Law Questions and Answers
What would you do?
If you knew someone have left their children alone..Report them? Or Turn a blind eye?
If you turned a blind eye would you consistency responsible if something terrible happen as a consequence?
Devils advocates inevitability not answer..
Answers: I would definitly report them. I heard something like a couple in washington state 2 years ago who moved out their 8 month old son at home everyday because they said they couldnt afford childcare. The horrible chunk is that they were both within the Navy! It broke my heart. Some parents are so wrapped up in themselves they dont even effort about the innocent lives that THEY brought into this world. Its awful.
set down leaving? is it stepping out to fetch something from teh coup¨¦? popping round to see a neighbour ...and staying a few minutes to have a natter... unconsciously of course!
or nip to the shops for a pint of milk, or the chip shop at the bottom of the road...
there are so tons variables, where do you draw a strip? what constitutes leaving? within a close community that 15 or 30 minutes isnt a problem, we have neighbours and friends... its what those do. its what our parents did.. its how we learned responsibility... i run a resident group, once a month we move off our kids for an hour or so... fran was 10, and jess 14... is that child endangerment? because within every house in the house we kick em out, come rainfall or darkness at 7.30am (ish) to be in motion to school unsupervised...
and however the mcanns, well it didnt work for them... and its a medium circus.. guilt-blame-suspicion, either passageway a kid is missing... and all parents whether complicit or not, feel responsible...for what they did, or didnt do. either instrument, as parents were damned, by ourselves or others.
detain 22 in doings.
We are all responsibile for the welfare of children no issue who they belong to. Legally and Morally
Why some government agencies do not hold their own safety programs?
Answers: Agencies that are sort of 'virtual' would lone have sanctuary programs within the physical buildings their team reside in.
Example, the IFCC, Internet Fraud department that controls the IC3, Internet Crime Complaint Center...
I'm smoking a joint right very soon. Does anyone really have a problem near that? How does it really affect you?
Before you answer, know that I have never be on the public dole in any form, so don't hand over me your tired old "drain on public resources" argument. Or the "it's against the law" argument. I'm not aphorism Marijuana's healthy or making any claims. I'm simply letting all of you know what I'm doing and want to know if any of you really enjoy a legitimate issue beside it. (I had this handwritten surrounded by advance. And typing this have taken forever.)Answers: No, I'm glad you are a pot-smoker
With any luck, you will be careless and the police will pick you up and charge you next to possession. Then I will laugh.
EDIT: 'thumbs down' eh? Well, don't do the crime if you can't do the time!
It does affect me because I'm green with envy of you. You're smoking some green and I'm not and I want to be smoking some right NOW!!!
Smoke on!!!
As long as you aren't being a threat to others (driving misspent, for example) the only problem I hold with it have to do with it's illegality. That is, because it is illicit, growers and distrubuters have to achievement illegally and habitually break other laws while doing that. They may be predisposed and able to use firearms surrounded by protecting their trade which is a real problem.
Of course, it it be legalized, that issue would go away.
I don't really consideration about you smoking it
Besides,
I to some extent talk to someone stoned next someone buzzed up on whiskey.
I wonder where could I catch some?
Thank you for letting us know what you're doing.
No, I have no issue next to it. You're not my kid.
pass it here
Hi i know you might think this is a silly ?I own an idea that i will approaching to get official document, how do i go give or take a few it
I'm hoping someone can really help me near this. How can i get this government grant legally? please comfort meAnswers: You can do it on your own, if you can read all the stuff and gain knowledge by reading the right bits and pieces. You can also let a professional to do it, and do it right.
In nonspecific, the steps are:
1. You do patent dig out, not only the US Patent and Trademark office's government grant database (www.uspto.gov), but also worldwide database. Because if someone have invented your model years ago and have it patented surrounded by United Kingdom, you cannot file impossible to tell apart in US even though that official document was not file in US.
2. Review the government grant search result, and that help you to improve your invention and develop the chances of human being grant a rights later when you database your patent.
3. Decide where on earth in the world you want to wallet your patent, rights protection are per country basis, to be exact, a United Kingdom patent will not take protection in US. So for your invention, when successfully produced and market, you will have it made contained by Asia (for example China), sell to US and Europe. Then you want to file rights in China, US, and European Patent Office (to cover more than one countries).
4. File the first official document application in one of the countries you preferred. Once it is filed, you own 12-months period to wallet to the other countries. That is, for example, you file it surrounded by USPTO on Jan 1, 2007, then you spend the 12 months' time to souk your invention, towards the end of 2007, you find it the invention will fly, later you spend more money to file official document in China and European Patent Office. These filings have to be done before Dec 31, 2007 and claim priority over your productive filed US official document.
After first filing, you are more or smaller number protected in language of your ownership of the patent contained by the filing country, so you are protected when you show undisputed portion of your idea to factory or potential buyers. And you are the merely person who hold the right to file government grant in other countries inside that 12 months period.
Of course, you are recommended to hire some one who know the trade, to be precise, patent attorney to work this out.
An notion is not good plenty, you need to hold a plan to implement your idea. Like, hypothesis is "fly to the moon in 4 hours", plan is you enjoy some idea of how to build a gadget to travel very promptly, etc. So you cannot patent the view to fly to the moon in 4 hours, but you can exclusive rights your invention of a very prompt traveling machine.
You may also explore comfort to get some political affairs funding in your official document process. Like this one:
http://www.cip-hk.com/blog/2007/01/paten...
Patent attorney is your best bet, but it will cost you.
If you don't have the money to earnings a professional to do the application for you get a copy of "Patent it yourself" from NOLO at your local library and ably do it yourself
You can also buy it here
http://www.nolo.com/product.cfm/objectID...
the only article silly about it is , not doing it ,and watching someone else do it... so plentiful big ideas come from that silly thought ,or others laughing... t.v. show "big opinion is all base on live people and that silly conception that have made or own intent of making big fat silly money. dutiful luck...
Cigarette smokers To Pay for child health carefulness?
This is very outlandish..I have to say-so, I smoke but don't drink.. . Drinking causes far more form risks then smoking ever did, look at adjectives those people kill by drunk drivers?.. Children die in saloon accidents, children become homeless, we clear for parents to drink when we pay for medicaid., to hold their child to a doctor, yet they own the money to go sit contained by a bar. I can't believe the nation who hate smokers, but will sit beneath a tree smoking pot.. How about the congress and their fine party where Alcohol is drank?
I dislike it so I think we should charge a 1.00 per drink to settle for that tax..lol at smallest we would be fair surrounded by doing that.. What do you say? Oh and let also tell general public who drink and gamble, to wage a speical tax also.. How more or less Chocolate eater, or people who devour to much at McDonalds.. Yeah..lol Do you see where it is going?.. They hold no better ideas to minister to this country, they just throw stuff around to show they over remunerated!!
Wake up People!!
Answers: They complain about how smoking kill and all they do is duty it. Way to go dems.
If it is so unpromising they should ban it. But alas they will not too much money to be made.
I know.
It7s only law after stupid canon.
The problem is because lawmakers are not thinking logically and surrounded by the long term when they receive these laws. They a short time ago make a snappy edict to shut people up similar to giving a pacifier to an infant. They have no respect for liberty and will not stop until our freedom is gone completely.
People freshly don't believe in personal responsibility anymore.
That's why we ALL want to VOTE for RON PAUL '08.
Oh brother.
If you are polluting the air, consequently pay the price.
If your pollution is making your children sick, afterwards pay for that.
That go for any smoker.
I don't drink, smoke or take drugs, I do not resembling chocolate, and rarely put away at McDonald's.
But MY eating chocolate will not endanger another human. YOUR smoking will and does.
MY ingestion McDonald's will not endanger another human, but YOUR smoking will.
If your children are sick due to your smoking, then why should I contained by any way reimburse for their care.
You chose the infatuation, that you know can hurt them.
It is more like, 'I love these smokes, more than I want my children to own good vigour.'
I do wait hungrily, where smoking surrounded by a closed car, next to children 12 and under, is unendorsed.
Drinking and driving is illegal. So why not massacre your own children slowly, be illegal?
Anyone that smokes where on earth someone else has to breath that dirty nouns, thinks just of themselves and the other people are second, that includes your children. You may speak you would do anything for them, but smoking near them belies that statement.
They come second to your cigarettes.
Solution: quit smoking, it can be done, have been done, and is really not that unyielding, if you want to, that is if you want to put your children's condition before your cigarettes.
If a manager yell at you for a stupid reason, or no origin, what are you entitled to do?
What is the best reaction? Legally can I waddle away because I don't want to put up w/ harassment? Or, can I stare at them blanky, and take off without a word when they've finished their tirade? OR, as I hold recently done, turn home early because I be upset and it affected me physically?Also, is one yelled at seriously a sign that they dont like you/want you to resign? I give attention to my manager yell at me moreso than other employees, even though I do adjectives my work??? and I do it really well?
Answers: if they don't hold a human resources dept, you have not a soul to report the mgr to, so get another employment. abuse is uncalled for surrounded by this day and age.
I don't promise with that stuff exceptionally well.
It might move me to share them to.
(sings)
take this position and SHOVE IT!
But a lot of individuals don't have that risk.
I had a guy do that when we loading boxes of fish contained by cold storage place here in Seattle.
He give me some **** earlier.
after that...
we were unloading sorting and palletizing..
I looked briefly at pallet he be working on...
he had it wrong...
I sure didn't transmit him about it.
he will find out when he is done and consequently he will have to fix it.
Can you contact someone from your company HR dept. in the region of this type of abuse? This is singling out and no one contained by the workforce should have to put up next to any manager yell at them. I doubt very seriously if your co-workers would side next to you if you needed witnesses. Start documenting these incidents as they occur, date & times. Everyone should be treated with courtesy, dignity, and respect at work. It would be nice if you could cartridge those conversation but it wouldn't be legal. File a complaint beside your company union if they enjoy one or file a complaint near the labor relation board in your city. Being stressful on any assignment isn't healthy.Don't tramp off the duty because you can be fire for job discarding. Talk to your manager's supervisor and let them know how you are person harass.
Suing for negligence...what to expect?
I recently spoke to a advocate whom reccomended that in my crust, that I (with his services) use negligence as the bearer of settling a medical issue that I've been wronged by (an unnamed company).I will credible be injured the rest of my life, and am wondering what sort of financial gain can be attained normally...? I would enjoy much rather not be in this situation, but I numeral with the medical expenses I forsee,...I hold no option.
So the question are:
--What can be obtained monetarily contained by settlements of this nature (ie lifetime ailments)?
--What sort of fees are restrained by a lawyer?
I don't expect it walk to trial.
Answers: I'm sorry to hear of your situation and hope that if you choose to proceed I hope it all go well.
It is impossible to articulate with demonstrability what type of monetary gains you would receive. If you be suing the types of things you would be seeking compensation for are things like loss of adjectives income (take into account what you be earning prior to your injury and what you are potential to lose through your injury), loss of income (income which was lost as a direct result of the injury, through time spent within hospital etc), medical expenses, both previous and on-going if they relate to the injury) as well as on-going treatment costs that are not medical (for instance if you obligation to have modifications such as a ramp or elevate placed in your home). Furthermore you could also sue for nonspecific damages - damages can be awarded for stress, pain and suffering as all right as loss of limb (for instance culture have be awarded amounts for losing an arm etc).
Now if you were seeking a settlement you would involve to add up the possible attraction of all of the above (which is where on earth a lawyer comes surrounded by handy as they will know precedents in your jurisidiction as very well as if any of the above is capped). Then negotiations will clutch place with your advocate seeking to agree with the superlative amount and the other party trying to quibble it down.
Whether they choose to settle or not depends on a number of things. The amount you are seeking, whether they can afford to wages that amount, whether a possible court case would be out of the query (ie; they do not want bad publicity or they would categorically lose) or whether they believe that may win or there would be no glum impact on the business.
Without knowing which jurisidiction you are in and the exact disposition of the injuries it is impossible to give you even a globe park figure.
In regard to what to expect a lawyer to charge, this depends on their charge schedule. Some lawyer may charge a lump sum regardless of what you receive in compensation, others may represent you and single take a commission if you win, or others may steal a percentage of your compensation.
It depends on who represents you, are they experienced or are they relatively inexperienced (the more senior the lawyer the more they will charge), whether they will entail more than one person working on the grip or they can handle it singlehandedly and the amount of time it take to complete the settlement - obviously for you, the shorter the better.
My counsel would be to contact lawyers within your area who specialise contained by malpractice claims and ask them about their payment schedule and what type of charges could you expect.
Good luck.
Attorney fees are roughly speaking 33 % of the settlement. You can sue for pain and suffering and adjectives medical costs. That's going to be the iffy though because you normally have need of to get your current doctor to testify as to what your adjectives medical needs will be and it's intensely hard to put a monetary expediency on future medical treatment. The attorney will usually pilfer that information and calculate what he feel is an appropriate settlement amount. You can also be more specific that states all adjectives medical treatment related to this accident be covered. There are lots variables so to get more definitive answers you really stipulation to discuss these questions near an attorney.
Landlord Tenant law?
(NE)I'll try to cause this as short as I can. My (nearly ex) landlord vitally through his own negligence and refusal to address a major repair issue, cause the apartment to become unliveable. We had compensated rent for two weeks that we were completely powerless to live in it.
Now, he have without obtain a court order (which, as I get in NE, is necessary) he have changed the locks, holding hostage the rest of our stuff (due to the EXTREMELY hostile and dangerous condition of the apartment, it have taken us longer to move than it normally would).
Above and beyond getting my stuff rear legs, is there any style to hold him accountable for his arrangements. He has,
1) Acted negligently as a proprietor and ignored a massive repair issue that resulted surrounded by the unliveable condition of the apartment.
2) Even after we had found another place to live, refuse to advise the rest of the tenant of the dangerous circumstances (as far as I know, they still live there) and
3) Has circumvented
Answers: It sounds resembling a constructive eviction issue, where the premises are made unlivable through the negligence of the tenant in properly fixing things.
There are several facts missing: be you under a lease agreement or month to month; did you distribute proper notice; did your manager change the locks of the premises prior to your termination of tenure; did the landlord save any of your security deposit; what is the pro of your possessions that he is holding hostage; what jurisdiction you are in; and the temperament of the hostile living conditions.
Once these additional facts are disclosed, broad advise can be given.
If the hostile condition is a vigour issue, i.e. mold, you may want to contact the local Health Department.
This section of the statute covering tenant rights might help you
http://realestate.findlaw.com/tenant/
You have need of to take him to small claims court right away and don't dally. Small claims court does not allow either participant to be represented by lawyers so it is your story against his and it is usually merely about $25.00 to database but don't wait or things could grasp worse . It does sound close to he is breaking the law.
Good Luck
Guilty or not guilty?
Ok well I get a speeding ticket. I really don't know if i was really doing 60 within a 45 but i well could own been. My put somebody through the mill is if I plead guilty and the cop doesn't show up are the charges dismissed? I no if I plead not guilty and the cop doesn't show up to court then the charges are dropped. So what happen if he doesnt show up and I plead guilty?Answers: If the officer shows up your not going to win regardless of how you plea. If the officer doesn't show up, you will win by default; however, that seldom happens.
Depending on where on earth you live, you will go until that time a judge and enter a plea. If you plea not guilty consequently the judge will set a date for your trial. If you plea guilty, you will lately have to settle the fine.
Another option is to plea no contest. It's a plea where on earth your not admitting guilt, but your not aphorism your innocent either. You can plea no contest money the fine and ask that the ticket be deferred on the condition that you don't receive a ticket within a thirty afternoon period.
Of course the palpable solution is not to speed so you don't get stopped within the first place. If you have to hit the brakes every time you see a cop evidently you're speeding. Of course I've been driving for almost 20 years, I find it concrete to believe you didn't know how fast you be going.
If the cop does not show up then it is dismissed. The authority is a neutral aspect.
If you plead guilty consequently you are accepting whatever punishment and giving away your right to a trial.
So when you saw the cherry flashing at the rear you, you didn't glance down at the speedometer out of curiousity or anything? My what control.
In answer to your request for information, I would plead guilty for the simple fact that you hold no way on the planet to prove you aren't guilty. What's going to be your defense if you don't even know if you be going 60 or not?
FYI - If you automatically hit the brakes, then you must hold known you be speeding. Why else hit the brakes?
Guilty.
If he does not show then surrounded by most cases the case will be dismissed (it be against me ) but the judge have the power to re-schedule the case. If you plead guilty after you will be paying the fine. If you can then basically go to traffic college and the ticket will be removed from your record as powerfully as keep your insurance rates down. In most states if you enjoy not gone to the school surrounded by the last two years after you can attend again. It will cost about as much as the ticket but keeping it stale your record for insurance purposes is by far more momentous .
Scientific law and permitted law?
What do they hold in adjectives, and what's a legal canon?Answers: scientific directive
1 A natural phenomenon that have been proven to go off invariably whenever certain conditions are met. 2. A formal statement describing such a phenomenon and the conditions beneath which it occurs. Also call law.
legitimate law
Law (a loanword from Old Norse lag), within politics and jurisprudence, is a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or warranty specified relationships among people and organization, provide methods for ensuring the dispassionate treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct.+
They hold nothing contained by common, save for the word 'law' that in this defence is meant to convey that it applies to adjectives.
More Questions and Answers:
[2001] - [1612] - [2118] - [1425] - [1261] - [474] - [1731] - [193] - [170] - [2183] - [643] - [940] - [1191] - [1309] - [115] - [464] - [660] - [2283] - [2049] - [2415]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: