Law Questions and Answers
I do not care around piracy, do you?
Movie stars and musicians make satisfactory money as it is, and they dont use there profits adequate to help better the country. I know some do but not plenty. I dont think it should be illicit to download free music and watch movies online. Maybe nearby could be a five year rule, where for five years after a release near could be those laws but after that it newly seems stupid...I dont know, its adjectives a loead of bullsh*t if you ask me.Answers: One of the ethics of the USA is that in attendance is a fair bazaar - people are compensated for their thinking and talents - their work is protected by a set of law.
We also have a long tradition of piracy: Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin and revolutionized industry surrounded by this country. His invention created a new boom within the economy. But his impression was so simple that most ethnic group built their own cotton gins and Eli never made much money for his wonderful machine. Years latter some states banded together and voted to award Eli with a considerable sum of money (A bit over $100,000 - which was worth a million subsidise then).
At least some body required to make things right for Eli.
Ben Franklin also have many practical inventions but he believed his design belonged to the public and never made money on his inventions.
The RIAA is an oligopoly that exists only because the system makes ridiculous law to punish people who threaten their control of the industry: independent radio, record sharing, and artists actually one able to own their own work.
No, I don't diligence about piracy. Heck, I'd probably still be contained by a band making music today if it wasn't for the industry and the agency it treats its artists, its fans, and its customers.
My songs are free on the network - but if you sign a contract for a label to income you, you're not even allowed to share your own work. And they wonder why sales are down. And they wonder why every clean act looks approaching Britney Spears and sounds like #*&%. And they wonder why they can't find accurate musicians or anyone to buy the music...
WOW!
You mean to update me you know what every singer & actor does beside their money? Frankly, I think pirates should do prison time. Stealing is stealing folks!
You guys disgust me
weeder
UPDATE: Great, so you donate and volunteer, but you're still a pickpocket. I can tell by your comments that you own NEVER created something yourself (song, film, etc) or you would thought about this a great deal. These people, especially musicians, put everything they own into their music just to hold a bunch a losers come along and rip them off. So if suddenly you become rich I can come to your house and steal your stuff since you brand name enough money anyway? You're an idiot.
My computer would be softwareless if it weren't for piracy
It's not stealing, it's piracy. It sounds so much cooler.
You are wrong on so tons levels...
You desire that they earn enough ? [and it is ''their'' profit].
That which they do is entertainment- not brain surgery nor
rocket science. How are their pains compensated ? By
someone buying them, just resembling a painting or a Lexus.
If it's the amount of money that they earn that offend you,
YOU earn that much and donate it to Free The Trees or whatever. ONLY later can you point your finger and say
" I help this much, have you ?"
Can she refuse me?
My mother have just passed away. I am the executer of her will. My mother have lived with me for relatively some time, however my mother had a existence estate at a property that my sister owned. That is were adjectives her belongings are. Now my sister; the one who has the remainder interest surrounded by the property will not let me collect and collect moms stuff. Mom just passed away and she won't even agree to us in to carry clothing for her. She is saying that moms duration estate died with her and that she is the sole owner. She have also told me not to return to the property that she will have adjectives of my mothers belonging put in storage and once I record the will for probate then and individual would she allow me take the belongings. I know she presently owns the property but can she take possession of the property that quick without letting us remove the contents. I thought as executor that I be able to crease my mothers belonging even though property has passed to her. She have already changed the locks and put no trespassing signs upAnswers: wow, money will corrupt anyone won't it?
I feel bleak for you. There has to be something you can do. I suggest you contact a legal representative.
Well technically, until the Letters of Probate issue you don't really have a permitted entitlement to handle the belongings any.
Apply for probate asap.
I'm sure someone can give you a better answer, but I'll try.
I believe it really depends on what the will say. Was everything left to your sister, or only the property? Were the clothing left to anyone within particular? If they be left to you consequently you have a right to safe and sound them. If she will not let you on the property to do so or is unwilling to unite you at another location then you should consider contacting the authorities. If the articles be not left directly to you, your sister, and no mention of them be made in the will consequently legally your sister probably does hold the right to keep you from obtain them. If this is the case a lawsuit will enjoy to be filed within order to attempt getting some of your mother's belongings. If everything be left to your sister surrounded by the will you're out of luck.
As there be a will there have to be a lawyer. You should sermon to him/her about this.
It does come across a little out of the ordinary though that your mother put you in charge of her will, and within turn her legacy, and on the other hand gave, seemingly, everything to your sister. No offense.
I would consider wipe my hands at the intact situation.
Wow. Your sister won't even allow you to have clothes to bury the two of your's mother contained by? Disgraceful what people become when they see opportunity like that.
File for probate, get hold of a lawyer and go and get your mothers' estate/everything else in lay down.
sounds like a bitter family connections
however i truly believe your sister is within her legally recognized rites
I know you are both are grieving over the loss of your mother. Well this is how your sister is coping with the loss. Leave her alone to complete her grieving , I believe she wont be close to this for very long. Don't get hold of lawyers involved next to this because it will place you both further apart. Besides loosing your mother you also will be loosing your sister as well. Do you presume your sister will destroy your mothers things, I don't focus so. This is the time to remember your mother not to be fighting your sister. Have you ever hear the term silence is golden. Avoid any contact next to your sister , I know it will be hard but do it. She will eventually make the acquaintance of you back near open arms. Just similar to you she also really truly loved her mother and she will not wanting to loose her sister as well. Remember ancestors grieve in different ways as ogreish and as horrible as she may nouns to us on how she is treating this situation, this is her way of crying for the loss of your mother. Just grant yourselves sometime.
Sensible is correct. The life estate ONLY covers the home.
As for the property, it is not on the other hand clear if you have file probate. I suspect not. If not, then do so on the double then once the Letters Testimentary are issued, contact an attorney for the estate and database an illegal detainer against the sister.
She is holding hostage assets of the estate which she know she cannot do legally.
What exactly is an 'Order' thats issued by a judge of a court?
I just this minute gained 'custody' of my 15 year weak brother. My grandmother who resides in Baton Rouge, La orginally have legal custody, but when he come to live with me within Arkansas, I was given an 'Order' placing him within my custody. Do I really have custody of him, or does my grandmother? By the passageway, she never signed any papers in regard to custody being given to me. However, she did write a handwritten dispatch saying she be no longer able to filch care of him.Answers: The Order issued stipulates the ruling of the Judge during your brother's custody audible range. If it was consensual, wherein your grandmother agreed to relinquish her rights as his allowed custodian, and the Office of Child Protection and the Judge saw it was surrounded by the best interest of your brother to put him in your custody, afterwards he/she rendered a decision surrounded by your favor, placing your brother in your custody, thus by canon issuing the binding Order. Your grandmother did not have to sign any documents. Laws pertaining to minor children are different. They do not hold hearings within open court, where on earth everyone can attend, there is usually a crust worker that oversees the interest of your brother, and the case is hear in any the Judge's Chambers, or behind a closed door. An Order is essentially your Judgment contained by this case.
An command is the law of the topography.
Congrats Dad!
This is not a question for Yahoo Answers -- you call for to have a attorney -- someone familiar beside the laws of Arkansas and Louisiana -- look at the demand and make sure adjectives formalities were complied next to (e.g., giving notice to your grandmother and the mixed government agencies).
And please chat to a real, licensed attorney in YOUR state -- not a permissible secretary or a paralegal or someone random from YA. They cannot furnish you legal direction -- it is illegal contained by California, and I'm pretty certain contained by all 50 states.
Call beside any problem, Anytime:
Girls and Boys Town National Hotline
Phone: 1-8OO-448-3000
Email: Hotline@girlsandboystown.org
They have the decriminalized professionals to
Help you and your brother with this, and
back is just a telephone away. <}:-})
The judge's order is court behaviour which makes you the guardian of your brother (instead of Grandma). Grandma doesn't hold the power to make you the child's guardian...she could enjoy only given you power of attorney, which doesn't other suffice when you need it to.
This empower you to do the traditional parent-type legal stuff, from signing his enclosed space trip forms to approving brain surgery if he has an coincidence. If he says "you are not the boss of me," show him the judge's decree. You are indeed the boss of him.
Your grandma's approval isn't the key here...it's the judge's. You're the "parent" in a minute. Good luck!
If smoking is so bad why does the political affairs...?
1. Allow it to be sold?2. Not fine the growers and sellers?
3, Levy adjectives kinds of fines on individual users?
4. Accept money from tobacco companies?
Answers: If cigarettes be a new invention, they would be outlawed exceedingly quickly. As it is, smoking tobacco have been around hundreds of years and have ingrained itself into our culture. Many local economies depend on tobacco and would drip apart without it. For heaps people, smoking tobacco is module of their lifestyle, and that is their right as long as they are not infringing on other relations. As far as fining the users, I'm not aware of any "fines," but there are taxes. Most of the taxes I can come up with of are voter approved (California's Prop 10 and Prop 99 are two examples). In addition, the growers and seller pay taxes on their profits. Also, I'm not aware of the affairs of state accepting money from the tobacco companies, other than the taxes they collect. I know for reliable the tobacco industry contributes to campaigns and have a powerful lobby, but that's not unique, several industries do that.
1& 2 are answered by 3 & 4
cheers!
There is a lot of "rates dollars" on them tobacco products.
That's why! <}:-})
You asked this like 5 minutes ago. It's adjectives about money. They enjoy no reason to stop any, death is protected by the constitution anyway.
It is approaching Prohibition, it would never work.
It's all for the $$$$$, why else do you ruminate they would add addictives.
so far its one industry that hasn't gone overseas or outsourcing to a foreign country.
Taxes are huge
personal freedom is something they draw from accused of attacking day by day without going after smoking
smoking, charge for smokers, etc. is big business.
Because it isn't the government's job to police what an individual ingests. Are you suggesting the administration should tell you what you can put away, how much you can eat and what you can drink? Where you can dance and what you can do?
Are you mad?
1) The system knows complete prohibition does not work. This would produce a complete underground black market for the product.
2) The senate makes billions contained by tax revenue stale of the sale of tobacco products.
3) In the United States we enjoy freedom. This freedom includes the freedom to do dumb things as long as they do not hurt others. Of course, the government out law some drugs but most of those are extremely addictive & mind altering and cause a difficulty to society as a whole. Despite the medium hysteria, there is still no clear evidence that second appendage smoke causes any strength risk. There simply is no proof. If it did there would be an entire social group dying of cancer right now. I know my father smoked around me constantly growing up and I hold no health affects from it nor do any of my siblings.
Your point is solid, the administration should out law tobacco if it is such a horrible substance cause so much harm to our society. The certainty is, it is merely a political item which some politicians use to gain power and push their agendas. Tobacco is not going to become illegal so the affairs of state should simply back past its sell-by date and let this official industry alone.
What product or company will the government want to demonize subsequent? Maybe your industry..
Partially because they're wedded to the revenue.
Partially because in attendance are enough smokers to
spawn them pay at the poles for the unpopular handling.
Partially because they don't want to widen the
already disastrous, expensive and unsuccessful
"time of war on drugs".
And mostly, because smoking really isn't as bad
as they would own you believe, and they're afraid
that the required debate would bring this out.
oh i thought u were discussion about smoking weed :D
Has anyone had a DUI...?
have anyone who's gotten a DUI gone through the moderate counseling classes? (not the early intervention classes) If so... what should one expect??Answers: I've never have one, but know two young ancestors who lost their lives to drunk drivers. One of them was going to be a bride a week past her murder.
Hopefully the person taking this class will bring a hands on look at what their drinking is not solely doing to them, but how it puts other people's loved ones in difficulty.
I'm not sure what you mean by "moderate counseling" classes. If the "precipitate intervention" is the same as what I'm thinking of, Driver Intervention, that's the 3 hours of daylight weekend program. If you're referred on to a counseling center, it depends on their assessment of you and where you're at near your use. The typical outpatient counseling programs here, they can be different within different counties and states, are Standard Outpatient treatment (1x wk for 12 wks) and IOP plus Aftercare treatment (3x wk for 6 wks and then 1x wk for 12 wks). However, to be precise in my county of residence and as I enjoy said, it depends on what the treatment agency does in your county of residence.
RA 9288 new born screening ruling?
Answers: http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/... shows the law.
I think im bout to travel to jail (please help)?
okay i get a ticket and didn't show up to court. i certainly didn't do it calculated, i just thought today be the 27th. so, my grandmom says that they will enjoy a warrant out for me. is this true? i hope not. what if i go to reimburse the ticket today, will they arrest me? i hope not!!!Answers: I did the same entity...I called the town where on earth I got the ticket...they told me to transport the money (with a late fee), I did...they newly told me to try not to get pulled over for a few days because as soon as they get the money the warrant would be canceled...they are only concerned give or take a few getting the money...it cost them to keep you surrounded by jail..abundantly more than a $140 ticket...speeding tickets are the major path some places suplement their budgets...hince the speed trap towns...the ticket in grill I got pulled over for doing 58 contained by a 45, he pulled me over near a Speed Limit Sign that said 55...what happen was that it be 55 then turned to 45 for a mile, afterwards back to 55...explicitly how they get you...dumb hick town...it be Thanksgiving Day 04 and I was going to my parent's house for dinner...I be in the Army at the time and it be the first Thanksgiving I was competent to go to within 5 years...the cop sucked...and after he gave me the ticket, I told him so (I in actuality told him to pick up a weapon and toe the line, not be some shitty cop surrounded by a hick town) ...=)
Mate for an offense like that your looking at 20 years conceivably even death row.
Good luck
They will probably not arrest you if you be in motion to the courthouse to make arrangements to settle, they would rather own the money than you.
There will be a warrant though, and it will show up on a warrant search if you're ever pulled over.
Oh yea, it will cost more very soon that a warrant has be issued, bring along an extra $100 or so.
xdous, you're making the guy cry. :)))))
relax, man. go immediately to the court. if it's too late, travel and pay the ticket and you'll be fine.
You're around to go away and formulate big rocks into little rocks.and in proclaim to get you here they send Dog the Bounty Hunter after you..
Relax. No worries - christen the courts, tell them what happen and make arrangements to run care of it. It happen - we all engineer mistakes. You might have a behind schedule fee, but I seriously doubt they'd transport ya to the big house. Grandma is right though - they will issue a warrant (maybe Grandma's trying to scare you into mortal a little more responsible - GO GRAMMY!).
Go clear the ticket today. You will probably be given instructions on how to see the judge right away to clutch care of your missed court date, but it is hugely unlikely that they will put you in penal complex when you quickly and voluntarily turn yourself surrounded by on a minor traffic ticket.
It may cost you a $$$ penalty though.
Call the court ASAP and explain that you missed your court date due to a horrible mistake. See if they can reschedule you. If you don't ring ASAP, you risk a bench warrant...if there isn't one already.
Are illegal downloads harmful??
Guys i am a download junkie.i use utorrent and other p2ps and also rapidshare for downloading files :) . i download around 50 gb a month like movies, softwares and games.i even downloaded vista.is it not detrimental for me to continue adjectives thse downloads ?? mind you guys that i download all costly music and softwares and games.i even host a blogspot beside full of download links :D. is it safe after adjectives?? wont i be punished.please guys give a positive answer.coz i am really afraid very soon.i use pirated vista which has be cracked.please give reply soon friends.Answers: Eventually you will be served beside a law suit for copyright infringement. Then if you don't money, you could face detention centre time. Stealing copyrighted items is a FELONY.
Not to mention that you open your computer up to every virus contained by the computer universe.
And hey, thanks for driving the cost of the things I buy reasonably up. Really appreciate the added expenses.
just dont get hold of caught
If my employer compels me to carry out Daily Inspections.?
on vehicle which I have no responsiblity for and do not drive the said vehicle, and signing to the effect that I have carried out these checks even though they say aloud that I will have no liability should anything come about resulting in an catastrophe with doesn`t matter what consequences, what actual liabilities and consequences could I suffer contained by a court of law (UK - English Law) should anything come about which could later be traced to something I checked on the vehicle?Answers: The liability will be next to your employer. It's called vicarious liability: it is your employer responsibilty to carry out safekeeping checks and he is using someone unqualified, and someone he knows to be unqualified. It is his blame and he will be found to be liable
No liability for you. You're instructed to carry out diverse actions, you transport out those actions, sign the sheet to right to be heard you've done it, that's it.
You're not certifying the vehicle is roadworthy, are you?
Once happen to me, I was required to do "first parade" checks on multiple vehicles and one of them have a serious and expensive engine failure. The "post mortem" established that the grease had be checked as per my sign-off sheet, so that was that as far as I be concerned. Then they went on to other things and eventually established that a inaccurate piston broke.
Firstly, are you appropriately qualified to carry out these checks? If the answer is no - you hold two options. You can request your employer to make sure that you receive the prerequisite training to undertake the checks or secondly, notify your employer of your concerns that you are not qualified to undertake these duties. A apposite starting point is your employment contract and job description - are you specially employed to transport out these duties?
With regard to liability, it could be possible that you would be held individually liabile but in opinion it should not happen. For example if an individual brings an act for personal injuries arising from using a 'defective' vehicle, you may be named contained by the proceedings as a 'defendant'. However, the claim is more likely to be pursued against your employer as they have (or should have) appropriate insurance to cover such claims.
If you are really discontent about the present situation request a slot with your executive to discuss what can be done. If you are still no happy, I would intuitively change job!
What does it mean to be a "moderate justice" on the Supreme Court?
Answers: It money they typically aren't biased by previous party affiliations, and they don't variety rulings to appease those that put them in power.
It routine you don't just rule along event lines.
One can easily predict the rulings of justices resembling Roberts and Thomas before any evidence is presented, because they meet the terms the conservative puppet masters who put them on the court.
The moderates are those who think for themselves and vote respectively case base on the evidence, the law, the constitution, and their apt judgment.
More Questions and Answers:
[1074] - [1726] - [1625] - [1833] - [485] - [1525] - [734] - [558] - [2394] - [1789] - [148] - [1100] - [431] - [818] - [2101] - [147] - [1947] - [513] - [2485] - [1388]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: