Law Questions and Answers

Can the following actions be considered a crime below any provision of law ?

1. X leaves the key to his house under the door mat and Y a friend finds the push button and enters the house ?

2. X a boy and Y a girl are friends, X and Y enjoy consensual sex and Y becomes pregnant, is X liable contained by any way ?

3. X is a boy and Y is a girl, Y call X and they engage within intimate conversation which X records privately, is X liable ?

4. X is owner of a plot of Land "P", X goes out of station for 12 years and Y occupy the plot and constructs a house, is Y liable ?

5. X is a movie producer, and Y is an aspiring actress, X offers the front role to Y if she will have consensual sex next to him, is X liable ?

6. X lies about his opening and income to get married to Y, base on the representation made by X , Y marries him, is X liable ?
Answers: 1. Yes, a crime may enjoy been committed. It is unconstitutional to enter someones home without blessing. Finding a key does not equate to sanction.
2. X is liable for half of the support of the child. Additionally if any party is beneath the age of consent, the older creature may have committed statutory rape.
3. No. Unless at hand is a specific state law, any party of a headset conversation may record the conversation.
4. Yes, as expected.
5. Yes. Depending on the state this could actually be classified as rape, as X is "forcing" Y to consent to protect her livelihood. Or the charge could be prostitution as it could be construed to be sex for money.
6. Yes. This is fraud.
I sounds approaching this is an assignment.

Why don;t you give your own assessment and in class you will swot up the law.
1. X is irresponsible.
2. X is the father and is liable within the way adjectives fathers are.
3. Depends on the law of your state.
4. Y loses the house since it was built on property y did not own.
5. Yes this is a prime example of sexual singling out.
6. Y is liable to be stupid.
ONE ASWERE ONLY.
If any one regardless enters a nother house it's
onlawfull entry.regardless of the knob.Yes a friend can be proscuted.if the house owner presses
charges,
.
P.WELSH
This depends on the location.

Laws are different in different location.

In respectively case more details are needed.
1. merely entering x's house doenot mount to any crime by y. unless he have got a intention or motive to missappropriate any property of x . If he does so consequently he is liable to be punished under indian penal code for criminal misappropriation of property or for criminal tresspass or for house breaking . One point that is exalted in such a cse within the intnt of the acused the necessary mens rea
2. no X is not liable as for directive is concerned only when y the girl is a minor consequently can be x liable to any punishment . If the sex has be performed beside mutual consent then it is okay . But where on earth y is married and x have sex beside her without her husbands consent then he wiil be liable to be punished beneath indian penal code for perfoming adultry.
3. merely recording the bits and pieces doesnot constitute a crime only when x tries to blackmail y or distributes such matter in the public after x is liable to punishment .
4. y wont be liable till x produces the title of the land and show valid reason that he had no prior scholarship that y has taken possession of his landscape and constructed a house and why he couldnot move to the court to have the possession of the park from y earliest as possible.
5. Yes X is liable only when y registers an FIR contained by the police station and it must be proved in the court to staple x which is a question of certainty and not always uncomplicated to prove.
6. No x is not liable to be punished under indian regulation but the wife tht is Y can move the court to have divorce on this ground.
1. Merely entering the house is not a crime unless untill it is not supported by criminal intention to do any crime, since the entity is a friend.

2. Law does not recognise consent of a girl under age of 16, hence the boy is liable for punishment.

3. X is liable

4. Yes, 'Y' is liable for civil and criminlal management.

5. Yes 'X' is liable under criminal Law.

6. Yes.

Can your parents cash your check?

I kno someone that's 23 and contained by jail..He have his paycheck coming 2day n wants his mother 2 change his check so that she can pay sour a loan for him..Is that in anyway possible?Please Help..
Answers: The merely way that she can bread it is if she has a wall account and he signs the check over to her. She can next take the check and deposit it into her guard account and withdrawl the currency.

What is reasonable force when getting robbed?

how far would you be in motion to protect your home from crime and what you can do if you catch some one surrounded by the ackt
Answers: Not sure where you are living, but within the UK it is more to do with a cast-iron level of force.

Basically, if you can prove right the level of force you used to keep yourself in a court of decree then to be precise deemed logical. Certain things will be asked of you such as:

Did you need to keep yourself? Could you have moved out the area instead of getting involved etc.

Let me hand over you an example... You are at home watching the TV and someone breaks in to the house. You are an average sized mannish with no training surrounded by defence. The man comes running up to you near a baseball bat in his foot and threatens to smash your head surrounded by. You pick up a steak knife that be on your table in front of you and you stab him, he falls to the ground. You ring up the police and an ambulance. Is that justifiable?

Yes, it probably would be. You be threatened and you were, within your opinion, contained by iminent danger of attack. You next used a pre-emptive strike to defend yourself. If he have hit you with the bat that could hold easily kill you.

Now, if you were contained by a supermarket and a 75 year old female started to hit you with her handbag and you battered her next to shopping basket that would not be cast-iron!

It is best to get guidance from your local police regarding such matter as well as perchance attending a safety course training you the dos and donts. I have skilled self defence, and control and restraint to prison officer as well as private guarantee and it is difficult to know what to do in reliable situations... Just remember that you need to prove the actions you steal.
calling the cops.

Anything else is either mindless sternness or mindless cowardice
It is what is necessary for the protection of you and your family unit. If someone has broken into your house, that is to say a very terrifying situation. You don't know that's its only your things that they are after.
Think out ahead what you would do. Also instruct other familial member in the order of it, sort of like a fire drill.
I deem you have to guage the situation at the time but realistically if I woke up and found someone within my house I'd hit them as hard as I could next to whatever be the nearest heaviest object. Would I risk human being arrested for it? Yes I would... I wouldn't give the b*stard the hit and miss to kill me or my familial.

I'd rather be judge by 12 than carried by 6
DO WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO AND DON'T BE KIND.

YOU ARE ALLOWED TO DO ANYTHING TO PROTECT YOUR FAMILY.
If you feel that your natural life is threatened you can use all the force required to protect yourself and your home.

How do TV stations know how many race watched a show...??

approaching E4 said 8 million people watch the big brother finale and if so can they like know who and who watch it specifically
Answers: How does the audience measurement process work?

The Broadcasters' Audience Research Board (BARB) is responsible for providing estimates of the number of populace watching television. This includes which channel and programmes are being watch, at what time, and the type of people who are watching at any one time. BARB provides small screen audience data on a minute-by-minute font for channels received in the UK. The data is available for reporting locally and at ITV and BBC regional level and covers adjectives analogue and digital platforms.

Viewing estimates are obtained from panel of television owning households representing the viewing demeanour of the 24+ million households within the UK. The panel are selected to be representative of respectively ITV and BBC region. The service covers viewing within private households solitary.

Panel homes are selected via a 'multi-stage, stratified and unclustered' token design. What this means is that the panel is fully representative of adjectives television households across the total of the UK. A range of individual and household characteristics (panel controls) are needed to ensure that the panel is fully representative. As estimates for the considerable majority of panel controls are not available from Census data it is called for to conduct an Establishment Survey to obtain this information.

The BARB Establishment Survey is carried out on a continuous starting place and involves some 52,000 interviews per year. It is a random probability survey which finances that any household within the UK have an equal likelihood of anyone selected for interview. The survey ensure that any changes adjectives in the population can be identified so that the panel can be updated and in tune to ensure that the panel continues to reflect the television-owning population. In adding up to being the prime source of box population information, such as the number of multi-channel homes, the Establishment Survey also generates the potential recruits from which panel associate homes are selected.

Once a panel accomplice agrees to join the panel, their home will afterwards have adjectives their television sets, video cassette recorder etc. electronically monitored by a meter. This is a small black box about the size of the average hardback book, which is put resting on the television set and connected to it. This automatically identify and collects information about the programme and furrow that the panel member is viewing.
They probably own a team of watchers who report within.

I'm not exactly sure how these viewing figures are arrived at, except to assume that say aloud 1000 people dispatch in a monthly report of what they've be watching and from this it can be deduced approx how much audience here was for respectively show.

Other way of doing it is to seize a sample from an polling company or bazaar research. People fill within a questionnaire and the results of this will show who watched what and the frequency of watching and how several watched etc.

Here's a website which does the research : -

Viewing Figures The Authority on Television Viewing > Viewing ...The Authority on Television Viewing. ... Powered by Viewing Figures Ltd Software Services Terms Of Use Privacy Statement ...
http://www.viewingfigures.com
It is supposedly done through impressively strict sampling of actual viewers viewing habbits.

I was involved surrounded by this once and was told by the guy giving me the speech on how significant it was to be completely honest that I represented several thousand viewers (I mull over he said 70,000 I can't recall the exact number). And I must confess that after the first bit I fixed I was bored and started picking things I didn't similar to as opposed to things I if truth be told watched purely to jack with the process. Hey they didn't pay cheque me that much so I figured they get what they paid for.
when a TV program runs, viewers judgment it with their eyes and after the eyes are counted through the unseenable automated TV scanner and the total number counted by the program master by dividing with 2 as everybody view with two eyes, lol.

Error: Due to some one eyed eyewitness, the calculation is bit wrongful

Are zero-tolerance laws stupid?

Kids receive suspended from school for drawing a weapon written, or for going "bang bang". Kids return with charged with serious crimes for have a boy-scout pocket knife contained by their cars? Yet nothing is done roughly all the bombing on TV or in rap lyrics. Is this crazy? Is adjectives sense going down the drain?
Answers: You have a slight point, and I blame the medium for 99% of children's behavior now adays.They rate movies "PG" in a minute that I would have have to sneak into to see when I was 15.
Public schooling is really going to be the downfall of this country. It is more expensive next home schooling and produces an inferior product. Unfortunatly we do need to enjoy something in place for those to apathetic to parent their children, hence, public education.

It wasnt other like this, but it is in a minute.
Yeah, I heard roughly speaking the drawing of the gun thing. Yes, we own gone way too far. However teacher are not the brightest builbs in the storm lantern. We spend more money, yet the product is worse. All they know how to do is crawl in the circle near the #2 pencil. No thought process anymore...

What does the gun laws within britain say exactly?

please point me to a site/specific sites which could lend a hand give specific info as to what the law there utter...
i'm trying to compare the gun control laws which are currently implement in different countries.
* if you could provide statistics(and your sources) as to how these laws hold fared,that would be terrifically useful.gratitude for helping!
Answers: start with intermingle...

the second link have stats
'Don't shoot people'

Pete Doherty sentencing postponed again, what a surprise. Your views please.?

If he be a normal extremity of the public he would have be locked up a long time ago.
Answers: Is encouraging your cat to do drugs a crime?
it (not he) would have be locked up. but you get some on its last legs idiot "star-spangled" judge proving time & time again that "celebrity" make you above the law. doherty is a parasite junkie (allegedly, if medium reports are to be believed ;) &, in my evaluation, should be hunted down & killed by any & every ability necessary. no departure too cruel for that kind of rats.

Here's another one about the departure penalty !?

You are part of a set of a jury and sentence a guy to death after he's have a fair trial...

the guy fries/chokes/whatever you do to him.

A few months following evidence is found that renders the verdict completely wrong and it turns out that he wasnt a slaughterer after all.

What do you do?
Answers: Apart from passion guilty of something I couldn't help, I have an idea that I would begin calling the intact system into questions. I wouldn't want this to surface to anyone else.

Here are some things that I would focus on (sources below)

Risks of executing innocent people-
124 people on disappearance rows have be released with evidence of their innocence. DNA is available within less than 10% of adjectives homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent people.

The extermination penalty doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the destruction penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The loss penalty is neither. Homicide rates are superior in states and regions that own it than in states that don’t.

We enjoy a good alternative. Life short parole is now on paperwork in 48 states. It resources what it says. It is sure and swift and seldom appealed. Life without parole is smaller amount expensive than the death cost.

Death penalty costs. The passing penalty costs much more than go in prison, mostly because of the trial process. When the death cost is a possible sentence, extra costs start mounting up before trial, verbs through the uniquely complicated trial in annihilation penalty cases (actually 2 separate stages, one to prefer if the defendant is guilty and the second to choose the sentence, mandated by the Supreme Court), and appeals.

The demise penalty doesn't apply to citizens with money. Its outgoing for the “worst of the worst,” but for defendants with the worst lawyer. When is the last time a well-to-do person be on death row, consent to alone executed?

The death cost doesn't necessarily help family of murder victims. Murder victim nearest and dearest members across the country argue that the drawn-out destruction penalty process is hurting for them and that life minus parole is an appropriate alternative.

Problems with speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent family released from death row have already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent person.
I perceive bad but know that I made my result based on adjectives the evidence I had and made what I thought be the right choice in establish to protect innocent people.


If someone attacks me and I kill in cold blood them in self armour I will not feel similar to the bad guy because they be looking for food to feed kids

I know not same piece but what I mean is that basically jamming people contained by a box is not any nicer...and extermination should be very tough to get...but sometimes in attendance is a need for society to put down the rabid member for the safety of the intact
Well, first off, I'd never be on a jury contained by a capital baggage because the prosecutor would ask me if I could ever sentence someone to death and I'd utter no and would be dismissed.

This scenario where an innocent man is executed have undoubtably happened plentiful times in this country. It is significantly unlikely that such cases unequivocally are found out however, because of how hard it is to bring unmarked evidence in any contracted case. The state will put adjectives it's effort into blocking the procedures. It is so intricate that people almost never try to do it within cases where a character has already be executed. They would rather put their time within effort surrounded by saving the natural life of someone who has all the same to be killed.

But I assume, if the effort be to be put in and we uncovered a few cases of wrongful execution, it might basis enough of an uproar that the departure penalty would be concluded in this country.

But explicitly why the prosecutors would put all their energy into blocking it.
I'm fortunate to live in Canada, a country that no longer have the death cost. A man who was sentenced to passing at the age of 14, Steven Truscott, was just this minute exonerated of the crime for which he was sentenced to hang down when we still had the annihilation penalty, over 40 years after the certainty. His sentence was commuted. I would never vote for the loss penalty if I be a juror; in the United States, where on earth you have to be likely to impose the extermination penalty to serve as a juror for assets cases, this would disqualify me for serving on a jury.

Were I to be in your hypothetical situation, I would find it thorny to live with myself afterwards.

What shoulds he do?

my partner has to children.
His ex requests him to pay c s a he have said he will do it all the right channel. but she wants currency in paw. He has said to her he is not going to pass her cash contained by hand and he requests to do it the proper way other knowledgeable c s a will be on his back. but she didnt approaching this and has stopped him from seeing the girls wat can he do. she have said they dont want to see him. but they r only 5 and 8 and love coming over. so we grain this is her cos he wont give her brass??
Answers: Child support and access should be two seperate issues. He should pay solitary through the CSA and get official advice to seize access rights. She is low using the children in this passageway.
Sounds like your are right and the ex is bully and knieving. If he does resolve to pay brass, he should refuse to contribute her the money unless she writes a receipt, which she is not potential to do as she is probably trying to scam welfare and collect child support and welfare benefits, which is fraud.

He needs to hire an attorney and thieve her to Court for contempt of visitation...she may find herself in young offenders` institution for awhile and have a tweaking of attitude.
Women/Mothers (and i am both) have no right to transmit the other parent he can not see the kids...I see this so often surrounded by my work and it really gets my vertebrae up

What can he do?

Pay her cash and win a receipt everytime he does. So if or when CSA assess him he can provide proof that he is and have maintained.

I get he would rather do everything the right process and if the CSA were righteous enough for the career i would say travel for it.but they are not...and they will take ages...too long for him not to see his kids.

and they will more than imagined make huge errors contained by their assessment (about 89% are wrong)

So he either pays her brass and gets receipts.after he sees his kids and have proof of payment

or

Get himself a right family advocate (legal aid may be available for some of the fees)
Why hasn't he paid the child support even so? If he did, she would have the lolly in mitt wouldn't she?

They are his kids, he needs to support them. If their mom requirements money to take safekeeping of them immediately, why wouldn't he give a hand? He can go beyond the court ordered child support. Generally kids want more than is ordered anyway.

Tell him to quit being cheap and pocket care of his children. If he won't support them, he doesn't deserve to see them.

How do i file a complaint against a police officer for indecent procedure?

Answers: Most city, county or state police agencies have Internal Affairs section in which a citizen cal directory a complaint. Depending upon the findings of the Internal Affairs section, defensible punishment can be administered or a complete dismissal can be the end result. The officer can be fired, suspended any with or short pay depending upon the severity or number of complaints that the officer have racked up. Don't be surprised, alot of the departments protect their own. Good Luck!
Hire a lawyer to
write a notification to the following folks:
The mayor
your city councilman
The chief of police
and his Immediate supervisor.
Make it the same memo and be sure
to have it signed and notarized.
Make sure to include specific details
of the coarse procedures and have
it ineradicably entered on his
police service register.Request that he be
reprimanded and ask for a letter of apology.
You can try calling the precint where on earth he works and filing a complaint, but as near is high code of honor beside the "thin blue line", possible not much is going to happen save for the commanding officer will call and listen to your complaint, after deem there are no grounds for it.

More Questions and Answers:
[2344] - [1912] - [2003] - [1350] - [1511] - [1344] - [76] - [148] - [1943] - [1795] - [1702] - [1634] - [966] - [2348] - [1443] - [479] - [85] - [2349] - [1598] - [1646]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: