Law Questions and Answers
What should be done when...what rights do i have..?
I just this minute paid a large amount of money for a legal service and the female that was supposed to filch care of the issue back out. I distrusted her from the beginning and slowly over a time of year of 9 months, she fabricated excuses and stories in establish to cover up the fact that she be completely fake. Now, what rights do I hold concerning suing the lady & what steps do I want to take?Answers: Surely if you compensated a "great deal" of money, you have some sort of a contract or written agreement upon which you can sue her for breach of contract. Make a written constraint first, send her a note, keep a copy. If no written contract agreement, some receipts or even witness to the agreement will facilitate. If you can't afford an attorney, file it yourself using self-help how to net site like Legal Support Services.USA. Good luck!
where on earth do you live. The jurisdiction governs the law in interview regarding issues close to this. Look in the sickly pages for a local decriminalized group that does free advice; or send for the local bar association for a referral
perfect luck.
Contact your state bar association and database a complaint with them.
Would you pay postage for your phone books?
If 50 residents of every voting district mail the useless yellow page to their representatives, do you think we might carry legislation prohibiting such abuse?Answers: Excellent point. What a spend foolishly of trees and energy.
I dont know but I will the phone book on the sidewalk in front of my apartment and own told the landlord that someone keep littering and soliciting. Eventually, the idiot phone book companies will get the point.
If a construction worker finds money in walls he is demolishing, does he or the homeowner carry to keep it?
What enunciate you?Answers: ahhh, this is a property law 101, first year canon school type cross-examine.
Under the common directive, found property can be divided into
(1) lost property--Property is generally deem to have be lost if it is found in a place where on earth the true owner likely did not intend to set it down, and where on earth it is not likely to be found by the true owner. At adjectives law, the finder of a lost item could claim the right to possess the item against any other personage in the world except the true owner.
(2) mislaid property--Property is collectively deemed to own been mislaid (some courts refer to it as misplaced) if it is found within a place where the true owner feasible did intend to set it, but then simply forgot to pick it up again. For example, a wallet found contained by a shop lying on a counter near a change register will likely be deem misplaced rather than lost. The finder of a misplaced reason has a duty to turn it over to the owner of the premises, on the argument that the true owner is likely to return to that location to search out for his misplaced item. If the true owner never shows up, the property becomes that of the owner of the premises.
(3) forsaken property--Property is generally deem to have be abandoned if it is found contained by a place where the true owner probable intended to leave it, but is contained by such a condition that it is apparent that the true owner have no intention of returning to claim the item. Abandoned property generally become the property of whoever should find it and take possession of it first, although some states enjoy enacted statutes below which certain kind of abandoned property — usually cars and wrecked ships and aircraft — become the property of the state.
(4) treasure trove--Treasure trove is property that consists of coins or currency underhand by the owner. To be considered treasure trove and not mislaid property, the property must have be deliberately invisible or concealed, and sufficiently long ago that the original owner can be considered unresponsive or not discoverable. For example, under English ruling, 100 Roman coins found buried in a chest would be treasure trove; however, 100 Roman coins which be lost over time in a bazaar would not be treasure trove, as they were not blatantly hidden as a single hoard.
Under American adjectives law, treasure trove belongs to the finder, unless the inspired owner reclaims. Some states own rejected the American common canon and hold that treasure trove belongs to the owner of the property in which the treasure trove be found. These courts reason that the American adjectives law rule encourage trespass.
Sooo...a bunch of people will argue in some way about what this stuff is, and someone will win and someone will lose. Interesting stuff, if dry.
Moral standards would be to pass it back to the home owners.
But, what does the contract speak?
The article was interesting, but let's facade it. The Woman owns the home in which the walls be located. The man came into her home beneath contract, for which he was rewarded, to do work. Now who do you think owns the money. The entity owning the walls, or the person who is a hired contractor unrelated to the human being who owns the walls.
As a judge said, he sued her beneath the old but little know, "Finders Keeps, Losers Weepers," proposition of law, i.e. rarely used; and never within this country.
She offered him a finders fee of 10% and out of greed he rejected it.
sorry. Homeowner win this one, hands down.
When property is surrounded by someone's possession, it cannot be found within the import of lost property. An article in the possession and protection of the owner of the place where on earth it is found is not legally considered lost. Similarly, an owner of environment is considered to have possession of adjectives articles on the land even though he or she may be badly informed of their presence. If the finder of lost property is an employee of the owner of the parkland, the owner's right to custody of the property is superior to that of the employee.
Is there anyway of finding out who someones Lawyer is???
minus using another Lawyer?? are there any system searchs you can do that will list the Lawyers first name?Answers: Not directly. Oftentimes, even the fact of representation itself is protected by attorney's ethical duty of confidentialty. You could discover PAST representation from court collection etc., but present representation can be a secret, unless the client allows otherwise.
YES! Every attorney must report a NOTICE OF APPEARANCE in every covering. Court cases are PUBLIC info (except juvenile cases). If you know the Plaintiff & Defendant, and or case number, you can look up the baggage and find out the attorney. Some times the Clerk of Clourt will give this public info to you over the phone! Most courts put this info on-line presently but it may take a few weeks, or you can travel to the court house clerks office and use the public computer to look up any armour and find the info. Its best to go to the court clerks department in human being and review the file yourself. The attorney catch sight of of appearance will be there.
Is it agaisnt the law not to pay packet over time rate?
Im a medical assistant for a doctor and she whants me to work from 9 to really late resembling 7 0r 730 and i dont even get to clock out for lunch. she breaking the tenet right?? i even work weekends sometimes and still get regular earningsAnswers: Are you earning an hourly wage on a part of a set time basis or are you earn a salary on a full time foundation? If you are full time and salaried, you are not entitled to over time. You may be entitled to comp time though. You inevitability to check the policies of the office and your employment status. If you own an hr rep to talk to that would be great.
Indeed it is.
Home health guardianship question?
If you work within home health keeping in pts home's as a assistance giver and nearby are other family member living in the home and at any time you quality you are in harms path by a out side family applicant. of the home you are staying in.you finish your shift and call upon in transmit the whole story to your boss and why you surface like your not sheltered and that none of the other girls are either. because of a in no doubt family appendage. as a independent contract laborer is there not somewere contained by the rules of pt saftey and the saftey of the health carefulness worker were we should not hold to go to a home we dont grain safe surrounded by... in other words if we hold a good ample reason for our vibrations they cant fire you for refusing the situation if you know for sure you could be in menace..Answers: Sounds reasonable. You shouldn't own to work in a place where on earth you feel your existence is in menace. Don't know how your contract reads if you own one as an independent. You should be able to waste to work there underneath the conditions you stated without alarm of reprisal. I think i.e. your option as an independent contract individual. Have you discussed this with the boss you mentioned.?
Discution to define control on cannabis?
HelloI am writing this to gain an balanced view on the tenet and restriction of cannabis. I would love to hear your opinions and thoughts of the explanation that the government continues to restrict cannabis and but harder, more addictive drugs such as alcohol and tobacco are still left legalized. Please share your opinions on this subject, and dont simply answer next to "the government should control weed because its a dodgy drug" or "they should legalize it for sure". bestow me your opinion WHY it is controlled, and not whether or not it should be.
Thanks
Answers: Read these posts and my answers
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind...
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind...
To summarize my other replies.. It should be decriminalized. Was oringally made illegal as portion of a racism propaganda against the mexicans and blacks.
IF for no other reason, it should be officially recognized medicinally. The FDA and Gov BOTH know it has medicinal properties. Marinol, a synthetic thc rx have been a legally recognized available rx for 20 years. This is one reason it is still unofficial. Marinol costs about 1000 in need insurance. Who is gonna pay that for something synthetic if the legitimate stuff was permissible?
Is it illegal to not distribute your children to school,even if you can't assistance it???
I have 4 children, 9,7,4,and 2.My two little ones be very unwell today, and so i wasn't able to cart my eldest 2, both to and from school.
I have no one else to do it any,(husband leaves for work in another city at 7 surrounded by the morning!) we have singular recently moved to this nouns,away from family and friends.
So the headteacher rings me up and tell me that it is illegal to NOT distribute the children into school, i should any get a hackney cab, or ask my husband to rearrange his opening schedual!
I was so outraged at the school lack of concerned!
And also so shocked that i was doing something dubious!
Is this nasty headteacher correct?????
Answers: I deem the headmistress is talking rubbish. Yes it is a officially recognized requirement for all children to dance to school surrounded by this country but in a situations such as the one you describe, and for only just a few days, I doubt you could conceivably get into any trouble. You could with the sole purpose be taken to court over this if your children were missing generous amounts of time off institution (ie weeks at a time) and you were boldly not sending them for no good judgment.
Its all awfully well for the headmistress to report to you to "get a taxi" or sort your husband "rearrange his work schedule" but the FACT is that the former can be prohibitively expensive (plus I wouldn't quality safe putting my children surrounded by a taxi beside a complete stranger driving) and the latter isn't always possible if he's not a manager/supervisor or doesn't work flexi-time. If he's lately a lowly drone like my next of kin, requests for time off to give somebody a lift his kids to school can shift down like head sh*t with his boss!
I mull over she's a just an not conversant arrogant beeatch who either doesn't own kids or has have so much help herself (and so much money!) that she doesn't get the drift the problems facing "normal" families. Ignore the silly moo and I hope your little ones are impression better soon!
You are familiar beside the term, TRUENCY? See wikipedia's polite entry here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truancy.
Try not to be outraged. Instead use the teacher's call as an opportunity to introduce yourself as topical resident. Ask if there are honest community services / programs you and your kids might join within an effort to lattice with other moms. When you know a few parents capably, you'll be able to ask for give support to.
The theory is, if you conduct yourself like a responsible grown-up, teacher/school admin will be more forthcoming. Try to remember that background has be slashed to little bits for a long time. In fact, public ed surrounded by the U.S. is often mistaken for the House pissoir. Teachers are rewarded on par with entry-level secretaries within most states.
Strange as it may sound, send for head lecturer back and thank her for her concern that your children be missed! Then explain a bit about your circs as a course of introduction and ASK for ADVICE/help available in your university community, if any. No one can resist such a request!
yes she is correct. I agree with her totally. There be nothing stopping you from taking your children to college you were simply man lazy.
How do you regard your eldest two felt mortal kept out of school because mummy couldn't be bothered to achieve the children ready.
If you are tired and your husband have found a new position and relocated you thus isolating you and he doesn't help next to the childcare then sort it out.
stir up in the morning and pilfer your children to school this is your duty as a mother.
It is an misdemeanour not to take your children to university for the reason you hold stated and im not a teacher but not even i can realize the reasoning behind it. The headteacher is not disagreeable, she is doing her job and she is doing it comparatively well as far as i can see.
Does this count as Double Jeopardy?
I kill my wife and stir to jail for man slaughter. I receive out 12 years later and I find out she's still alive (changed her identity). The unbroken time she was leeching out of my rich mother dying mother,and poisoned out 3 children for the insurance money. Knowing adjectives of this, I still have no proof against her and this lead me to shoot her dead at her assignment in front of everyone. The police ID her as my wife that I supposedly kill. Can I be charged with murder?Answers: Yup. They'll appologize for the first incarceration,
and put you away for another.
Different date, different crime.
I gotta budge with the first guy. You'll go and get exonerated on the first, then convicted on the second. Although it would present an interesting travel case. I'm sure you'd have a hell of an argument that you already did the time for the crime.
Its resembling the old you fire a gun out the skylight right as someone is commiting suicide by jumping stale the 100 floor ( so he would die) Your bullet hits and kills the party as they pass your fanlight. Should you be charged with murder when minus your bullet, the guy would have be dead anyway?
Things that formulate you go hmmmmm
It's disheartening to realise that doesn`t matter what the law is, the authorities will repeatedly bend it to suit their purposes.
Back in the untimely 1990s, for those who can remember, there be the infamous Rodney King assault court cases where four police officer where originally acquit of the crime. Rioting followed and so to quell inflamed passions, the authorities arranged to trial the police again. But how could they? What about double jeopardy?
Simple, you invent a fresh crime called "violate a persons civil rights" Of course one might ask how you could commit any crime lacking violating the victims rights. But answers to question like that weren't too forthcoming and the accuse were reprosecuted, duly found guilty and sent to the incarcerate.
My point is that it would look bad for the sake of writ and the tranquility of modern society if one could legally newly walk into someone's place of work and blast them into sleep. Therefore the authorities would try to present any excuse so as to charge the perpetuator with murder, despite double jeopardy attaching. I deem it is pretty lame to suggest that a crime is defined by what day it happen, but I'm sure that won't stop the prosecutor.
All the same in that is still one thing the state can't do; and explicitly to put a fix in for the sentence. All the poster above who is charged next to murder, has to do is to explain to the jury the full circumstances of the valise and then to mention the 5th amendment. If not adjectives of twelve good men and women true, in that will still be a few who will stand and prevent a conviction due to their sense of justice.
Is it right for local government to control what we do on our property if its not hurting anyone.?
When you purchase property contained by ontario it seems that your local political affairs tells you what you can or cannot do next to it.In my neck of the woods because it is a tourist nouns we are under regulations on what trees we can cut how tons cars we have surrounded by the back 40 even when you hold to tresspass to see them a person cannot even enjoy a hobby if his or her nieghbours dont like it .It have gotten so bad that you cannot even own your choice of pet out in the country where on earth your nearest nieghbour is 2 miles away. Even a camelion is illegal no exotic pets. Science fiction is coming true BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING.Answers: cash where you liive and stop crying. j\k but if you do not approaching the rules then public sale your house and land and move to USA this is where on earth everyone else comes anyways
If you're really not hurting any-one than no.
But the world is getting far too crowded.
Exotic pets pose ecological hazard.
Cars are polluters.
Trees are an ecological resource.
Any resource you use is feasible to be limited.
Defining the boundary of "hurting any-one" get
wider every day.
The problem is choosing for a sane administration,
(probably an oxymoron as no sane person would want the livelihood.)
where the crap do you live?? I live contained by Ontario, all my existence, and have never encounter these problems. I was born contained by Niagara Falls, a huge tourist area, lived in that until I was 23 and zilch like what you describe have ever happened. I immediately live in the Great Northland, and nil like that here any. They sell Chameleons contained by the local pet stores..they are not illegal. But I own to say someone should be doing something almost the amount of junkers people save in their pay for 40---->bad for the environment, terrifying as they rust and rot, and just plain look similar to ****. Unless its your business..send em to the scrappers!
More Questions and Answers:
[2441] - [834] - [2023] - [2189] - [1529] - [1397] - [1643] - [2031] - [104] - [2174] - [1610] - [1015] - [1958] - [1141] - [811] - [765] - [2149] - [764] - [1569] - [833]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: