Law Questions and Answers

Does a non biological ex step parent who has parenting time enjoy to pay child support contained by Colorado?

Adams county to be exact. Like I said ex step-parent who was awarded parenting time beside the child. Please advise!!
Answers: Not unless you adopt the child or agreed to it for having visitation.
An excellent ask - for you to ask a lawyer. Too frequent variables in cases similar to this.

You asked "what was the court thinking?" - They are thinking that the ex step-parent and the child hold created a bond that is beneficial to the child to verbs. This may be because of the amount of time they spent together before they become an ex-step-parent. It may also relate to the amount of parenting this person preformed while directly member of the child's life.

The court be probably also thinking that you did not show why this should not be allowed.

I don't know any of the parties involved, I'm making no judgment, however it looks like the court saw that this arrangement be for the best interest of the child. If you think the court is wrong, hire a attorney.

There is no precedence for collecting support payments from non-biological parents that have not adopt a child.
Visitation is not necessarily tied to support payments.

The child is "entitled" to support from two people and ONLY two ethnic group. Mother and Father. One probably has custody and the other pays support. If they hold joint custody, they share the kid and probably neither pays support. The singular way a step-parent could be forced to earnings support is this:

Non-custodial parent gives up parental rights. Custodial parent agrees to that and assumes full responsibility for the child. Custodial parent get married and new spouse adopt the child. Now new spouse is the second parent and is responsible for child supervision, even if a divorce takes place.

So did you ADOPT the kid? If not, they should not be capable of make you payment child support.
No. In Colorado, only biological and adoptive parents own an obligation to support a child. Parenting time and child support are not dependent on respectively other. A step-parent who has not adopt a child does not have an necessity to support the child.

If i am going to surely make a plea barter does it matter if i use a public ally or a private attorney?

the police and i are arranging me to turn myself in for one count of burglary at which point i will be released on bond and own to appear in court. i know this is a felony and i want to get hold of this expunged from my record. I be wondering if it mattered if i have a private attorney or a public defender. i only just turned 18, and this is my first offense ever so my goal is to seize "youthful offender" status and this be expunged from my copy. i am not sure if only an attorney can do that or if a public ally can do that as well since i am not contesting anything my principal goal is for a plea negotiate where this does not step on my record but i serve my probation time. appreciation guys
Answers: Public Defenders are Attorneys. They take indistinguishable bar examine as any prosecutor or private attorney. You should chitchat to the attorney before decide what to do.
I think a private attorney will roughly fight for your rights more. The public ally works for the court and guess who signs their check!
Best luck, if you don't have the money and you are lucky you can procure a good public champion who will look out for you. If you're not a violent wrongdoer I don't think you'll shift to jail but i don't know almost removing it from your record.
Don't commit any more crimes, dummy!!! (and draw from off drugs immediately if that's the reason you are committing crimes, otherwise you'll run out up Bubba's bath toy existing soon.)
Either one can do the job of handling your plea and sentencing. But you are barred to have a public supporter appointed if you can afford your own attorney.

Hire a criminal attorney to assist you. You will need one anyway to expunge your register. That's not in the charge description of the public defender.

Their is no real menace to smoking pot, the only vulnerability is that you can get fined and arrested for possession?

In my humble belief, ciggerets and liquor is way more precarious then pot. Statistics show that ciggerets eradicate thousands of people every year due to lung cancer heart attack, etc, pot have yet to be proven to mete out any of these thinks. Statistics also show thousands of populace die from alcohol overdose, but yet, you can't overdose on weed no business how much you smoke. As a matter of certainty, the only judgment why weed is illegal is because they can't due it, so people would grow it on their own and not pay cheque taxes on it, not because of what it does to you. Weed also wears rotten in nearly 2 hours, so you can drive home sober. If you get tanked at a f¨ºte, your going to be drunk for the rest of the night, and most populace are willing to pinch the risk to drive home. Alchol can also cause fight and people to becoume disorderly, not pot. Do you agree with my following statement.
Answers: Yeah statistically speaking - the worst piece that's going to happen to you as a result is going to sentence to prison.
Pot has be shown/proven to lead to high highs. Just resembling the alcoholic who "has" to have a drink, the pot smoker ends up going to a stronger substance to bring higher.

Who is Norman Hsu running from?

Was he not found aboard an Amtrack? He had a passport, so why did he not slip out through the south? Was he head north, west?Who was after him besides the bounty hunters? Is Hillary concerned roughly speaking the revelations coming from the chinese connection? The medium is reluctant on this matter!
Answers: I enjoy not heard the hottest on that, but bet that the Clintons know all going on for it. The panic and stress will crack them to the point, that respectively will blame the other, whenever they are indicted. Before that happens, I would close to to see her back on Yahoo Answers, answering the easier said than done questions for a translation! Yeah! like that's gonna hoppen!
He be arrested in a hospital contained by Colorado, was heading to California on Amtrak to turn himself surrounded by but got sick.

You're really stretching.
the chinese nouns was so 10 years ago -- is your nouns arrested much?

at least he wasn't within a bathroom in minnesota -- jeez.

Los Angelos / San Francisco. Not Angles and St. Francis. Why is it like this?

Answers: Even after California become part of the USA, copious new cities towns and counties be given Spanish names. Some be given variations on Native American name.
Ahem, settled by the Spanish. *coughcough*

*cough* Also, it's "angels".
Um, well first of adjectives it's Los Angeles, not Angelos.

Second, the names of copious California cities and towns were picked by the Spanish settlers surrounded by the 18th century.
I don't get the examine ... you want to know why the cities were name as they were? Pick up a history book.

We are homeowners in an association and want to sign a petition getting rid of the fees what should we do?

we are a neighborhood not a condominium. near are 407 homes and almost 80% want to get rid of the fees because the control association does not keep up what requests to be done. for example, they do not bring people beforehand the covenants committe who have continually disregarded requests to adhere to the guidlines, they dont maintain up with inspections, the board member for a year now enjoy discussed purchasing blinds for the clubhouse and still we have no blinds. they can't seem to be to get anything expert and we are tired of paying fees and receiving no services or even okay services. we inquired about signing a petition and they told us that within order to achieve rid of the association it would require 66 and 1/3 % of the homeowners AND that each homeowner(s) mortgage company must agree as powerfully. does the mortgage company have anything to do next to your association, all they require is that you money your mortgage. help please...we are tired of the bull s h i t!
Answers: The initial desire of a homeowners association (bylaws and covenants) is to maintain the utility of the property (and common areas) govern by them. In that sense - they association may be correct (if mortgage lenders considered the homeowners association budget when approving the mortgages).

You need a copy of the covenants. Every company - every developer will hold different contracts. Investigate. If it comes down to it - get the packages. Just do a form letter for everyone to distribute to their lender - it's just a different stamp.

Can't you vote out ineffective members of your board?
Excuse me, but why would anyone want to belong to a homeowners association? Don't we hold freedom in this country?



Freedom, practice it. It is refreshing.
When you closed escrow, you predictable signed a contract to abide by the HOA rules. If you didn't sign that agreement, they (the mortgage company, previous owner) would not have agree to you move in; it be probably a condition of you taking ownership.
In addition, various states have law governing the HOA, which includes how money is spent, reserves, etc.. Has the management company complied near you state's laws?
Though it's unlikely you'll ever disband the HOA association completely, it may be allowed and legitimately possible. Plan on spending money on attorney fees.
Bottom line: do NOT stop paying your dues. Not solely does it violate a legal agreement, masses HOAs have teeth: they can fine you and ultimately force the Dutch auction of your home to pay for long-gone fees. Of course, you have the freedom to move elsewhere.

Who would drive better, the stoner or the typical drunk?

Answers: It would be a matter of degree of impairment. In my opinion (and I'm no expert), drunks hold a higher sense of arrogance--"I know what I'm doing." However, stoners own a lower sense of reality.

You'd see the drunk driving 20 miles over the speed constrict. You'd see the stoner driving 20 miles under the speed aim.

I'd guess it's a toss up.
The drunk would be driving 95 using all four lane of the freeway, the stoner would be driving in the slow lane at 55, frightened a cop will see him - guess who is more dangerous? (Now the stoner remembering when his court date is - that might be another story.)
PS: Of course alcohol AND marijuana manufacture a particularly poisonous combination.
Neither - both are impaired. There is a point why the charge is DUI - Driving Under the Influence. It encompasses anything that you can bear that would impair your judgment or sensitivity times. Stoners and drunks are both impaired and it doesn't label a difference what their individual symptoms are.
The sober one but .. I would have to move about with the reefer dude.
the stoner would drive safer and better, hand down
Duh.the stoner.
the stoner.
Uh-oh, I see a race between Bill and Teddy.
if i chose,it would be the stoner by far. although both are impairments.
The stoner, by far. He's more paranoid and well thought-out.

For example, the drunk drives through a stop sign. The stoner waits for it to turn green.
I've see trauma patients mangled and bleeding who are drunk and ones who are stoned - so I guess neither is a great driver.

I have also see innocent victims plowed into by people who are drunk and ones who are stoned - so I guess I don't want any one on the road next to me.

All the people who claim pot is non-hazardous are nuts - I have see more than one accident cause by "just pot". Just nil - grow the F up, and realize that no one desires that crap.

Does anyone know who I should write to in good opinion to changing an NC imperative? I live in Eastern NC.?

Do you know the heading and if this person is a senator, etc?
Answers: Go to the NC Assembly website and locate your region or unit. Then once you find that and the Assembly congressperson, contact him/her.
contact your local NC senator. i live in winstonsalem,NC where on earth do you live?

Paternity and child support?

question roughly speaking a 12 year old child who have not seen her father
since a toddler.
Her grandfather have helped put on a pedestal her.
Her father went to court when she be 1 and got some rights
visitation every other weekend.
He dropped the skin ,since he started it and decided not to pursue
rights.
He later stopped paying child support.
I know legally this sounds wrong but this be done through lawyers
not a child support agency.
I allowed this to stop because I be concerned about her sanctuary with him. He be going to try and get full right and tolerate his childless sister adopt him.
His son is older and I touch he can voice her feelings a bit more.
I hold recently approved to try for child support again.
Since I heard it is the directive.
Even though I still have concerns almost her safety, this is not
done through lawyer so it doesnt give any custody rights ,nonetheless.
I am trying not to say too much ,but what do you quality about this?
If I am concerned next to her safety should I in recent times let it progress?
Answers: Many times when you go for child support the m¨ºl¨¦e will be on for visitation.

I have other said if you don't want the child to be around the father because of safety issues after why stay intangled with him inflict that is what happen.
If he hasn't been paying child support, later he is probably going to have trouble convincing a mediate that he needs to own custody.

Definitely go after child support. I antipathy deadbeat dads.
Contact a lawyer.
With child support repeatedly comes visitation - especially if you can't prove a safety issue...but contained by many states if one parent have absolutely NO contact near a child for a year or more then you can enjoy their parental rights removed. You'll need to check your state and a legal representative would be best to answer those questions... If your the mother than do what you consider is right - but if this guy hasn't seen or help his son in apprx 10 yrs no jusge is going to allow him custody. What I am curious more or less is why he is trying to get custody transfered to his sister...hold you done anything that they can prove showing you to be an unfit mother? If not don't worry - rob yourself and the grandfather to a lawyer - everything will work out fine.
The duty to pay support is independent of the right to visitation and both can be modified by the court. Every county surrounded by the U.S. has individuals assigned to assist in the collection of support. Theu usually work for the District Attorney although some are within a separate agency. Visitation is entirely separate and if you don't wish this party to have visitation, afterwards it is a simple procedure to have the court rule on that.
Get an attorney and profile for Child Support. It can also be retroactive. Visitation will be decided by the court. My wifes ex took rotten for 17 years and is now paying off support.

Do you think it is a true statement that the US have a 'counterfeit-money' economy?

After adjectives, the fed prints money, federal bank loan that money into the economy relying on a practice call 'fractional reserve banking', which makes it possible for them to loan 5 times the money they own on hand.

The Constitution (the supreme ruling of the land) puts the creation of money into the hands of Congress, but establishes that every 'dollar' be worth one ounce of silver.

Should we impeach every Congressman who votes for deficit spending?

Should we impeach every President who signs a budget requiring deficit spending?
Answers: its easier to a moment ago vote for ron paul - he states the same point
adam smith wrote a great story on redeaming a silver certificate

immediately its just green dissertation or electronic blips, only worth something because most culture agree that is

he redeem the $5 bill for silver, payable to the bearer, etc, they gave him some silver dust within a baggie, I too was shoocked, The US management redeams its currency in a baggie
but establishes that every 'dollar' be worth one ounce of silver.
puts the creation of money into the hand of Congress,

Since when?

The Federal reserve Bank prints money, when requested by our gov. and to replace all shredded composition money.

We are not on a silver or gold standard any longer.
I am against deficit spending, and cogitate that a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution is a well-mannered idea.

Article I, paragraph 8 of the Constitution reads (in part):

"To coin money, regulate the utility thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures."

I see nowhere that the value of the dollar is fixed to the price of silver. Can you quote a more specific source?
why not we hold counterfit law inventor an give the knob to the to take bribes.
the constituntion for the working individuals an not the law
we should throw them adjectives out an start over again.we the people are the ones they should ask first
george bush doed not know where on earth he is 99% of the time

More Questions and Answers:
[158] - [2473] - [544] - [2284] - [179] - [2045] - [192] - [2433] - [749] - [417] - [1479] - [2179] - [667] - [1089] - [505] - [890] - [2282] - [486] - [29] - [2425]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: