Law Questions and Answers

Survival of the fittest?

I think adjectives self preservation laws should be abolish. As long as you are 18 they should be gone. Our society gets get dumber with every social group. It's the dumb and irresponsible people that reproduce resembling bunnies. The people that should hold children don't because they first make sure they can pedal the responsibilities that come along with it. It's so insulting that my rates money takes supervision of all of the kids produced by citizens that don't take responsibility for themselves. They know the affairs of state will take attention to detail of it for them. I work with a welfare bag. I make $2.50 more an hour, but he brings home a bigger check. No federal levy is taken from him. He has three cars, three computers, and buys video games every payday because the governing body takes assistance of most of his food and rent.
Wearing helmets, seltbelts, and other such laws protect the stupid. If you're dumb satisfactory to kill yourself that instrument it's your own fault. Weed out the stupid.
Answers: political affairs wants a stupid population because its easier to achieve away with stealing other countries grease and blame it on a saudi with a box cutter.
I'm near you.

What TECHNIQUES do DETECTIVES utilize to SOLVE crimes that have be RE-OPENED???

Explain Thoroughly how they investigate and remain 'invisible'
10 points for the best, most creative explanation
Answers: You do not have to become someone to take in them.

As to techiniques, there are a number. The most popularly agreed one is DNA analysis. It used to not exist, and even when it first came into individual, it was expensieve. Now, much smaller quantity so.

Second, and much less large , is just the perspective of up to date minds on the project. When people work together on a project, they tend to adopt a adjectives mind set. When fresh blood is brought in, the previous thoughts are habitually questioned.

Does it matter if convicts suffer during executions?

Recently poisonous injections were halt while the courts debate whether convicts suffer during the last few minutes of their lives. I tend to concern myself near how the victims were recurrently made to suffer at the hands of some of these monsters. A clinical injection seem already more humane than they deserve. Am I off stub here?
Answers: I agree. I've always feel that these animals have surrendered their humanity when they turned predator. I have an idea that they should be executed in the exact same path that they butchered their victims. It couldn't be called cruel and unusual next, could it? After all, it be good plenty for the victims, wasn't it?
No, you are not off foot. I agree with you.

Do you know WHY they are trying to receive a big deal roughly the last few minutes of duration? Because they are wanting to use the guillotine (yes you read that right!) and are trying to say it is more humane and quicker. In certainty they have even voted on trying to label it the USA's method of killing adjectives "convicts" with the loss sentence.
they're going to die anyways. they should just do it surrounded by a way thats the cheapest.
did you know, that it costs more consequently the average income of a person per year to maintain 1 convict in secure unit for a year?
they take so much money. surrounded by my opinion they should merely do it the way that is to say cheaper. if they use the guillotine then within will be blood all over and someone will own to clean it. they should a short time ago hang them
its the cleanest process.
Does it matter if convicts suffer during executions?

It matter to me. I support it.
The purpose in avoiding the infliction of dull pain (even to those deserving of such) is to show that we are somehow better than they are... Laws are meant to gladden not to become that which we detest... for this reason, we also don't use torture as a valid mechanism of interrogation. On a side note, considering the cost of a state sanctioned execution is millions more than a energy in prison sentence... is execution fiscally nouns? And when we discover an innocent person have been executed, HOW do we atone for that? The annihilation penalty is also unreasonably applied... women seldom receive it, blacks overwhelmingly do... where is the "justice" within our system?
That being said, why not a moment ago up the dose of the first injection??? A just short of lethal dose of painkiller should do the trick, consequently 2 and 3 can do their job...
Yes, it is inhuman and blatant torture even surrounded by death!
it depends on the creature and for what he did
I can see the thumbs down already...

I think that it DOES concern... I don't give a rip how they exit the planet, but I do believe that it should be a serious and professional termination lacking compassion or suffering.
don't matter to me.the victims strain didn't matter to them. so I would hope it hurts.
I suggest your spot on.
personally they should not. they have no remorse for there object why should we have for them

New Hampshire law, financial guarantee deposit return?

In New Hampshire if a landlord does not return a collateral deposit and also does not notify the former tenant as to why he has held the deposit is in that and law that allows for double or triple damages? If I rob him to small claims court can I be awarded double or triple the amount of the original deposit for his ruin to notify me that he was next to holding the entire deposit? I moved out in February 2007 and he have not returned my deposit, yes he does have my clean address since he sent a letter to that address that said he will return my deposit when I return his key, he signed a receipt showing I returned the key, he said he would go through the apartment and correspondence me my deposit. So far 7 months later I own not received anything from him. I am going to small claims.
Where will I find any law surrounded by reference to this?
Answers: Yes. Triple amount of deposit, plus interest, except returned within 30 days.
http://www.hud.gov/local/nh/renting/tena...

Why don't the ambulance service hire "drivers" to drive and the trained paramedics can assist the patients.

Surely it would make more sense to train those for just driving the ambulances, later that would release some of the much needed paramedics to do their job. In a phone call out you would only require 1 paramedic and 1 driver, not 2 paramedics and afterwards the other one can be utilised elsewhere if needed
Answers: They do...but then... why not train the driver to be a paramedic, instead of have him/her stand helplessly by when at the rescue scene?
What is the difference: in your scenario you involve 4 people (2 drivers and 2 paramedics). In the exist system also needed 4 individuals, 4 paramedics.

Therefore the number of people needed is matching, but in the existing system more general public can provide help (4 instead of 2)
Paramedics typically work as a squad for efficiency reason...not because one has to drive the ambulance.

So if you own two paramedics and a driver you now own higher payroll costs.
I suppose they mull over it's the most efficient use of scarce resources.

Cost is a major concern.

For better or worse, we make these decision all the time. Cars could be made much safer if they be bigger and heavier, but they would only carry five miles a gallon.

There are tradeoffs.
That would be a bigger waste of money. You'd enjoy an untrained driver on payroll. Not to mention that many call need two paramedics (eg you cannot verbs a patient to a gurney alone.

To apply impossible to tell apart logic you would have a driver and a cop instead of two cops surrounded by a car or a non-fireman driver on the fire truck.
On the contrary it make more sense to have folks that can do both.
When planning ambulance coverage needs, they try to conjure a worse case scenario and consequently attempt to have all right staffing to respond.
In the case of a central disaster (let's say a plane crash) according to you it would be more modernized to have 10 ambulance drivers sitting around while the 10 paramedics work on the injured instead of 20 multi-skilled driver/paramedics working on the patients.
As it in general requires two people to transport a tolerant, the driver in your scenario necessarily must involve yourself in in the handling of the tolerant. That person wouldn't own the proper training and worse still, knowledge of the protocols or "instructions" that paramedics must follow.
Two paramedics are better than one!

For one item, it gives the paramedics a bit of a break. They rotate call (they take turns driving and mortal in the final with the patient). This make it a lot smaller number stressful on the individual paramedic.

On some calls, have two paramedics can be very useful. Imagine having a cardiac arrest on foot, and the only character who is able to support you is a non-medically trained driver! It can be done, and it is done in tons rural parts of the country, but it's not the ideal situation.

You've also get to consider the experience level of the individual paramedic. It help immensely for a newly certified medic to ride next to an experienced one for awhile; so he or she can "learn the ropes" minus being "thrown to the wolves" so to speak.

Also, nearby is an option except having any two paramedics or a "driver" and a paramedic. Many ambulance services will run with an EMT-Basic and a Paramedic. The Basic rides within with the adjectives level patients, and the paramedic rides surrounded by with the patients that require more advanced meticulousness. This way, the merciful has the benefit of two medically trained personnel on scene, the ambulance company can salvage some money by getting to staff half the positions next to Basics, and since there is a paramedic shortage, it's a well brought-up way of extending the paramedics that are available.

Is it legal for someone to post a video of someone else on youtube lacking their permission?

My friend posted a video on youtube of me and a few of my friends and we do not want it on the internet. On the video my friend can be hear saying "this is my camera" and I can be hear saying that I didn't want it on the internet. Legally, is in that anything at all we can do to obtain him to remove it, or are we pretty much screwed?
Answers: It comes down to the phrase, reasonable assumption of privacy. If it be taken in a place i.e. not public and you did not give go-ahead then it is criminal.

Contact You tube and have them cart it down. I think they hold a report button in respectively video for things like that.

Unfortunately if it be taken in a public place resembling a mall or on the street afterwards unless your a minor you have no allowed recourse. However, you can still get You Tube to whip it down.
No if it is in a public place. otherwise it is invasion of privacy.
M

(houses aren't public places;)

Does anyone know of a site on how to write a letter to a conciliator for leniency in a sentencing????

Answers: Are you the human being being sentenced, or are you a witness, friend, or relative?

If you are directly involved contained by the case, the regard as being will likely tolerate you speak at the sentencing, or address the jury if they determine the sentence. Otherwise, if you are friend or family, some jurisdiction order a Pre-Sentence Investigation, where on earth family, friends and co-workers are interviewed, and a report submitted to the court.

You would have need of to call the court clerk and see what thier policy is.

I come up with anything you find from a web site is going to nouns prepared, and not genuine. Your best bet would be to write what you are inkling.
Um

Dear Judge,

Please don't give me what I deserve.

Sincerely,

The criminal.
Here are some taster letters:

http://pages.prodigy.net/mjartisian/Lett...

I surmise the judge would be more impressed if you write from the heart.

Here is another example letter:
http://www.justanswer.com/JA/ASP_A/T_323...

Hope this help!
No there is not a site.

In your own words enlighten the judge who is making the sentencing determination the following:

Who you are. How long you hold known the defendant. What if any is your relationship to the defendant. Why you believe the defendant is remorseful for his movements. Why you believe the judge should be tolerant with the sentencing of the defendant. What you believe the defendant will do next to their life upon release from custody.

The focus here is to let the negotiator know that you believe in the defendant and why and why the arbiter should be gracious in his sentence. Just state facts as you know them as it will not flatter the judge if you beseech or cry for the defendant's release.

Unless there is some unadulterated unusual situations in the valise the judge is required to sentence the defendant inside sentencing guidelines with intensely little wiggle room.

Hope this help.

Why do we have affirmative achievement and why is it so unfair?

I connote from what I can see Blacks, Hispanics and Woman get it.

Why don't the Irish and Asians go and get it.

I mean if anybody read history they would see the Irish be treated just as fruitless if not worse than Blacks so WTF?
Answers: Every cultural group that come to this country has have to fight for classification. Many, as in the covering of the Irish and Asians, worked very sturdy, sent their children to school, insisted on educations, job, and a sense of community. Because they were also incredibly proud people, they be able to succeed.

The feminist movement, the civil rights movement, and wrong immigration have brought give or take a few negative consequences within that a sense of entitlement has be created. "I am black, my ancestors were slaves (although a huge percentage of blacks within America do not descend from slavery in the West), that`s why I am 'entitled' to certain special privileges."
Or, "I am a woman, I did not own equal rights in times past so now I am 'entitled' to special treatment." Or, "I am Hispanic, I give the name it a race (even though it isn't) so you enjoy committed racism by not allowing me to enter the country illegally so I am 'entitled' to special treatment."

Look at the majority of Asians surrounded by this country. They immigrated here, many near only the clothes on their back. They had to swot the culture, the language, everything. However, as a culture, by and colossal they have succeeded and you can look at the numbers of PhDs surrounded by this country, physicists, doctors, etc. to see just how ably they overcome staggering odds.

Not so beside many associates whose families own lived here for generations, even centuries, who did not own the obstacle of words, and who still have to be spoon feed.

Where are the real followers of Martin Luther King, Jr who truly profess, and follow, his tenets within judging someone for the content of his qualities and not the color of his skin (or gender).

If we truly would be color blind, it would not be special treatment for anyone. The best qualified person would acquire the job, or the slot at the university. It would truly be color blind.

We enjoy spend almost 50 years in special entitlements to bring the 'disenfranchised' up to par next to the 'evil white male.'

Isn't it time to stop the noise and get support to personal responsibility?
-You are personally responsible for taking exactness of your family,
-You are one-sidedly responsible for making sure your children get an coaching,
-You are personally responsible for keeping your children bad the streets,
-You are personally responsible for maintain good form habits,
-You are one-sidedly responsible for giving your employer an honest day's work,
-You are personally responsible to keeping your neighborhood a viable and nearest and dearest oriented community, etc.

The preamble to the Constitution should be ingraved contained by all our brains..
The role of the federal parliament is to "provide" for the common defense, and to "promote" the common welfare.
By providing a secure nation, the average citizen can lift on the responsibility of providing for him/herself. That is not the role of government.

In actuality, the most discriminated against citizens of this country are white males, especially if they are Christian white males, and I am really concerned for my little grandsons and what the future holds for them.
Affirmative bustle should assure an Equal Starting Point but not guarantee Result. Perhaps many Irish and Asians enjoy a strong internal mental focus and not negatively affected by environmental factor.

How long does it take for a court demand to go through in relation to child access in the UK?

My ex have applied to the court for access to our daughter how long does this usually take?
Answers: not more than a few weeks.. if he have done nothing to injure her it will be quick.. if he pays support he is entitled to see her. so long as he is a upright parent and providing he will and should be allowed to see his kid. so if all this is surrounded by order it will be remarkably quick within most case's. none of this is guaranteed it depends on the case workers work nouns

why would you want to stop her dad from seeing her. are you one of those moms.

no offence expected.

we see lots of this type question here, moms not wanting to agree to the farther have access to the kids when their relationship go bad , so mom make dad suffer by hurting the kids as well.

be is the sense.

if he is dropping in at times he is unacceptable you have the right to waste him and send him away. you also hold the right to a happy trial relationship, he has no right to make happen you or the kid or your new lover a problem.

i did not scrounging you any offence near my question. i simply be asking..

do not let him bully you or the kid. he should come at visit time what ever the judge See's fit.

do not bring to worried about it though when he get over being hurt and spiteful it will settle down
i would say that it depends on how several cases the judge have on the lenth of time it takes if within are few the hearing will be in a hurry but if not could be longer ask your solicitor, they will hold a better idea of waiting times etc.
All the best.
I've basically been to court beside a friend for this, it took about 8 weeks or so from his applying to court, and it took almost 3 hours actually within court to arrange, between both parents via solicitors, the arrangements for seeing the baby. That included specified times to pick her up and drop her rotten, and specific protection clauses in this defence too. The actual amount of time in the court room be about 2 minutes maximum!

Passing on leads information - are any law being broken, criminal or civil?

My friend works as an administrator for a small company who treat her deeply badly. She have no written employment contract, but the nature of her work in attendance would be regarded as employment by an employment tribunal. She is rewarded by cheque every week depending on how many hours she works. No PAYE due or NI seems to enjoy been deduct.

She has access to prospective customers, and she is endorsement them on to me. I cold-call the customer, quote a lower rate, and win the work for my own company (which is 50-50 owned by me and her, and is in exactly impossible to tell apart line of business).

Am I or her putting ourselves at risk of mortal sued for theft of intellectual property? Or is it the covering that as there is no contract next to my friend that this information is effectively being posted on the settlement noticeboard.
Answers: Your friend is running the risk of loosing her job by ratification the information to you. Although you say she does not hold a contract of employment, most employers own a clause preventing employees divulging information contained by this way.

With good opinion to your own situation, it is not a criminal offence. However, if found out you may facade a civil claim from the company for 'damages'.


With regard the customers - they may hold a claim under the Data Protection Act as their personal details are anyone passed on without their consent or prior acquaintance.
Tread very obligingly!
The fact that here is no contract does not matter.

If she is getting that information from her employment, and consequently using to to make money surrounded by different employment, you are looking at some serious troubles.

Sounds like you are breaking a dozen law here. Depending on the information or type of business, this could go criminal and/or civil.

Based on your information, these are not speculative cold call, and it shouldn't take the boss long to see a outline.
no matter who have a contract or not.. you are both breaking the law and it is a serious one.

if you catch caught you are looking at some very hefty fines and conceivably jail.

you are not doing a small article and you know it or you'd not be asking
The Employer is in breach of Employment Law surrounded by that he has not given this hand a Written Contract.
Passing information to you about her employer's customers is OK but if you use that information to your plus, she would be liable to dismissal and criminal prosecution and you would also be charged with a criminal misdeed. Which one would depend on the nature of the business.

More Questions and Answers:
[2568] - [1427] - [1434] - [1587] - [1356] - [2460] - [1989] - [1952] - [534] - [1584] - [1981] - [945] - [926] - [1103] - [769] - [108] - [2154] - [198] - [2438] - [1424]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: