Law Questions and Answers
Why do people mull over freedom is about doing anything you want??
I always hear just about left wing liberals complaining that our freedoms own been diminished...how can any society seriously hold any lasting freedom in need any moral boundaries? with great freedom, comes great reponsiblity...why is it populace want the "freedom" that they think they enjoy...and not the responsiblity?...it is the modern "freedom" or I should say depravity...which will be the annihilation of western society.this is for sure...probably to be replaced with something which have decency, respect, and a principle center...similar to Islamic law, or something of this character.Answers: Are you asking whether people who angle questions almost the diminishing freedoms in our society are morons and own no moral standing? It is exactly because I have standards that I ask these question, and I definately don't want to go around doing anything I want.
But you are saying that muslims don't cross-question the erosion of these freedoms because they adhere to a religion that advocate decency, respect and a principle meeting point.
If you want to know why everyone isn't turning to Islam, why don't you just come out and ask the request for information.
Liberals arent calling for being competent to do whatever you want.
Its a simple formula. Your rights stop when they infringe on another person's, not when they hit a religious hedge.
Uh... Have you looked in a dictionary? There are copious definitions, but one of them happen to be: The exemption from external control, interference, regulation, etc.
Another is: The power to determine action in need restraint.
Are you suggesting we redefine the word? It means what it routine. Maybe we should redefine our principles and eliminate freedom from the catalogue.
Do you think the investigational reporting guidelines will cut down on the sillyness in the Politics division?
Answers: No I believe it will help bring questions removed if a unusual person doesn't agree near the askers view point , which it didn't past .
The community guidelines are certainly one seriously violated now. I don't know how they plan to 'enforce' them. People are using it as a platform for spouting opinion (occasionally in the form of question, a la Jeapordy) more often than asking a genuine question. I don't see how they can enforce their 'rules' but I guess we'll see, eh?
Deathbed confessions..no reason to feign..?
Picture yourself near the expire of your life, you enjoy to confess something that happened contained by the past..you spawn a sealed affidavit years earlier whilst your still in mental fitting health near instructions for it not to be opened until some time after your departure.Under these circumstances why would anyone lie contained by their confession (with no repercussions to living family members)
I cant envision why one would make a false statement surrounded by the said affadavit
Answers: The "sealed affidavit" and the "deathbed confession" are two seperate things.
The affidavit be completed but the author had no concern for on the spot or pending passing.
However, a deathbed confession the statements are made with the player truely believing they are about to die. Knowing one have nothing to lose by person honest makes the statement more credible than that of the former affidavit.
Best wishes.
What you are referring to is a dying testimonial. It would be an exception to the hearsay rule and admissible in court.
It is considered reliable for the reason you suggest. However it is more credible if the fear of awaiting death is sudden..."John Smith shot me".and after you die.
my response is to hensleyclaw. . .
if John Smith shot me . . . and you died -- he has REALLY impossible aim (or really strong bullets).
Congratulations, you just discovered the dying testimonial exception to the hearsay rule.
Edit:
Well with an affidavit authentication is what is most vital. The question at this point is more of whether the affiant be competent, not acting under duress or undue influence; and most importantly, that the document is authentic.
In writ to authenticate the document to a legal demonstrability, you would start with the signature and check to see if the affiant be duly sworn. If he were, the document would be notorized. Also, I would be more convinced if here were witnesses who also signed within attestation of the affiant's state of mind and testamentary capacity.
It really is best to start near trying to disprove these things rather than prove them.
In directive there is an exception to the hearsay rule. Generally, a character cannot testify to what someonw else says, but a party can testify to what a victim said roughly who it was that kill him. The reasoning is that someone would not possibly lie something like this - especially given the Christian history of the common directive system and that lying is a sin that would endanger your mortal soul.
However, there is be a problem. In India, another former British colony, there be tribal fighting. Anytime one human being died by violent vehicle, which happened deeply at the time, they would blame the leaders of the rival tribe.
The problem is that people know about the exception and they exploited it. In hint to your hypo, this could also be the case. If the confession simply effects the dying person, afterwards maybe they did not slump. However, there could be incentives to pull the wool over your eyes and if the person thought that everyone would conjecture as you do, then he might try to exploit this.
For eg, a character could desire fame (see the Benet Ramsey guy) and confess to something to bring more reputation. The person could try to exculpate someone from a crime that they commited.
It does give the impression of being unlikely that a statement totally against one's interest would be false. However, what really is the problem now, the guy is limp so what consequences are there to him?
Oh this is not a dying announcement (that is what I described above), this would be a statement against one's own interest. Dying declaration one and only applies to a person relating about his murderer.
I work in the State of Arizona,?
I work surrounded by the State of Arizona, my employer states he is notrequired by law to offer you a 15 minute break. does anybody no if this is true, and if so where justifiably does it state that
Answers: Yes, it's true. Employers in Arizona are not required to provide ANY breaks to workforce; however, most business owners will have workers take a lunchbreak anyway - otherwise, it would be really not easy to keep clothed employees.
Depends on the amount of time worked
http://www.ica.state.az.us/Divisions/lab...
Look into the Arizona Labor Laws
It does not appear that Arizona have a law requiring breaks. See http://blog.laborlawcenter.com/2006/07/2...
For the kidnappers of .Madeleine Mcann..that's kidnapper not parents..what do you think?
What is your evaluation? For the kidnappers who could never be parents because they do not possess a heart , or compassion. If you conjecture you are ''parent material'' then plug your brain surrounded by and sort yourself out. I doubt they have the dimensions to even read this. So my question to those wish to post an opinion is what cost other than demise would you give those who own kidnapped Madeleine Mcann?Answers: I read the story this morning when it be released about the parents man suspect.
After so many years surrounded by law enforcement, one point I've learned beside any certainy is that you just never know until adjectives the evidence is in.
The medium reported that the parents MAY be suspect which is certainly an avenue that MUST be checked...only just in covering.
Imagine the number of times family member have committed crimes against other inherited members using the alibi that nearby would be no way they could bring spoil to their own spouse or any other member.
In this bag, however, what IF the parents were responsible and nobody checked merely to be sure.that leaves this child in a hopeless situation where on earth she very capably could remain because nobody looked!
I don't know what to think. And that isn't a cop-out answer. I hold been bombarded next to information (true or not?) from all sides, and am only waiting, like profusely of people, for it adjectives to pan out and hopefully, for even-handedness to prevail.
I just hope that Maddie, somewhere she is, isn't suffering.
I think I would put them surrounded by jail within a cell that's completely dark and where on earth no sounds can be heard unless circumstances determined it be absolutely indispensable, such as putting a light on for several minutes at a time so the prisoner(s) could toilet, hose and eat and the singular communication they got be only prerequisite contact with guards/wardens. I would not inform them how long the sentence would be for and ban the guards from disclosing anything to them such as time of sunshine, what day it is etc etc. That's around the worst punishment I could think of, it would be just about feeling completely helpless minus the chance of knowing when it be going to end. Just what the kidnapper have put on the parents of Madeline.
I massively much doubt the parents' involvement as if they wanted to take out her, why take her on holiday to do it and if something happen accidentally, why cover it up. As for people proverb they're not acting normally, who's to right to be heard what is normal surrounded by that case, folks act differently and ethnic group react completely differently to a given situation. You never know how you're going to act or act in response to something until you're going through it.
I think they should rot within a cell, with no amenities except food and water! Be treated close to the dirt they are and never get out!
I may not be a police officer but I do know bodies don't bleed after 25 days, so the suspicion of any blood human being found in that saloon being the childs is ridiculous.
If Madeleine have died in an luck, why try and cover it up. They are both Doctors, not idiots! How many times will they own seen children die do you muse! It happens! They would surely enjoy found a better cover story than saying they disappeared them alone, they must have particular what people would infer of them!
Losing a child can make folks behave in adjectives sorts of odd ways, believe me I KNOW! I deduce there is something curious about the undamaged thing but I'll believe the Parents are innocent unless someone can really prove other-wise. It wouldn't be the first time an innocent human being was blamed!
Shared Road Easement?
We have 2 driveways to our property, respectively on a different road. Our property is surrounded by 2 dirt roads.Our address is on one of the roads, the main road, but we enjoy a shared easement on both roads and driveways on both. There is a gate on the smaller number used road and it obviously have been used for years.
We've solitary owned the house for 1 yr. and we unfortunately enjoy a neighbor who claims that the road we share an easement with, is his, because the road is fully on his property.
There is a neighbor that lives at the wrapping up of the road and, obviously have to use the road so the lousy neighbor claims that it's ok for him to use it, because the owner at the end of the road requests to use it.
We think that since we share the easement near them, we have as much right as anyone to use the road, regardless of whether it's our basic ingress or not, regardless of whether it's all on his property or not. It's not surveyed. What do you reflect? Do we have a right or not? What can we do to prove it?
Answers: It doesn't issue that the road is entirely on his property. You have an easement. An easement is the right to use.
"He, convinced against his will, is of equal opinion still." You aren't going to "prove" anything to your neighbor.
So only use the road. If he puts a lock on the gate, you enjoy the legal right to cut it sour with bolt cutters.
What does your Property description say-so? If you have an Easement, it will be here in writing.
You if truth be told have 2 question to be answered. Is the road fully on your neighbors property, or not? A Surveyor can tell you. The 2nd is whether or not you enjoy an Easement on your neighbors property. The County Recorder of Deeds, or the Surveyor's Office should be able to put in the picture you that.
Civil law even-handedness?
i need support with my intro to directive hw. i cant seem to find this.. is a satisfying the blank:civil laws regulate the process people treat respectively other, so individuals will not be_______, _________, or have their _____ hurt by others.
also please any website that can donate me all the info on civil tenet justice and criminal even-handedness such as what prove is required and who must prove, penalties, and what type of cases are hear in respectively symtem.. thanks so much!!!
Answers: I can't find this quote. Perhaps it is contained by one of the cases you have be studying?
Next, what state are you in? Each state have different penalties.
For criminal cases, the prosecution (district attorney usually, representing The People of the State of _____ [whatever state you're in]) have the burden of proving that the defendant committed the crime. The prosecution's burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt."
For civil cases, the plaintiff (the soul who sues) has the burden of proving respectively element of his overnight case - each component of each mete out of action (or claim) that he is suing for. His burden is "by a preponderance of the evidence." If he is suing for punitive damages, his burden is "clear and convincing evidence" (usually, but by state, it may differ). The defendant doesn't usually hold a burden, unless he raises an affirmative defense - to be exact, a reason why plaintiff should not prevail (which doesn't hold anything to do with the elements surrounded by the plaintiff's claim).
My attorney has lost my broadsheet work twice. Some rcpts. and some supeona info. from my ex's employer. helllp
Answers: You should of gotten another attorney the first time he lost your paper work. Report him to the state pub and fire him.
You need a brand new lawyer. A creature has to maintain their own records as this happen, and why who knows, but they are not highly organized and do not have a correct filing system otherwise this would not ensue. Hopefully you can get your papers again and try someone else. Good luck.
Porn question?
Has any juvenile 15-17 got introuble beside the law for looking at porn? If so what is the costAnswers: Um... Short answer us yes he or she has.
Long answer is how the statute is views it. The directive is written if a person bring harm to a child by exposing that child to sexually explict medium. It does not say the personality exposing the person cannot be the child. Check out the story below.
Utah Boy Busted Looking At Underage Porn
(KUTV) Cops bust another Utahn for porn but, this time, the perpetrator is a child.
The boy’s mother is speaking out tonight roughly her son’s crime and the pain it’s cause her family.
The boy be looking at child pornography on his home computer and his parents had no impression. But investigators knew and sooner or later they came knock on the family’s door.
The boy’s mother refused to be identified.
The Utah mother have no idea the officer at her door were tracking flurry on her home computer. Someone she never suspected was looking at child porn.
The boy’s mom say, “They actually thought they be coming to talk to me roughly my husband using the internet. But it was one of my children. To one surrounded by the family will ever forget this. It be like a loss in the ethnic group.”
Shock, led to heartbreak. The in one piece family feel victimized.
“We had younger children that lived contained by our home and because this was a sex crime against children, near was closely of interviewing of that went on next to my smaller children and that was really strong,” said the woman.
This mother thought she knew her kids’ computer customs.
Turns out her son, had wipe the hard drive disappearing no trace of the porn.
Officer Sam Winkler with the South Jordan Police Department say, “What we didn’t realize is that most kids are smarter than parents think they are on the internet.”
Officer Winkler say most parents don’t know what their kids are doing online.
“They see their kid working on homework but when they leave the room their child does things they shouldn’t be doing online,” say Officer Winkler.
Winkler holds seminars to drill parents about internet danger.
“There are programs on the market that will study your computer for you,” says Officer Winkler.
This mother say in some ways, she’s indebted police got to her son in a minute.
“Because otherwise, had they not caught him up to that time he was an fully fledged, he’d be doing 5 years in prison,” she say.
That teen got probation be ordered to counseling, home confinement. It’s cost the family emotionally and financially.
If you surface like you want to become more computer savvy to know what your kids are doing online South Jordan Police Department is have a seminar next month. Give them a phone call its free lots of useful information from experts.
South Jordan Police Department: (801) 254-4708
((c) MMVII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)
I'm not sure of the law where you live, but I hold never heard of it human being against the law for a minor to possess porn. It is a short time ago illegal for someone to vend it to you or provide it.
FYI...this is assuming it is legal porn. It IS immoral for a 15-17 year old to be within possession of porn pics of a 15 - 17 year old (even if it is a candid pic your gf give you). There is case ruling about this surrounded by Canada.a young man be charged with making and possessing child pornography for taking and keeping pics of his girlfriend, even though she considered necessary to.
www.limewire.com
I worked for one week at this place. they still haven't paid me!!!!!?
i solely did a week at this particular hospital and didn't move about back. (the hunch was mutual i think). i won't travel into why i didn't like it in that, but it wasn't the patients. it was the staff and contained by a hospital where patients will sometimes find combative, it's best not to work there if you don't gain along with some of your co-workers (one woman staff appendage was kill about a year ago because her co-workers "didn't know" she have trouble with a patient). anyhow. nearby it is. now the give somebody the third degree is what do i do know. it's going on a month. they won't return my calls. i want to know what beaurus i should bid or what!!!Answers: Email me your state and I will look up what agency handles wage and hour claims for ya.
Most states own laws concerning when final paychecks must be issued. It usually depends upon the situation (quiting on the spot versus giving notice, etc). If it have been almost a month though that sounds a bit long for any situation.
You quit in need notice by merely not showing up?
Good luck on getting your pay, but this species of hassle is what happens when you burn bridges.
----------
Your interrogate indicates you quit without interest by not showing up. True or False? If true, my answer stands. If false, and you terminated your employment in being to your supervisor, then you're entitled to your settle up. 'Don't burn your bridges' isn't rude - its Life!
--------------
Thanks for the email, Vannessa. No wonder your co-workers didn't get along next to you. With an attitude like that, I see this situation up more in the adjectives.
-------------
Thanks for the clarification, in which armour I see your point. But your foul-mouthed prissy attitude here and in the two lovely cuss-filled emails you sent (and contained by other answers of yours I read) leave me appreciative that I don't have to work next to you and your ilk.
Contact Human Resources and explain them the situation. Even if you worked for only a time, you are still entitled to get remunerated. If this doesn't work, contact the Employment Development Department, (EDD), and ask them if you can collect unemployment, which you might not, mete out is only a week, however you can also see if you be even entered surrounded by the system when you were hired. If EDD tell you that there's no record of you working for such hospital, someone without a doubt screwed you.
But contact Human Resources first, find out what's keeping them from paying you and even returning your calls, afterwards if it continues you can submit a complaint with EDD against your former employer, that you be not paid. Be sure to enjoy some sort of proof that you worked there, probably a copy of your application, anything that identifies you and the company when you be hired. Good luck.
Have you turned in a Claim for hours worked or wages earn? Did you turn in a time card? Did you ask your Supervisor how you should proceed? Do they even know that you quit and hold no intention to return?
What is the normal Payroll procedure near, and have you followed it?
They do owe you even if you worked newly one day but surrounded by the future, you might want to furnish a two-weeks notice until that time you leave, no issue how much you dislike them or the job. That keep YOUR record (name) verbs when you apply for other jobs and it shows a later life on your part by treating others the approach you would want them to treat you.
Send them a Certified or Registered letter (don't remember ~ which ever one requires them to sign and you procure the card back) and let them know you haven't received the check and that no will one will return your call and it's been over a month. Let them know if you don't enjoy the check in your hand within 10 working days (FYI, that doesn't include weekends or holidays), you will be forced to contact the Better Business Bureau and the Labor Relations Board and directory a complaint with respectively.
Be sure and document everything you do so you have a narrative of events as you tried to get this.
More Questions and Answers:
[1899] - [184] - [1029] - [1790] - [1683] - [2415] - [2378] - [2438] - [839] - [1149] - [36] - [2065] - [405] - [117] - [1160] - [363] - [1564] - [185] - [1459] - [1127]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: