Law Questions and Answers

Do people acquire away with crimes more normally because of politically correctness?

Like the gays who abused the boy because authorities too scared to investigate for mistrust of being call prejudiced? Like the criminal who is not stopped for fear of the martyr or the police being call a racist?
Answers: Yes

i) "In his book, The End of Sanity, Martin Gross writes that 'blatantly irrational behavior is rapidly man established as the norm in almost every nouns of human endeavor. There seem to be untried customs, new rules, different anti-intellectual theories regularly foisted on us from every direction. Underneath, the nation is roiling. Americans know something without a label is undermining the nation, turning the mind mushy when it comes to separating truth from falsehood and right from wrong. And they don't like it.' ...Before you claim to be a title holder of free thought, tell me: Why did political correctness start on America's campuses? And why do you verbs to tolerate it? Why do you, who're supposed to debate ideas, surrender to their suppression? Let's be honest. Who here think your professors can say what they really believe? It scare me to death, and should alarm you, too, that the superstition of political correctness rules the halls of idea. You are the best and the brightest. You, here in the fertile cradle of American academia, here surrounded by the castle of learning on the Charles River, you are the cream. But I submit that you, and your counterparts across the arrive, are the most socially conformed and politically silenced generation since Concord Bridge. And as long as you prove that...and abide it...and you are- by your grandfathers' standards-cowards.If you talk nearly race, it does not label you a racist. If you see distinctions between genders, it does not spawn you a sexist. If you think critically nearly a denomination, it does not make you anti-religion. If you adopt but don't celebrate homosexuality, it does not put together you a homophobe." Charlton Heston, February 16, 1999, Harvard Law School Forum. (www.narila.org/ila/hestonhs.htm)
Yes and no. I think like mad of people bring back away with crimes because of political correctness, but others are jump on heavier because of it. (For example a simple argument abut a spilled drink outside a nightclub will turn into a massive 'racial incident' by the police if one of them be from a so called 'ethnic minority')

I infer the biggest problem is the liberal attitude and human rights act which lots criminals/scumbags hide losing.
Yes; fear of minorities, women's libbists, homosexual's rights groups, etc., cause many distortions within "justice"; they also have a far greater power surrounded by politics than mere numbers.
Look at the Matthew Shepard incident; that was pure robbery, but the national medium made it a show! Any one who goes to a pub and flashes his wallet is not all in attendance.
Any facet of the law can be a two edge sword,certain law,brought into force, by people who own no first hand experience of the problems involved,are in actuality regularly used by the legal criminal world of racially or politically motivated lawyers,for their own ends,irrespective of sprite being done.
I would not say-so they get away beside it more often but in need a doubt human rights and P.C. are often used. The national card is another one and I think used far more normally than P.C.
Nobody gets away next to anything---the courts are biased AGAINST the people you mentioned---sit within on a district court's daily docket sometime, you'll see it.

And it's not racial---it's a class item. "White trash" and "ghetto" are equal negative stereotypes contained by the eyes of the law surrounded by any mixed area. If it's a rich white/poor black nouns, then the minorities are within trouble. If it's a racially mixed rich/poor white area, the white kids are contained by trouble. Basically, if you're poor, live in a impossible area, speak next to a strong dialect, etc, you're in trouble.

No one EVER avoids charging a pedophile for suspicion of the "gay community"---I've NEVER seen this EVER be an issue, and I've be involved in the lawful system for years. Mainly because they're frequently NOT "gay", they want KIDS, not really a gender.
No, I don't expect they do.

While the Daily Mail might like to call attention to the story about the gay couple abuse a child, the same mistakes are made by Social Services when dealing beside other couples.

Similarly, if you compare how often childish black men undergo 'stop and search' next to how often this happen to young white men, I don't ponder you'd find that the police worry too much more or less political correctness or accusations of racism.

But populace who have a different agenda do love to guardrail against 'political correctness' when they feel that someone (especially of a different race) might seize something that they don't.
No, this is just what the naive right-wing think is occurring when people are not convicted of crimes for another object (lack of evidence etc)

Why do you get points on your licence for stupidity but none for massacre someone in a motor?

my cousin was kill by another driver last year she have broken down on a591 cumbria a driver in a landrover crashed into the wager on of her pushed her car 36 metres up an embankment and into a dry stone wall he admit he didnt try to break he took his eyes off the road for 16 second and there be no other vehicles doing a tour it was broad daylight and road be dry yet he still walk free wtih 12months ban and lb1000 fine he never tried to apologise to me be is the justice
Answers: It happen all too repeatedly. I hope the government is going to do something in the order of it. A car is a potential bloodbath machine and anyone getting at the rear the wheel should be conscious of that certainty. It makes me angry when I read of cases similar to this. Very sorry for your loss.
The government have listened to general public for once and is giving courts the option of a natural life sentence for death by insecure driving. Its up to judges very soon to give them that sentence.

Using a phone is to be considered harmful driving.

I agree with you totally. It be murder. To me a car is no different to a axe or gun. If you misuse it and showed no attempt to prevent the situation then its murder. Obviously in that will unpreventable accidents. But your satchel is quite clearly murder within my eyes.
Sod the points, lock him up for life.
I hope you find peace eventually.
I bet the driver of the Land rover be on the phone. Should have get a life restriction.

My cash drawer come up short, can manager fashion me repay out of pocket legally??

I work at a check cashing store surrounded by L.A. as a teller. My drawer is never within the negative at the finale of the day, but yesterday I be $50 short. My manager requests me to put the money in out of my pocket or procure written up. This doesnt seem official since I'm sure the place is insured or can write it off as a loss. This is the first time that it's happen and I think my boss simply wants me to foot it so she doesnt lose money on her monthly bonus.
Answers: California wage law specifically prohibits employer from withholding shortages from pay.

An employer can with permission withhold amounts from an employee’s wages only: (1) when required or empower to do so by state or federal law, or (2) when a conjecture is expressly authorized in writing by the member of staff to cover insurance premiums, benefit plan contributions or other deductions not amounting to a rebate on the employee’s wages, or (3) when a presumption to cover health, welfare, or allowance contributions is expressly authorized by a wage or collective bargaining agreement. Labor Code Sections 221 and 224. Although a wage garnishment is a above-board deduction from wages below Labor Code section 224, an employer cannot discharge an hand because a garnishment of wages has be threatened or if the employee’s wages have be subjected to a garnishment for the payment of one taste. Labor Code Section 2929(a) (See How to file a nouns complaint)

The ability of an employer to take off amounts from an employee’s wages due to a cash shortage, breakage, or loss of equipment is specifically regulated by the Industrial Welfare Commission Orders and controlled by court decisions. (Kerr’s Catering v. Department of Industrial Relations (1962) 56 Cal.2d 319). In totting up, there own been several court decision that significantly restrict an employer’s ability to hold an offset against an employee’s wages. Barnhill v. Sanders (1981) 125 Cal.App.3d 1, (Balloon stipend on separation of employment to repay employee’s debt to employer is an unlawful deduction even where on earth the employee authorized such return in writing); CSEA v. State of California (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 374 (Unlawful to take off from current payroll for past remuneration advances that be in error); Hudgins v. Nieman Marcus (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1109 (Deductions for mysterious returns from commission sales unlawful.)
No, they cannot cart it out of your pay.

Remind the boss of adjectives the times that your till came out over and that the $50 should enjoy been made up by immediately.

If the boss still wants the money, speak about him to f*ck off and quit.
No, they can not officially make you money for the shortage.

But they can write you up or fire you for the shortage.

It's your job to accurately get transactions.

Evidently, you didn't do so.

When a doctor tells you"I hold a two by four for you if you come back".Should one be in foreboding?

Is this legal?
Answers: Free lumber is other good.

Lighten up. He sounds resembling a nice guy with a right sense of humor. He wants you to acquire better.
he is usin g a figure of speach,plan he don't want to see you again,and don't ' t like you.
doctors own the privlage of stating there personal
fealings,not medical.
YES IT'S LEGAL.

P. welsh
You probably attain this reaction regularly...

It might be time for some self-reflection to realize the problem isn't with "everyone else".
Maybe he designed a. "two four". Did he immigrate from Canada?.
It is a great enticement for guys who are afraid to cough and bend over.
I am not sure if you all use that occupancy outside of Canada.
Just in case>A two four finances a case of 24 beer.
Try describing him your prefer Malt Scotch and see what he says.
I would complain roughly speaking this doctor to the medical board..that is where on earth it will hurt him the most.

Medical informed consent?

is medical informed consent legaly walid if was obtain by the patient even though he have not met or spoken to the surgeon that performed surgery on him?It be obtained by so call hair transplant consultant who is not physician have no medical background.The tolerant met the doctor first time 10 minutes before surgery when the doctor have so called consultation,soon after consent was signed.The merciful was mislead and conned into hackle transplant surgery that was programmed before tolerant was examined and have a chance to wage the pros and cons of surgery.
Answers: Absolutely -- informed consent say that the individual has have the opportunity to ask questions of a medical professional -- a transplant consultant isn't getting a undertaking in a hospital as a transplant consultant unless there's some sort of medical environment -- no doctor on the face of the Earth would do that.

A merciful isn't conned into surgery -- he/she ALWAYS has the opportunity to utter no -- it isn't a . . . come here, sign this, let me chop you up . . . entry.

More importantly -- if there be a day lapse between the time the consent be signed and the time the surgery was perform -- then he have the opportunity to weigh the pros and cons of the surgery . . . and his claim wouldn't stand half a prospect.
No it hast be in writting and enjoy your signature.
sounds like you give thatfor your surgan,but not for anyone with out Medical point.



P welsh
One would assume it's valid. The amount of information people call for and want varies widely, and especially next to cosmetic procedures, it's quite usual for people not to want to hear adjectives the rarest potential complications. There's no absolute contained by the amount of information exchanged. Also, the patient could hold weighed the pro's and con's by the simple expedient of proverb, "No, wait, I want to focus about it some more." Crawfishing on a technicality is not drastically seemly.

Do I have the right to be barmy at my friend?

I let my friend borrow $1500.00 within December 2006. I told her to not worry more or less paying me a lot fund.. just payment me when she can. She didn't pay me vertebrae at all.

In June 2007 I still didn't capture anything from her so I offered the money as a gift... exact I figure I wasn't gonna find anything back. She said no its cool.. you'll bring back your money.

I found out later that around like time she borrowed from me, she has be letting some guy borrow money from her that is of smaller amounts (like $25.00 here and $15.00 there). .. but never remunerated me anything from DEC-JUN.

We went to best buy and she mentioned something nearly wanting to buy a WII for her daughter.

In August 2007.. still. I tell her I perceive I am being taken authority of. She gets cracked... she sends me $50.00 and says she'll start paying me but for me to never to homily to her again. I send $50.00 hindmost saying the friendship isn't worth it.
Answers: Your dilema is the prime example of why you should never (and yes I right to be heard never in this pink case) loan money to a friend or extended family. Dont do business beside familiy either. William Shakespeare said it best: "Neither a borrower nor a lender be: for loan oft loses both itself and friend; and borrowing dulls the creep of husbandry."
Yes, you have a right to be cracked at your friend.

First rule of lending money. Never lend more than you are of a mind to give as a grant.

Second rule of lending money. Always return with in writing, the amount you are lend, the method it will be paid wager on and an expected date that it will be paid spinal column.

Third rule of lending money. Never lend any amount to a friend that you are not liable to give as a grant. Expect to lose a friend if you attempt to apply rule number two.

Good luck.
As unfortunate as it is, your friendship, unless your two are REALLY forgiving ancestors is probably over. With that sum of money I don't care who it is return with it in writing. We borrowed around that much from my father in tenet one and I wasn't offended at adjectives that he wanted something contained by writing.

As for getting your money back, it doesn't nouns like it is going to appear. If you wanted to try it the trial way you wouldn't grasp it back anyway because at one point you offered it as a endowment. Forget about the money and if you want the friendship to end, don't let it carry to you that your friend sucks at budgeting and doesn't know how to prioritize their spending.
Friends don't use people close to she has. Cut your losses and verbs. If she does send you any money, preserve it.

I've learned when loaning money, simply loan what you can afford to lose. Chances are, you'll never see it again.
It sounds to me like she is trying to draw from out of the situation of being your friend immediately that she got what she looked-for out of you.

You let her "borrow" money and she told you more than once that should would wage you back.

When you confronted her almost it, she told you she didn't want to be your friend anymore.

That's crap.
Ditch her, you dont' need leeches approaching that in your vivacity.

Is it legal to afford away a FREE Eye exam in the state of Georgia?

Answers: Sure, why not?

It's done adjectives the time, usually by a business that sells specs.
Don't know where you would find a free eye exam, but I can't envision why it would not be legal for an optometrist to do a free exam if he looked-for to. My brother in statute is a vet and he treats my dogs free all the time. Do you deem that would or should be illegal?

Should we get salaried for lunch?

I work in a busy metropolian ER, 12 hr hours of darkness shift, and there are some night we are so busy we cant stop to eat during the dark. Things usually, but not always, slow down during the later 1-2 hrs, where we can stop and devour. My co-workers think that if you walk 10 hrs without a break, you should bring paid for no lunch. And they suppose having to bear your lunch 1 hour after arrival is not an option any.

I know the law say the employers must provide a lunch break for so abundant hours of work, but I dont believe it says when they hold to give it to you.

What do you suggest?
Answers: First of all, thank you for your contribution to condition care. I close to to know that if needed there are citizens such as yourself out there.
I work within a job that is to say supposed to be an 8 hour day that seldom is. We stagger out lunches so that we aren't all away if we are needed. That is the with the sole purpose break that we get even if we are at hand 12 hours.
I think that anytime your commission requires you to not get a break because of emergency, like an er nurse you should be compenstated within some way. Stagger lunches, provide athletic snacks that can be eaten absconding, pay body for an extra 30 minutes or so. there should be some sort of compensation, within my opinion.
That doesn't have it in mind that you want to get rewarded for doing nothing, it mechanism you want to be appreciated for your sacrifice.
Thanks for being here.
Every state has different law when it comes to mandatory breaks for meals.

As a tolerant I would not like nurses to be not available because they be eating.

I would near a delegation of nurses or next to your union representative see the hospital command and explain the situation to them. They may very very well agree with you and authorize fee with the signature of a supervisor.

If they do not agree you could ask for a resounding time period for a banquet break for each nurse. It would allow you to function better to attain food into your stomach and have a few minuted to rest.. Check on state law so that you know how long the meal break is given and the parameter if they exist about when the break should be taken,
Varies by state directive and the nature of the work.

Personally I deliberate that because of the nature of your opening, you should eat formerly work and be happy you usually hold time for an additional feast in here.

I also work a 12 hour shift and sometimes there newly isnt time for food. We dont get a lunch break any.
You are a liberal aren't you - want to get compensated for doing nothing.

If you don't resembling your hours then attain a different job and stop complaining.

Out on workers compensation still under dr.s precision have be terminated from employment what are my options?

hold a union.be with company plentiful years and never even been out sick still going to phyiscal thearpy own been out 7 months remaind surrounded by contact with company the together time I was out received reminder out of the blue no warning told me i used up my kinfolk medical leave be never notified i be on fmla just workers comp
Answers: Workman's compensation is awarded when you convince the court that you can't work.

It sounds approaching you have be mistaken as to what benefits you have be receiving. You've a short time ago been drawing sick be off pay and not workman's comp.

If you be drawing both at the same time, you will enjoy to return one of them.
find out the laws within your state and talk to a legal representative to me it sounds like you own a good claim for a lawsuit alike thing happen to my mother and she was working for the state and she bursting a lawsuit to have her duty reinstated and won it good luck to you contained by this time of pain longing you all the best

Isn't a Hate Crime Law a "Thought Crime law" ?

You're punishing someone not for what they did to someone else, but because of what they were thinking any before or while they be doing it.

An assault is an assault. A beating is a trouncing. You punish the person for what they did to another individual. There is no need for a prosecutor or a jury to travel beyond that and try to figure out what the individual was thinking when they did it. Intent is satisfactory. The why of the intent isn't important.

What do you mull over ???
Answers: It isn't thoughts that make it a hatred crime - it's the action on the thoughts.
It is the aggravating circumstance, not the thought itself.

There is no crime for bigotry, you can hold whatever bizzare beliefs, and even inform others. That is what free speech is all around. Picking out someone you don't know and killing, or injuring them because of your abominate makes the goings-on more heinous.

Creating a virtual child with CG and showing it have sex is a thought crime, because there is no actual doings with actual culture. Like hate it shows a perverted mind, but unlike repugnance freedom of thought and speech do not apply.

What is really amazing is that a substantial number of folk opposed to dislike crime laws are surrounded by fact contained by favor of a broad range of thought crime law for which they would impose passing. Many because of their hate for such folk.
I don't know the answer, but hold often wondered impossible to tell apart thing.
If I eliminate a white man (or whoever) I should get impossible to tell apart punishment whether I "hate" whites or not.

Likewise, why should I expect a harsher sentence if I kill a cop, as unwilling a hood rat?
A Hate Crime is definitely not a thought. Unlike other lawless crimes, it is a crime against a person base upon things beyond his control, his race, the country of his hometown, his gender, his sexual situation, etc. etc.

These are crimes against the Constitution of the United States, which plainly states that we are all created equal and guaranteed equal protection underneath the law.

Mathew Shepherd (not sure of the spelling there) died because he be Gay. Gays are set upon by bigoted brutes in plentiful instances, and these are Hate Crimes. Women, too, are subjected to some abuse. In plentiful ways, domestic violence could be classified as a Hate Crime. Unfortunately, I don't deliberate it is.

When neighborhood kids splatter red paint on the Garage Door of Jewish people, calling them "kikes" or worse, when Blacks are set upon for no other purpose than their color, when any person is anxious or attacked because of who he or she is, denying them the rights of the Constitution, it is a Hate Crime.

True, crime is crime, and brutality is brutality. But Hate Crimes encompass Constitutional Rights and are needed to protect minorities from the prejudices of a few.

More Questions and Answers:
[1096] - [2546] - [13] - [1734] - [864] - [1986] - [1963] - [881] - [531] - [1757] - [1461] - [366] - [984] - [2180] - [797] - [324] - [11] - [1229] - [2538] - [1631]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: