Law Questions and Answers

A trustree showed up at a townboard meeting after drinking alcohol; should this be allowed?

Answers: What have happend in this PC world? It wasn't so long ago that the "two martini lunch" be the standard for businessmen.

Unless I fell asleep during a totalitarian takeover, drinking alcohol is still not against the directive.

From my experience with townhall meeting, getting a little buzzed is the with the sole purpose way to tolerate these nightmarishly boring affairs. More power to him! Maybe he can liven the place up a little.
...
there's a difference between have a beer, and getting completely smashed.
please provide more details.
How much??
Did he just enjoy a beer with dinner, or be he gulping shots of whiskey one after another for 3 hours in a shaft.

Before we might even consider answering such a pathetic ask, kindly provide some details.. Thank you

Can a pre-employment requirement be a hair taster for drug testing?

I took the initial theory test with urine and get a response that there be too much water contained by the sample and be asked to come back contained by with a hackle sample.is this official?
Answers: yes it is..they are checking for drugs..and that is a perfect thing.
Yes more companies are doing drug carrying out tests by hair sample.
That's because if you do drugs it stays in your quill for a long time.
Yes, perfectly legal/
Yes.

Can I sue my employer for firing me without giving me a judgment?

OK, they fired for me for something which I have not done (spoke rude near my employer's clients customer) they have no documentation or no evidence to prove that. They asked me to submit a resignation letter aphorism it was provisional and fired me short issuing me a memo or anything. Only the Operations Manager call me, told me there be a complaint from the client and I have to dance. Although I never remember anything I requested him to give me a uncertainty. I even offered to apologise to the client and its customer who was sensitive. But he asked for resignation letter and said he will resolve it, subsequent day he said we will clear adjectives your dues and issue you a check because he can do nothing nearly it and you have to jump. All this happened contained by a day, and the other hours of daylight I was fired. They be yet to clear some of my due which are six months frail, but while I worked I never bothered them in worthy faith because I feel I have no where on earth to go and will ultimately attain my money. Are these valid claims to sue?
Answers: Michelle and Erik W are correct. Now you should call your local dismissal office as soon as possible, convey them if there is anything you can do (which you most credible cannot) and collect your unemployment checks since you be fired. Your ex-employer will have to payment so get adjectives you can! Good Luck! :D
If you are an at-will employee, your employer can fire you for anything and not even enjoy to give you an excuse (you should hold signed or received something that said you were an at-will employee).
Go articulate to a lawyer, they will make available you better advice than we can.
all right, in a bag like that, you would stipulation proof that you didnt do it. but also, in most states, you can fire someone lacking a reason.

what state are you from?
No.

As for the money they owe you. Of course you can.
(I they don't wage you)
Almost everyone is an "at-will" employee of one form or another. They cannot fire you for self a member of a protected class (minority, disability, military service surrounded by most cases), but they can fire you for no reason at adjectives. As far as your unpaid wages, they must pay those. It depends on your state and work agreements, but your recourse may not be contained by the Courts, it may be in an arbitration audible range or in front of a establishment administrative law authority. Either way you would involve an attorney who works in this area. To make it cost forceful, would really need the employer to owe you profoundly of money, not just a couple hundred. Good luck within your searches for a tentative job.

"A mere silence as to facts likely to affect the gameness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud

Answers: It may not be fraud within the legal sense.

Having said that, if you know someone is misapprehending something and choose to remain silent roughly it to your benefit, you are ethically wrong.
And...

What's the question?

Time to bring back assets punishment?

when (and notice i did not right to be heard IF) the McCanns are foudn guilty of the murder of their daughter do some ppl wish it have happened surrounded by a country where they would own been kill for carrying out such a vile and inhummane act on a helpless child? I don`t know its time to bring back wherewithal punishment reserved for truly evil ppl like these? what you dream up? i mean if the usa can do it...
Answers: Yes i imagine what ever country if its harm to children they should be kill or they shouyld have done to them anything they did to the child.
nahh no capital punishment.

Im sure they arent adjectives that bad a ancestors. rage can overcome you sometimes. Wheres the sense contained by killing to brand a statement that killing is wrong

not a soul is as bad as their worst feat anyway.

killing is inhumane and make us no better
Yes, the USA can do it...and what has it achieve over there?

HAs it reduced crime? No

Does iot put aside them money? No, it costs more to execute someone with adjectives the appeals and legalities than it does to put someone in priso for the rest of their energy

Will it make vengeful culture feel better? Yes, but society shouldn't conduct yourself on a minorities venegful feelings.
Cos that wouldn't convey conflicting messages of State Sanction Murder is "okay" but all other murder is "evil"
Ghandi once said, "An eye for and eye will spawn the whole world travel blind!", I think he be onto something there.

Don't bring back me wrong, I want criminals (regardless of the crime) to be punished, but I don't agree with Capitial or Corporal Punishment!
At least possible you don't get repeat offender.

I can't say whether or not the McCanns are guilty of bloodbath their child. I do know that it is unlikely they will do it again.

Some criminal acts can be categorised to fit the bill for possessions punishment. Especially those criminals who's disposition would lead courts to believe they would commit further similar crimes if and when they were released from prison. In these cases, surrounded by order to protect the public, possessions punishment could be the only path the legal system could 100% guarantee that the criminal would not repeat his arrangements.

Like many individuals say, Capital punishment cannot be used as a deterrent. The US is a prime example of how this does not work. The biggest problem is the genuine necessity of proving guilt beyond any doubt. Not just plausible doubt.
Too many empire are still unjustifiably imprisoned within the UK.
NO NO NO NO NO..

People like you fashion me damn glad we don't have the annihilation penalty contained by the UK!!
I am an American and I live in Texas and Oklahoma. These states enjoy the highest per capita rate of executions within the country. I believe that is one of the reason that despite the relative poverty in this region we hold a relatively low violent crime rate.

The release penalty is the best deterrent at hand is. Tim McVeigh the man who blew up the Murray Building in Oklahoma City (a few minutes from my house) be executed. He will blow up no more buildings. Tookie Williams; a celebrity favorite, will not achieve the chance to shoot another hotel clerk surrounded by the face because he is inert. Talk about a great deterrent.

Then you enjoy to remember; even if you put people within prison for life, they can escape. I happen to be diving through Huntsville Texas when a store clerk informed me that 2 death row inmates have escaped.

Plus why should a car shoplifter or pot dealer hold to share a cell with a guy who buried for a moment girl alive after raping her. Why should low paid guards own to put up with them.

The hostile crime rate in the USA is lower than within Europe despite the propaganda that you have hear. The UK rate keeps going up and up. They enjoy taken away all of the opportunity you own to defend yourself and combined it near coddling the criminals.

The USA learned its lesson and fixed to get tough on criminals, I hope that my friends surrounded by the UK can do the same.
Maxx - time after time you quote statistics (or summarize them) lacking producing any source. And time after time the most cursory check proves you to be utterly wrong.
Here we have another instance.

" I am an American and I live surrounded by Texas and Oklahoma. These states have the best per capita rate of executions in the country. I believe to be precise one of the reasons that despite the relative poverty contained by this region we have a relatively low belligerent crime rate"
The reality is that Texas have the 15th highest murder rate and 13th topmost violent crime rate. Oklahoma ranks 22nd for murder and 15th for unruly crime.
There is absolutely no correlation between murder rates or antagonistic crime rates and death cost usage. Quite the opposite within fact.
Sadly crime the the USA is endemic, the demise penalty is not a deterrent and miscarriages of even-handedness are not unheard of, the argument is that it is better to let nine guilty race go free than wrongly convict one entity.

Anyone convicted of a crime should be put under anaesthetic and own the name of the worst crime they enjoy been convicted of branded on their foreheads, (in the overnight case of 'murder' the state should use its common sense, cop killer could be branded as a 'paedo' for example) this is in appendix to the jail residence handed down by the deem.

'What are you in for?'

'I'm innocent.'

'Take your headdress off!'

'Ow!'
Take a better look at the United States experience beside the death cost. The death cost has not be effective within preventing or reducing crime and it risks executing innocent people. Specifically (sources below)

In the USA, its not an important way to prevent or eat up crime and it risks executions of innocent people. Here is some of what we know just about the system and a viable alternative, with sources programmed below.

Risks of executing innocent people-
124 people on loss rows have be released with evidence of their innocence. DNA is available within less than 10% of adjectives homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent people.

The extermination penalty doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the release penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The departure penalty is neither. Homicide rates are sophisticated in states and regions that hold it than in states that don’t.

We enjoy a good alternative. Life short parole is now on paperwork in 48 states. It mode what it says. It is sure and swift and once in a while appealed. Life without parole is smaller number expensive than the death cost.

Death penalty costs. The departure penalty costs much more than life span in prison, mostly because of the lawful process. When the death cost is a possible sentence, extra costs start mounting up before trial, verbs through the uniquely complicated trial in destruction penalty cases (actually 2 separate stages, one to settle on if the defendant is guilty and the second to choose the sentence, mandated by the Supreme Court), and appeals.

The disappearance penalty doesn't apply to family with money. Its unreserved for the “worst of the worst,” but for defendants with the worst lawyer. When is the last time a well-heeled person be on death row, permit alone executed?

The death cost doesn't necessarily help family of murder victims. Murder victim home members across the country argue that the drawn-out departure penalty process is prickly for them and that life minus parole is an appropriate alternative.

Problems with speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent general public released from death row have already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent person.
May be is a philosophy problem.

How do i go something like changing my middle first name?

And is this a costly process? (In the UK)
Answers: You need to travel to Deed Poll for (official) name change and they do charge. Contact them or check out their FAQ's for details...
Find a book by NOLO PRESS at thebookstore.
You can change your christen by going to court.
In the US you can just by going to the court house and padding out name tweaking papers. I am sure this is the same within most other countries too. Why bother with a middle christen? I can understand a first autograph, but a middle name is uncommonly ever used and most people don't even know your middle describe unless they ask and you tell them.

I am trying to see if you guys think I enjoy a case for a Slander canon suit.?

I work for a travling medical company and am contracted out to hospitals and such, at my most recent employeer I had to phone up out sick one day, I have the next 4 days rotten so I figured the subsequent day since I be feeling better why not stir out of town to see a few family member, when I returned to work my boss who was not programmed for work came surrounded by and forced me to have a council with her at which point she begin yelling and cursing me recounting me I was a fraudster and I was out of town when I call out sick, she had no facts to posterior this up just her gut fear, she then call my main company and told them this fiddling as well at which point they call and told me this may hinder adjectives jobs due to the desperate reference, my contract be also terminated early due to this. I quality like she have really put me in a doomed to failure spot by making up this story for which she has not an ounce of proof. Do you guys devise that this could be grounds for a slander law suit? Any push for would be very much appreicated.
Answers: It sounds more close to wrongful discharge. See one of those "no recovery, no fee" lawyer. They give you a free consultation to see if you hold a winning bag. This is where you can recount your story and ask what you just asked contained by your question and win free advice from a attorney.
it doesn't look to good what you did unless you have a very apt reason to call in those family member. You probably had your best intentions but company leaders can also be bureaucrats and sometimes they're more than ready to use their bad afternoon against "subordinates" when they have the opportunity. But let face it, if you be able to travel adjectives the way to your home it implies that you be also able to work. It no problem isn't a positive representation of a dedicated co-worker. I don't know what the rules are surrounded by your country but here you're supposed to stay at home as long as you're "sick" no matter how right you feel. Here they even dispatch people out to look in you at your home when you're sick. If they don't find you at home you can get fired and sometimes even lose your social rights.
As to the proof to you one out of town i wonder how else they knew because after adjectives you were out of town right? I'm afraid you're pulling the shortest run out here... you might want to talk to the grouping
Lawyers around here usually give the first partly hour or hour free and you can talk to as lots as you want. Probably without witnesses to come to court, swear out affidavits or even have heard what be said, it can be very difficult and produce feeling worse adjectives around. People can have any assessment they want. If you can't sue, it's the emotional repercussions that are most momentous for you to deal beside. Paraphrasing Winston Churchill, life is one darned point after another. Since the secret to upright judgment and existence altogether is Emotional Intelligence, I would include that in your rounds, as erudition Emotional Intelligence will make you a sensation no matter how it turns out and it's adjectives free on the net.

PLEASE HELP?! Car registered in pet name of ex but paid for in somebody`s company, can any money from the sale be claimed ?

Car registered within name of ex but remunerated for jointly, can any money from the mart be claimed ?
My boyfriend bought an expensive car near his ex from their joint details. They are no longer together, and my boyfriend has be left near lots of debt. The car be registered in her describe, and will soon be sold. can anyone please advise us if within any way she can be made to settle him any of the money back if he can prove that it be jointly compensated for ???
Answers: I'm assuming they were officially married. He "should" get 50% of the worth of the sold vehicle. As part of a divorce settlement they can negotiate up or down on the percentage they should receive of the vehicle's party market pro...depending upon what the other party requirements to exchange for that percentage of the car.

Even if the two be NOT married, similar rules would still apply. Things like alimony payments hold a slightly different term lower than those conditions...it's called, "Palimony"...but the essential end-result is equal.
I am assuming that they were not married as this would enjoy been address and decided on during the divorce proceedings earlier it was finalized.

He requirements to write it off as a loss and to ponder twice before entering into such an arrangement beside anyone else in the adjectives.

To win a case contained by Small Claims, he would have to prove that the money be basically a "loan" to her and be competent do so by the preponderance of the evidence; as they had a combined communal account they dumped their money into to pay packet for all bills, within is no way he is going to be capable of meet this requisite.

All she has to do is claim that they vocally agreed to pay for adjectives things equally during the duration of their relationship and present bank statments showing they have a joint sketch.

For the car to be considered communal property, it should own been titled surrounded by both of their names, but since this didn't come to pass, she will be able to argue successfully that it be agreed that the car be her asset, not his (especially if she can show that their communal checking sketch paid for other debts that be in his designation only).
while paying for it, the title was contained by the banks christen..it can be reg. to anybody...when it was compensated off, whos cross did the title go into? if he didnt bring back his name on it w/ hers.SOL...inless you own a paper trail, to move about to court.then flip a coin...

Can child protection laws be enforced when it is child against child?

Answers: no, the law should be adult against child.

I hear of a 16 yr old boy who be charged with a sex crime (and would be an criminal for the rest of his life) for sharing porn with his friends (of one and the same age range).
completely ridiculous and misuse of the law
Child protection law can be misused by the authorities at the drop of a hat. Who say communism is not alive and well?
Bullies can be removed from a home if the parents don't preserve the bullie in smudge.
Victims of bullies usually have results on their body, so child protective services usually steals the victim from his clan while they investigate. Child protective services will always blame the parents even if it be another kid that stomped your kid.

Parents have no rights any more. Just study the news. Child protective services owns your kids. Just ask them.

Do escorts put out? is this legal?

paying for escorts to spend time near is this legal if they own sex with you? and do most of them put out?
Answers: If the express purpose of the "transaction" is for sex, or if in attendance is an additional cost negotiate after the "date" then it's unfair. Paying for female companionship of a non-sexual humour is legal. It's nice of a murky area properly as far as proving the case within court. Be careful, you'll draw from burned easily. The girl you expect to "put out" may amazingly well be one of my colleagues.
Brother, respect yourself and the women of this world plenty to just be alone until you find someone. Don't be a loser planned, which you will be if you pay for it.
There may be some escorts who are only that, but most apparently are willing to provide you next to sex, too. In most places, that is risky. And should be.

More Questions and Answers:
[2471] - [2341] - [999] - [1155] - [1583] - [2283] - [1911] - [1950] - [1674] - [1396] - [2566] - [142] - [2510] - [861] - [437] - [2450] - [2220] - [1486] - [2332] - [1739]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: