Law Questions and Answers

Speed ticket?

i want to know if any one can get me any just right on thurday my daughther got soap contained by her eye i thoght i had mop up it out on firday she woke up crying said her eye hurt i call the doctor to see if i can attain her in because i know they close at 1pm
i got my kids in position and try to get her in attendance fast that i can i be speed a little not that much i thoght the speed limet be 50 and it was 45 the cop could see my daugther surrounded by pain and he did not any tell me how nifty i was going what i go and get if i was speed why did he too so long to verbs me over where he verbs was just about 3 mill befor he pull me over i only just look see how fast i be going it was 54 not 68 thicket said it get me with a radar
how do i know it be for me there profoundly of cars on that road i could go to court i could loose and find the point or i can do or thake the school on dvd i did that one back about 7 year ago i don't how the online is if ya be me what will ya do

Thanks
Answers: I'd just shift to traffic school. Too bleak about your daughter but I don't guess it would make much difference to the intermediary.

Going through a jury trial over a minor traffic ticket and loosing will end up costing you more because you'll probably wrap up up having to pay cheque court costs.
Why did your daughter get soap surrounded by her eye?

Can a video film or footage considered admissable surrounded by the court of law?

What for example one hubbyist of a videocam started to pilfer video of the a passage contained by one downtown suburb at night contained by his hotel room, filming relations passing by surrounded by one of the dimly lighted street then sudden he saw a woman person maul, beaten and rob by two men, but by zoom diligently with the camera he have clear picture of the two perpetrators.

Now the question- Is this considered admissable in the crime of robbery if he will present this surrounded by court? Because some lawyers if he happen to defend the two guys would speak about the judge that this is clearly a manifestation sacrilege of the rights of the accuse. Is this true? Because the video tape clearly state the two men who are his client who robbed a woman downtown are already guilty therefore no requirement to present witness or evidence to prove that they are innocent of the said charges. Which is against the provision of any accuse or sacrilege of the constitution. Is this correct?

stop smoking weeds when u answer this.
Answers: The ruling is funny about cameras and video. Actually, the video is not "the" evidence. Except in administrative proceedings (traffic tickets for the most part), the evidence is the nouns of an eyewitness.

Q. Were you at x dimly lit street on Y date at Z o'clock.
A. Yes.

Q. Did you observe something up?
A. Yes, I saw D beating the bejeezus out of V.

Q. Did you enjoy a video camera with you?
A. Yes, and I videotape the beating.

Other attorney: Your honor, I request a voir dire of the tape.
Judge clears the jury out of the courtroom for voir dire, shows the videotape images to the witness.

Q. Is the videotape image a even-handed and accurate representation of what you saw?
A. Yes.

I offer the videotape surrounded by evidence.

After the judge decide that the videotape is relevant the case and not overly prejudicial, the jury comes rear in and the cassette is re-played and the witness repeats that then video shows what he saw.

You can't cross-examine a videotape. The "evidence" is the witness motto that he saw what the tape shows. The footage is basically demonstrative of the witness' testimony.
Apparently so. This United States Supreme Court shield included a video in the slip belief. This is the first time by the way, that a video have been introduced as subdivision of a Supreme Court opinion.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/0...
And scroll down to "Scott v. Harris" an 04-30-07 valise.
Here is the PDF link: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/0...

You will have need of Adobe Acrobat reader for the text.
You will obligation "Real Player" if you want to watch the video.
Had you discontinued taking Valium when earlier asked?

Anyways, it depends on the country.
Some use routine observation of public places,
if you want a strict privacy, simply stay at home.

Why are animals tested for cosmetics and household products today? It is so horribly cruel.?

http://www.api4animals.org/a2_research.p...

There are charities who now trial without using animals.
http://www.humaneseal.org/
Answers: You own to prove that the chemicals in the cosmetics and products are not detrimental for human use.
Go to the lab and exchange yourself for a couple of lab animals.

Preliminary testing can be done effectively near computer modeling and deduction but in the past I use it I want that lab animal to try it out. If you were honest beside yourself you feel matching way. Just curious are you a lacto-vegetarian? Are you a vegan? How do you consistency about abortion? What is your stand on wealth punishment?

Sorry, but in a world where on earth everyone wants an omelet here is a need to break eggs. I'm sure you use cosmetics and perfume. Would you want the same computer that say a bee can't fly tell you that your perfume is not dangerous? Testing is crucial to some things like medication. Without lab animals I would probably be dead right presently. I have diabetes, no conducting tests, equals no meds and results in no GIMP.

Is it fair that if you protect your property from intruders, you could be the one to appendage up in prison ?

Interested within your views
Answers: This integral subject is a case of giving the public something to verbs about. It is immaculately OK to use self defence. The cases that own hit the headlines enjoy been excessive or unreasonable force, similar to the farmer who shot an intruder surrounded by the back as he be running away.

The officer who told someone above that an ashtray is not an offensive weapon is not correct. It become an offensive weapon as soon as it is used, but if the force is believable, there is no problem.
no its not fair-minded at all!
you should reasonably be allowed to protect your house,self and belongings from intruders
criminals seem to hold more rights than decent canon abiding people
No it isn't, but the regulation is there to prevent society from inviting people into their property, massacre them and passing them rotten as intruders.

That's why you are allowed to use "reasonable force" and not an AK-47 - at smallest not in the UK.

A policeman once told me that the best entry to do is buy a heavy chalice ashtray and keep it surrounded by the bedroom. You can wallop an intruder with this and not be charged as it is not classed as an abhorrent weapon. If you use a baseball bat, for instance, a court would view this as premeditated on your division.

The upshot is that if you hit an intruder with a household purpose you will most likely receive away with it as long as you don't pummel them to a pulp.
Whoever breaks in my house will be departure feet first

Im of late an impulsive kinda guy
I'm within two minds on this one , on one hand i regard as it's fair to protect my property and i would do , even if it expected going to prison.
But on the other hand what's to stop gansters etc trouncing someone and dragging them on to their property. We would have to draw the procession somewhere.
This is a bit of a question on what is justifiable force. judging from your sound out I would say that you belong to the adjectives possible force brigade, which I am not completely out of sympathy with. i guess that you may be able to claim self fortification until you get him stale your property ( I presume this means your house ) but if you resolve to give him a angelic hiding by trapping him on your property you are in for some question. The rule is reasonable force taking into statement the evidence. I do not know precisely what that means because the wording is essentially imprecise
justifiable force is allowed.
a blind man who stabbed a burgler to death, face no charges.
damn right, too
but a man who forced a burglar out of a 2nd floor window after he'd assaulted a juvenile girl, was prosecuted for GBH.
eh? if it have been my daughter i would hold done the same.

the statute is flimsy, CPS discretion is always a factor.
suppose it depends how the targets/figures are going that week.
as inequality is rife!
Yes it is tolerant.

You may legally protect yourself, family connections and property from an intruder so long as the force you use is reasonable. If at hand is any question almost how reasonable the force you applied later you will be judged by your peers, others who own homes and property and hold families that they would preserve using any force necessary.

The theory that you cannot defend yourself, others or property is a myth propagated by those who want you to be fearful contained by order to win your votes.
It is contained by case history that you can use more than justifiable force on private property.
Go to your local library and look in the imperative book Archbald and all will be revealed.
Our wonderful leaders will not reveal this to the public as it would deprive the legitimate beavers of MONEY.
No, as soon as they break in they they forfeit any rights including the right to duration. At the very lowest, anyone who breaks into my house will never walk again.
Unless the regulation reflects this here will never be an end to crime.
we should establish first two things.
what and how do you work in command to protect your property
and that the legal system (from police till the judge) is not supreme.

due the reasons above is unattainable to have a tenet enableing you using any necesary force, because anyone could use this to start killing other culture.

let's do an exercise: imagine for a moment that you can eradicate any person whithin your property that you considered an intruder. in a minute imagine that your son whilst going to schooll fall down in the garden of "subject B", whom is not pleased next to the "intruder" damaging his garden, so he take an AK-47 and shoot 20 times to your son killing him. what would you argue?

That your son be not an intruder? yes he is (was)
That your son was a angelic boy? so what the law is the imperative!

if this is the case consequently...would you support the law that consent to an stupid man to kill your son?

hence, even near a system that works fine it would be really dangerous have a law resembling that, futhermore when the legal system is far from ultimate. where approving a tenet like this would permit people wipe out other people next drag them to their property and claim that there be intruders.
depends on the type of intrusion and the level of conduct taken by you.
it would be difficult to prove a person's intent.

True crime 1st hand what do you know?

Answers: 'True crime' where on earth did you get that from?
How do we outline 'crime'?
Is someone who breaks the law of the home you live in a 'criminal' is it that simple?
It is not that simple but it is a reality.
'1st hand knowledge'? another correct one.
Is this the spot where adjectives we 'criminals' confess, and give exoneration for our mis deeds?
Justification is not a reason for committing a 'crime' it could logically be taken into account during sentencing, but you would be a criminal, you enjoy broken the law!.
OK I am a 'criminal ' acquittal? doesn't count, no need for me to bore you to extermination about my 'crime' but I did it, I also did 5 years lock away time for it!
Must have be serious then?
I dont focus so.
My opinion, (which is no more valid than the subsequent mans), is that anyone breaking the law of the domain you live in is a criminal, or at tiniest classed as such.
When I lived in London years ago someone be murdered on my doorstep.

I have be mugged - was the first personage to be mugged in my nice 'safe' nouns.

This year I have be defrauded twice!!

I don't much resembling knowing it first hand I reflect on I would rather read fiction!!
Iv read adjectives anne rule books and think shes a great author Once i be going to ring crime stoppers anon but the cctv saw me dial the number so i cut and ran Met my mate on the corner and started playing hopscotch but we get locked up for graffiti and threatening weapons Couldn,t seize off our dna be on the stones and we were on number six so we couldn,t plead not guilty Nine months suspended and my wrists hurt,iv single been here 12 minutes,and i dont similar to tomatoes,oh well

Penalties 4 third DUI in NC obtain a person?

My brother freshly got his 3rd DUI/DWI here contained by North Carolina. The other inmates at the jail told him he be looking at 18-22 months in prision. He have one of those ignition things on the car, but took it rotten. This was the 3rd within about 6yrs
Answers: My brother surrounded by law did something like a year in NC for his third offense. He be out in roughly speaking 9 months for good behavior.
WWW.findlaw.com to find you answer.
They should convey him to and alcohol treatment facility and dry him out and then yes he requirements to spend some time in the facility of the courts choice. He is one of the reason that people want to go and get rid of alcohol so he ruins a couple of cold ones at home for everyone. This is his third time in six years that he have been irresponsible and bold satisfactory to take other peoples lives surrounded by his hands. Guess it would be okay for me to jump out every two years and shoot randomly next to a gun as long as i missed what is the problem?
He can now run for governor.

Print store won't re-print photos that I took?

I love to take pictures of my kids. I am not a professional photographer, but photography is a hobby of mine. I took several pictures of my daughters lately and then ordered prints of the photographs online, merely as I've always done.

I received an email from the company recitation me they won't print them because they think they're professional photographs and I requirement to prove that I have rights to reprint- how do I prove that I took these photographs? My word is not going to be apposite enough for them..
Answers: I would reply to nearby e-mail with the following statement:

Dear XXX,

I am within receipt of your e-mail refusal to print my photographs. While I appreciate the reality that you are attempting to protect a copyright, this letter is to push for you that these photographs are my own original work, and that I hold retained all endorsed rights to copy and distribute these images.

Please release my instruct and ship my printed images.

Sincerely,
XXXXX

Also, if they don't process your lay down, consider using a service that does print work for professionals. I have some of my husband's nicer pictures done by www.propicsexpress.com and I am other delighted by the feature of prints that I receive from them.
As a amateur photographer myself, I have nonetheless to run into this problem, mainly because I use a local service to direct my re-prints from so they know me and my work.

You need to phone up or e-mail them and find out what they need, you might of late need to sermon to a supervisor to resolve this.

But, in the adjectives you might want to just print them out yourself. For smaller prints I use a thermal wax/resin/dye sublimation, and I’m looking at one that will print up to 8 x 10 (under 300 yes I found one) for a thermal wax/resin/dye sublimation. They aren’t the fastest printers within the world, but I’m seldom in a hurry and the prints are hugely nice.

Good luck

The Kodak printer (dye sublimation) I use for 4x6's has a cost per print of $0.20 the local processors can't do it much cheaper consequently that. The prints are water proof, unlike injet prints. I still use my local processor for 8x10's and bigger prints, but I also looking at a bright (dye sublimation) that will print out 8 x 10, but I don't have a cost per print however.
Just tell them "While I am predisposed to certify under cost of perjury that these photographs are my own work, I am no longer willing to do business next to you. Sincerely..."

Companies who are unwilling to take my word are companies I don't have need of to patronize.

How do you feel roughly speaking Unicor, the Federal Prison Industries?

We had a discussion just about this at the Ethical Society forum this morning. The ironic thing is that using prisoners as cheap labor be outlawed early contained by the 20th century. Here's what the 21st century is doing: http://www.unicor.gov/
Answers: I think its Unethical

How do you find a decent attorney?

Say I need a securities attorney and don't know anyone who can refer one to me. How can I find a decent attorney? Picking one randomly sounds resembling a stupid idea, but I'm not relatively sure what other choice I have.

Are here any resources on the Internet I can turn to?
Answers: First, check the state bar website to see if the attorney has ever be disciplined, suspended or disbarred
Second, check out Martindale Hubbel on the internet or the library. It will say if the legal representative is rated "A", "B", or "C"
Finaly bring input by word of mouth
The worst source to rely on are yellow page, newspaper, tv, or radio ad
check with the state slab and go from within . omg stay away from internet lawyers unless you can in fact go to their organization . good luck

Does a building inspector have a endorsed right to take pics of your property on your property w/o authority?

He never asked permission to progress to the backyard and took pics. I live in Nassau county NY. Had some work done but merely replaced the existing cement patio and retaining wall on the backyard which both be crumbling and was a see. as far as i know that is not a despoliation and doesn't need a receipt to redo.
Answers: It's highly reasonable to expect a building inspector to pinch pictures as part of documentation for an inspection.
And yes, they are capably within their rights to do so. State law have numerous statutes on public condition, and hazards.
Though a examine worth asking, is why are you so unusually defense about it. It is as if you own something to hide.
The answer probably lies surrounded by your question. You said " Had some work done but single replaced the existing cement patio and retaining wall on the backyard which both be crumbling and was a jeopardy. as far as i know that is not a sacrilege and doesn't need a receipt to redo." Are you SURE no permission was required? In Florida, any concrete work needed a certification and inspection.

More Questions and Answers:
[141] - [1193] - [553] - [1562] - [67] - [1617] - [2021] - [364] - [1036] - [1917] - [1277] - [1968] - [1824] - [1970] - [655] - [1891] - [2244] - [21] - [2270] - [1491]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: