. I don't know if you have a Department of Trades and Industry or a Work Place Ombudsman where on earth you live if you do contact them too, It would be worth $25 a week to see the IRS going through all in that records and doing a full duty check also the work place Ombudsman checking if all workforce in the company are getting the right rate of income and entitlements. Have a glass of wine smile, relax and capture some sleep don't let this effect your existence remember it's only a post also they made this mistake not you.
Never burn your bridges and let me know how you shift !
First request proof. If you claimed you were underpaid, I am sure they would want proof.

Second if you owe them income them back. It is their error but it is not your money.
If you do not recompense the monies back and you know that you received more than you be allowed, you can be sued for Illegal conversion and from your post, it seems you know the money wasn't yours.

Pay it support and move on.
Consulte a attorney.

I would also recommend finding a new employment. It looks like you've be having problems for a long while at the company. Why would you want to stay?

Did he enunciate how the error was made? Are you remunerated hourly or salary? If it is hourly, can you prove the hours? For me it doesn't event if I work 45 or 50 hours a week, my pay is one and the same. It's expected that get my work done.
Elysialaw have it right. Demand proof of the over payments broken down by hours and wage. The part give or take a few your "quitting and they won't go after you" make me wonder if they want you to quit? It sounds like they required to fire you, but had no physical reason and know it. This whole piece sounds a bit fishy. If by any chance they are right in the region of the overpayment, work out a schedule that you muse is fair and can live next to.

Association Without Members QUestion?

What is the largest recently founded or expanded bias federation the American Association of Retired Persons, National Right to Life Committee, Christian Coalition, or National Audubon Society ?
Answers: AARP, by a very substantial margin.

If the Michigan Government shuts down.?

and you cant get your licence plates and drivers licence renued then what are you suppost to do if yours wants to be reununed?? Do you just drive near the outdated 1's or do you not drive at all??
Answers: LOL I wouldn't verbs about it. ... but if it happen, maybe the National Guard would step surrounded by. License plates would be one of my lesser worries.

Written subsequently:
Wow.. I thought this was a banter until I read the news today. LOL anyways..
I can read between the lines your concern now, but if any situation should arise w/the plates, you hold a very valid plea to present if the dmv closes, so I say drive.
Believe me, they will hang on to those things that generate revenue open. What will shut down will be trash pickup, any road repair (as little as it was), and other services.

And yes, they will adjectives still get remunerated for being greedy politicians.

Think nearly it tho. The ONLY thing the elected representatives is needed for is police and fire department. Things as trivial as plates and tags hold no effect on anything and might as well be issued by a private company (your sports car insurance company).
No State Government has ever closed down, unless confident civil servants go on strike and near is probabable legislature that prohibit Government employees from striking. You are going to verbs yourself to death asking such a give somebody the third degree.

Should we make smoking unsanctioned? (please provide good reason why or why not)?

Answers: smoking is illegal surrounded by several places now. It is improper to smoke in Washington state.
No. How much more senate regulation do you want in your go? Don't laws already enjoy enough control over every aspect of your natural life?

You know, you only hold to look at the Halstead Act, and see what happened after that. Prohibition is a BAD IDEA!
No, because regardless of who profits bad of tobacco it all boils down to personal choice.

There is plenty of information available to the public to prevent individuals from smoking.

Target the same group of folks the tobacco industries target, the youth. You start there and you can curb race from even starting.
i don't think we should produce it illegal, general public can choose to slowly kill themselves if they want to.
however, i do resembling the idea of not allowing smoking within restaurants and stuff- they say that secondhand smoke is worse for you than in reality smoking a cigarette...so i'd rather not be harmed because of someone's stupid outcome to be a smoker.
well it does burn out our bodys from the inside out...alarm causes so abundant things to happen surrounded by our lives..remember that fear is a great motivater used by everyone for tons different reasons newly like georges time of war .now when adjectives your fears and all citizens fears are over and completly rewarded ...this is when you will get your country posterior and the citizens will be free and you as citizens will be at peace...can you feel the medium fear on you ..breath and whip a walk...set yourself free it is one and only mind control...just close to other bad behaviour...watch the medium hype.hype ..hype.cut out the hype drinks.their all hype and promoted hype .hype fun anyone
No of late for the kids under 21 afterwards it should be
NO!!! I don't drink or do drugs. I have to do something for my stress.
Do you reflect on the Government is that stupid to make smoking forbidden,never they make BILLIONS of dollars from other peoples misery...ps.I am a smoker.
if they made tabbaco unlawful people would only just break the law to smoke. I be watching a documantary on this prison and they made tabbaco illegal surrounded by this prison and it became more profitable to smuggle it into young offenders` institution and sell it surrounded by jail than weed!!!! And also the establishment makes too much money rotten of it to ever ban it. Tabbaco companies reward taxes too!
No. The government can't forever be parenting adults who construct their own choices. Everyone knows the consequences of smoking nonetheless they smoke, so be it. My mother and I quit cold turkey in 1996 when a close friend died from lung cancer contained by great pain. I guess it is up to the individual whether or not they verbs to smoke knowing the risks, but I do feel smoking should be debarred in public places.
As for making smoking iffy, that would be wrong and an exercise in futility; liquor be banned contained by the twenties and people still drank; drugs are off the record now nonetheless people are still addict, etc merely outlawing something does nothing to stop it.
It would not solely be an immoral feat of aggression against smokers to ban smoking, but would also be completely inane (as idiotic as Alcohol or Drug Prohibition). Prohibitionism make the prohibited activity more dicey (alcohol became extremely uncertain during the 20s when it was made surrounded by bathtubs), increases the frequency of that activity (everybody beside half a brain know that most underage drinkers and drug addicts merely do it because it is illegal), and promotes organized crime (everybody know that Prohibition led to the rise of Al Capone and the rest of the mafia and that Drug Prohibition prolongs the existence of organized crime).

We should not build smoking illegal, even though it is absolutely stupid to smoke. To do so would be a complete disaster.
We should not.
Because millions of irate smokers,
(me included), would lynch every single
legislator who voted for it, and their families,
and their pets.

Come to suggest of it, it might just provide
a long overdue housecleaning.
logically we should make it wrong. in some places race have already! Why? because it can squirrel away lives. it will make teens to not start. and it's a short time ago plain Bad!!

Is it illegal to be in motion out and leave a wash machine whilst it is within use?

Somewhere this is lodged in my mind as human being true and having suffered numerous floods from a reckless neighbour I need to run more serious action. I would appreciate any of your experiences or experience of the law here. Thank you.
Answers: Not illicit, clearly.
However, if you have suffered twist from floods, and the neighbour still refuses to desist from an amusement that causes wound to your property, that's a different matter.
That would indubitably count as causing a bane of your existence,negligence, and quite possibly as hurtful damage. Speak to a solicitor, or your local CAB.
erm. this is legitimate as far as I know, however people approaching GreenPeace might have a different panorama on the subject.
however i also may suggest that if this flood is through no fault of your own later claim on your neighbours insurance.
Dont think so.
I know a guy who get 25 to life for going away his washing mechanism unattended. Apparently the machine unplugged itself jump out the window slaughter his neighbour. The machine be never found.
Not at all
Just to be on the secure side, I'd egt home contents insurance. ;-D
I never heard almost that one! Kept my washing electrical device on when going out (If i had to) In Scotland and very soon do it in Ireland. Why should it be against the law? Or maybe be you thinking of laundering money LOL
It's the first i've hear of it, I do it all the time.
I don't reason there is a Washing Machine Act.

It's not against the LAW to check out of your washing electrical device unattended. I do it regular, as I do the oven, fridge, freezer & dishwasher.

Imagine how many empire would be up in court if we be arrested for law breaking over a wash machine.

Get some sense of truth will you.
personally i wont take off the house if ANY electrical appliance is on-TV.Washing machine,DVD,fridge,cental heat etc
Due to my safety first attitude i enjoy lost my job,loved ones and friends, but at least my home is not detrimental.
It depends on whether the action is possible or not. If someone leaves a washing electrical device running and is aware that, for whatever motivation, it may not work properly and overflow & flood, they would be negligent if they moved out it running in their absenteeism. If they were to disappear it running knowing it would flood and did not care more or less it, that would constitute gross negligence.
I hope not! I would never get out of the laundry room if it be!

I suggest you file a written complaint beside the apartment manager and bill them for everything that have been ruined. Also point out how much time it is costing you.

Also, point out how they might be getting rot and mold (which will create the apartments uninhabitable) in the walls and floor due the frequent wetting--make it within their best interest to solve the problem.

Also point out that, if not solved, this repeating problem might force you to move out.

If your neighbor is doing something that could prejudice the apartment building and harassing the neighbors (even though no incident is intentional, the repeatedness indicates that they are aware of the problem but not making any changes), which could eventually lead to their eviction. The be in charge of might be having other problems and might want to evict them but simply not have mediocre legal reason. You might be able to back by providing this information. If you notify the manager urgently each time it happen, they can inspect and confirm the floods, document them, and eventually solve the problem. Because of laws protecting accurate tenants from impossible landlords, though, it will take some time and lots of documentation to prove it's the tenant, not the proprietor, who's the problem.
Certainly not.
If this were the bag, leaving a radio or box set on with a fire self caused by a short circuit would also be unfair.
However, leaving a smoking cigarette that cause a fire would probably negate any claim for damage to an Insurance Claim.

Statute of limitations in saloon accident surrounded by Florida?

There was a vehicle accident surrounded by 2003 in which my friend drove a sports car listed within my parents name that I be the primary driver of. She was citited for the luck but the other party have no car insurance/valid drivers license/long arrest story of DUI, etc. Is there a statute of limitations for what the drunk guy can come after us?
Answers: within Florida, there are the following statues of limitations:

Personal Injury: 4 years
Libel, slander: 2 years
Injury to personal property: 4 years
Product/manufacturer liability: 4 years

Florida also has rules of discovery, statutes of repose, and a toll on the statute of limitations.

Rules of discovery: Because it is not other possible to determine if or when you have be injured until after, this rule permits a suit to be file within a unshakable time period after an injury is discovered.

Statutes of repose: This statute puts an extended time term on when a suit can be filed, preventing claims from human being filed after a set spell of time.

Tolling the statute: In certain instances, the statute of limitations can be tolled, or stopped, for a set time extent.
The Florida statute of limitations for personal injury is four (4) years. So is the statute of limitations for injury to personal property. The statute of limitations starts running at the time the claim accrues, which is usually the date of the fluke.

If he discovered the injury later, the claim could accrue latter than the date of the accident.

I am not an attorney and this is not lawful advice.

http://www.expertlaw.com/library/limitat...

Inheritance waiting...?

My wife and I are currently waiting on an inheritance. The paperwork started in the year 2001 and we still own recieved nothing. Everytime we contact the attorney we get a runarond and lied to. We've be told numerous times that the inheritance would arrive at the end of the month.

I'm tired of getting lied to by the legal representative. Does anyone think i can purloin legal act against them? I know an inheritance can take a while, but 6 years? I dont conjecture the lawyer is doing their assignment and passing us by. We've be too relaxed now i necessitate to take appointments. Any info would be great!

Thanks!
Answers: Go talk to another attorney - let them know you want to bring back your inheritance money, AND sue the pants sour of the crooked lawyer that have been screw around with you.

Destroy that useless piece of crap.

Personally, I would've gotten some inhabitants together a long time before presently, and gone down to the lawyers bureau and calmly explained that they own exactly 30 days to either gain your money, or to admit that they are incompetent, and compensation any money that you have salaried them this far.

Have one of the guys you bring with you save looking around nervously and reaching into his jacket.

Actually, I would probably newly punch him in the herald until he was incapable of speech.
I give somebody a lift it that there is a will and that it is contained by probate. Contact the probate judge beside your complaints.

Also keep a well thought-out record to the mobile calls and write correspondence to the lawyer for the "record". Send them near a return receipt. Be tremendously specific with the complaints encyclopaedia the dates and what you be told. Also list the date and times of non-returned calls.
DilG be ALMOST correct. You cannot contact the probate judge. However, you CAN purchase a copy of the probate file and own it reviewed by a third-party probate attorney for any sign of inpropriety.

The file is public journal therefore, if you know where on earth the deceased died, contact the probate clerk and ask how much a copy of the record will cost.

Then go from near.

The other suggestions are not worth considering because they are ignorant.
Six years? That's style too long.

If the lawyer have repeatedly told you that you would get the funds "by the failure of the month," but sends you nothing, afterwards my educated guess is that the attorney has taken some of the estate for his own use, and doesn't own the money to cut you a check.

Before hiring an attorney, what I would personally do is first comfirm that probate have been completed, if you haven't already done so. You can dance to the probate court and see if an order of final distribution have been issued.

Next, contact the advocate, and tell him that you suspect that he have used the estate for improper purposes, and if he continues to grant you the runaround, you will report your suspicions to the state bar association. (The pole takes allegations of tasteless use of client funds VERY seriously. It is one of the top reasons that attorneys are suspended or disbarred.) If probate have indeed been completed, consequently I guarantee you will receive your money in a event of days.

Deferred Adjudication and Texas Gun Laws?

Okay, my husband got busted next to less than 1 gram of cocaine (a felony) backbone in 1999 when he be barely 18 years older and recieved Deferred Adjudication. He got sour of his probation over 3 years ago and did not have to do any time. He be never convicted of anything and other than this, he have never gotten into any trouble with the regulation. He can get an Order of Non-Discloser within about another year and a partly. I know that he can not own a gun but I want one for my home for self defense and to protect my family. I own no criminal record at adjectives, not even a traffic ticket. Would I be albe to get a gun even though my husband have a little bit of a chronological? What is the processof getting a gun here in Texas? I am wanting any a 22 or a 25.
Answers: If your husband did deferred adjudication at hand is no legal restriction to him owning a firearm. State and Federal Law prohibits anyone convicted of a felony from possessing a firearm. So, you are undamaging.

As to the weapon, I would not get anything smaller than a .38 for personal defense. Also, cart the Texas concealed carry class, even if you don't intend to take at all times, basically to cover yourself against any future liability issues.
Go to your state's or county website for handgun law and requiremements..
I know you don't want to hear this but...my 2nd husband (we were together 15 years) shot and kill himself (yes, committed suicide) with a .22 he have bought for "protection"..I strongly suggest you NOT get a gun.if you enjoy children in the home, I REALLY insist on against it...
THINK long and hard past you make this edict...take some gun sanctuary classes if you feel you must own a gun.
I will NEVER allow another gun in my home...ever...
I suggest something bigger than a 25, if you do enjoy to shoot somebody with that you'll merely make them cracked. Try a 9mm and go to a reach (or in Texas perchance just out contained by an open spot) and practice next to it. I'm not very big or strong but next to a little practice I be able to shoot straight.

Pedestrains always own the right of way...?

Yesterday afternoon, my aunt, who is disabled, get hit by a car. She be crossing under the street lamp where she's supposed to, at the time she started to cross, she have the green light, however, she walk with a person on foot and was incompetent to make it adjectives the way to the other side, a motor, comes flying around the corner and hit her, she now have a crushed walker, and a broken shoulder along next to other cuts and bruises. My question is, can she sue them for at lowest her medical expenses? I understand the vehicle had the green wishy-washy, but if you clearly see someone attempting to make it across the street you can't basically hit them to get them out of the track! Any advice is appreciated.
Answers: You can't merely run over what is in your channel -- that's both law and logic.

Even if she have entered the cross stroll on a red light (althought a mitigating factor for the driver and contributory negligience on her part) it still does not lawfully give him the right to run her over!

When we drive we enjoy the legal requisite to keep our vehicle undamagingly under control at adjectives times and be aware of any and all potential obstacle in our towpath.

I am not a sue happy character - but in this covering the idiot deserves it!
Sure she can sue them. She may get greatly of money. She may have have the right-of-way. But the fact is, adjectives the laws, adjectives the potential legal penalty to the offending driver, all the anguish the other driver may touch, did not prevent your Aunt from getting plowed over.

Life is like that.

When it get right down to the nitty gritty, you can have adjectives the laws and penalty for offenders you want, adjectives the government controls you can envision, you still need to pocket care of and view out for yourself. I don't know of a single law that ever eliminate a problem.

Hope your Aunt will be OK.
Pedestrians always hold the right of way, even if they're wrong (jaywalking, though that would be a factor and would count for the driver). In this travel case the driver is completely in the wrong. She enter the crosswalk legally but due to infirmity could not clear the crosswalk formerly the light changed.

The tenet is quite clear on this. She is due adjectives medical expenses and pain and suffering as economically.
The driver is at fault for failing to relinquish and a ticket should have be issued. Their mandatory liability insurance will cover this. If for some reason a ticket be not issued and the insurance company refuses to recompense, then the solitary recourse is a law suit. However, it may be fairly hard to prove surrounded by this case (but not if a ticket be issued).

Could someone explain to me what's the deal near the Jena 6?

I'm sorry i really don't see what all the fuss is more or less.
Answers: I do not understand any. A bunch of kids broke the law and the nation have taken it as another opportunity to divide itself.
It seems that some black students looked-for to sit under the tree where on earth the white students usually sit. Several days later someone hung some nooses from the tree as a alarm to the black students - and the white kids got a slap on the wrist.

Days subsequent a fight broke out (6 black students and one white student who have allegedly been contained by the noose incident) and the black students be charged w/ attempted murder. There's more detail but that's the gist.

My opinion is that the town leaders took a "boys will be boys" attitude to the rope, and then come down hard on the retaliation. I reckon a 6 on 1 fight is more than a slap on the wrist - but attempted murder is a bit overkill. Had the town admit that the noose be more than a prank, and punished those boys, this never would have escalated.
I agree, They commited a crime and they should adopt the punishment. At first when one of them was senetced to 10 years, i thought that be a little deep. These kids aren't Rosa Parks or anything thier just some thug kids.

/hello here
maybe these y/a users could abet you understand
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
My perception is Jena, Louisiana, may be a "hotbed" of cultural tension.

The institution obviously have areas where individual ethnic background "hang out" surrounded by specific areas.

It's alleged that one or some from one group used a hangmans noose sour a branch of a tree to scare the other group from sitting hard by the tree. One boy apparently engaged several others surrounded by a confrontation stating the tree area belonged to his group.

The following time, six boys assaulted the first boy. A complaint was file and the six boys committing the assault were arrested.

The district attorney attempted to treat the offense as an attempted murder base upon the injuries received by the first boy.

The outcry was base upon the racial issue and the charges as an fully developed.

My opinion is this...if the boys are juveniles consequently they should be handled contained by juvenile court. However, in most states fierce crimes can include juveniles being handle in mature court.

Was the issue racial...I don`t know so...but the basic issue is that of an assault by six boys against one. Ethnicity should not be considered when charges be filed.

If the offender were black or white...that's not the issue...the issue is somebody committed an offense!
Check here (past the green box) to see the FULL story.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/jen...

More Questions and Answers:
[651] - [1780] - [1555] - [2553] - [1673] - [1725] - [2387] - [487] - [12] - [2132] - [1493] - [1154] - [587] - [1322] - [1888] - [1220] - [612] - [1234] - [1678] - [1459]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: