Law Questions and Answers

Can someone tell me why the hell I should wages to download music that I could otherwise get for free?

I am looking for one individual to give me a powerfully thought out answer and this, if you do then I will start buying my music officially, why should I pay 1 dollar(or anything for that matter) to hear a song that I enjoy already heard, and if I havent hear the song already why would I pay 1 dollar to hear a song I might not resembling? I mean if it be simpler to pay for it I might, why should I hold to type in my credit card number and adress or distribute a self adressed envelope to 6666 NOWHERE, CA? just to "legally" own a song, I niggardly if the money were zapped out of my wallet, I might consider it, I know my rights as a entity I I know they have to bestow you a warning up to that time they do anything, a warning of which I hold not recieved, and the only agency they even care is if you download a movie close to "shrek 3" or something, give me one suitable reason why I should wage other than "its the right entity to do" or that it is illegal to do so, why should I keeping if Joe Biggs for 'BS Record company' gets a trial speedboat?
Answers: so that the band you are interested contained by gets credit where on earth credit is due and is able to release a second or even a third album. what you don't realize is that if a decoration sells anything smaller number than 100,000 copies of an album on their first time out they will never release a second (which by the way requests to outshine the first and probably go gold ingots with 500,000 sold to hold a chance of releasing a third album).
Having the rights to music, AKA anyone able to play it at will, can merely be given out by the owner. This principal works for every other industry. For example, can you drive a Ford truck at will without buying it? Can you wear a set of two of Levis jeans at will without buying them? Can a friend hold sex with your wife at will minus marrying her?

I am sure you answered, No to adjectives the questions. Why consequently should you have the fitness to use some ones music at will? All the companies above make money bad their product just similar to the music industry. Why do you think it is different? Or would quality the same approach about the Ford if you know you wouldn't get caught?
if you are so languorous as to not legally digit out a way to rightfully listen to the song for free like on the radio or at a friends house and your moral compass is such that you choose to intentionally violate federal criminal and civil copyright statutes then nil I say can dissuade you...or did I do purely that?

What is your opinion on euthanasia?

Euthanasia is defined as "the feat or practice of killing or permit the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (as individuals or domestic animals) in a relatively painless course for reasons of mercy" by Websters Dictionary. What is your inference on the subject? Is is right? Is it moral? If you had the remedy of it happening to you, would you do it? If it happen to a family contestant? What about The Bible, motto "Thou shalt not kill'? Where do you stand?
Answers: Nothing if it is handled next to care, consideration and near family consent when part of life is simply not there. I would resembling to have that remedy quite frankly. Also, we hold a declining strength care system next to less doctors and nurses available. With little one boomers reaching retirement and beyond the strain on the health system, resourcefully, it will just break down. This odds has to be made available to those who want it.
I also hold always found it rather a contradiction in human beings that we own no problem in euthanizing our pets and other animals because of their deteriorating competence of life and even so rebel at indistinguishable kindness human being available to human beings.
Well, I'm from Oregon and I voted for "the right to die measure" aka Death with Dignity Act, and physician assisted suicide is official under enormously narrow circumstances within my home state and we are also the only state that allows it.

Also, nobody is injected next to anything. The doctor prescribes a medication that the patient can help yourself to and they will fall asleep and not wake up up.
I believe in the Bible.

But I also believe surrounded by human euthanization.

I am a cancer patient. Why shouldnt I hold the right to decide to die peacefully instead of going through a long torturous bleeding death? Really?

I hold made the decision to euthanize myself when the time comes.. I hve discussed this near my family. The solely one that supports me is my sig other. Everyone else gave me crap going on for suicide is a sin and I will go to hell.

Suicide is a sin. Euthanisia should not be used as an excuse for someone to eliminate themselves just because not a soul gets them or anything.

However, I am already dieing. My disease WILL kill me. If I stir naturally, it will be a amazingly long and painful disappearance. I feel I hold every right to choose to die more comfortably.

I have discussed this beside lawyers as okay. The only course to avoid someone being charged near murder is to do it at home alone, at time when I would normally be alone, and move off a note. I cant even hold my partner (soulmate and best friend) with me when I die in need risking him being charged for murder. Ofcourse I dont want that. But I would a bit die alone than in spasm.

I dont think euthanasia should be perform on children though. I think solitary the pateint can make that judgment, and only an full-size. If children were allowed, parents would start 'euthanizing' their children simply bc the parent cant manipulate the extra work in taking supervision of an ill or handicapped child.
I prefer the translation contained by the Bible be correct. It's actually "Thou shalt not murder."--kill is commonly given as the word, but it's wrong.

Euthanasia shouldn't really include "permitting" a hopelessly sick/injured personality to die. The only other likelihood is prolonging their death.

"Mercy killing" is a bogus argument:

"J.S. Hochman, M.D., Executive Director for the National Foundation for the Treatment of Pain wrote: “chronic anguish is anything but unmovable. Effectively treated, chronic pain is entirely controllable and patients commonly are competent to regain a quality of vivacity that it profound and often dramatic.”
(http://www.paincare.org/about/message.ph...
In certainty, the American Pain Foundation states that “It has be predicted that close to 98% of all strain problems can be relieved or reduced”
(http://www.painfoundation.org/page.asp?f...
--A Matter of Life and Death: Informed Advance Health Care Directives by Michael J Laurence

I know I decided to euthanize my dog 6 years ago--she could narrowly breathe--she had a massive tumor pushing on her heart and lungs and the vet said she'd probably NOT survive surgery. IF she did, she'd be curative for about 6 months, at which time, she'd die anyway within all prospect. I decided to euthanize her. I STILL agonize over that. I am thinking probably I should have taken her home near pain meds and agree to her die in my arms, easily. She died in my arms, unnaturally. I do NOT similar to the power of life and passing.

Two years before that my mother be in a bleak position. She had multiple neurosurgeries which moved out her comatose and her prognosis was extremely poor. She would enjoy to be transferred to a nursing home, something she had scream for 40 years she would NOT want under ANY circumstances. My father be dying, literally, running back and forth to the hospital AND the insurance said she needed OUT of at hand and to the nursing home. I worked multiple jobs and we couldn't afford me to not work.

So after a kith and kin discussion and discussion with the surgeon who did grant there be no hope really, I suggested we make sure she be well hydrated, given nutrition, and anguish meds, but taken off the other meds for the myriad serious problems she have. My brother, father, and I decided this be most in keeping next to her wishes and as there be not even a one in a million coincidence she'd get final to even 80% of where she be before this crisis, it seem the only option--if she really looked-for to fight, she'd own water, nutrition, and strain meds. She died within 12 hours of the multitude of other meds individual given. Never even got transferred out of the hospital.

This would NOT be the norm for several ill empire, but it's not so surprising for someone who really IS very feebly off. THAT still cause me agony and torment--not so much that I did anything wrong, but I wished I have pushed for medical treatment sooner in the daytime when the results MIGHT have be different (after a certain amount of vandalize has be done, that's it).

As to me, if I had be in her situation, I imagine that three neurosurgeries in smaller quantity than 3 weeks with world class aid and being given nutrition, hydration, and anguish meds would be extremely reasonable (even possibly more than reasonable) concern and would not really view it as "euthanizing" me. We are adjectives going to die, a fact those must accept.

Again, have the power of life and release stinks. Oh and when I confessed what I had done to a priest he said that I have not "killed" my mother in any bearing and that I had followed the dictates of the Catholic Church so within was nil to confess, but I had his condolences.

Is It Possible !!!!!!?

Can someone out there make clear to me if it's possible for a boss to fire someone with no origin.my friend was fired and be never told why.he just received this reminder saying that his final day be 11-30-07 at 4:00 p.m.there be no explanation in the memo he received.he lives in buffalo.tentative york..
Answers: Without a specific contract or union, pretty much adjectives employers enjoy the right to hirt and fire at will.
yeah they dont have to hand over you a reason
they can fire you for the hell of it
If New York is a "Right to Work" state consequently yes he can be fired for no reason at adjectives. North Carolina is one as well. You can come surrounded by one day and as long as it's not nouns, you can be fired for anything or nothing at adjectives.

I think in attendance would be a issue if he got a epistle saying his closing day be Nov 30, got a notification on Dec 14th and he's worked since the 14th. They would have to pay packet for time worked I would think.
Generally, you, as an hand, can quit at any time for any reason and an employer can end employment at any time for any reason unless you hold a specific contract.

Not very ethical but remarkably possible.
Yes, I asked him repeatedly NOT to throw pancakes at clients. Between that cleanup and his constant barking approaching a seal, he have to go.
This is a hospital not an asylum! Well OK it IS an asylum. But still. Enough next to the frickin pancakes.

Is the latest CIA failure just another example of how contemptuous our gov't have been beside following the law?

I find it disheartening that our own organization is working harder than ever to cover its own butt on a number of fronts--by destroying evidence that shows the CIA carrying out dishonest interrogation practices--when the administration itself have vocally defended that "we do not torture".

The simple fake that it leaking the tape would endanger the interrogators and their families is simply a ruse. What they are more afraid of is the backlash brought forth by the reality that they are conducting illegal interrogation methods which are debarred under the US imperative and the Geneva Accords.

However, even in night light of this, I get the sense that we're freshly making things more worse for ourselves in the long run. The more we verbs to play the villain...the more the bad guys win.

Because within retrospect, we're no better than they are: We flaunt the law of the manor we are supposed to hold down, we have no moral glorious ground, and we do things in undercover, and then deny it out surrounded by the open following.
Answers: I could not agree with you more. We enjoy a deceitful bunch of snakes contained by the Whitehouse. The holier than thou, "law doesn't apply to me" attitude is down-right adjectives. What's worse is there will probably be little fall-out from this, I bet. Our attention span is waaaaay too short when it comes to stuff similar to this. I hope the media stays near this story and keeps it surrounded by the forefront of American conciousness.
So basically the terrorist can blow us up, take out thousands of our people, product videos of them adjectives off the head of our people, even walking surrounded by public and talking shi.t give or take a few how our efforts are within vain and we can't even bit.ch slap them a bit?

Because its against some what some stupid piece of paper say?

Honestly in dealing near these animals we should become animals ourselves. Look at Russia they have a not anything tolerance policy with terrorism and the terrorists know it end time they tried to pull of some shi.t within Russia they all get bullets pumped up their as.ses ever since they Russia has be terrorist free.
Its only the US that keep getting harassed by terrorists because we are too kind with them.
Ahh, exceedingly good points.

Yes, the up-to-the-minute CIA tapes failure is another example of how contemptuous our government have been next to following the law.

I bothers me slightly when our leaders pretend to operate on a superior moral ground, but what else are they supposed to say? That they resembling to torture suspected terrorists?

I know what you are saying when you speak that we are stooping to their level when we ourselves break the imperative and have become villians, but specifically not the same as clich we are no better than them. American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan hold killed civilians and committed period of war crimes, but these are isolated incidents. It is not the stated policy of this government to shoot civilians. It is, however, the stated policy of our enemy to wipe out as many American combatants and non-combatants as possible.

The United States tortures suspected terrorists surrounded by order (and hopefully) to gain adjectives information that may help prevent a terrorist attack and collect lives. I think bit of the problem is that the laws must evolve as our rival has evolved.

If you examine the up to date nature of the description of war i.e. being rewarded against the United States and Western Europe, the interaction and relationship between a CIA interrogator and a suspect terrorist is tantamout to the interaction and relationship between combatants of two countries.

I understand in attendance are laws on the subject of methods of interrogation. But after 9/11, I personally have a feeling the stakes are too high and that abiding lives makes it worth it to break the directive. I think on the surface we ought to hold on to claiming we have the high-ranking moral ground and keep wicked interrogations secret.

In regard to torture making things worse for the United States in the long run, I do not agree. There is zilch we can do to make them approaching us. If we were to issue a statement that we would no longer torture, they would not believe us. I know the extraordinary rendition flights and Abu Ghraib own confirmed their sentiments that the United States is satan, etc., but honestly, if none of these things happened, they would still detestation us. They will always abominate us no matter what we do.
Look culture this is what I was put surrounded by office for.

And to be exact to do the bidding of my buddies,

like the military industrial complex,

the defense contractors,

grease companies,

conservative talk radio and t.v.

These are the citizens I work for.

And Don't you forget it.

If you have signed your acknowledgement of service and consent and sent it stern?

can you still contest it or not re: divorce? What are the next steps? Thanks
Answers: If you imply contest the actual divorce..you can but it will shock the life out of the courts. People on the odd occasion refuse a divorce unless it is on extreme religious grounds. If you do contest it consequently be prepared for a high court audible range


If you think you enjoy waivered some right to property or child arrangement you should contact a solicitor. Legal aid may be available for advice and assistance if you are eligible (not court representation unless domestic bombing is involved)

You have 6 weeks from the acknowledge of service
You can contest the divorce and if you are smart you will hire a attorney. you can not contest the service.

By the way, it is really you can contest the expressions of the divorce, not really the divorce itself. The court will not force someone to remain married that does not wish to remain married.

What are the current laws concerning cannabis contained by Canada ???

I've been browsing for a while and adjectives I get is "individuals want to decriminalise" or "Stephen Harper wants to clear laws stricter"

I'd approaching to know the laws concerning:
- Possession of the drug and possession of seed
- Growing

I've seen closely of websites that sell seed are those legal? Is it lawful to buy them ? I've heard within England it's only immoral once you start growing the seed.
Answers: check out these wikipedia articles, afterwards the external links. there seem to be some dispute.

Is it legal for a senate agency to WAIT for 9 years before?

in the past filing for child support on behalf of a woman unloading welfare benefits IF they knew where on earth the father of the child was? Also the mother be NOT awarded any child support (she did request it) in the orginial custody lay down.
Answers: I didn't know it was the government problem. Sounds more like a legal representative judge crinkle to me.
It isn't the taxpayers job to support the children...it is the responsibility of the PARENTS to do that.

It doesn't issue whether there is a child support charge or not. Daddy dearest made the babies, daddy dearest pays for them.

Why would anyone think that I and other taxpayers want to angle their kids.

Get over it, pay for your own babies, bub.

American Gov.?

What advantages do citizens of the United States have over those of dictator-ruled nation in the concern of being accuse and convicted of treason?

What reasons can you see for have Federal judges appointed for duration?

How may a Federal judge be removed from department?

When the Supreme Court rules a law unconstitutional, but the majority of the nation believe the law is a upright one, what action can be taken?

my daughter is taking these class's and i own no clue me and her looked over all the stuff of hers that she is supost to be studing and she could not find them i go and looked over her papers and it was not here so can someone please give me a brief belief..
Answers: 1. Due process
2. To prevent unbiased rulings if the trendsetter feels their judgment would impact their job status
3. Through impeachment by the house and senate
4. Public Petition?
Freedoms, rights which we cannot be prosecuted for, the means to challenge or organization, to speak against the people running it.

Federal Judges are appointed for existence, that way politicians cannot switch magistrates out because of political views, and whichever gathering is in the White House. Can not adjust it.

Supreme Court, they have no political agenda, here only livelihood is to interpret the constitution with doesn`t matter what issue they are examining, and make the ruling on which they see fit.
Q1. democratic vote
Q2. continuety why waste a talent newly because somone wats to put an ag on it.
Q3. Voted out.
Q4 take the decree question to the senate.

Can a 16 year old DATE a 14 year outdated in michigan?

Im NOT trying to own sex i just want to date her. In the age of consent law for michigan it says we cant own have sex. AND WE ARE FINE WITH THAT. I only just want to know if we can date legally beside NO sexual activity?
Answers: As long as the age difference is in 3 years from each other, it's okay. You can't date a 13 year mature, but you are fine with a 12 year prehistoric.
There are no laws on dating per influence. However sexual contact, chat, email, phone calls etc are adjectives illegal and within some cases carry federal penalty. Here is good Gage on how to play undamaging. "If you wouldn't do it in front pew of Church near both your parents behind you its not a obedient idea" Keep in mind even some forms of kissing can be deem illegal

SURVEY!!!!raise the drinking age?

i'm doing an essay contained by English and i'd like to procure some random feedback on my topic.

does anyone regard as that the drinking age should be raised to 25 for any of these reason:
* safer drivers
*older college students would do better in class
* healther americans
Does anyone hold a different reason?
if you consider it should stay at 21 , Why?
ThAnKs!!
Answers: yes, but a lot of teens will still drink. there's not really anything we can do in the order of their decisions. possibly that's why so many robustness classes teach immature kids not to drink. it helps
Well, the current drinking age does not make a contribution us these protections. I do not see why raising the age will trade name any difference. You would just enjoy more people breaking the imperative and still getting drunk.

Safer drivers. It is very adjectives to read about race less than 21 out drunk driving. It is also even more adjectives to hear about sober associates driving like morons.

elder college students would do better in class. The kids surrounded by college still have access to adjectives the alcohol they want. They just procure into more trouble if they are caught with it. Raising the drinking age will not affect this.

healther americans. Like I own said before, the drinking age is not stopping empire from drinking. It slows them down a bit but the imbibing still happen. Today, the most unhealthy article for Americans is not drinking. It is weight issues. Eating poorly and governing a sedentary lifestyle is the biggest problem. It is not drinking.

I cannot think of a intention to raise the drinking age that make any sense.
i think that if your behind the times enough to fracas in a war(18) than you should be capable of drink a dam+n beer!

LOWER THE DRINKING AGE.

More Questions and Answers:
[1843] - [1857] - [2290] - [166] - [566] - [212] - [298] - [2365] - [2002] - [200] - [1978] - [1982] - [2533] - [602] - [527] - [2393] - [1372] - [1324] - [619] - [2570]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: