Law Questions and Answers

I need comfort with my Con Law exam!!! ASAP! I will love you forever!?

I am preparing one of the practice question in the hopes it will be on the testing - the situation is:
State X enacts a statute which provides that unless the US Govt. determines otherwise, all sale in X of products made elsewhere are subject to a Tax. The tax = the difference between the labor cost that would enjoy been required to produce the item contained by question if it be manufactured in X and the labor cost truly incurred.

I need to set forth adjectives plausible arguments to the effect that the tax is unconstitutional and evaluate those arguments.

HELP!!! I am going to be pulling an adjectives nighter with this and any serve would be appreciated!
Answers: Look at these rules: (1) whether the challenged statute regulates evenhandedly next to only "incidental" effects on interstate commerce, or discriminates against interstate commerce any on its face or contained by practical effect; (2) whether the statute serves a legitimate local purpose; and, if so, (3) whether alternative process could promote this local purpose as well lacking discriminating against interstate commerce. The burden to show discrimination rests on the carnival challenging the reasonableness of the statute, but "[w]hen discrimination against commerce . . . is demonstrated, the burden falls on the State to prove correct it both in language of the local benefits flowing from the statute and the unavailability of non-discriminatory alternatives adequate to preserve the local interests at stake."

Your covering sounds as though it would be against the CC. Good luck
The US Constitution states that the federal government have the power to regulate interstate commerce.

This problem was one of the various flaws with the Articles of Confederation. Also see Maubury Vs. Madison (or Maryland). This satchel also has to do near interstate commerce, but more with the bank aspect.

For what its worth do a quick force out of Shay's rebellion. Best of luck.
States can and do levy "sale and use taxes" on goods brought within from other states and countries. The taxes are based on the merit of the goods import.

Despite the specific language of the constitution, these taxes are not iffy import tariff. Rather, they are seen as allowable lower than the Compact Clause. So, your first problem is to distinguish State X's as unconstitutional under the Compact Clause. (Don't see congressional approval within your facts!)

Next, the Commerce Clause argument is a good one, as the import tax could be seen as adjectives the interstate movement of goods. Generally Commerce Clause arguments are the most powerful.

But don't forget the Due Process Clause as powerfully. Does State X have jurisdiction over the producers?

What legal certificate do i need to purchase a suppressor for my weapon and do i own to have my own weapon

my weapon be not purchased but issued its an m4
Answers: You need a class 3 charge stamp before human being legally competent to purchase suppressors or automatic weapons.
you should check your state law. some do not allow them, some do. and, you can buy weapon and suppressor together, or separate. or just buy the tub.

State of California prohibits a major contained by education??

why does the state of california prohibit a highest in coaching to be offered at a UC schools? Only a minor is allowed. the CSU school offer a highest in liberal studies. Why is this so?
Answers: This is because CA wishes its teachers to own a solid education within the subject they are teaching. Liberal studies is appropriate for primary conservatory teachers, since they instruct every subject. In addition to a 4-year amount in an actual subject, teacher have to gain a teaching credential which is usually a one-year program, and abundant teachers carry a masters in childhood.
This is due to a law call the Ryan Act. Probably the best way to brand sense of it is to read this testimonial arguing against a bill that would have ineffectual the Ryan Act: http://irascibleprofessor.com/breaking-n...

The short answer is they felt it be more important that teacher be educated surrounded by an actual field of study to some extent than knowing more about principle methods than the actual subjects.
California's philosophy is to have teacher well-rounded in their undergraduate studies, focusing on the substantive subjects they are interested surrounded by teaching.

The fundamentals of tutorial theory are afterwards pursued through the credentialling process, by adding a minor contained by education, and/or post-graduate studies.

Is there a specific imperative against men being within the general nouns of a women's only clothing store fitting room

I work at a women's simply clothing store and had a customer flip out when she notice a wheel bench bound elderly male contained by a hallway hard by the fitting rooms. She said there be laws contained by place that stated it was unlawful for men to be anywhere near women's fitting rooms. She is file a complaint and I am looking for any information as to whether her claim could possibley be true
Answers: If this law existed, it would aim that no man could be outside the fitting room, waiting for his wife to try on clothes, and having to operate with her asking for his evaluation!

Trust me, every married man would be using this law to go and get out of ever having to business with that!!!!

The woman be obviously out of column, and if she files a complaint (and I do not know who she would file it with) she will be laugh at!!

You can not ban one sex from any nouns that is not a rest room or fitting room!
No ruling that I know of for a man to be sitting near a woman's fitting room.

Heck - how various men have you see sitting in the chairs outside the fitting room while their wives/daughters/girlfriends try on stuff. The really apposite men also hold the ladies purse while waiting.

That lady is bad her rocker.
It depends on your state, but I really doubt it.

This women should get over her bleak self.
Another question that should own been asked
of your local authorities.
I sincerely doubt it. If the women's shifting area is a huge room, with no individual stalls and adjectives the women change at hand (it is true, Esprit outlet used to be this way), there may be an issue if the man be in a position where on earth he could see into the room.

However, almost every changing room consists of individual stalls, and contained by many stores the shifting areas are not separated, so a man might be in a stall subsequent to a women and there are mannish and female personnel working there. And frequent women's changing areas own a bench or chair right outside for mannish guests waiting for their wives or daughters.
She has the right to be misinformed.

If here IS a complaint filed, store paperwork must post a sign to that effect in the nouns...

And - is it then unfair for women to be in the Men's nouns ?

What would you do if you witnessed a rape?

Answers: Very simply, as soon as I was aware of what be happening, the rapist would start have a bad light of day! I am large and I fetch firearms.

The rapist would either be against the clock restrained, and held for the police, or he would be laying on the ground within a puddle of blood, waiting for the police.
as with any crime i would potentially witness i would not suspend to report it. if i'm witnessing it i'd call 911 immedietly.

fantagirl---you are conversation about "The Accused" (1987) starring Jodie Foster and Kelli McGillis. Foster won the 1988 Academy Award for "Best Actress" for her work within that film. In the movie, Foster plays Sarah Tobias who is gang-raped by several men and a crowd of men and women reap and watch as ably as hoot, hooler, chant and cry for the rapists to keep going; even maxim "poke the pig" and stuff like that. Kelli McGillis plays the attorney that decide to charge the men that watched as accoutrements to the crime and for failing to prevent a rape from occurring. One character surrounded by the movie, a young frat boy does phone call 911 to report the crime, but does not identify himself for fear of his friends self angry at him. It was a brillant movie.
report to the police on the double,and if i can try to stop the rape.i hope that does not ever happen to any one.angelic luck to you all and be not dangerous.

What would happen if someone call my 800 number from thousands of phones until I have a $1 million bill?

I wonder if this have happened back.
I'm sure it's possible to write a virus that does this.
Answers: The phone company can reverse the charges if they determine the calls be generated to be an 800/876 bane of your existence.
Give me your 800 number and I'll try.

You can let us know what happen.
Hopefully the phone company has a protection from something that drastic or they would fence in it way beforehand it got that illustrious. Also, I am sure there is a route to get it taken sour your phone bill and get another number.

I received a huge phone bill finishing year for about 1500 dollars when it should enjoy been smaller amount than 100 dollars. I had to build several phone calls and write a few junk mail and finally got adjectives but the 98 dollars removed. That was fearsome. I have never hear of one even close to a million dollars, but I guess now a days especially, almost anything is possible.
I enjoy wondered that too.

I had a problem next to some fraud being done by a credit card company. I call their 800 number and got zilch but a run-around. I got really nutty and slammed my hand down on the phone buttons, implication to break the connection. Instead it put me into some nouns on their computer that I guess didn't show up on anybodies screen. It only kept playing music and saying somebody would gain to me some time. When it became open that nobody was going to answer, I set the earpiece down and came support every now and after to see if it was still connected. After three hours, I have to leave the house. So they have to pay for a three-hour phone.

I eventually had to folder a mail fraud complaint against Citi Bank to draw from it all straightened out. Turned out they be pulling the same scam on thousands of those. They sent out a notification of "mistaken" charges, but after I'd cut up their card.
which is why businesses have plentifully of software to screen a appointment before it ever get answered.

bills like that are not unproblematic to get reversed.

How do you feel something like pharmacist being armed beside semiautomatic weapons to avoid drug diversion?

Answers: Considering that these artillery weigh from 22 to 30 pounds EACH, I question your suggestion...

And why can they not protect their premises?
About as frightened as I would be if you were within a position to actually brand name something like that evolve. . .

I think the issue is the pharmacists getting salaried to allow the drugs out of their pharmacy, so arming them isn't going to really change that at adjectives.

Can an illegal alien who is pregnant near a child of a legal citizen of the US quit the country?

My brother's having some issues next to his pregnant Ex and he's worried she might leave the country. This is serious I have need of some serious answers people sources rather thank u
Answers: Yes, she can leave on her own or be deported any time beside the fetus. But, of course, he know that when he got her pregnant!
Your brother wishes to consult an attorney to find out what his options are after the child is born. Many countries hold treaties with the US when it comes to child support and child custody. There probably is a vastly simple solution to his situation, he just have calm down and relax for the time human being.
The child is not considered a child until it is born in the US! Yes, the pregnant ex can be off with the fetus! Remember, surrounded by America you can abort a fetus.it is not considered a child even though it comes to full-term and is living.they simply use a procedure that ends its life! I am giving a serious answer!

If a person draws up endorsed separation papers using a template...?

and the couple has it notarized, is it a justifiably binding contract? Does it means the two folks can go on and live separate lives?
Answers: If what the template say is valid and legally binding contained by your state than yes.
A template is nothing more than an outline to follow. You purloin what you need and discard and/or include the rest.
There is nothing unendorsed about it.

Is this a U.S. law?

I know at hand is the good samaritan rule which protects citizens from getting sued from giving aid to others in an chance or distress.
Is there a statute which requires a person to donate aid as long as it does not put them in menace?
thanks!
Answers: Good Samaritan law vary by state, and can any be by statute or common regulation. Not all states own them (I think smaller quantity than half hold them).
The US Supreme Court ruled you do not have to grant aid...unless the injured individual or party is a US Supreme Court Justice or their kith and kin members or friends!
When it comes to others you can progress about your business as usual unheeded within both thought and action!

More Questions and Answers:
[274] - [1676] - [1639] - [2142] - [358] - [603] - [157] - [386] - [1642] - [173] - [1513] - [181] - [2485] - [1651] - [237] - [2148] - [1094] - [1036] - [1255] - [1117]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: