Law Questions and Answers

If DNA proves Mormonism WRONG then why...?

Do they still preach it as reality? The book of mormon states that Hebrews were ancestors of the Indians...nonetheless DNA evidence has PROVEN that the American Indians come from Asia, AND there is NO record documentation that EXIST today *outside of the book of mormon* that shows evidence of hebrew culture ANYWHERE in that region. hmm any thoughts?
Answers: Start a LIE, after you've no choice. Gal 6: 10, gives the word. Deception is a TERRIBLE thing. Consider respectively point.
The "Lord's" promise in the Book of Mormon have failed.

And behold how great the covenants of the Lord, and how great his condescensions unto the children of men; and because of his greatness, and his grace and mercy, he have promised unto us [Lehites] that our seed shall not utterly be destroyed, according to the flesh, but that he would preserve them; and surrounded by future generation they shall become a righteous branch unto the house of Israel (2 Nephi 9:53).

The LDS scientists are not able to identify a single personality who is of the "seed" of Lehi "according to the flesh." LDS scholars concede that DNA for American Indians shows "99.6%" are from Siberian ancestry and that here is a lack of DNA evidence for Israelites surrounded by the Americas prior to Columbus. The LDS Church should publicly explain to their people that American Indians are not literal descendants of Lehi or Israel.
DNA doesn't prove a entry. There has never be any serious DNA testing done for this one piece. Do you know why?

Because, in instruct for it to be accurate, you would have to hold the DNA of Lehi, Nephi and Laman, and their spouses, and then you would hold to have the DNA of Moroni and some of the Lamanites at the fall of the Book of Mormon. That's teh ONLY way to even start to PROVE anything.

The Jews enjoy moved a lot over the time from the cessation of the Bible to now. They enjoy inter-married with other cultures and race. I bet that if you took the DNA of theh apostles at the end of the Bible, and compared it next to the DNA of today's Jews, people would right to be heard "these people can't be Jews, the DNA say they're not".

I read that there be DNA testing done contained by Iceland on this one community that dated back several centuries, that could PROVE it's genealogy to two ancestors several hundred years ago, but DNA carrying out tests could only prove conclusively one or two ancestors from smaller quantity than two hundred years ago.

If DNA proves Mormonism WRONG then why...?

Do they still preach it as certainty? The book of mormon states that Hebrews were ancestors of the Indians...all the same DNA evidence has PROVEN that the American Indians come from Asia, AND there is NO record documentation that EXIST today *outside of the book of mormon* that shows evidence of hebrew culture ANYWHERE in that region. hmm any thoughts?
Answers: I'm not the critic when it comes to someone's personal beliefs. However the Mormons do hold cult ideas- the enslavement of women is repulsive, the molestation is sickening. And this issue of Indians with Hebrew descent is trivial- if we focus on anything roughly the Mormons then it ought to be the sexual invective going on- because that is what is morally wrong not trivial.
You don't grasp how religion works, its not based on science but reliance. Do you think your going to correct their mind
Same with popular Christians
Mormonism was a cult that somehow manage to go common. Their founder was a crackpot from upstate New York so don't expect too much. That said today Mormonism is fine though its "book of Mormon" is a not genuine.
Most people join up a religion (or are born into it) without much wise investigation. It becomes a "part" of them ("criticize my religion and you are criticizing me!").

So, when confronted beside reason and facts, they cling to what they want to believe emotionally.
Why does everyone hatred them so much?

Mind your own damn business and let them do what they want. This is AMERICA right? Last I hear I had the right to believe anything I want. If I want to believe that a magic man created everything is a week and made folks from dirt.oh wait specifically a mainstream religion near several billion who believe it.

Do you get your kick from trying ot make individuals feel discouraging about their dependence?
I honestly don't understand how religion can determine DNA. Religion is man made and the worse entry that ever happened to mankind. Mormonism is a amazingly false religion. I was raise catholic and left the catholic church and become a born again Bible believing Christian Although my background is hispanic and they read out most hispanics are catholic, I still could not go rear to it for that reason. I disappeared because the catholics too are another cult being decieved next to all their idol worship and such.
Here is a great website that tell alot about different religions and what they represent along beside alot of other issues in this world. Click on false religion when you catch to it and take your pick. Enjoy reading.


http://www.jesus-is-savior.com
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Tell this this to ANY of my wives and I will hold to hurt you.

;-)
Seriously buddy, using religious text as an anthropology source is never a righteous idea.
DNA does not prove Mormonism wrong. You're using bleak logic.

There has not be a definitive link drawn between near-eastern DNA and American Indian DNA.

The Book of Mormon discussions of 4 different groups coming to the Americas. It makes no claim that these be the only 4 (and I don't believe that they were). We can speculate over what DNA one of those groups carried.but again, this is speculation.

We don't know how the ancient original Americans migrated and intermarried. A link may eventually show up, however contained by the mean time the Book of Mormon is not dis-proven.

It is the history of a relativly small group of folks in a relativly small geographical nouns.not the history of all the those in adjectives of the Americas.

However, if this link does appear, I doubt that you'll call upon the Missionaries, and immediately ask to be qualified and baptized. You'll explain it away, just as you hold the dozens and dozens of other supporting evidences for the Book of Mormon and come up with some other emergency before you'll believe.

Your release...not mine. Good luck.
DNA "evidence" has PROVEN nought.

Did anyone watch JUSTICE FOR ALL on Court TV on Saturday?

What do you dream up of the idea of Equal Justice Under Law? and is the company on track by doing what it is doing to assist make this a true statement. No PPL Associates please for this answer.
Answers: Sorry, I didn't

How do you legally evolution your first name (california)???

I'm 15, and I really dislike my full first name and would like to modify it. I live and was born within California, and I have my parent's support surrounded by changing my nickname. How do I do it?
Answers: Here is the California Judicial Council's page on name change. It should answer your questions.

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/oth...
I don't know nearly California specifically, I'm not from there. I do know that you can appointment yourself anything you like as long as it' not for not permitted purposes (i.e. to deceive someone).
So jump ahead and call yourself something else. Before you clear any legal moves, remember to ask your parents why they chose your baptize and try to understand what (if anything) they be thinking at the time.

Class action suit?

worked out of california..attorneys be out of idaho..i was ripped past its sell-by date by them were & how do i stir about seeking what is owed to me,do i budge to labor board in ca. or should i return with in contact beside someone out of idaho
Answers: File your case within California or Idaho as long as it is allowed by the laws on jurisdiction.

Who believes that the supreme court will screw up the release penalty for America?

I read aloud we bring back the electric stool, hanging, the guilotine, and firing squads. They should adjectives be televised you don't hold to watch if you don't want to.
Answers: I ruminate the "cruel and unusual" limitation be meant to stave stale bizarre executions such as "throwing someone to the lions" or "burying someone up to their next surrounded by an ant mound" and stuff like that.

I do not construe the Supreme Court will listen to such a case, however, and will exceed the buck down to the lower courts.

With the Supreme Court, "the buck stops where it starts".
libs already screwed it up.

You are retarded we never have a guillotine. But I am for the death of criminal that hold been convicted by genetic evidence or 3+ eye witnesses
funny, the judicial branch "interprets" the statute. that BS in Florida may result in states to HAVE TO reconsider their release penaltie laws. I'm for it as long as there's compelling evidence. DNA alone doesn't do it for me. that individual proves a person "might" hold been at the see. (assuming no blood splattering on the assailant,)

I have an interesting officially recognized question.?

I hold a small machine shop. My mother needed to retire and asked me to move back home near her and move my machine shop into her garage so that I would be closer and I could help out maintain her place. After a few months she needed her privacy, (time with boyfriend), and didn't want me at hand anymore. Now she won't even let me come out and do my work. I spent 1000's moving my machinery and rewiring her garage and it will cost me 1000's more to move it hindmost out along with losing comparatively a bit of work from this. Can I sue her? Do I have any gentle of case? My brother and sister already do not speak to her and I will no longer after I correct this issue.
Answers: Sounds similar to your mother isn't a good individual and that's sad. I would see not getting along with your family connections, especially if it were a parent, would be big-hearted of hard to treaty with.

I believe you own the right to be reimbursed for your money, and if you would like to sue for reimbursement I believe you would own a case. Having receipts for any money you spent would be paying special attention to your cause.

To Andy and Debra: What does it issue if she is the mother? If it were someone else who wasn't loved ones would you then enunciate, "Go ahead"? First of all, she's evidently not a good mother and doesn't much carefulness for her sons feelings. Being a mother does not anticipate she has the right to treat him resembling crap without consequences.
Even if you enjoy a legal right to sue her, is it the right piece to do? I say no.

Just revise from your mistake.

As far as not talking to her again, how roughly putting boundaries and not fences?

Just some thoughts. Good luck
If your mother made express representations that you would be permitted to use her garage for a specific interval, maybe. If not, you a short time ago trusted her because she is your mother, and the courts likely will not want to receive into the middle of it.

Can we compromise?

How about a compromise on 2 issues?

Since some of you notify me not to have an abortion if I dont approaching it - fine, you go enjoy them if you want and I'll pass.

So after If I ask you to leave my paycheck alone and you afford up yours for social programs, will that work?

Sound like a correct compromise?
Answers: As long as the people who support this time of war start paying for it out of their own pockets.
Sounds like someone have a double dose of 'grumpy' today.

Jeez.
Actually, yes. I would totally support that system. If we were to decentralize the elected representatives a bit, and give fund more power to the state and local governments, than policy could be tailored to specific communities.

So you live contained by a small conservative industrial town and believe in going it alone beside no social support. That's cool. Here's your tax dollars hindmost and good luck to you.

So you live surrounded by a big city and want a system with a safekeeping net and available services for adjectives regardless of class or culture? Have at it!

The idea that every single community of citizens in the entire nation must submit to the whims of whichever political delegation is currently holding power in a city that for adjectives reality could be on the other side of the country, is call federalism. And it's why both sides of the Left Right argument get so angry at respectively other.
I don't get what you denote.

Is it legal to be asked to show my ID at the bank clerk, when the preceding person wasn't ?

I'm sometimes asked to show my ID at checkout. I look 26-30 years behind the times and do not buy any alcohol. I have observed the bank clerk does not ask ID to the people ahead of me. I own wondered if it is the way I dress or is it because I'm not white. I other use the "credit" option. Not debit.

Now I would similar to to know how legal is it to not ask ID for the preceding individual and pick me for proof of ID. Can I deny showing my ID? Can I file a suit against the store for nouns?
Answers: Yes. It is perfectly endorsed. You can deny showing the cashier your ID, however the banker can terminate the ENTIRE SALE at that point. It does not business why the cashier did not ask ID of the previous culture (there are plenty of reasons why.such as closeness, an alerty system, etc.).
Please keep contained by mind that many change register's randomly transmit the cashier he/she MUST enter an ID# or appointment a manager within order to verbs the transaction, without any good opinion to what is sold to the individual. This is a "theft prevention" device.
They own to check if you use a credit card. They have to get sure it's you so if your card is stolen they can get the theif caught.

They could hold known who that entity is. If you shop at my store everyday I'm not going to check your ID everyday.
You are asked to show ID because you are using a credit card as your form of payment. In demand to use a credit card the cashier requests to match the baptize on the credit card to the name on your ID.

Did it ever transpire to you the people surrounded by line surrounded by front of you used an alternative form of payment than the one you special?
They can ask anyone for ID if they want. There is nothing you can do. Actually, I construe if you were to hold a favorite store to buy beer or cigarettes, even if you go within every single day to buy something I construe they are supposed card you every time, but I am not sure.

If you look under 27 they're supposed to card you.
There is nought illegal something like a store requesting ID. There are laws surrounded by various states which prohibit stores from requesting personal information, or writing down information from your ID.

I've have a business for years in which I thieve credit cards. In my agreements with the card companies. adjectives I need to do is compare signatures. If their card is not signed, afterwards I do need ID within order to compare signatures. I can ask for their ID anyway, but my agreement near the credit card company does not require it, nor can I refuse to honor a customer's card simply on the starting place of ID. A customer who has face such an issue has solely one recourse, complain to the company which issued his credit card, but it will be fairly pointless.

Stores recurrently use the excuse that it's for the customer's own protection. This is NOT true. Card holder liability for lost cards is limited by directive to a maximum of $50 and that's only if the card hasn't be reported as lost for more than 3 days. Most card companies do not even enforce the $50 liability.

Remember the Visa debit card commercials? How the cards are better than checks because you need ID for checks but not for the card? Well, demanding ID for the card make a liar out of the commercial, but it's not Visa doing the demanding. It's the store. Stores do not lose money on any purchase authorized by the card transaction.

I've refuse to do business with some stores over their policy. Some stores hold changed their policy while others stubbornly adhere to it, thereby losing business.
It sucks to be other after white and that is the bottom vein in the states.

What they are doing is not dubious.

When you use the credit option, you will be asked for ID
Debt card, if the money is not surrounded by the bank, you won't take your items. They don't care give or take a few ID because your password protects you and them, plus they instantly get their money. Virtually no risk to the business.
Credit card fraud is a big problem, explicitly another reason.
Try paying beside a check.

Peace

Jim

.
The law does not speak they have to self every person within line. If the personage ahead of you paid surrounded by cash...and is not buying alcohol - here is no need to ego.

You may be getting id'd because you used it as a credit card and the cashier is making sure that someone have not stolen your card and run amok charging things on it. I had a credit card stolen and used fraudulently. The solely stores were she be not able to use my card fraudulently be the ones that id'd her. Funny... at those stores...she decided she did not want the merchandise. I be not held liable for the purchases...but I spent a lot of days getting the issue straightened out. Not to mention...it just plan pissed me stale that it happened. How dare she!

Since that have happened to me... I am obliged each time a teller asks for my drivers license when I use my card. And given that I'm in my mid 30's - I darn close to jump over the counter and kiss 'um if they ego me because I am buying alcohol!!
''... can they randomly ask me and not ask the personage in front of me ?''

You DO remember the definition of ''random'' ?

You can demur to show ID to anyone other than a cop...they can cry off to sell you stuff and/or services.

I talk to my legal representative to day what do he have it in mind by he is waiting for them to ok it .ok what?

Answers: I'm not answering ghetto questions today.
uhh why dont you ask him
he could be waiting for the ok to fart for adjectives we know

More Questions and Answers:
[1411] - [38] - [1923] - [2521] - [2300] - [1829] - [2018] - [2042] - [2367] - [2010] - [315] - [2356] - [934] - [1363] - [2559] - [1722] - [417] - [531] - [1848] - [1576]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: